Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2017, Vol. 441 Issue (3): 192-206    DOI: 10.12094/1002-7246(2017)03-0192-15
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
股票流动性会促进我国企业技术创新吗?
冯根福, 刘虹, 冯照桢, 温军
西安交通大学经济与金融学院, 陕西西安 710061
Does Stock Liquidity Enhance Technological Innovation?
FENG Genfu, LIU Hong, FENG Zhaozhen, WEN Jun
(School of Economics and Finance, Xi’an Jiaotong University
下载:  PDF (1155KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 本文基于2006-2013年中国沪深A股上市公司数据,研究了股票流动性与企业技术创新的关系。在以专利授权量和研发效率两个维度对技术创新进行度量的基础上,使用股权分置改革和印花税调整作为准自然实验的外生冲击,结合倾向得分匹配和倍差估计法对本文提出的假说进行了实证检验,研究发现:企业性质对中国资本市场的股票流动性与企业技术创新之间的关系有明显调节作用;对于我国民营企业而言,股票流动性的提高降低了企业的技术创新水平;对于国有企业而言,在国有企业考核办法不断改进和股权多元化不断推进的情况下,股票流动性的提高有助于企业技术创新水平的提升。根据研究结论,本文就如何改善股市流动性和提高上市公司技术创新水平提出了相关政策建议。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
冯根福
刘虹
冯照桢
温军
关键词:  股票流动性  技术创新  股权分置改革  印花税    
Abstract:  Based on the 2006-2013 A-share high frequency data to measure stock liquidity, this paper studied the causal relationship between stock liquidity and the technological innovation from two aspects: patent granted number and the R&D efficiency, and use the split-share structure reform and adjustment of stamp duty as exogenous shocks of quasi-natural experiment, combining propensity score matching and difference in differences estimation method, further verified the robustness of conclusion. Study found that the relationship between China's capital market stock liquidity and the enterprise technological innovation is moderated by firm nature; the enterprise's technological innovation level increases with the increase of stock liquidity in State-Owned enterprise; but instead, stock liquidity reduces the enterprise technological innovation in non-State-Owned enterprises. This article also puts forward appropriate policy recommendations on how to improve technological innovation of the listed company according to the research conclusions.
Key words:  Stock Liquidity    Technological Innovation    Split-Share Structure Reform    Stamp Duty
JEL分类号:  G12   G18   O31  
作者简介:  冯根福,经济学博士,教授,西安交通大学经济与金融学院,Email:fgf@mail.xjtu.edu.cn.刘虹(通讯作者),经济学博士研究生,西安交通大学经济与金融学院。冯照桢(通讯作者),经济学博士,西安交通大学经济与金融学院,Email:xjtufeng@126.com.温军,经济学博士,教授,西安交通大学经济与金融学院,Email:wjun1978@163.com.
引用本文:    
冯根福, 刘虹, 冯照桢, 温军. 股票流动性会促进我国企业技术创新吗?[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 441(3): 192-206.
