Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2017, Vol. 442 Issue (4): 176-190    DOI: 10.12094/1002-7246(2017)04-0176-15
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
新三板做市商制度、股票流动性与证券价值
陈辉, 顾乃康
广东金融学院金融系,广东广州 510521
中山大学管理学院,广东广州 510275
The Mechanism of Market Making in the New Third Board, Stock Liquidity, and Securities Values
CHEN Hui, GU Naikang
Department of Finance, Guangdong University of Finance
Business School, Sun Yat-sen University
下载:  PDF (1283KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 本文研究了新三板挂牌公司的股票转让方式由协议转让变更为做市转让对股票流动性和证券价值的影响。研究发现,一是与对照组公司的均值比较和基于倍差法模型的回归结果表明,实施了做市转让方式的处理组公司的股票流动性更高;二是处理组公司在事件日前后存在显著为正的平均累积异常收益,而这一现象在对照组公司中不存在;三是交易机制变更的个股的累积异常收益率与股票流动性变化正相关,控制样本选择偏差后的结论基本不变;四是交易机制变更的个股的股票流动性变化与做市商数量正相关,控制样本选择偏差后的结论基本不变。研究结果表明,做市商制度对股票流动性和证券价值有正面影响,我们不能因新三板市场整体换手率的波动而否定做市商制度的作用。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
陈辉
顾乃康
关键词:  新三板  做市转让  协议转让  做市商  股票流动性  证券价值    
Abstract:  This paper analyzes the influence of the companies’ trading mechanism in the new third board transferring from negotiating transfer to market making transfer on stock liquidity and securities values. The results show that, compared with the matched group, the stock liquidity of the treatment group that has changed their trading mechanism is higher; there is a positive average cumulative abnormal return around the event day in the treatment group, but this phenomenon does not exist in the matched group; the relationship between cumulative abnormal return and the change of stock liquidity is positive, and this result does not change after controlling the sample-selection bias; the relationship between the change of stock liquidity and the number of market makers is positive, and this result does not change after controlling the sample-selection bias. These results mean that, there are positive effects of market making on stock liquidity and firm value, and we can’t deny these effects when we observe the variation of the total turnover of the new third board. The paper also gives some policy suggestions for the new third board.
Key words:  New Third Board    Market Making Transfer    Negotiating Transfer    Market Maker    Stock Liquidity    Security Value
JEL分类号:  G14   G18   G24  
基金资助: 国家社会科学基金青年项目(16CJY072)
作者简介:  陈辉(通讯作者),经济学博士,副教授,广东金融学院金融系,Email:sysuchenhui@163.com.顾乃康,管理学博士,教授,中山大学管理学院,Email:mnsgnk@sysu.edu.cn.
引用本文:    
陈辉, 顾乃康. 新三板做市商制度、股票流动性与证券价值[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 442(4): 176-190.
CHEN Hui, GU Naikang. The Mechanism of Market Making in the New Third Board, Stock Liquidity, and Securities Values. Journal of Financial Research, 2017, 442(4): 176-190.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/10.12094/1002-7246(2017)04-0176-15  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2017/V442/I4/176
[1] 陈辉、顾乃康和万小勇,2011,《股票流动性、股权分置改革与公司价值》,《管理科学》第3期,第43~55页。
[2] 陈一勤,2000,《从NASDAQ看中国做市商制度的建立》,《金融研究》第2期,第80~84页。
[3] 贺强、王汀汀和杜惠芬,2015,《新三板做市商制度比较研究》,《清华金融评论》第6期,第1~3页。
[4] 金永军、扬迁和刘斌,2010,《做市商制度最新的演变趋势及启示》,《证券市场导报》第10期,第24~34页。
[5] 马永波和郭牧炫,2016,《做市商制度、双边价差与市场稳定性——基于银行间债券市场做市行为的研究》,《金融研究》第4期,第50~65页。
[6] 苏冬蔚和麦元勋,2004,《流动性与资产定价: 基于我国股市资产换手率与预期收益的实证研究》,《经济研究》第2期,第95~105页。
[7] 王雄元、张春强和何捷,2015,《宏观经济波动性与短期融资券风险溢价》,《金融研究》第1期,第68~83页。
[8] 杨之曙和王丽岩,2000,《NASDAQ股票市场交易制度对我国建立二板市场的借鉴》,《金融研究》第8期,第78~84页。
[9] Acharya, V. V., and L. H. Pedersen. 2005. “Asset Pricing with Liquidity Risk,” Journal of Financial Economics, 77(2): 375~410.
Acharya, V. V., and L. H. Pedersen. 2005. “Asset Pricing with Liquidity Risk,” Journal of Financial Economics, 77(2): 375~410.
