Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2018, Vol. 453 Issue (3): 172-189    
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
股指成份股调整与股价崩盘风险:基于一项准自然实验的证据
叶康涛, 刘芳, 李帆
中国人民大学商学院,北京 100872;
北京金融衍生品研究院,北京 100033
CSI300 Index Additions and Stock Price Crash Risk: Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment
YE Kangtao, LIU Fang, LI Fan
Business School,Renmin University of China;
CFFEX Institute for Financial Derivatives
下载:  PDF (1699KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 本文考察了入选沪深300指数成份股对该公司未来股价崩盘风险的影响。为缓解内生性问题,本文利用中国特有的备选股制度所提供的准自然实验机会,以备选股作为对照组,采用双重差分模型进行了实证检验。分析结果表明,相比备选股,公司在入选成为股指成份股之后,其股价崩盘风险显著上升。进一步的路径检验发现,分析师乐观预测偏差及分析师跟随在其间起到了部分中介效应。本研究不但有助于更好地理解股价崩盘风险动因和股指成份股调整的经济后果,也为监管部门加强分析师监管、完善成份股调整制度提供了决策参考。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
叶康涛
刘芳
李帆
关键词:  股指成份股调整  股价崩盘风险  双重差分模型    
Abstract:  This paper examines the effect of CSI300 Index additions on stock price crash risk. To alleviate endogeneity concern, we use those stocks selected as backups for the stocks newly included in CSI300 Index as the control group and conduct a difference-in-differences analysis. We find that, compared to backup stocks, stocks newly added experience a significant increase in future stock price crash risk. Further analyses suggest that analyst optimistic forecast bias and coverage both play a partial mediating role in the crash effect of CSI300 Index additions. This study not only provides more insights about the determinants of stock price crash risk and the consequences of stock price index additions, but also offers reference for the regulatory authorities to strengthen the analyst supervision and improve the CSI300 index adjustment system.
Key words:  CSI300 Index Addition    Stock Price Crash Risk    Difference-in-Differences Analysis
JEL分类号:  G14   G31  
基金资助: 本文感谢国家自科基金重大项目(项目号:71790602)、教育部人文社科项目规划项目(项目号:16YJA790059)、财政部全国会计科研课题重点项目(项目号:2015KJA009)、上海市金融工作党委和上海市金融办上海青年金才专项资助。
作者简介:  叶康涛,管理学博士,教授,中国人民大学商学院,Email:yekangtao@rmbs.ruc.edu.cn.
刘 芳(通讯作者), 会计学博士研究生,中国人民大学商学院,Email: fangliu1116@163.com.
李 帆,会计学博士,北京金融衍生品研究院,Email: lifan@cffex.com.cn.
引用本文:    
叶康涛, 刘芳, 李帆. 股指成份股调整与股价崩盘风险:基于一项准自然实验的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 453(3): 172-189.
YE Kangtao, LIU Fang, LI Fan. CSI300 Index Additions and Stock Price Crash Risk: Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment. Journal of Financial Research, 2018, 453(3): 172-189.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2018/V453/I3/172
[1]江轩宇和许年行,2015,《企业过度投资与股价崩盘风险》,《金融研究》第8期,第141 ~ 158页。
[2]王化成、曹丰和叶康涛,2015,《掏空还是监督: 大股东持股比例与股价崩盘风险》,《管理世界》第2 期,第45 ~ 57页。
[3]温忠麟、张 雷、侯杰泰和刘红云,2004,《中介效应检验程序及其应用》,《心理学报》第5期,第 614 ~ 620 页。
[4]叶康涛、曹丰和王化成,2015,《内部控制信息披露能够降低股价崩盘风险吗?》,《金融研究》第2期,第192 ~ 206页。
[5]甄红线、张先治和迟国泰,2015,《制度环境、终极控制权对公司绩效的影响——基于代理成本的中介效应检验》,《金融研究》第12 期,第 162 ~ 177 页。
[6]Beyer, A.,Cohen, D.A.,Lys, T.Z. and Walther, B.R.,2010,“The Financial Reporting Environment∶Review of the Recent Literature”,Journal of Accounting and Economics,50∶296 ~ 343.
[7]Brisker,E.R.,Çolak,G. and Peterson,D.R.,2013,“Changes in Cash Holdings Around the S&P 500 Additions”,Journal of Banking and Finance, 37∶1787 ~ 1807.
[8]Chen, H.,Noronha, G. and Singal, V.,2004,“The Asymmetric Price Response to S&P 500 Index Additions and Deletions: Evidence of Asymmetry and a New Explanation”,The Journal of Finance,59∶1901 ~ 1930.
[9]Crawford,S. S. , Roulstone,D. T. and So,E. C. ,2012,“Analyst Initiations of Coverage and Stock Return Synchronicity”,The Accounting Review,87∶1527 ~ 1553.
[10]Denis, D.K.,McConnell, J.J.,Ovtchinnikov, A.V. and Yu, Y.,2003,“S&P Additions and Earnings Expectations”,The Journal of Finance,58∶1821 ~ 1840.
[11]Dhillon, U. and Johnson, H.,1991,“Changes in the Standard and Poor's 500 List”,The Journal of Business,64∶75 ~ 85.
[12]Dimson E.,1979,“Risk Measurement When Shares are Subject to Infrequent Trading”,Journal of Financial Economics,7∶197 ~ 226.
[13]Easterwood, J.C. and Nutt, S.R.,1999,“Inefficiency in Analysts' Earnings Forecasts: Systematic Misreaction or Systematic Optimism?”,The Journal of Finance,54∶1777 ~ 1797.
