Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2017, Vol. 447 Issue (9): 161-177    DOI: 10.12094/1002-7246(2017)09-0161-17
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
我国股票市场熔断机制的磁力效应:基于自然实验的证据
杨晓兰, 金雪军
上海外国语大学国际工商管理学院,上海 200083;
浙江大学经济学院,浙江杭州 310027
Magnet Effects of Circuit Breaker in Chinese Stock Markets: Evidence of Natural Experiments
YANG Xiaolan, JIN Xuejun
School of Business and Management, Shanghai International Studies University;
College of Economics,Zhejiang University
下载:  PDF (1566KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 本文利用自然实验的思路,以2016年1月4日和7日为熔断组,以2015年沪深300指数跌幅超过7%的3个交易日为控制组,检验熔断机制对股票市场产生的效应。结果显示,在指数下跌至熔断临界值之前,熔断机制会加剧卖单的大量涌现,导致市场订单流不平衡性提高,存在显著的磁力效应。在指数下跌5%之前,熔断机制对已经跌停的股票并不产生影响;在指数下跌5%-7%之间,熔断机制和涨跌停板制度存在叠加效应,订单流不平衡性进一步恶化。在股指下跌的过程中,熔断机制的磁力效应存在从沪深300成分股向非成分股的溢出。此外,股指期货交易、融资融券、沪港通净流入都会对熔断机制的磁力效应产生影响。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
杨晓兰
金雪军
关键词:  熔断机制  股票市场  磁力效应  涨跌停制度    
Abstract:  In this paper, we use the idea of natural experiment to examine the effect of circuit breaker on the stock market. The two trading days (January 4th and 7th,2016 ) are included in the Circuit Breaker Treatment, and three trading days when the HS300 stock index decreased more than 7% in 2015 are included in the Control Treatment. Based on the intraday stock trading data, the empirical results show that the circuit breakers when implemented significantly increased order imbalance and market participants displayed behavior consistent with the magnet effect. Especially, after the HS300 index fell by 5%, the circuit breakers played a role on increasing the order imbalance on stocks no matter they hit the price limit or not. The effect of circuit breaker was first observed in H300 index stocks and then in the non-HS300 stocks. The magnet effect of circuit breaker is sensitive to the trading volume of Share Price Index Futures, margin trading and trading from the channel of Shanghai-Hong Kong Stock Connect program. Our results have implications for improving the mechanism and regulation aimed at maintaining the stock markets during turbulent periods.
Key words:  Circuit Breaker    Stock Market    Magnet Effect    Price Limit
JEL分类号:  G10   G14   G18  
基金资助: 国家自科基金青年项目“基于文本挖掘的网络信息与股票市场关联机制研究”(71303210)、国家自科基金“基于投资者关注度与社交学习解释股市过度波动”(G030202)。林依洋、王伟超、詹忆、王翼杰在数据收集上的贡献。
作者简介:  杨晓兰,经济学博士,教授,上海外国语大学国际工商管理学院,Email:yangxiaolan1996@126.com.
金雪军(通讯作者),教授,浙江大学经济学院,Email:cec_jxj@zju.edu.cn.
引用本文:    
杨晓兰, 金雪军. 我国股票市场熔断机制的磁力效应:基于自然实验的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 447(9): 161-177.
YANG Xiaolan, JIN Xuejun. Magnet Effects of Circuit Breaker in Chinese Stock Markets: Evidence of Natural Experiments. Journal of Financial Research, 2017, 447(9): 161-177.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/10.12094/1002-7246(2017)09-0161-17  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2017/V447/I9/161
[1] 曹栋和张佳,2017,《基于GARCH-M模型的股指期货对股市波动影响的研究》,《中国管理科学》第1期,第27~34页。
[2] 高昊宇、杨晓光和叶彦艺,2017,《机构投资者对暴涨暴跌的抑制作用:基于中国市场的实证》,《金融研究》第2期,163~178页。
[3] 李志生、陈晨和林秉旋,2015,《卖空交易与股票价格稳定性——来自中国融资融券市场的自然实验》,《金融研究》第6期,第173~188页。
[7] Ackert, L. F., Church, B. K. and Jayaraman, N.,2005,“Circuit Breakers with Uncertainty about the Presence of Informed Agents: I Know What You Know . . . I Think.”Financial Markets, Institutions& Instruments, 14(3):135~168.
[8] Draus, Sarah and Van Achter, Mark, 2012,Circuit Breakers and Market Runs.Working paper, Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2081962.
[4] 刘逖,2002,《证券市场微观结构理论与实践》,上海:复旦大学出版社.