FENG Genfu, LIU Hong, FENG Zhaozhen, WEN Jun. Does Stock Liquidity Enhance Technological Innovation?. Journal of Financial Research, 2017, 441(3): 192-206.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/10.12094/1002-7246(2017)03-0192-15  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2017/V441/I3/192
[8] 徐欣和唐清泉,2010,《财务分析师跟踪与企业R&D活动——来自中国证券市场的研究》,《金融研究》第12期,第173~189页。
[1] 陈胜蓝和卢锐,2012,《股权分置改革, 盈余管理与高管薪酬业绩敏感性》,《金融研究》第10期,第180~190页。
[2] 陈辉、顾乃康和万小勇,2011,《股票流动性, 股权分置改革与公司价值》,《管理科学》第3期,第43~55页。
[9] 张慧莲,2009,《股权分置改革前后股指波动性测度及原因分析》,《金融研究》第5期,第84~92页。
[3] 冯根福和温军,2008,《中国上市公司治理与企业技术创新关系的实证分析》,《中国工业经济》第7期,第91~101页。
[10] 张学勇和廖理,2010,《股权分置改革, 自愿性信息披露与公司治理》,《经济研究》第4期,第28~39页。
[4] 李春涛和宋敏,2010,《中国制造业企业的创新活动: 所有制和 CEO 激励的作用》,《经济研究》第5期,第55~67页。
[5] 廖理、沈红波和郦金梁,2008,《股权分置改革与上市公司治理的实证研究》,《中国工业经济》第5期,第99~108页。
[6] 温军和冯根福,2012,《异质机构, 企业性质与自主创新》,《经济研究》第3期,第53~64页。
[7] 谢赤、张太原和曾志坚,2007,《中国股票市场存在流动性溢价吗?——股票市场流动性对预期收益率影响的实证研究》,《管理世界》第11期,第36~47页。
[8] 徐欣和唐清泉,2010,《财务分析师跟踪与企业R&D活动——来自中国证券市场的研究》,《金融研究》第12期,第173~189页。
[9] 张慧莲,2009,《股权分置改革前后股指波动性测度及原因分析》,《金融研究》第5期,第84~92页。
[10] 张学勇和廖理,2010,《股权分置改革, 自愿性信息披露与公司治理》,《经济研究》第4期,第28~39页。
[11] Admati, A. R. and P. Pfleiderer. 2009. “The “Wall Street Walk” and Shareholder Activism: Exit as a Form of Voice”,Review of Financial Studies, 22(7): 2645~2685.
Admati, A. R. and P. Pfleiderer. 2009. “The “Wall Street Walk” and Shareholder Activism: Exit as a Form of Voice”,Review of Financial Studies, 22(7): 2645~2685.
[12] Aghion, P., J. Van Reenen and L. Zingales. 2013. “Innovation and Institutional Ownership”,The American Economic Review, 103(1): 277~304.
Aghion, P., J. Van Reenen and L. Zingales. 2013. “Innovation and Institutional Ownership”,The American Economic Review, 103(1): 277~304.
[13] Bharath, S. T., S. Jayaraman and V. Nagar. 2013. “Exit as Governance: An Empirical Analysis”,The Journal of Finance, 68(6): 2515~2547.
Bharath, S. T., S. Jayaraman and V. Nagar. 2013. “Exit as Governance: An Empirical Analysis”,The Journal of Finance, 68(6): 2515~2547.
[14] Bushee, B. J. 1998. “The Influence of Institutional Investors on Myopic R&D Investment Behavior”,Accounting review, 74(3): 305~333.
Bushee, B. J. 1998. “The Influence of Institutional Investors on Myopic R&D Investment Behavior”,Accounting review, 74(3): 305~333.
[15] Bushee, B. J. 2001. “Do Institutional Investors Prefer near‐Term Earnings over Long‐Run Value?*”,Contemporary Accounting Research, 18(2): 207~246.
Bushee, B. J. 2001. “Do Institutional Investors Prefer near‐Term Earnings over Long‐Run Value?*”,Contemporary Accounting Research, 18(2): 207~246.
[16] Chaganti, R. and F. Damanpour. 1991. “Institutional Ownership, Capital Structure, and Firm Performance”,Strategic Management Journal, 12(7): 479~491.
Chaganti, R. and F. Damanpour. 1991. “Institutional Ownership, Capital Structure, and Firm Performance”,Strategic Management Journal, 12(7): 479~491.
[17] Chemmanur, T. and X. Tian. (2012).Do Anti-Takeover Provisions Spur Corporate Innovation? Paper presented at the AFA 2012 Chicago Meetings Paper.
Chemmanur, T. and X. Tian. (2012).Do Anti-Takeover Provisions Spur Corporate Innovation? Paper presented at the AFA 2012 Chicago Meetings Paper.
[18] Chen, Q., X. Chen and K. Schipper, et al. 2012. “The Sensitivity of Corporate Cash Holdings to Corporate Governance”,Review of Financial Studies, 25(12): 3610~3644.
