Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2017, Vol. 442 Issue (4): 161-175    DOI: 10.12094/1002-7246(2017)04-0161-15
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
社会责任信息披露与股价崩盘风险——基于信息效应与声誉保险效应的路径分析
宋献中, 胡珺, 李四海
暨南大学管理学院,广东广州 510632
中南财经政法大学会计学院,湖北武汉 430073
Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure and Stock Price Crash Risk:Based on Information Effect and Reputation Insurance Effect
SONG Xianzhong, HU Jun, LI Sihai
Management School, Jinan University
Accounting School, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law
下载:  PDF (1281KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 本文从企业信息不对称和投资者情绪两个角度探讨了企业股价崩盘风险的形成机理,并以2009-2014年沪深A股上市公司为样本,分别从社会责任信息披露的信息效应和声誉保险效应两条路径考察了对股价崩盘风险的影响。研究发现,社会责任信息披露与未来股价崩盘风险显著负相关,说明企业披露社会责任信息降低了未来股价崩盘风险。对影响路径的分析发现,社会责任信息同时通过信息效应和声誉保险效应降低股价崩盘风险,但声誉保险效应占据主导地位。在通过一系列稳健性检验后,以上结论仍成立。拓展分析表明,自愿社会责任信息披露相对于应规披露,对股价崩盘风险的约束作用更强,且上述关系在企业违规这一特定情境下仍成立。本文不仅丰富了企业股价崩盘风险形成机理的理解和分析范式,为股价崩盘风险的预防提供了新的经验支持,对于深入理解社会责任信息披露的经济后果也具有重要的理论与现实意义。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
宋献中
胡珺
李四海
关键词:  社会责任信息披露  信息效应  声誉保险效应  股价崩盘风险    
Abstract:  we employed Chinese listed companies during period of 2009-2014 as samples, from perspective of information effect and reputation insurance effect respectively examining the relationship between corporate social responsibility disclosure and stock price crash risk. We find that with disclosing of corporate social responsibility, the stock price crash risk will obviously decrease. Analysis to effects channel suggests that corporate social responsibility disclosure through both information resources effect and reputation capital effect decrease stock price crash risk, but reputation capital effect plays a dominant role. After the problems such as the nature of being internal has been controlled, the above-mentioned conclusion is still correct. Further test show that voluntary disclosure of corporate social responsibility has a more significant restraint to the stock price crash risk when compared to mandatory disclosure,and the relationship is still exist when it turns to an illegal situation.Our findings enrich the formation mechanism and analysis paradigm of the stock price crash risk,which not only provide new evidences to prevent crash risk,it also has an important significance of understanding the economic consequences of corporate social responsibility disclosure.
Key words:  Corporate Social Responsibility    Information Effect    Reputation Insurance Effect    Stock Price Crash Risk
JEL分类号:  G12   G14   M41  
基金资助: 国家社会科学基金项目(16ZZD049和14AZD068),国家自然科学基金项目(71372166、71672075、71602070和71502174),及广州区域低碳经济研究基地
作者简介:  宋献中,财务学博士,教授,暨南大学管理学院,Email:tsxz@jnu.edu.cn.胡珺,博士研究生,暨南大学管理学院,Email:jnuhujun@163.com.李四海(通讯作者),财务学博士,副教授,中南财经政法大学会计学院,Email:lshhhy0420@163.com.
引用本文:    
宋献中, 胡珺, 李四海. 社会责任信息披露与股价崩盘风险——基于信息效应与声誉保险效应的路径分析[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 442(4): 161-175.
