Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2018, Vol. 457 Issue (7): 158-173    
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
企业避税的战略效应——基于避税对企业产品市场绩效的影响研究
刘行, 吕长江
东北财经大学会计学院/中国内部控制研究中心,辽宁大连 116025;
复旦大学管理学院,上海 200433
Strategic Effect of Tax Avoidance: The Causal Impact of Tax Avoidance on Firms' Product Market Performance
LIU Hang, LV Changjiang
School of Accountancy, Dongbei University of Finance and Economics;
School of Management, Fudan University
下载:  PDF (1439KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 自企业避税被纳入公司治理框架以来,已有文献对于企业避税的认识存在明显差异,本文试图从避税对企业产品市场绩效的影响视角,研究避税在企业中的角色。基于我国A股上市公司样本,我们发现,与竞争者相比,企业的所得税避税程度每提高1个标准差,其未来的行业市场份额将增长1.9%。这一结论表明,避税会帮助企业建立竞争优势,从而意味着企业的避税行为具有战略效应。此外,避税的战略效应在融资约束严重的企业更为显著,但避税的战略效应并不受信息透明度、代理冲突与产权性质的影响。最后,避税对产品市场绩效的影响具有一定的持续性。本文从理论与实证上厘清了现有文献的冲突,也有一定的政策性启示。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
刘行
吕长江
关键词:  企业避税  产品市场竞争  市场份额  融资约束    
Abstract:  There are significant differences among the review of literature on the tax since the tax was taken into corporate governance framework. This paper tries to study the roles of tax from its impacts on corporate product market performance. Based on samples of Chinese A-share listed firms, we find increasing tax avoidance will improve corporate competitive power significantly, one standard deviation increase in corporate income tax avoidance in relation to rivals leads to a 1.9% gain in future market share. In addition, such an impact is concentrated in firms facing tighter financing constraints, while such an impact does not affected by information asymmetry, agency conflict and ownership structure. Finally, the impact of tax avoidance on product market performance can persist. Conclusions of this paper extend current literature and have policy implications.
Key words:  Tax Avoidance    Product Market Competition    Market Share    Financing Constraints
JEL分类号:  G32   H25   H26   L11  
基金资助: 本文得到国家自科基金(71402017、71772029)的资助。
作者简介:  刘 行,会计学博士,副教授,东北财经大学会计学院/中国内部控制研究中心,Email: liuhangruc@gmail.com.
吕长江,经济学博士,教授,复旦大学管理学院,Email: cjlu@fudan.edu.cn.
刘 行(通讯作者),会计学博士,副教授,东北财经大学会计学院/中国内部控制研究中心,Email: liuhangruc@gmail.com.
引用本文:    
刘行, 吕长江. 企业避税的战略效应——基于避税对企业产品市场绩效的影响研究[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 457(7): 158-173.
LIU Hang, LV Changjiang. Strategic Effect of Tax Avoidance: The Causal Impact of Tax Avoidance on Firms' Product Market Performance. Journal of Financial Research, 2018, 457(7): 158-173.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2018/V457/I7/158
[1] 陈冬、范蕊和梁上坤,2016,《谁动了上市公司的壳?——地方保护主义与上市公司壳交易》,《金融研究》第7期,第176~190页。
[2] 迈克尔·波特:《竞争战略:分析产业和竞争者的技巧》(陈小悦译),1980,华夏出版社1997年出版。
[3] 樊纲、王小鲁和朱恒鹏:《中国市场化指数——各地区市场化指数相对进程 2009 年报告》,2010,经济科学出版社。
[4] 刘行和叶康涛,2013,《企业的避税活动会影响投资效率吗?》,《会计研究》第6期,第47~53页。
[5] 陆正飞和韩非池,2013,《宏观经济政策如何影响公司现金持有的经济效应?——基于产品市场和资本市场两重角度的研究》,《管理世界》第6期,第43~60页。
[6] 屈耀辉、姜付秀和陈朝晖,2007,《资本结构决策具有战略效应吗?》,《管理世界》第2期,第69~75页。
[7] 王亮亮,2016,《金融危机冲击、融资约束与公司避税》,《南开管理评论》第1期,第155~168页。
[8] 王小鲁、樊纲和余静文:《中国分省份市场化指数报告》,2016,社会科学文献出版社。
[9] 吴联生,2009,《国有股权、税收优惠与公司税负》,《经济研究》第10期,第109~120页。
[10] 叶康涛和刘行,2014,《公司避税活动与内部代理成本》,《金融研究》第9期,第158~176页。
[11] 张会丽和吴有红,2012,《超额现金持有水平与产品市场竞争优势——来自中国上市公司的经验证据》,《金融研究》第2期,第183~195页。
[12] Balakrishnan, K., J. Blouin and W. Guay, 2012, “Does Tax Aggressiveness Reduce Corporate Transparency?”, Working Paper.
