How Do Tax Cuts Affect China's Income Distribution？ Evidence from Monthly Personal Income Tax Data
LU Yuanping, CUI Xiaoyong, ZHAO Ying
School of Public Finance and Taxation, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law / Innovation and Talent Base for Income Distribution and Public Finance; School of Economics, Peking University
Summary:
China's personal income tax system was not established for a single revenue-raising function but to regulate the distribution of income, which contrasts strongly with the tax systems of other major countries, such as the US, where personal income tax accounts for a relatively high proportion of total tax revenue. The main focus of China's personal income tax system is to change the degree of progressive taxation by adjusting the basic expense deduction standard, and thereby affecting the tax burden on individuals' wages and salaries and the macro distribution of income. The standard for basic expense deductions has long attracted the attention of academics and the public. A lower standard for basic deductions reduces both the motivation of individual residents to work and the effect of personal tax in regulating the macro distribution of Chinese residents' income. Therefore, how to preserve the motivations of individual residents to work while also narrowing the social income distribution gap is a challenging issue for personal income tax reform. Currently, most of the literature examining how the basic deduction standard affects personal welfare, such as residents' income, employment, and consumption, is based on simulations of theoretical models. Only a small number of scholars use micro data to analyze how changes in basic deduction standards affect individual consumption behavior, and there is room for further improvement in research design and the accuracy of income distribution and tax data. As noted, the basic deduction standard in China's personal income tax system is established to prioritize income distribution adjustments. Since the basic deduction standard was first set in 1980, it has been revised seven times to date. The largest reform of the personal income tax system in the past 20 years occurred in September 2011, with the increase in the basic personal income tax deduction standard from RMB2,000 to RMB3,500. This reform, which had important implications, provides a good basis for our research. This paper uses monthly bookkeeping data from China's Urban Household Survey (UHS) for the period from 2010 to 2012, and the 2011 policy that increased the basic personal income tax deduction to construct an individual-year-month difference-in-differences (DID) model to assess how the adjustment of deduction affects both the tax burden on individuals' salaries and wages at the micro level and the macro-level income distribution. The conclusions of this paper are as follows. First, the individual income tax reform prompted a reduction in the individual tax burden of about 36.31%, with individuals earning 2,000-16,100 yuan per month being most affected by the adjustment of the expense deduction standard, and groups with higher incomes being mostly affected by the adjustment of the tax bracket. Second, although the tax reform reduced the personal income tax burden, its regulatory effect on the social income distribution at the macro level was not strengthened; indeed, it was weakened to an extent. Third, the increase in individual after-tax income following the tax reform had a limited impact on labor supply, but it improved basic consumption for low-income groups and promoted service consumption expenditures of high-income groups. The contributions of this article are as follows. First, we enrich the literature by providing a more detailed research design than is traditionally used. As personal income tax was paid on a monthly basis around 2011, the most appropriate way to capture the impact of the personal income tax reform is to conduct research on a monthly basis. Therefore, unlike the traditional individual-year DID model, we construct an individual-year-month DID model to better evaluate the impact of policy changes. Second, we determine a more accurate income distribution than has been determined to date. This article confirms that the difference between the income distribution at the theoretical and practical levels is small, and provides evidence that will support future theoretical analyses and empirical research. Third, we provide more detailed metrics than other studies. This paper uses detailed micro data for policy evaluation and removes the impact of two individual income tax reforms that occurred in the same year. The unique monthly bookkeeping data from China's UHS, which include information on income, expenditure, tax payments, and employment at the individual monthly level, provide a sound basis for assessing the impact of the change in the standard for the basic deduction of personal income tax in 2011 on the actual tax burden of individuals and the distribution of income in society.
鲁元平, 崔小勇, 赵颖. 减税如何影响居民收入分配 ——来自个人所得税月度数据的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2023, 521(10): 165-185.
LU Yuanping, CUI Xiaoyong, ZHAO Ying. How Do Tax Cuts Affect China's Income Distribution？ Evidence from Monthly Personal Income Tax Data. Journal of Financial Research, 2023, 521(10): 165-185.