SONG Xianzhong, HU Jun, LI Sihai. Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure and Stock Price Crash Risk:Based on Information Effect and Reputation Insurance Effect. Journal of Financial Research, 2017, 442(4): 161-175.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/10.12094/1002-7246(2017)04-0161-15  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2017/V442/I4/161
[2] 李莉、闫斌和顾春霞,2014,《知识产权保护、信息不对称与高科技企业资本结构》,《管理世界》第11期,第1~9页。
[3] 罗进辉和杜兴强,2014,《媒体报道、制度环境与股价崩盘风险》,《会计研究》第9期,第53~59页。
[1] 江轩宇,2013,《税收征管、税收激进与股价崩盘风险》,《南开管理评论》第5期,第152~160页。
[4] 潘越、戴亦一和林超群,2011,《信息不透明、分析师关注与个股暴跌风险》,《金融研究》第9期,第138~151页。
[2] 李莉、闫斌和顾春霞,2014,《知识产权保护、信息不对称与高科技企业资本结构》,《管理世界》第11期,第1~9页。
[3] 罗进辉和杜兴强,2014,《媒体报道、制度环境与股价崩盘风险》,《会计研究》第9期,第53~59页。
[4] 潘越、戴亦一和林超群,2011,《信息不透明、分析师关注与个股暴跌风险》,《金融研究》第9期,第138~151页。
[5] 权小锋、吴世农和尹洪英,2015,《企业社会责任与股价崩盘风险:“价值利器”或“自利工具”》,《经济研究》第11期,第49~64页。
权小锋、吴世农和尹洪英,2015,《企业社会责任与股价崩盘风险:“价值利器”或“自利工具”》,《经济研究》第11期,第49~64页。
[6] 陶春华、杨思静和林晚发,2015,《公司治理、企业社会责任与股价崩盘风险》,《湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》第6期,第50~56页。
陶春华、杨思静和林晚发,2015,《公司治理、企业社会责任与股价崩盘风险》,《湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》第6期,第50~56页。
[7] 王化成、曹丰和叶康涛,2015,《监督还是掏空:大股东持股比例与股价崩盘风险》,《管理世界》第2期,第45~57页。
王化成、曹丰和叶康涛,2015,《监督还是掏空:大股东持股比例与股价崩盘风险》,《管理世界》第2期,第45~57页。
[8] 许年行、江轩宇、伊志宏和徐信忠,2012,《分析师利益冲突、乐观偏差与股价崩盘风险》,《经济研究》第7期,第127~140页。
许年行、江轩宇、伊志宏和徐信忠,2012,《分析师利益冲突、乐观偏差与股价崩盘风险》,《经济研究》第7期,第127~140页。
[9] 许年行、于上尧和伊志宏,2013,《机构投资者羊群行为与股价崩盘风险》,《管理世界》第6期,第31~43页。
许年行、于上尧和伊志宏,2013,《机构投资者羊群行为与股价崩盘风险》,《管理世界》第6期,第31~43页。
[10] 叶康涛、曹丰和王化成,2015,《内部控制信息披露能够降低股价崩盘风险吗?》,《金融研究》第2期,第192~206页。
叶康涛、曹丰和王化成,2015,《内部控制信息披露能够降低股价崩盘风险吗?》,《金融研究》第2期,第192~206页。
[11] 于蔚、汪淼军和金祥荣,2012,《政治关联和融资约束:信息效应与资源效应》,《经济研究》第9期,第125~139页。
于蔚、汪淼军和金祥荣,2012,《政治关联和融资约束:信息效应与资源效应》,《经济研究》第9期,第125~139页。
[12] Chen, J., Hong H. and Stein J. C., 2001, “Forecasting Crashes: Trading Volume,Past Returns, and Conditional Skewness in Stock Prices”, Journal of Financial Economics, 61(6) : 345~381.
Chen, J., Hong H. and Stein J. C., 2001, “Forecasting Crashes: Trading Volume,Past Returns, and Conditional Skewness in Stock Prices”, Journal of Financial Economics, 61(6) : 345~381.
[13] Gao, F., Ling L. L. and Zhang. I. X., 2014, “Commitment to Social Good and Insider Trading”, Journal of Accounting & Economics, 57(2):149~175.
