Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2018, Vol. 457 Issue (7): 124-142    
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
社保基金持股与企业盈余质量:A股上市公司的证据
李春涛, 薛原, 惠丽丽
华中科技大学管理学院,湖北武汉 430074;
武汉理工大学管理学院,湖北武汉 430070
Social Security Fund and Corporate Earnings Quality:Evidence from China
LI Chuntao, XUE Yuan, HUI Lili
School of Management,Huazhong University of Science and Technology;
School of Management, Wuhan University of Technology
下载:  PDF (1658KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 本文利用中国A股上市公司2006-2015年的数据,研究社保基金持股对上市公司盈余质量的影响。我们用上市公司财务重述作为测度盈余质量的指标,发现社保基金持股能够显著降低企业发布财务重述的概率,这表明社保基金对上市公司盈余质量的提高具有促进作用。并且,社保基金的这一治理作用在国有企业、内部治理水平较差以及市场化程度较低地区的上市公司中更加显著。通过双重差分模型和安慰剂检验等方法弱化了内生性问题之后,以上结论依然成立,说明社保基金持股和盈余质量提升之间存在因果关系,我们称之为社保基金的公司治理作用。进一步研究发现,社保基金可以通过抑制控股股东资金占用、增加机构调研次数等途径提升被持股公司的盈余质量。本文有助于认识和评估社保基金持股对于上市公司的监督与治理作用。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
李春涛
薛原
惠丽丽
关键词:  社保基金  盈余质量  财务重述  双重差分  安慰剂检验    
Abstract:  Using the data set of listed firms from 2006 to 2015 in China, this research examines the impact of Social Security Fund (SSF) on Corporate China's earnings quality. We use financial restatement as a direct measure of bad earnings quality. Overall, we find that being held by SSF is associated with less financial restatements and credit it to increased corporate earnings quality. This effect is more pronounced in state-owned enterprises, firms with weaker corporate governance practice and firms from regions with less developed markets mechanism. After controlling for possible endogeneity issues with a difference-in-differences approach and some placebo tests, the above results still hold robust. We further find that a less occupation of fund and more institutions' site visits are among possible underlying channels through which Social Security Fund affects corporate earnings quality and thus firms' financial restatement. This research has obvious yet important policy implications, which calls for the monitoring from more powerful large minority shareholders, including China's Social Security Fund, to increase the governance standard for China's listed firms.
Key words:  Social Security Fund    Earnings Quality    Financial Restatement    Difference-in-Differences    Placebo test
JEL分类号:  G23   G30   M41  
基金资助: 国家自然科学基金(批准号:71503275)、中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(批准号:2018VI069)和产业升级与区域金融湖北省协同创新中心对本研究的资助。
作者简介:  李春涛,教授,华中科技大学管理学院,Email:chtl@hust.edu.cn.
薛 原,博士研究生,华中科技大学管理学院,Email:xueyuan19920310@163.com.
惠丽丽(通讯作者),会计学博士,讲师,武汉理工大学管理学院,Email:hllwhu@163.com.
引用本文:    
李春涛, 薛原, 惠丽丽. 社保基金持股与企业盈余质量:A股上市公司的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 457(7): 124-142.
LI Chuntao, XUE Yuan, HUI Lili. Social Security Fund and Corporate Earnings Quality:Evidence from China. Journal of Financial Research, 2018, 457(7): 124-142.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2018/V457/I7/124
[1] 白重恩、刘俏、陆洲、宋敏和张俊喜,2005,《中国上市公司治理结构的实证研究》,《经济研究》第2期,第81~91页。
[2] 薄仙慧和吴联生,2009,《国有控股与机构投资者的治理效应:盈余管理视角》,《经济研究》第2期,第81~91页。
[3] 程书强,2006,《机构投资者持股与上市公司会计盈余信息关系实证研究》,《管理世界》第9期,第129~136页。
[4] 高雷和张杰,2008,《公司治理、机构投资者与盈余管理》,《会计研究》第9期,第64~72页。
[5] 靳庆鲁、宣扬、李刚和陈明端,2016,《社保基金持股与公司股利政策》,《会计研究》第5期,第34~39页。
[6] 李春涛、宋敏和张璇,2014,《分析师跟踪与企业盈余管理——来自中国上市公司的证据》,《金融研究》第7期,第124~139页。
[7] 魏志华、李常青和王毅辉,2009,《中国上市公司年报重述公告效应研究》,《会计研究》第8期,第31~39页。
[8] 杨海燕、韦德洪和孙健,2012,《机构投资者持股能提高上市公司会计信息质量吗?——兼论不同类型机构投资者的差异》,《会计研究》第9期,第16~23页。
[9] 张璇、周鹏和李春涛,2016,《卖空与盈余质量——来自财务重述的证据》,《金融研究》第8期,第175~190页。
[10] Boone, A. L. and J. T. White, 2015, “The Effect of Institutional Ownership on Firm Transparency and Information Production”, Journal of Financial Economics, 117(3):508~533.
