Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2017, Vol. 447 Issue (9): 51-66    DOI: 10.12094/1002-7246(2017)09-0051-16
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
延迟退休、财政支出结构调整与养老金替代率
严成樑
中央财经大学经济学院, 北京 100081
Postponed Retirement, Government Expenditure Structure Adjustmentand the Replacement Ratio
YAN Chengliang
School of Economics, Central University of Finance and Economics
下载:  PDF (1462KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 本文构建了一个包含延迟退休和财政支出的跨期叠代模型,考察延迟退休和财政支出结构调整对养老金替代率的影响。本文的研究表明,延迟退休和财政支出中社会保障支出比例上升使得养老金替代率上升。相应的传导机制是,延迟退休使得储蓄减少,这又使得均衡状态的资本和工资收入下降。延迟退休通过工资收入下降的渠道对社保收入具有负面影响,通过增加社保缴纳人数渠道对社保收入具有正面影响。财政支出中社会保障支出增加使得生产性财政支出减少,这降低了资本回报率,使得均衡状态的资本和工资水平下降。社会保障支出对社保收入具有直接的正向影响,但又会通过工资水平下降渠道对社保收入具有负面影响。本文认为,在实施延迟退休政策和增加社会保障支出比例的同时,应从宏观视角和微观视角采取经济增长刺激计划,以实现福利改善。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
严成樑
关键词:  延迟退休  财政支出结构  养老金替代率  经济增长    
Abstract:  This paper presents an overlapping generation model including postponed retirement and government expenditure, and we explore the effect of postponed retirement and adjustment of government expenditure on the replacement ratio. We find that postponed retirement and government social security expenditure have positive effect on the replacement ratio. Postponed retirement decreases saving, which in turn lowers both capital per capita and wage income. Postponed retirement decreases pension through its negative impact on wage income, whereas it has positive effect on pension through its impact on the labor supply. Government social security expenditure lowers productive expenditure, which in turn has negative effect on capital and wage income. Government social security expenditure can increase pension directly. Our results suggest that, the government should adopt growth enhancing program from both macro and micro perspectives, so as to improve social welfare.
Key words:  Postponed Retirement    Government Expenditure    The Replacement Ratio    Economic Growth
JEL分类号:  E62   H55   J26   O41  
基金资助: 国家社科基金项目(16BJL059,16ZDA005,14ZDB120),北京市社科基金项目(15JGA015)和霍英东教育基金会基础性研究课题(151083)。
作者简介:  严成樑,经济学博士,副教授,中央财经大学经济学院,Email: yanchengliang@gsm.pku.edu.cn.
引用本文:    
严成樑. 延迟退休、财政支出结构调整与养老金替代率[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 447(9): 51-66.
YAN Chengliang. Postponed Retirement, Government Expenditure Structure Adjustmentand the Replacement Ratio. Journal of Financial Research, 2017, 447(9): 51-66.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/10.12094/1002-7246(2017)09-0051-16  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2017/V447/I9/51
[1] 高奥和龚六堂,2015,《国有资本收入划拨养老保险、人力资本积累与经济增长》,《金融研究》第1期,第16~31页。
高奥和龚六堂,2015,《国有资本收入划拨养老保险、人力资本积累与经济增长》,《金融研究》第1期,第16~31页。
[2] 耿志祥和孙祁祥,2017,《人口老龄化、延迟退休与二次人口红利》,《金融研究》第1期,第52~68页。
耿志祥和孙祁祥,2017,《人口老龄化、延迟退休与二次人口红利》,《金融研究》第1期,第52~68页。
[3] 郭凯明和颜色,2016,《延迟退休年龄、代际收入转移与劳动力供给增长》,《经济研究》第6期,第128~142页。
郭凯明和颜色,2016,《延迟退休年龄、代际收入转移与劳动力供给增长》,《经济研究》第6期,第128~142页。
[4] 郭凯明和余靖雯,2017:《工资增长、生育率差异与人力资本积累》,《金融研究》第3期,第1~15页。
郭凯明和余靖雯,2017:《工资增长、生育率差异与人力资本积累》,《金融研究》第3期,第1~15页。
[5] 龚六堂和苗建军,2012,《动态经济学方法》,北京大学出版社。
龚六堂和苗建军,2012,《动态经济学方法》,北京大学出版社。
[6] 王晓军和米海杰,2013,《澄清对养老金替代率的误解》,《统计研究》第11期,第52~59页。
王晓军和米海杰,2013,《澄清对养老金替代率的误解》,《统计研究》第11期,第52~59页。
[7] 汪伟,2016,《人口老龄化、生育政策调整与中国经济增长》,《经济学(季刊)》第16卷第1期,第67~96页。
汪伟,2016,《人口老龄化、生育政策调整与中国经济增长》,《经济学(季刊)》第16卷第1期,第67~96页。
[8] 严成樑,2016,《延迟退休、内生出生率与经济增长》,《经济研究》第11期,第28~43页。
严成樑,2016,《延迟退休、内生出生率与经济增长》,《经济研究》第11期,第28~43页。
[9] 尹恒和朱虹,2011,《县级财政生产性财政支出偏向研究》,《中国社会科学》第1期,第88~101页。
尹恒和朱虹,2011,《县级财政生产性财政支出偏向研究》,《中国社会科学》第1期,第88~101页。
[10] 郑秉文,2017,《中国养老金发展报告2016》,经济管理出版社。
郑秉文,2017,《中国养老金发展报告2016》,经济管理出版社。
[11] Alonso-Ortiz, J. 2014. “Social Security and Retirement across the OECD”. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 47: 300~316.