Gao, F., Ling L. L. and Zhang. I. X., 2014, “Commitment to Social Good and Insider Trading”, Journal of Accounting & Economics, 57(2):149~175.
[14] Gelb, D. and Strawser J.A., 2001, “Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Disclosures: an Alternative Explanation for Increased Disclosure”,Journal of Business Ethics, 33(1): 1~13.
Gelb, D. and Strawser J.A., 2001, “Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Disclosures: an Alternative Explanation for Increased Disclosure”,Journal of Business Ethics, 33(1): 1~13.
[15] Gennotte, G. and Leland H., 1990, “Market Liquidity, Hedging, and Crashes”,The American Economic Review, 43(16): 999~1021.
Gennotte, G. and Leland H., 1990, “Market Liquidity, Hedging, and Crashes”,The American Economic Review, 43(16): 999~1021.
[16] Godfrey, P. C., Merrill C.B. and Hansen J. M., 2009, “The Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Shareholder Value: An Empirical Test of the Risk Management Hypothesis”, Strategic Management Journal, 30(4): 425~445.
Godfrey, P. C., Merrill C.B. and Hansen J. M., 2009, “The Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Shareholder Value: An Empirical Test of the Risk Management Hypothesis”, Strategic Management Journal, 30(4): 425~445.
[17] Godfrey, P.C., 2005, “The Relationship between Corporate Philanthropy and Shareholder Wealth: A RiskManagement Perspective”, Academy of Management Review, 30(4): 777~798.
Godfrey, P.C., 2005, “The Relationship between Corporate Philanthropy and Shareholder Wealth: A RiskManagement Perspective”, Academy of Management Review, 30(4): 777~798.
[18] Gray, R., Kouhy R. and Lavers S., 1995, “Corporate Social and Environmental Reporting: a Review of the Literature and a Longitudinal Study of UK Disclosure”,Accounting Auditing and Accountability Journal,8(2): 47~77.
Gray, R., Kouhy R. and Lavers S., 1995, “Corporate Social and Environmental Reporting: a Review of the Literature and a Longitudinal Study of UK Disclosure”,Accounting Auditing and Accountability Journal,8(2): 47~77.
[19] Hoi, C. K. and H. Zhang., 2013, “Is Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Associated with Tax Avoidance? Evidence from Irresponsible CSR Activities”,Accounting Review, 88(6):2025-2059.
Hoi, C. K. and H. Zhang., 2013, “Is Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Associated with Tax Avoidance? Evidence from Irresponsible CSR Activities”,Accounting Review, 88(6):2025-2059.
[20] Hutton, A. P., Marcus A. J. and Tehranian H., 2009, “Opaque Financial Reports,R2, and Crash Risk”,Journal of Financial Economics, .94(1): 67~86.
Hutton, A. P., Marcus A. J. and Tehranian H., 2009, “Opaque Financial Reports,R2, and Crash Risk”,Journal of Financial Economics, .94(1): 67~86.
[21] Kim, J., and Zhang L., 2014, “Financial Reporting Opacity and Expected Crash Risk:Evidence from Implied Volatility Smirks”, Contemporary Accounting Research, 31(3):851~875.
Kim, J., and Zhang L., 2014, “Financial Reporting Opacity and Expected Crash Risk:Evidence from Implied Volatility Smirks”, Contemporary Accounting Research, 31(3):851~875.
[22] Kim, J. and Zhang L., 2012, “Accounting Conservatism and Stock Price Crash Risk:Firm-Level Evidence”, Contemporary Accounting Research, 33(4): 352~387.
Kim, J. and Zhang L., 2012, “Accounting Conservatism and Stock Price Crash Risk:Firm-Level Evidence”, Contemporary Accounting Research, 33(4): 352~387.
[23] Kim, J., Li Y. and Zhang L., 2011, “Corporate Tax Avoidance and Stock Price Crash Risk: Firm-level Analysis”,Journal of Financial Economics,l.100(3): 639~662.