Chen, Q., X. Chen and K. Schipper, et al. 2012. “The Sensitivity of Corporate Cash Holdings to Corporate Governance”,Review of Financial Studies, 25(12): 3610~3644.
[19] Chordia, T., R. Roll and A. Subrahmanyam. 2001. “Market Liquidity and Trading Activity”,The Journal of Finance, 56(2): 501~530.
Chordia, T., R. Roll and A. Subrahmanyam. 2001. “Market Liquidity and Trading Activity”,The Journal of Finance, 56(2): 501~530.
[20] David, P., J. P. O'Brien and T. Yoshikawa. 2008. “The Implications of Debt Heterogeneity for R&D Investment and Firm Performance”,Academy of Management Journal, 51(1): 165~181.
David, P., J. P. O'Brien and T. Yoshikawa. 2008. “The Implications of Debt Heterogeneity for R&D Investment and Firm Performance”,Academy of Management Journal, 51(1): 165~181.
[21] Desyllas, P. and A. Hughes. 2010. “Do High Technology Acquirers Become More Innovative?”,Research Policy, 39(8): 1105~1121.
Desyllas, P. and A. Hughes. 2010. “Do High Technology Acquirers Become More Innovative?”,Research Policy, 39(8): 1105~1121.
[22] Edmans, A. 2009. “Blockholder Trading, Market Efficiency, and Managerial Myopia”,The Journal of Finance, 64(6): 2481~2513.
Edmans, A. 2009. “Blockholder Trading, Market Efficiency, and Managerial Myopia”,The Journal of Finance, 64(6): 2481~2513.
[23] Edmans, A., V. W. Fang and E. Zur. 2013. “The Effect of Liquidity on Governance”,Review of Financial Studies, 26(6): 1443~1482.
Edmans, A., V. W. Fang and E. Zur. 2013. “The Effect of Liquidity on Governance”,Review of Financial Studies, 26(6): 1443~1482.
[24] Edmans, A. and G. Manso. 2011. “Governance through Trading and Intervention: A Theory of Multiple Blockholders”,Review of Financial Studies, 24(7): 2395~2428.
Edmans, A. and G. Manso. 2011. “Governance through Trading and Intervention: A Theory of Multiple Blockholders”,Review of Financial Studies, 24(7): 2395~2428.
[25] Fang, V. W., T. H. Noe and S. Tice. 2009. “Stock Market Liquidity and Firm Value”,Journal of Financial Economics, 94(1): 150~169.
Fang, V. W., T. H. Noe and S. Tice. 2009. “Stock Market Liquidity and Firm Value”,Journal of Financial Economics, 94(1): 150~169.
[26] Fang, V. W., X. Tian and S. Tice. 2014. “Does Stock Liquidity Enhance or Impede Firm Innovation?”,The Journal of Finance, 69(5): 2085~2125.
Fang, V. W., X. Tian and S. Tice. 2014. “Does Stock Liquidity Enhance or Impede Firm Innovation?”,The Journal of Finance, 69(5): 2085~2125.
[27] Goyenko, R. Y., C. W. Holden and C. A. Trzcinka. 2009. “Do Liquidity Measures Measure Liquidity?”,Journal of Financial Economics, 92(2): 153~181.
Goyenko, R. Y., C. W. Holden and C. A. Trzcinka. 2009. “Do Liquidity Measures Measure Liquidity?”,Journal of Financial Economics, 92(2): 153~181.
[28] Graham, J. R., C. R. Harvey and S. Rajgopal. 2005. “The Economic Implications of Corporate Financial Reporting”,Journal of accounting and economics, 40(1): 3~73.
Graham, J. R., C. R. Harvey and S. Rajgopal. 2005. “The Economic Implications of Corporate Financial Reporting”,Journal of accounting and economics, 40(1): 3~73.
[29] Hasbrouck, J. 2009. “Trading Costs and Returns for Us Equities: Estimating Effective Costs from Daily Data”,The Journal of Finance, 64(3): 1445~1477.
