Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2017, Vol. 441 Issue (3): 159-175    DOI: 10.12094/1002-7246(2017)03-0159-17
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
创新能力对上市公司并购业绩的影响
张学勇, 柳依依, 罗丹, 陈锐
中央财经大学金融学院, 北京 100081
The Impact of Innovation on Acquisition Performance
ZHANG Xueyong, LIU Yiyi, LUO Dan, CHEN Rui
School of Finance, Central University of Finance and Economics
下载:  PDF (1306KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 近年来,获得目标公司的创新技术逐渐成为并购的重要动机之一。本文实证考察了1998-2015年中国上市公司作为并购方的7086件股权并购事件,研究并购双方的创新能力对上市公司并购业绩的影响。实证研究发现,从目标公司的创新能力来看,相对于并购非创新性公司,那些并购创新性公司的并购方股票的长、短期收益率均表现更好;从并购方公司创新能力来看,那些具有创新能力并购方的股票长期表现较好,但短期表现与那些无创新能力的并购方公司无显著差异。我们进一步将样本按照并购双方有无创新能力划分为四个组合,发现“并购方无专利-目标方有专利”和“并购方有专利-目标方有专利”组合的并购表现整体好于另两个并购组合,说明并购中目标方的创新能力才是决定并购方公司股票市场表现的关键。不过,当并购方也具有创新能力时,会有助于产生创新协同效应,从而提升并购方股票的长期表现。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
张学勇
柳依依
罗丹
陈锐
关键词:  并购业绩  专利  事件研究法    
Abstract:  In recent years, accessing to the target's technology is becoming one of the important motives of M&A. Using a large patent-merger data in Chinese stock markets over the period of 1998 to 2015, and applying event study, calendar time portfolio method and multiple regression model, we find that key factor of promoting acquisition performance is the target innovation. (1) We show that acquirers that acquiring innovative target will get significant higher CAR and BHAR; (2) In the long run, while innovative acquirers gain more returns, in the short run, their performance has no significant difference with those non-innovative acquirers. (3) According to whether targets and acquirers have patent’s application before M&A, we divided our sample into four groups and find acquisitions featured as “innovative acquirer-innovative target” and “non-innovative acquirer-innovative target” relatively have higher returns compared to other groups. However, when the acquirer is also innovative, it can help to produce innovation synergy which promote the long-term acquisition performance; a finding of considerable importance for corporate managers and investors.
Key words:  Acquisition Performance    Patents    Event Study
JEL分类号:  G34   O31   O32  
基金资助: 国家自然科学基金(71673318,71602198)和中央财经大学青年科研创新团队支持计划
作者简介:  张学勇,经济学博士,教授,中央财经大学金融学院,Email:zhangxueyong@cufe.edu.cn.柳依依,中央财经大学金融学院研究生,Email:willowyiyi@163.com.罗丹,中央财经大学金融学院研究生,Email:luodan1512004@163.com.陈锐,中央财经大学金融学院讲师,Email:r.chen@cufe.edu.cn.
引用本文:    
张学勇, 柳依依, 罗丹, 陈锐. 创新能力对上市公司并购业绩的影响[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 441(3): 159-175.
ZHANG Xueyong, LIU Yiyi, LUO Dan, CHEN Rui. The Impact of Innovation on Acquisition Performance. Journal of Financial Research, 2017, 441(3): 159-175.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/10.12094/1002-7246(2017)03-0159-17  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2017/V441/I3/159
[1] 纪宣明,2004,《技术创新,制度创新与企业发展:厦新电子扭亏个案研究》,《金融研究》第9期,第163~169页。
[2] 赖步连、杨继东和周业安,2006,《异质波动与并购绩效——基于中国上市公司的实证研究》,《金融研究》第12期,第126~139页。
[1] 纪宣明,2004,《技术创新,制度创新与企业发展:厦新电子扭亏个案研究》,《金融研究》第9期,第163~169页。
[2] 赖步连、杨继东和周业安,2006,《异质波动与并购绩效——基于中国上市公司的实证研究》,《金融研究》第12期,第126~139页。
[3] 李善民和陈玉罡,2002,《上市公司兼并与收购的财富效应》,《经济研究》第11期,第27~35页。
李善民和陈玉罡,2002,《上市公司兼并与收购的财富效应》,《经济研究》第11期,第27~35页。
[4] 陆国庆,2011,《中国中小板上市公司产业创新的绩效研究》,《经济研究》第2期,第138~148页。
陆国庆,2011,《中国中小板上市公司产业创新的绩效研究》,《经济研究》第2期,第138~148页。
[5] 吕一博、苏敬勤和傅宇,2008,《中国中小企业成长的影响因素研究——基于中国东北地区中小企业的实证研究》,《中国工业经济》第1期,第14~23页。
吕一博、苏敬勤和傅宇,2008,《中国中小企业成长的影响因素研究——基于中国东北地区中小企业的实证研究》,《中国工业经济》第1期,第14~23页。
[6] 温成玉和刘志新,2011,《技术并购对高技术上市公司创新绩效的影响》,《科研管理》第5期,第1~7页。
温成玉和刘志新,2011,《技术并购对高技术上市公司创新绩效的影响》,《科研管理》第5期,第1~7页。
[7] 翟进步、贾宁和李丹,2010,《中国上市公司收购兼并的市场预期绩效实现了吗?》,《金融研究》第5期,第133~151页。
[8] 张学勇和张叶青,2016,《风险投资、创新能力与公司IPO的市场表现》,《经济研究》第10期,第112~125页。
[7] 翟进步、贾宁和李丹,2010,《中国上市公司收购兼并的市场预期绩效实现了吗?》,《金融研究》第5期,第133~151页。
[9] 张峥和聂思,2016,《中国制造业上市公司并购创新绩效研究》,《科研管理》第37期,第36~43页。