[14]Fried. D., and D. Givoly. 1982. Financial Analysts' Forecasts of Earnings: A Hetter Surrogate for Market Expectations. Journal of Accounting and Economics,4∶85~107.
[15]Harris, L. and Gurel,E.,1986,“Price and Volume Effects Associated with Changes in the S&P 500 List: New Evidence for the Existence of Price Pressures”,The Journal of Finance,41∶815 ~ 829.
[16]Hutton, A.P.,Marcus, A.J. and Tehranian, H.,2009,“Opaque Financial Reports, R2, and Crash Risk”,Journal of Financial Economics,94∶67 ~ 86.
[17]Jain, P.C.,1987,“The Effect on Stock Price of Inclusion in or Exclusion from the S&P 500”,Financial Analyst Journal,43∶58 ~ 65.
[18]Jin, L. and Myers, S.C.,2006,“R2 Around the World: New Theory and New Tests”, Journal of Financial Economics,79∶257 ~ 292.
[19]Kim, J.-B.,Li, Y. and Zhang, L.,2011a,“Corporate Tax Avoidance and Stock Price Crash Risk: Firm level Analysis”,Journal of Financial Economics,100∶639 ~ 662.
[20]Kim, J.-B. and Zhang, L.,2016,“Accounting Conservatism and Stock Price Crash Risk: Firm-level Evidence”,Contemporary Accounting Research,33∶412 ~ 441.
[21]Li, K. and You, H.,2015,“What is the Value of Sell-side Analysts? Evidence from Coverage Initiations and Terminations”,Journal of Accounting and Economics,60∶141~160.
[22]Matsumoto, Dawn., 2002, “Management's Incentives to Avoid Negative Earnings Surprises”,The Accounting Review,77∶483~514.
[23]Petersen,M. A.,2009,“Estimating Standard Errors in Finance Panel Data Sets∶Comparing Approaches”,Review of Financial Studies,22∶435 ~ 480.
[24]Platikanova, P.,2008,“Long-term Price Effect of S&P 500 Index Additions and Earnings Quality”,Financial Analysis Journal,64∶62 ~ 76.
[25]Richardson, S.,2006,“Over-Investment of Free Cash Flow”,Review of Accounting Studies,11∶159 ~ 189.
[26]Shleifer, A.,1986,“Do Demand Curves for Stocks Slope Down?”,The Journal of Finance,41∶579 ~ 590.
[27]Xu, N.,Jiang, X.,Chan, K. C. and Yi, Z.,2013,“Analyst Coverage,Optimism and Stock Price Crash Risk∶Evidence from China”,Pacific-Basin Finance Journal,25∶217 ~ 239.
[28]Xu, N., Li, X.,Yuan, Q. and Chan, K. C.,2014,“Excess Perks and Stock Price Crash Risk: Evidence from China”,Journal of Corporate Finance,25∶419 ~ 434.
[29]Zhu, S., Jiang,X., Ke,X. and Bai,X.,2017,“Stock Index Adjustments, Analyst Coverage and Institutional Holdings∶Evidence from China”,China Journal of Accounting Research,forthcoming.
[1] 卞元超, 吴利华, 白俊红. 高铁开通是否促进了区域创新?[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 468(6): 132-149.
[2] 张学勇, 张秋月. 券商声誉损失与公司IPO市场表现——来自中国上市公司IPO造假的新证据[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 460(10): 141-157.
[3] 宋献中, 胡珺, 李四海. 社会责任信息披露与股价崩盘风险——基于信息效应与声誉保险效应的路径分析[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 442(4): 161-175.
[4] 孙淑伟, 梁上坤, 阮刚铭, 付宇翔. 高管减持、信息压制与股价崩盘风险[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 175-190.
[5] 张晓宇, 徐龙炳. 限售股解禁、资本运作与股价崩盘风险[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 158-174.
[6] 项后军, 何 康, 于 洋. 自贸区设立、贸易发展与资本流动——基于上海自贸区的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 436(10): 48-63.
[7] 江轩宇, 许年行. 企业过度投资与股价崩盘风险[J]. 金融研究, 2015, 422(8): 141-158.
[1] 王曦, 朱立挺, 王凯立. 我国货币政策是否关注资产价格?——基于马尔科夫区制转换BEKK多元GARCH模型[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 1 -17 .
[2] 刘勇政, 李岩. 中国的高速铁路建设与城市经济增长[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 18 -33 .
[3] 况伟大, 王琪琳. 房价波动、房贷规模与银行资本充足率[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 34 -48 .
[4] 祝树金, 赵玉龙. 资源错配与企业的出口行为——基于中国工业企业数据的经验研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 49 -64 .
[5] 陈德球, 陈运森, 董志勇. 政策不确定性、市场竞争与资本配置[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 65 -80 .
[6] 牟敦果, 王沛英. 中国能源价格内生性研究及货币政策选择分析[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 81 -95 .
[7] 高铭, 江嘉骏, 陈佳, 刘玉珍. 谁说女子不如儿郎?——P2P投资行为与过度自信[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 96 -111 .
[8] 吕若思, 刘青, 黄灿, 胡海燕, 卢进勇. 外资在华并购是否改善目标企业经营绩效?——基于企业层面的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 112 -127 .
[9] 姜军, 申丹琳, 江轩宇, 伊志宏. 债权人保护与企业创新[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 128 -142 .
[10] 刘莎莎, 孔高文. 信息搜寻、个人投资者交易与股价联动异象——基于股票送转的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 143 -157 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1