[10] Amihud, Y., 2002. “Illiquidity and Stock Returns: Cross-Section and Time-Series Effects,” Journal of Financial Markets, 5(1): 31~56.
Amihud, Y., 2002. “Illiquidity and Stock Returns: Cross-Section and Time-Series Effects,” Journal of Financial Markets, 5(1): 31~56.
[11] Amihud, Y., and H. Mendelson. 1986. “Asset Pricing and the Bid-Ask Spread,” Journal of Financial Economics, 17(2): 223~249.
Amihud, Y., and H. Mendelson. 1986. “Asset Pricing and the Bid-Ask Spread,” Journal of Financial Economics, 17(2): 223~249.
[12] Amihud, Y., H. Mendelson, and B. Lauterbach. 1997. “Market Microstructure and Securities Values: Evidence from the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange,” Journal of Financial Economics, 45(3): 365~390.
Amihud, Y., H. Mendelson, and B. Lauterbach. 1997. “Market Microstructure and Securities Values: Evidence from the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange,” Journal of Financial Economics, 45(3): 365~390.
[13] Anand, A., C. Tanggaard, and D. G. Weaver. 2009. “Paying for Market Quality,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 44(6):1427~1457.
Anand, A., C. Tanggaard, and D. G. Weaver. 2009. “Paying for Market Quality,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 44(6):1427~1457.
[14] Brennan, M. J., and A. Subrahmanyam. 1996. “Market Microstructure and Asset Pricing: On the Compensation for Illiquidity in Stock Returns,” Journal of Financial Economics, 41(3): 441~464.
Brennan, M. J., and A. Subrahmanyam. 1996. “Market Microstructure and Asset Pricing: On the Compensation for Illiquidity in Stock Returns,” Journal of Financial Economics, 41(3): 441~464.
[15] Brown, S. J., W. N. Goetzmann, and S. A. Ross. 1995. “Survival,” The Journal of Finance, 50(3): 853~873.
Brown, S. J., W. N. Goetzmann, and S. A. Ross. 1995. “Survival,” The Journal of Finance, 50(3): 853~873.
[16] Chen, J., H. Hong, and J. C. Stein. 2001.“Forecasting Crashes: Trading Volume, Past Returns, and Conditional Skewness in Stock Prices,” Journal of Financial Economics, 61(3): 345~381.
Chen, J., H. Hong, and J. C. Stein. 2001.“Forecasting Crashes: Trading Volume, Past Returns, and Conditional Skewness in Stock Prices,” Journal of Financial Economics, 61(3): 345~381.
[17] Christie, W. G., and R. D. Huang. 1994. “Market Structures and Liquidity: A Transactions Data Study of Exchange Listings,” Journal of Financial Intermediation, 3(3): 300~326.
Christie, W. G., and R. D. Huang. 1994. “Market Structures and Liquidity: A Transactions Data Study of Exchange Listings,” Journal of Financial Intermediation, 3(3): 300~326.
[18] Demsetz, H. 1968. “The Cost of Transacting,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 82(1): 33~53.
Demsetz, H. 1968. “The Cost of Transacting,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 82(1): 33~53.
[19] Derrien, F., and A. Kecskés. 2013. “The Real Effects of Financial Shocks: Evidence from Exogenous Changes in Analyst Coverage,” The Journal of Finance, 68(4): 1407~1440.
Derrien, F., and A. Kecskés. 2013. “The Real Effects of Financial Shocks: Evidence from Exogenous Changes in Analyst Coverage,” The Journal of Finance, 68(4): 1407~1440.
[20] Fang, V. W., T. H. Noe, and S. Tice. 2009. “Stock Market Liquidity and Firm Value,” Journal of Financial Economics, 94(1): 150~169.
Fang, V. W., T. H. Noe, and S. Tice. 2009. “Stock Market Liquidity and Firm Value,” Journal of Financial Economics, 94(1): 150~169.
[21] Garbade, K. D., and W. L. Silber. 1979. “Structural Organization of Secondary Markets: Clearing Frequency, Dealer Activity and Liquidity Risk,” The Journal of Finance, 34(3): 577~593.
Garbade, K. D., and W. L. Silber. 1979. “Structural Organization of Secondary Markets: Clearing Frequency, Dealer Activity and Liquidity Risk,” The Journal of Finance, 34(3): 577~593.
[22] Grossman, S. J., and M. H. Miller. 1988. “Liquidity and Market Structure,” The Journal of Finance, 43(3): 617~633.
Grossman, S. J., and M. H. Miller. 1988. “Liquidity and Market Structure,” The Journal of Finance, 43(3): 617~633.
[23] Huang, R. D., and H. R. Stoll. 1996. “Dealer Versus Auction Markets: A Paired Comparison of Execution Costs on NASDAQ and the NYSE,” Journal of Financial Economics, 41(3): 313~357.