Alonso-Ortiz, J. 2014. “Social Security and Retirement across the OECD”. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 47: 300~316.
[12] Barro, R.J. 1990. “Government Spending in A Simple Model of Endogenous Growth”. Journal of Political Economy, 98 (5): S103~S126.
[13] Cipriani, G. 2016. “Aging, Retirement, and Pay-As-You-Go Pensions”. Macroeconomic Dynamics DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1365100516000651.
[12] Barro, R.J. 1990. “Government Spending in A Simple Model of Endogenous Growth”. Journal of Political Economy, 98 (5): S103~S126.
[13] Cipriani, G. 2016. “Aging, Retirement, and Pay-As-You-Go Pensions”. Macroeconomic Dynamics DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1365100516000651.
[14] Fanti, L., and L. Gori. 2012. “Economic Growth and Stability with Public Pay-as-you-go Pensions and Private Intra-family Old-age Insurance”. Research in Economics, 66 (3): 219~229.
Fanti, L., and L. Gori. 2012. “Economic Growth and Stability with Public Pay-as-you-go Pensions and Private Intra-family Old-age Insurance”. Research in Economics, 66 (3): 219~229.
[15] Glomm, G., and M., Kaganovich. 2008. “Social Security, Public Education and the Growth-inequality Relationship”. European Economic Review, 52 (6): 1009~1034.
Glomm, G., and M., Kaganovich. 2008. “Social Security, Public Education and the Growth-inequality Relationship”. European Economic Review, 52 (6): 1009~1034.
[16] Glomm, G., and B., Ravikumar. 1997. “Productive Government Expenditures and Long-run Growth”. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 21 (1): 183~204.
Glomm, G., and B., Ravikumar. 1997. “Productive Government Expenditures and Long-run Growth”. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 21 (1): 183~204.
[17] Hirazawa, M., and A., Yakita. 2017. “Labor Supply of Elderly People, Fertility, and Economic Development”. Journal of Macroeconomics, 51: 75~96.
Hirazawa, M., and A., Yakita. 2017. “Labor Supply of Elderly People, Fertility, and Economic Development”. Journal of Macroeconomics, 51: 75~96.
[18] Ito, H., and K., Tabata. 2010. “The Spillover Effects of Population Aging, International Capital Flows, and Welfare”. Journal of Population Economics, 23 (2): 665~702.
Ito, H., and K., Tabata. 2010. “The Spillover Effects of Population Aging, International Capital Flows, and Welfare”. Journal of Population Economics, 23 (2): 665~702.
[19] Kaganovich, M., and I., Zilcha. 1999. “Education, Social Security, and Growth”. Journal of Public Economics, 71 (2): 289~309.
Kaganovich, M., and I., Zilcha. 1999. “Education, Social Security, and Growth”. Journal of Public Economics, 71 (2): 289~309.
[20] Kunze, L. 2014. “Mandatory Retirement and Economic Growth: An Inverted U-shaped Relationship”. Economics Bulletin, 34 (2): 885~891.
Kunze, L. 2014. “Mandatory Retirement and Economic Growth: An Inverted U-shaped Relationship”. Economics Bulletin, 34 (2): 885~891.
[21] Li, S. and S., Lin. 2016. “Population Aging and China's Social Security Reforms”. Journal of Policy Modeling, 38 (1): 65~95.
Li, S. and S., Lin. 2016. “Population Aging and China's Social Security Reforms”. Journal of Policy Modeling, 38 (1): 65~95.
[22] Mizuno, M., and A., Yakita. 2013. “Elderly Labor Supply and Fertility Decisions in Aging-population Economics”. Economics Letters, 121 (3): 395~399.
Mizuno, M., and A., Yakita. 2013. “Elderly Labor Supply and Fertility Decisions in Aging-population Economics”. Economics Letters, 121 (3): 395~399.
[23] Miyazaki, K. 2014. “The Effects of the Raising-the-Official-Pension-Age Policy in an Overlapping Generations Economy”. Economics Letters, 123 (3): 329~332.
Miyazaki, K. 2014. “The Effects of the Raising-the-Official-Pension-Age Policy in an Overlapping Generations Economy”. Economics Letters, 123 (3): 329~332.
[24] Omori, T. 2009. “Effects of Public Education and Social Security on Fertility”. Journal of Population Economics, 22 (3): 585~601.