Kim, J., Li Y. and Zhang L., 2011, “Corporate Tax Avoidance and Stock Price Crash Risk: Firm-level Analysis”,Journal of Financial Economics,l.100(3): 639~662.
[24] Kim, Y., Li H. and Li S., 2014, “Corporate Social Responsibility and Stock Price Crash Risk”,Journal of Banking & Finance, 43(1): 1~13.
Kim, Y., Li H. and Li S., 2014, “Corporate Social Responsibility and Stock Price Crash Risk”,Journal of Banking & Finance, 43(1): 1~13.
[25] Kim, Y., Park M. S. and Wier B., 2012, “Is Earnings Quality Associated with Corporate Social Responsibility”,The Accounting Review, 8(3): 761~796.
Kim, Y., Park M. S. and Wier B., 2012, “Is Earnings Quality Associated with Corporate Social Responsibility”,The Accounting Review, 8(3): 761~796.
[26] Lizzeri, A., 1999, “Information Revelation and Certification Intermediaries”,Journal of Economics, .30(5): 214~311.
Lizzeri, A., 1999, “Information Revelation and Certification Intermediaries”,Journal of Economics, .30(5): 214~311.
[27] Orlitzky, M., 2008, “Corporate Social Performance and Financial Performance: a Research Synthesis”, New York: Oxford University Press, 7(7): 112~134.
Orlitzky, M., 2008, “Corporate Social Performance and Financial Performance: a Research Synthesis”, New York: Oxford University Press, 7(7): 112~134.
[28] Sen, S., Bhattacharya C.B. and Korschun D., 2006, “The Role of Corporate Social Responsibility in Strengthening Multiple Stakeholder Relationships: a Field Experiment”,Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(3):158~66.
Sen, S., Bhattacharya C.B. and Korschun D., 2006, “The Role of Corporate Social Responsibility in Strengthening Multiple Stakeholder Relationships: a Field Experiment”,Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(3):158~66.
[1] 叶康涛, 刘芳, 李帆. 股指成份股调整与股价崩盘风险:基于一项准自然实验的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 453(3): 172-189.
[2] 孙淑伟, 梁上坤, 阮刚铭, 付宇翔. 高管减持、信息压制与股价崩盘风险[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 175-190.
[3] 张晓宇, 徐龙炳. 限售股解禁、资本运作与股价崩盘风险[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 158-174.
[4] 江轩宇, 许年行. 企业过度投资与股价崩盘风险[J]. 金融研究, 2015, 422(8): 141-158.
[1] 王曦, 朱立挺, 王凯立. 我国货币政策是否关注资产价格?——基于马尔科夫区制转换BEKK多元GARCH模型[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 1 -17 .
[2] 刘勇政, 李岩. 中国的高速铁路建设与城市经济增长[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 18 -33 .
[3] 况伟大, 王琪琳. 房价波动、房贷规模与银行资本充足率[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 34 -48 .
[4] 祝树金, 赵玉龙. 资源错配与企业的出口行为——基于中国工业企业数据的经验研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 49 -64 .
[5] 陈德球, 陈运森, 董志勇. 政策不确定性、市场竞争与资本配置[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 65 -80 .
[6] 牟敦果, 王沛英. 中国能源价格内生性研究及货币政策选择分析[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 81 -95 .
[7] 高铭, 江嘉骏, 陈佳, 刘玉珍. 谁说女子不如儿郎?——P2P投资行为与过度自信[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 96 -111 .
[8] 吕若思, 刘青, 黄灿, 胡海燕, 卢进勇. 外资在华并购是否改善目标企业经营绩效?——基于企业层面的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 112 -127 .
[9] 姜军, 申丹琳, 江轩宇, 伊志宏. 债权人保护与企业创新[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 128 -142 .
[10] 刘莎莎, 孔高文. 信息搜寻、个人投资者交易与股价联动异象——基于股票送转的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 143 -157 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1