[11] Brickley, J. A., R. C. Lease and C. W. Smith, 1988, “Ownership Structure and Voting on Antitakeover Amendments”, Journal of Financial Economics, 20(1-2):267~291.
[12] Burns, N., S. Kedia and M. Lipson, 2010, “Institutional Ownership and Monitoring: Evidence from Financial Misreporting”, Journal of Corporate Finance, 16(4):443~455.
[13] Bushee, B. J., 1998, “The Influence of Institutional Investors on Myopic R&D Investment Behavior”, The Accounting Review, 73(3):305~333.
[14] Bushee, B. J., 2001, “Do Institutional Investors Prefer Near‐term Earnings over Long‐run Value?”, Contemporary Accounting Research, 18(2):207~246.
[15] Bushman, R. M., J. D. Piotroski and A. J. Smith, 2004, “What Determines Corporate Transparency?”, Journal of Accounting Research, 42(2):207~252.
[16] Chen, X., J. Harford and K. Li, 2007, “Monitoring: Which Institutions Matter?”, Journal of Financial Economics, 86(2):279~305.
[17] Cheng, Q., F. Du, X. Wang, et al., 2016, “Seeing is Believing: Analysts' Corporate Site Visits”, Review of Accounting Studies, 21(4):1245~1286.
[18] Dechow, P., W. Ge and C. Schrand, 2010, “Understanding Earnings Quality: A Review of the Proxies, Their Determinants and Their Consequences”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50(2):344~401.
[19] Dewenter, K. L., X. Han and P. H. Malatesta, 2010, “Firm Values and Sovereign Wealth Fund Investments”, Journal of Financial Economics, 98(2):256~278.
[20] Francis, J., R. LaFond,, P. M. Olsson and K. Schipper, 2004, “Costs of Equity and Earnings Attributes”, The Accounting Review, 79(4):967~1010.
[21] Gillan, S. L. and L. T. Starks, 2000, “Corporate Governance Proposals and Shareholder Activism: The Role of Institutional Investors”, Journal of Financial Economics, 57(2):275~305.
[22] Harford, J., A. Kecskes and S. Mansi, 2018, “Do Long-term Investors Improve Corporate Decision Making?”. Journal of Corporate Finance 50:424-452.
[23] Jensen M. C. and W. H. Meckling, 1976, “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure”, Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4):305~360.
[24] Jensen M. C., 1993, “The Modern Industrial Revolution, Exit, and the Failure of Internal Control Systems”, The Journal of Finance, 48(3):831~880.
[25] Kinney, W. R. and L. S. McDaniel, 1989, “Characteristics of Firms Correcting Previously Reported Quarterly Earnings”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 11(1):71~93.
[26] Koh P. S., 2003, “On the Association Between Institutional Ownership and Aggressive Corporate Earnings Management in Australia”, The British Accounting Review, 35(2):105~128.
[27] Leckie, S. and N. Pan, 2007, “A Review of the National Social Security Fund in China”, Pensions: An International Journal, 12(2):88~97.
[28] Leuz C., D. Nanda and P. D. Wysocki, 2003, “Earnings Management and Investor Protection: an International Comparison”, Journal of Financial Economics, 69(3):505~527.
[29] Li Y., K. L. Benson and R. W. Faff, 2014, “Superman in the Dark: Trading Behavior of the Chinese National Social Security Fund”, Working Paper, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2468042
[30] Liu Q. and Z. J. Lu, 2007, “Corporate Governance and Earnings Management in the Chinese Listed Companies: A Tunneling Perspective”, Journal of Corporate Finance, 13(5):881~906.