Hasbrouck, J. 2009. “Trading Costs and Returns for Us Equities: Estimating Effective Costs from Daily Data”,The Journal of Finance, 64(3): 1445~1477.
[30] Hausman, J., B. H. Hall and Z. Griliches. 1984. “Econometric Models for Count Data with an Application to the Patents-R&D Relationship”,Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 52(4): 909~938.
Hausman, J., B. H. Hall and Z. Griliches. 1984. “Econometric Models for Count Data with an Application to the Patents-R&D Relationship”,Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 52(4): 909~938.
[31] He, J. J. and X. Tian. 2013. “The Dark Side of Analyst Coverage: The Case of Innovation”,Journal of Financial Economics, 109(3): 856~878.
He, J. J. and X. Tian. 2013. “The Dark Side of Analyst Coverage: The Case of Innovation”,Journal of Financial Economics, 109(3): 856~878.
[32] Hirshleifer, D., P.-H. Hsu and D. Li. 2013. “Innovative Efficiency and Stock Returns”,Journal of Financial Economics, 107(3): 632~654.
Hirshleifer, D., P.-H. Hsu and D. Li. 2013. “Innovative Efficiency and Stock Returns”,Journal of Financial Economics, 107(3): 632~654.
[33] Huang, W. and T. Zhu. 2015. “Foreign Institutional Investors and Corporate Governance in Emerging Markets: Evidence of a Split-Share Structure Reform in China”,Journal of Corporate Finance, 32: 312~326.
Huang, W. and T. Zhu. 2015. “Foreign Institutional Investors and Corporate Governance in Emerging Markets: Evidence of a Split-Share Structure Reform in China”,Journal of Corporate Finance, 32: 312~326.
[34] Kyle, A. S. and J.-L. Vila. 1991. “Noise Trading and Takeovers”,The RAND Journal of Economics, 22(1): 54~71.
Kyle, A. S. and J.-L. Vila. 1991. “Noise Trading and Takeovers”,The RAND Journal of Economics, 22(1): 54~71.
[35] Li, K.,T. Wang and Y.-L. Cheung, et al. 2011. “Privatization and Risk Sharing: Evidence from the Split Share Structure Reform in China”,Review of Financial Studies, 24(7): 2499~2525.
Li, K.,T. Wang and Y.-L. Cheung, et al. 2011. “Privatization and Risk Sharing: Evidence from the Split Share Structure Reform in China”,Review of Financial Studies, 24(7): 2499~2525.
[36] Liao, L., B. Liu and H. Wang. 2014. “China's Secondary Privatization: Perspectives from the Split-Share Structure Reform”,Journal of Financial Economics, 113(3): 500~518.
Liao, L., B. Liu and H. Wang. 2014. “China's Secondary Privatization: Perspectives from the Split-Share Structure Reform”,Journal of Financial Economics, 113(3): 500~518.
[37] Liu, C., K. Uchida and Y. Yang. 2014. “Controlling Shareholder, Split-Share Structure Reform and Cash Dividend Payments in China”,International Review of Economics & Finance, 29: 339~357.
Liu, C., K. Uchida and Y. Yang. 2014. “Controlling Shareholder, Split-Share Structure Reform and Cash Dividend Payments in China”,International Review of Economics & Finance, 29: 339~357.
[38] Liu, Q. and G. Tian. 2012. “Controlling Shareholder, Expropriations and Firm's Leverage Decision: Evidence from Chinese Non-Tradable Share Reform”,Journal of Corporate Finance, 18(4): 782~803.
Liu, Q. and G. Tian. 2012. “Controlling Shareholder, Expropriations and Firm's Leverage Decision: Evidence from Chinese Non-Tradable Share Reform”,Journal of Corporate Finance, 18(4): 782~803.
[39] Maug, E. 1998. “Large Shareholders as Monitors: Is There a Trade‐Off between Liquidity and Control?”,The Journal of Finance, 53(1): 65~98.
Maug, E. 1998. “Large Shareholders as Monitors: Is There a Trade‐Off between Liquidity and Control?”,The Journal of Finance, 53(1): 65~98.