Omori, T. 2009. “Effects of Public Education and Social Security on Fertility”. Journal of Population Economics, 22 (3): 585~601.
[25] Ono, T., and Y., Uchida. 2016. “Pensions, Education, and Growth: A Positive Analysis”. Journal of Macroeconomics, 48: 127~143.
Ono, T., and Y., Uchida. 2016. “Pensions, Education, and Growth: A Positive Analysis”. Journal of Macroeconomics, 48: 127~143.
[26] Wang, L. 2015. “Fertility and Unemployment in A Social Security System”. Economics Letters, 133: 19~23.
Wang, L. 2015. “Fertility and Unemployment in A Social Security System”. Economics Letters, 133: 19~23.
[27] Yew, S., and J., Zhang. 2009. “Optimal Social Security in A Dynamic Model with Human Capital Externalities, Fertility and Endogenous Growth”. Journal of Public Economics, 93 (3-4): 605~619.
Yew, S., and J., Zhang. 2009. “Optimal Social Security in A Dynamic Model with Human Capital Externalities, Fertility and Endogenous Growth”. Journal of Public Economics, 93 (3-4): 605~619.
[28] Zhang, J., and J., Zhang. 2007. “Optimal Social Security in a Dynamic Model with Investment Externalities and Endogenous Fertility”. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 31 (11): 3545~3567.
Zhang, J., and J., Zhang. 2007. “Optimal Social Security in a Dynamic Model with Investment Externalities and Endogenous Fertility”. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 31 (11): 3545~3567.
[1] 刘淑琳, 王贤彬, 黄亮雄. 经济增长目标驱动投资吗?——基于2001-2016年地级市样本的理论分析与实证检验[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 470(8): 1-19.
[2] 彭俞超, 黄娴静, 沈吉. 房地产投资与金融效率——金融资源“脱实向虚”的地区差异[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 458(8): 51-68.
[3] 毛捷, 黄春元. 地方债务、区域差异与经济增长——基于中国地级市数据的验证[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 455(5): 1-19.
[4] 张成思, 党超. 基于双预期的前瞻性货币政策反应机制[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 447(9): 1-17.
[5] 徐翔. 人口老龄化背景下的长期经济增长潜力研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 444(6): 17-32.
[6] 丁志杰, 谢峰. 汇率对中等收入国家经济跨越的影响研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 440(2): 42-53.
[7] 纪敏, 严宝玉, 李宏瑾. 杠杆率结构、水平和金融稳定——理论分析框架和中国经验[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 440(2): 11-25.
[8] 刘勇政, 李岩. 中国的高速铁路建设与城市经济增长[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 18-33.
[9] 耿志祥, 孙祁祥. 人口老龄化、延迟退休与二次人口红利[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 439(1): 52-68.
[10] 马勇, 田拓, 阮卓阳, 朱军军. 金融杠杆、经济增长与金融稳定[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 432(6): 37-51.
[11] 李涛, 徐翔, 孙硕. 普惠金融与经济增长[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 430(4): 1-16.
[12] 郭桂霞, 彭艳. 我国资本账户开放的门槛效应研究[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 429(3): 42-58.
[13] 陈雨露, 马勇, 阮卓阳. 金融周期和金融波动如何影响经济增长与金融稳定?[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 428(2): 1-22.
[14] 游 宇, 黄宗晔. 资本管制对融资结构和经济增长的影响[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 436(10): 32-47.
[15] 李明明, 秦凤鸣. 主权信用评级、债务危机与经济增长——来自欧元区国家的经验证据[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 436(10): 16-31.
[1] 王曦, 朱立挺, 王凯立. 我国货币政策是否关注资产价格?——基于马尔科夫区制转换BEKK多元GARCH模型[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 1 -17 .
[2] 刘勇政, 李岩. 中国的高速铁路建设与城市经济增长[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 18 -33 .
[3] 况伟大, 王琪琳. 房价波动、房贷规模与银行资本充足率[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 34 -48 .
[4] 祝树金, 赵玉龙. 资源错配与企业的出口行为——基于中国工业企业数据的经验研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 49 -64 .
[5] 陈德球, 陈运森, 董志勇. 政策不确定性、市场竞争与资本配置[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 65 -80 .
[6] 牟敦果, 王沛英. 中国能源价格内生性研究及货币政策选择分析[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 81 -95 .
[7] 高铭, 江嘉骏, 陈佳, 刘玉珍. 谁说女子不如儿郎?——P2P投资行为与过度自信[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 96 -111 .
[8] 吕若思, 刘青, 黄灿, 胡海燕, 卢进勇. 外资在华并购是否改善目标企业经营绩效?——基于企业层面的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 112 -127 .
[9] 姜军, 申丹琳, 江轩宇, 伊志宏. 债权人保护与企业创新[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 128 -142 .
[10] 刘莎莎, 孔高文. 信息搜寻、个人投资者交易与股价联动异象——基于股票送转的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 143 -157 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1