[1]刘元生、杨澄宇和袁强,2013,《个人所得税的收入分配效应》,《经济研究》第1期,第99～109页。 [2]彭海艳,2011,《我国个人所得税再分配效应及累进性的实证分析》,《财贸经济》第3期,第11～17页。 [3]田志伟、胡怡建和宫映华,2017,《免征额与个人所得税的收入再分配效应》,《经济研究》第10期,第113～127页。 [4]万海远、李实和孟凡强,2018,《中国税收制度的收入分配效应》,北京:社会科学文献出版社,第65页。 [5]习近平,2020,《不断开拓当代中国马克思主义政治经济学新境界》,《求知》第9期,第4～7页。 [6]徐建炜、马光荣和李实,2013,《个人所得税改善中国收入分配了吗——基于对1997—2011年微观数据的动态评估》,《中国社会科学》第6期,第53～71页。 [7]徐润和陈斌开,2015,《个人所得税改革可以刺激居民消费吗？——来自2011年所得税改革的证据》,《金融研究》第11期,第80～97页。 [8]许志伟、吴化斌和周晶,2013,《个人所得税改革的宏观福利分析》,《管理世界》第12期,第32～42页。 [9]叶菁菁、吴燕、陈方豪和王宇晴,2017,《个人所得税减免会增加劳动供给吗？——来自准自然实验的证据》,《管理世界》第12期,第20～32页。 [10]岳树民、卢艺和岳希明,2011,《免征额变动对个人所得税累进性的影响》,《财贸经济》第 2 期,第18～24页。 [11]岳希明、徐静、刘谦、丁胜和董莉娟,2012,《2011年个人所得税改革的收入再分配效应》,《经济研究》第9期,第113～124页。 [12]岳希明、张斌和徐静,2014,《中国税制的收入分配效应测度》,《中国社会科学》第 6 期,第96～117页。 [13]张传勇、张永岳和武霁,2014,《房价波动存在收入分配效应吗——一个家庭资产结构的视角》,《金融研究》第12期,第86～101页。 [14]赵达和王贞,2020,《个人所得税减免有助于中国城镇家庭提高消费吗？》,《统计研究》第5期,第27～39页。 [15]Blundell R.,A.Duncan and M.Costas,1998,“Estimating Labor Supply Responses Using Tax Reforms”,Econometrica,66,827～861. [16]Chetty R.,2012,“Bounds on Elasticities with Optimization Frictions Avoidance: A Synthesis of Micro and Macro Evidence on Labor Supply”,Econometrica ,80,969～1018. [17]Chetty R.,G.Adam,M.Day and W.Andrea,2013,“Does indivisible labor explain the difference between micro and macro elasticities？ A meta-analysis of extensive margin elasticities”,NBER macroeconomics Annual,27(1),1～56. [18]Fu S.and Y.Gu,2017,“Highway Toll and Air Pollution: Evidence From Chinese Cities”,Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,83,32～49. [19]Gross T.,R. Kluender, F. Liu, M. J. Notowidigdo and J. Wang, 2021,“The economic consequences of bankruptcy reform”,American Economic Review, 111(7), 2309~2341. [20]Kakwani N.,1977,“Measurement of Tax Progressivity: An International Comparison”,Economic Journal,87(345), 71～80. [21]Keane M.,2011,“Labor Supply and Taxes: A Survey”,Journal of Economic Literature , 49, 961～1075. [22]Kopczuk W.,2005,“Tax Bases, Tax Rates and the Elasticity of Reported Income”,Journal of Public Economics,89(11～12), 2093～2119. [23]Musgrave R.and T.Thin,1948,“Income Tax Progression 1929-48”,Journal of Political Economy,56(6),498～514. [24]Misra K.and P.Surico,2014,“Consumption, Income Changes, and Heterogeneity: Evidence from Two Fiscal Stimulus Programs”,American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics,6(4), 84～106. [25]Souleles N.,1999,“The Response of Household Consumption to Income Tax Refunds”,American Economic Review,89(4),947～958. [26]Mertens, Karel, and José Luis Montiel Olea,2018,“Marginal tax rates and income: New time series evidence”,The Quarterly Journal of Economics,133(4),1803～1884. [27]Zidar O.M.,2019,“Tax Cuts for Whom？ Heterogeneous Effects of Income Tax Changes on Growth and Employment”,Journal of Poltical Economy,127(3),1437～1472.