[40] Norli, O., C. Ostergaard and I. Schindele. (2010). “Liquidity and Shareholder Activism”. Paper presented at the EFA 2009 Bergen Meetings Paper.
Norli, O., C. Ostergaard and I. Schindele. (2010). “Liquidity and Shareholder Activism”. Paper presented at the EFA 2009 Bergen Meetings Paper.
[41] Porter, M. 1992. “Capital Disadvantage: America's Failing Capital Investment System”,Harvard business review, 70(5): 65~82.
Porter, M. 1992. “Capital Disadvantage: America's Failing Capital Investment System”,Harvard business review, 70(5): 65~82.
[42] Shleifer, A. and L. H. Summers. (1988). Breach of Trust in Hostile TakeoversCorporate Takeovers: Causes and Consequences: 33~68.
Shleifer, A. and L. H. Summers. (1988). Breach of Trust in Hostile TakeoversCorporate Takeovers: Causes and Consequences: 33~68.
[43] Stein, J. C. 1988. “Takeover Threats and Managerial Myopia”,The Journal of Political Economy, 96(1): 61~80.
Stein, J. C. 1988. “Takeover Threats and Managerial Myopia”,The Journal of Political Economy, 96(1): 61~80.
[44] Stein, J. C. 1989. “Efficient Capital Markets, Inefficient Firms: A Model of Myopic Corporate Behavior”,The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 104(4): 655~669.
Stein, J. C. 1989. “Efficient Capital Markets, Inefficient Firms: A Model of Myopic Corporate Behavior”,The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 104(4): 655~669.
[45] Yeh, Y. H., P. G. Shu and T. S. Lee, et al. 2009. “Non‐Tradable Share Reform and Corporate Governance in the Chinese Stock Market”,Corporate governance: an international review, 17(4): 457~475.
Yeh, Y. H., P. G. Shu and T. S. Lee, et al. 2009. “Non‐Tradable Share Reform and Corporate Governance in the Chinese Stock Market”,Corporate governance: an international review, 17(4): 457~475.
[1] 鲁元平, 张克中, 欧阳洁. 土地财政阻碍了区域技术创新吗?——基于267个地级市面板数据的实证检验[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 455(5): 101-119.
[2] 陈辉, 顾乃康. 新三板做市商制度、股票流动性与证券价值[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 442(4): 176-190.
[3] 林莞娟, 王辉, 韩涛. 股权分置改革对国有控股比例以及企业绩效影响的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 427(1): 192-206.
[4] 孔东民, 王亚男, 代昀昊. 为何企业上市降低了生产效率?——基于制度激励视角的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2015, 421(7): 76-97.
[1] 王曦, 朱立挺, 王凯立. 我国货币政策是否关注资产价格?——基于马尔科夫区制转换BEKK多元GARCH模型[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 1 -17 .
[2] 刘勇政, 李岩. 中国的高速铁路建设与城市经济增长[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 18 -33 .
[3] 况伟大, 王琪琳. 房价波动、房贷规模与银行资本充足率[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 34 -48 .
[4] 祝树金, 赵玉龙. 资源错配与企业的出口行为——基于中国工业企业数据的经验研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 49 -64 .
[5] 陈德球, 陈运森, 董志勇. 政策不确定性、市场竞争与资本配置[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 65 -80 .
[6] 牟敦果, 王沛英. 中国能源价格内生性研究及货币政策选择分析[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 81 -95 .
[7] 高铭, 江嘉骏, 陈佳, 刘玉珍. 谁说女子不如儿郎?——P2P投资行为与过度自信[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 96 -111 .
[8] 吕若思, 刘青, 黄灿, 胡海燕, 卢进勇. 外资在华并购是否改善目标企业经营绩效?——基于企业层面的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 112 -127 .
[9] 姜军, 申丹琳, 江轩宇, 伊志宏. 债权人保护与企业创新[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 128 -142 .
[10] 刘莎莎, 孔高文. 信息搜寻、个人投资者交易与股价联动异象——基于股票送转的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 143 -157 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1