[13] Bauer, A. M., J. Fang, J. Pittman, Y. Zhang and Y. Zhao, 2015, “The Importance of Aggressive Tax Planning to the Diversion of Corporate Resources: Evidence from Chinese Public Firms”, Working Paper.
[14] Bertrand, M. and S. Mullainathan, 2001, “Are CEOs Rewarded for Luck? The Ones Without Principals Are”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(3): 901~932.
[15] Bolton, P. and D. S. Scharfstein, 1990, “A Theory of Predation Based on Agency Problems in Financial Contracting”, American Economic Review, 80(1): 93~106.
[16] Brander, J. A. and T. R. Lewis, 1986, “Oligopoly and Financial Structure: The Limited Liability Effect”, American Economic Review, 76(5): 956~970.
[17] Campello, M., 2003, “Capital Structure and Product Markets Interactions: Evidence from Business Cycles”, Journal of Financial Economics, 68(3): 353~378.
[18] Campello, M., 2006, “Debt Financing: Does it Boost or Hurt Firm Performance in Product Markets?”, Journal of Financial Economics, 82(1): 135~172.
[19] Chen, K.-P. and C. Y. C. Chu, 2005, “Internal Control versus External Manipulation: A Model of Corporate Income Tax Evasion”, RAND Journal of Economics, 36(1): 151~164.
[20] Chen, S., X. Chen, Q. Cheng and T. Shevlin, 2010, “Are Family Firms more Tax Aggressive than Non-Family Firms?”, Journal of Financial Economics, 95(1): 41~61.
[21] Chevalier, J. A., 1995, “Capital Structure and Product-Market Competition: Empirical Evidence from the Supermarket Industry”, American Economic Review, 98(3): 415~435.
[22] Chevalier, J. A. and D. S. Scharfstein, 1996, “Capital-Market Imperfections and Countercyclical Markups: Theory and Evidence”, American Economic Review, 86(4): 703~725.
[23] Crocker, K. J. and J. Slemrod, 2005, “Corporate Tax Evasion with Agency Costs”, Journal of Public Economics, 89(9-10): 1593~1610.
[24] Dechow, P. M. and I. D. Dichev, 2002, “The Quality of Accruals and Earnings: The Role of Accrual Estimation Errors”, The Accounting Review, 89(s-1): 35~59.
[25] Dechow, P. M., R. G. Sloan and A. P. Sweeney, 1995, “Detecting Earnings Management”, The Accounting Review, 70(2): 193~225.
[26] Desai, M. and D. Dharmapala, 2009, “Corporate Tax Avoidance and Firm Value”, Review of Economics and Statistics, 91(3): 537~546.
[27] Desai, M. and D. Dharmapala, 2006, “Corporate Tax Avoidance and High-Powered Incentives”, Journal of Financial Economics, 79(1): 145~179.
[28] Desai, M., A. Dyck and L. Zingales, 2007, “Theft and Taxes”, Journal of Financial Economics, 84(3): 591~623.
[29] Donaldson, G., 1984, Managing Corporate Wealth, New York: Praegar.
[30] Donohoe, M. P. and W. R. Knechel, 2014, “Does Corporate Tax Aggressiveness Influence Audit Pricing?”, Contemporary Accounting Research, 31(1): 284~308.
[31] Fresard, L., 2010, “Financial Strength and Product Market Behavior: The Real Effects of Corporate Cash Holdings”, Journal of Finance, 65(3): 1097~1122.
[32] Hanlon,M.and S.Heitzman,2010,“A Review of Tax Research”,Journal of Accounting and Economics,50(2-3):127~178.
[33] Hanlon, M. and J. Slemrod, 2009, “What Does Tax Aggressiveness Signal? Evidence from Stock Price Reactions to News about Tax Shelter Involvement”, Journal of Public Economics, 93(1-2): 126~141.
[34] Hasan, I., C. K. Hoi, Q. Wu and H. Zhang, 2014, “Beauty is in the Eye of the Beholder: The Effect of Corporate Tax Avoidance on the Cost of Bank Loans”, Journal of Financial Economics, 113(1): 109~130.
[35] Hoberg, G., G. Phillips and N. Prabhala, 2014, “Product Market Threats, Payouts, and Financial Flexibility”, Journal of Finance, 69(1): 293~324.