[31] McCahery J. A., Z. Sautner and L. T. Starks, 2016, “Behind the Scenes: The Corporate Governance Preferences of Institutional Investors”, The Journal of Finance, 71(6):2905~2932.
[32] Mitton T., 2002, “A Cross-firm Analysis of the Impact of Corporate Governance on the East Asian Financial Crisis”, Journal of Financial Economics, 64(2):215~241.
[33] Pound J., 1988, “Proxy Contests and the Efficiency of Shareholder Oversight”, Journal of Financial Economics, 20(1-2):237~265.
[34] Rosenbaum P. R. and D. B. Rubin, 1983, “The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects”, Biometrika, 70(1):41~55.
[35] Ryan L. V. and M. Schneider, 2002, “The Antecedents of Institutional Investor Activism”, Academy of Management Review, 27(4):554~573.
[1] 钱雪松, 唐英伦, 方胜. 担保物权制度改革降低了企业债务融资成本吗?——来自中国《物权法》自然实验的经验证据[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 469(7): 115-134.
[2] 卞元超, 吴利华, 白俊红. 高铁开通是否促进了区域创新?[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 468(6): 132-149.
[3] 郭杰, 王宇澄, 曾博涵. 国家产业政策、地方政府行为与实际税率——理论分析和经验证据[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 466(4): 56-74.
[4] 叶康涛, 刘芳, 李帆. 股指成份股调整与股价崩盘风险:基于一项准自然实验的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 453(3): 172-189.
[5] 张学勇, 张秋月. 券商声誉损失与公司IPO市场表现——来自中国上市公司IPO造假的新证据[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 460(10): 141-157.
[6] 余靖雯, 陈晓光, 龚六堂. 财政压力如何影响了县级政府公共服务供给?[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 451(1): 18-35.
[7] 李春涛, 刘贝贝, 周鹏. 卖空与信息披露:融券准自然实验的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 447(9): 130-145.
[8] 张劲帆, 李汉涯, 何晖. 企业上市与企业创新——基于中国企业专利申请的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 443(5): 160-175.
[9] 王兵, 戴敏, 武文杰. 环保基地政策提高了企业环境绩效吗?——来自东莞市企业微观面板数据的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 442(4): 143-160.
[10] 张璇, 周鹏, 李春涛. 卖空与盈余质量——来自财务重述的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 434(8): 175-190.
[11] 谢露, 王欣, 张敏. 区域竞争与商业银行的盈余质量——基于我国商业银行的经验证据[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 433(7): 134-149.
[12] 项后军, 何 康, 于 洋. 自贸区设立、贸易发展与资本流动——基于上海自贸区的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 436(10): 48-63.
[1] 王曦, 朱立挺, 王凯立. 我国货币政策是否关注资产价格?——基于马尔科夫区制转换BEKK多元GARCH模型[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 1 -17 .
[2] 刘勇政, 李岩. 中国的高速铁路建设与城市经济增长[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 18 -33 .
[3] 况伟大, 王琪琳. 房价波动、房贷规模与银行资本充足率[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 34 -48 .
[4] 祝树金, 赵玉龙. 资源错配与企业的出口行为——基于中国工业企业数据的经验研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 49 -64 .
[5] 陈德球, 陈运森, 董志勇. 政策不确定性、市场竞争与资本配置[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 65 -80 .
[6] 牟敦果, 王沛英. 中国能源价格内生性研究及货币政策选择分析[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 81 -95 .
[7] 高铭, 江嘉骏, 陈佳, 刘玉珍. 谁说女子不如儿郎?——P2P投资行为与过度自信[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 96 -111 .
[8] 吕若思, 刘青, 黄灿, 胡海燕, 卢进勇. 外资在华并购是否改善目标企业经营绩效?——基于企业层面的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 112 -127 .
[9] 姜军, 申丹琳, 江轩宇, 伊志宏. 债权人保护与企业创新[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 128 -142 .
[10] 刘莎莎, 孔高文. 信息搜寻、个人投资者交易与股价联动异象——基于股票送转的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 143 -157 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1