[5] 许红伟和陈欣,2012,《我国推出融资融券交易促进了标的股票的定价效率吗?——基于双重差分模型的实证研究》,《管理世界》第5期,第52~61页。
[6] 杨晓兰,2015:《股市危机预警与应急处理机制研究》,杭州:浙江大学出版社。
[9] Goldstein, M.A., Evans, J.E. and Mahoney, J.M., 1998, “Circuit Breakers, Volatility, and The U.S. Equity Markets: Evidence from NYSE rule 80A”, Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
[7] Ackert, L. F., Church, B. K. and Jayaraman, N.,2005,“Circuit Breakers with Uncertainty about the Presence of Informed Agents: I Know What You Know . . . I Think.”Financial Markets, Institutions& Instruments, 14(3):135~168.
[8] Draus, Sarah and Van Achter, Mark, 2012,Circuit Breakers and Market Runs.Working paper, Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2081962.
[10] Greenwald, B. C., and Stein, J.C., 1991, “Transactional Risk, Market Crashes, and the Role of Circuit Breakers”, Journal of Business, 64:443~462.
[9] Goldstein, M.A., Evans, J.E. and Mahoney, J.M., 1998, “Circuit Breakers, Volatility, and The U.S. Equity Markets: Evidence from NYSE rule 80A”, Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
[11] Hutton A P, Marcus A J.andTehranian H., 2009,“Opaque Financial Reports, R2, and Crash Risk”. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(1): 67~86.
[10] Greenwald, B. C., and Stein, J.C., 1991, “Transactional Risk, Market Crashes, and the Role of Circuit Breakers”, Journal of Business, 64:443~462.
[12] LauterbachB.and Ben-Zion U., 1993, “Stock Market Crashes and the Performance of Circuit Breakers: Empirical Evidence”,The Journal of Finance, 48:1909~1925.
[11] Hutton A P, Marcus A J.andTehranian H., 2009,“Opaque Financial Reports, R2, and Crash Risk”. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(1): 67~86.
[13] Subrahmanyam, A., 1994, “Circuit Breakers and Market Volatility: a Theoretical Perspective”, The Journal of Finance, 49:237~254.
[12] LauterbachB.and Ben-Zion U., 1993, “Stock Market Crashes and the Performance of Circuit Breakers: Empirical Evidence”,The Journal of Finance, 48:1909~1925.
[13] Subrahmanyam, A., 1994, “Circuit Breakers and Market Volatility: a Theoretical Perspective”, The Journal of Finance, 49:237~254.
[1] 陈运森, 黄健峤. 股票市场开放与企业投资效率——基于“沪港通”的准自然实验[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 470(8): 151-170.
[2] 陈国进, 丁杰, 赵向琴. “好”的不确定性、“坏”的不确定性与股票市场定价——基于中国股市高频数据分析[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 469(7): 174-190.
[3] 谢谦, 唐国豪, 罗倩琳. 上市公司综合盈利水平与股票收益[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 465(3): 189-207.
[4] 许荣, 刘成立. 限制交易政策如何影响期现关系?——对股指期货价格发现功能的实证检验[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 464(2): 154-168.
[5] 陈坚, 张轶凡. 中国股票市场的已实现偏度与收益率预测[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 459(9): 107-125.
[6] 尹力博, 柳依依. 中国商品期货金融化了吗?—来自国际股票市场的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 429(3): 189-206.
[7] 郭永济, 张谊浩. 空气质量会影响股票市场吗?[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 428(2): 71-85.
[1] 王曦, 朱立挺, 王凯立. 我国货币政策是否关注资产价格?——基于马尔科夫区制转换BEKK多元GARCH模型[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 1 -17 .
[2] 刘勇政, 李岩. 中国的高速铁路建设与城市经济增长[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 18 -33 .
[3] 况伟大, 王琪琳. 房价波动、房贷规模与银行资本充足率[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 34 -48 .
[4] 祝树金, 赵玉龙. 资源错配与企业的出口行为——基于中国工业企业数据的经验研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 49 -64 .
[5] 陈德球, 陈运森, 董志勇. 政策不确定性、市场竞争与资本配置[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 65 -80 .
[6] 牟敦果, 王沛英. 中国能源价格内生性研究及货币政策选择分析[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 81 -95 .
[7] 高铭, 江嘉骏, 陈佳, 刘玉珍. 谁说女子不如儿郎?——P2P投资行为与过度自信[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 96 -111 .
[8] 吕若思, 刘青, 黄灿, 胡海燕, 卢进勇. 外资在华并购是否改善目标企业经营绩效?——基于企业层面的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 112 -127 .
[9] 姜军, 申丹琳, 江轩宇, 伊志宏. 债权人保护与企业创新[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 128 -142 .
[10] 刘莎莎, 孔高文. 信息搜寻、个人投资者交易与股价联动异象——基于股票送转的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 143 -157 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1