Huang, R. D., and H. R. Stoll. 1996. “Dealer Versus Auction Markets: A Paired Comparison of Execution Costs on NASDAQ and the NYSE,” Journal of Financial Economics, 41(3): 313~357.
[24] Lai, H. N., 2007. “The Market Quality of Dealer Versus Hybrid Markets: The Case of Moderately Liquid Securities,” Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 34(1-2): 349~373.
Lai, H. N., 2007. “The Market Quality of Dealer Versus Hybrid Markets: The Case of Moderately Liquid Securities,” Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 34(1-2): 349~373.
[25] Lesmond, D. A., J. P. Ogden, and C. A. Trzcinka.1999. “A New Estimate of Transaction Costs,” Review of Financial Studies, 12(5): 1113~1141.
Lesmond, D. A., J. P. Ogden, and C. A. Trzcinka.1999. “A New Estimate of Transaction Costs,” Review of Financial Studies, 12(5): 1113~1141.
[26] Menkveld, A. J., and T. Wang,2013. “How do Designated Market Makers Create Value for Small-Caps?” Journal of Financial Markets, 16(3): 571~603.
Menkveld, A. J., and T. Wang,2013. “How do Designated Market Makers Create Value for Small-Caps?” Journal of Financial Markets, 16(3): 571~603.
[27] Nimalendran, M., and G. Petrella, 2003. “Do ‘Thinly-Traded’ Stocks Benefit from Specialist Intervention?” Journal of Banking & Finance, 27(9): 1823~1854.
Nimalendran, M., and G. Petrella, 2003. “Do ‘Thinly-Traded’ Stocks Benefit from Specialist Intervention?” Journal of Banking & Finance, 27(9): 1823~1854.
[28] Stoll, H. R., 2000.“Friction,” The Journal of Finance, 55(4): 1479~1514.
Stoll, H. R., 2000.“Friction,” The Journal of Finance, 55(4): 1479~1514.
[29] Stoll, H. R., 2003. “Market Microstructure,” in Handbook of the Economics of Finance, Eds. by Constantinides, G. M., M. Milton, and R. M. Stulz, pp. 553~604.
Stoll, H. R., 2003. “Market Microstructure,” in Handbook of the Economics of Finance, Eds. by Constantinides, G. M., M. Milton, and R. M. Stulz, pp. 553~604.
[30] Venkataraman, K., and A. C. Waisburd, 2007. “The Value of the Designated Market Maker,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 42(3): 735~758.
Venkataraman, K., and A. C. Waisburd, 2007. “The Value of the Designated Market Maker,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 42(3): 735~758.
[1] 鄢伟波, 王小华, 温军. 分层制度提升新三板流动性了吗?——来自多维断点回归的经验证据[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 467(5): 170-189.
[2] 郑建明, 李金甜, 刘琳. 新三板做市交易提高流动性了吗?——基于“流动性悖论”的视角[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 454(4): 190-206.
[3] 冯根福, 刘虹, 冯照桢, 温军. 股票流动性会促进我国企业技术创新吗?[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 441(3): 192-206.
[4] 马永波, 郭牧炫. 做市商制度、双边价差与市场稳定性——基于银行间债券市场做市行为的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 430(4): 50-65.
[1] 王曦, 朱立挺, 王凯立. 我国货币政策是否关注资产价格?——基于马尔科夫区制转换BEKK多元GARCH模型[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 1 -17 .
[2] 刘勇政, 李岩. 中国的高速铁路建设与城市经济增长[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 18 -33 .
[3] 况伟大, 王琪琳. 房价波动、房贷规模与银行资本充足率[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 34 -48 .
[4] 祝树金, 赵玉龙. 资源错配与企业的出口行为——基于中国工业企业数据的经验研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 49 -64 .
[5] 陈德球, 陈运森, 董志勇. 政策不确定性、市场竞争与资本配置[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 65 -80 .
[6] 牟敦果, 王沛英. 中国能源价格内生性研究及货币政策选择分析[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 81 -95 .
[7] 高铭, 江嘉骏, 陈佳, 刘玉珍. 谁说女子不如儿郎?——P2P投资行为与过度自信[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 96 -111 .
[8] 吕若思, 刘青, 黄灿, 胡海燕, 卢进勇. 外资在华并购是否改善目标企业经营绩效?——基于企业层面的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 112 -127 .
[9] 姜军, 申丹琳, 江轩宇, 伊志宏. 债权人保护与企业创新[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 128 -142 .
[10] 刘莎莎, 孔高文. 信息搜寻、个人投资者交易与股价联动异象——基于股票送转的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 143 -157 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1