[36] Kim, J.-B., Y. Li and L. Zhang, 2011, “Corporate Tax Avoidance and Stock Price Crash Risk: Firm-Level Analysis”, Journal of Financial Economics, 100(3): 639~662.
[37] Kovenock, D. and G. M. Phillips, 1997, “Capital Structure and Product Market Behavior: An Examination of Plant Exit and Investment Decisions”, Review of Financial Studies, 10(3): 767~803.
[38] Law, K. K. F. and L. F. Mills, 2015, “Taxes and Financial Constraints: Evidence from Linguistic Cues”, Journal of Accounting Research, 53(4): 777~819.
[39] Rajan, R. G. and L. Zingales, 1998, “Financial Dependence and Growth”,American Economic Review,88(3):559~586.
[40] Richardson, G., R. Lanis and G. Taylor, 2015, “Financial Distress, Outside Directors and Corporate Tax Aggressiveness Spanning the Global Financial Crisis: An Empirical Analysis”, Journal of Banking & Finance, 52(3): 112~129.
[41] Telser, L. G., 1966, “Cutthroat Competition and the Long Purse”, Journal of Law & Economics, 9(1): 259~277.
[1] 徐明东, 陈学彬. 中国上市企业投资的资本成本敏感性估计[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 470(8): 113-132.
[2] 蔡卫星. 银行业市场结构对企业生产率的影响——来自工业企业的经验证据[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 466(4): 39-55.
[3] 余明桂, 钟慧洁, 范蕊. 民营化、融资约束与企业创新——来自中国工业企业的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 466(4): 75-91.
[4] 魏浩, 白明浩, 郭也. 融资约束与中国企业的进口行为[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 464(2): 98-116.
[5] 钱雪松, 徐建利, 杜立. 中国委托贷款弥补了正规信贷不足吗?[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 455(5): 82-100.
[6] 曹春方, 张婷婷, 刘秀梅. 市场分割提升了国企产品市场竞争地位?[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 453(3): 121-136.
[7] 黎文靖, 李茫茫. “实体+金融”:融资约束、政策迎合还是市场竞争?——基于不同产权性质视角的经验研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 446(8): 100-116.
[8] 刘啟仁, 黄建忠. 人民币汇率变动与出口企业研发[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 446(8): 19-34.
[9] 吕越, 吕云龙, 包群. 融资约束与企业增加值贸易——基于全球价值链视角的微观证据[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 443(5): 63-80.
[10] 张璇, 王鑫, 刘碧. 吃喝费用、融资约束与企业出口行为——世行中国企业调查数据的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 443(5): 176-190.
[11] 戴严科, 林曙. 利率波动、融资约束与存货投资——来自中国制造业企业的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 442(4): 95-111.
[12] 张海洋. 融资约束下金融互助模式的演进——从民间金融到网络借贷[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 441(3): 101-115.
[13] 祝树金, 赵玉龙. 资源错配与企业的出口行为——基于中国工业企业数据的经验研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 49-64.
[14] 黄宏斌, 翟淑萍, 陈静楠. 企业生命周期、融资方式与融资约束——基于投资者情绪调节效应的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 433(7): 96-112.
[15] 吕越, 罗伟, 刘斌. 融资约束与制造业的全球价值链跃升[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 432(6): 81-96.
[1] 王曦, 朱立挺, 王凯立. 我国货币政策是否关注资产价格?——基于马尔科夫区制转换BEKK多元GARCH模型[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 1 -17 .
[2] 刘勇政, 李岩. 中国的高速铁路建设与城市经济增长[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 18 -33 .
[3] 况伟大, 王琪琳. 房价波动、房贷规模与银行资本充足率[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 34 -48 .
[4] 祝树金, 赵玉龙. 资源错配与企业的出口行为——基于中国工业企业数据的经验研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 49 -64 .
[5] 陈德球, 陈运森, 董志勇. 政策不确定性、市场竞争与资本配置[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 65 -80 .
[6] 牟敦果, 王沛英. 中国能源价格内生性研究及货币政策选择分析[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 81 -95 .
[7] 高铭, 江嘉骏, 陈佳, 刘玉珍. 谁说女子不如儿郎?——P2P投资行为与过度自信[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 96 -111 .
[8] 吕若思, 刘青, 黄灿, 胡海燕, 卢进勇. 外资在华并购是否改善目标企业经营绩效?——基于企业层面的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 112 -127 .
[9] 姜军, 申丹琳, 江轩宇, 伊志宏. 债权人保护与企业创新[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 128 -142 .
[10] 刘莎莎, 孔高文. 信息搜寻、个人投资者交易与股价联动异象——基于股票送转的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 143 -157 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1