[8] 张学勇和张叶青,2016,《风险投资、创新能力与公司IPO的市场表现》,《经济研究》第10期,第112~125页。
[9] 张峥和聂思,2016,《中国制造业上市公司并购创新绩效研究》,《科研管理》第37期,第36~43页。
[10] 周煊、程立茹和王皓,2012,《技术创新水平越高企业财务绩效越好吗?——基于 16 年中国制药上市公司专利申请数据的实证研究》,《金融研究》第8期,第166~179页。
周煊、程立茹和王皓,2012,《技术创新水平越高企业财务绩效越好吗?——基于 16 年中国制药上市公司专利申请数据的实证研究》,《金融研究》第8期,第166~179页。
[11] 周亚虹、贺小丹和沈瑶,2012,《中国工业企业自主创新的影响因素和产出绩效研究》,《经济研究》第5期,第107~119页。
周亚虹、贺小丹和沈瑶,2012,《中国工业企业自主创新的影响因素和产出绩效研究》,《经济研究》第5期,第107~119页。
[12] Ahuja, Gautam, and Riitta Katila. 2001. “Technological Acquisitions and the Innovation Performance of Acquiring Firms: A Longitudinal Study.” Strategic Management Journal, 22(3): 197~220.
Ahuja, Gautam, and Riitta Katila. 2001. “Technological Acquisitions and the Innovation Performance of Acquiring Firms: A Longitudinal Study.” Strategic Management Journal, 22(3): 197~220.
[13] Ang, James S., and Chaopeng Wu. 2011. “The Role of Technological Synergy in Mergers and Acquisitions.” Available at SSRN 2024805.
Ang, James S., and Chaopeng Wu. 2011. “The Role of Technological Synergy in Mergers and Acquisitions.” Available at SSRN 2024805.
[14] Barber, Brad M., and John D. Lyon. 1997. “Detecting Long-run Abnormal Stock Returns: The Empirical Power and Specification of Test Statistics.” Journal of Financial Economics, 43(3): 341~372.
Barber, Brad M., and John D. Lyon. 1997. “Detecting Long-run Abnormal Stock Returns: The Empirical Power and Specification of Test Statistics.” Journal of Financial Economics, 43(3): 341~372.
[15] Bayus, Barry L., Gary Erickson, and Robert Jacobson. 2003. “The Financial Rewards of New Product Introductions in the Personal Computer Cndustry.” Management Science, 49(2): 197~210.
Bayus, Barry L., Gary Erickson, and Robert Jacobson. 2003. “The Financial Rewards of New Product Introductions in the Personal Computer Cndustry.” Management Science, 49(2): 197~210.
[16] Bena, Jan, and Kai Li. 2014. “Corporate Innovations and Mergers and Acquisitions.” The Journal of Finance, 69(5): 1923~1960.
Bena, Jan, and Kai Li. 2014. “Corporate Innovations and Mergers and Acquisitions.” The Journal of Finance, 69(5): 1923~1960.
[17] Cefis, Elena, and Orietta Marsili. 2015. “Crossing the Innovation Threshold through Mergers and Acquisitions.” Research Policy, 44(3): 698~710.
Cefis, Elena, and Orietta Marsili. 2015. “Crossing the Innovation Threshold through Mergers and Acquisitions.” Research Policy, 44(3): 698~710.
[18] Chan, Su Han, John D. Martin, and John W. Kensinger. 1990. “Corporate Research and Development Expenditures and Share Value.” Journal of Financial Economics, 26(2): 255~276.
Chan, Su Han, John D. Martin, and John W. Kensinger. 1990. “Corporate Research and Development Expenditures and Share Value.” Journal of Financial Economics, 26(2): 255~276.
[19] Clark, Kim. “Investment in New Technology and Competitive Advantage. 1987.” The Competitive Challenge, 59(82): 543~565.
Clark, Kim. “Investment in New Technology and Competitive Advantage. 1987.” The Competitive Challenge, 59(82): 543~565.
[20] Cloodt, Myriam, John Hagedoorn, and Hans Van Kranenburg. 2006. “Mergers and Acquisitions: Their Effect on the Innovative Performance of Companies in High-tech Industries.” Research Policy, 35(5): 642~654.
Cloodt, Myriam, John Hagedoorn, and Hans Van Kranenburg. 2006. “Mergers and Acquisitions: Their Effect on the Innovative Performance of Companies in High-tech Industries.” Research Policy, 35(5): 642~654.
[21] Coad, Alex, and Rekha Rao. 2008. “Innovation and Firm Growth in High-tech Sectors: A quantile Regression Approach.” Research Policy, 37(4): 633~648.
Coad, Alex, and Rekha Rao. 2008. “Innovation and Firm Growth in High-tech Sectors: A quantile Regression Approach.” Research Policy, 37(4): 633~648.
[22] Cohen, Wesley M., and Daniel A. Levinthal. 1990. “Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation.” Administrative Science Quarterly: 128~152.
Cohen, Wesley M., and Daniel A. Levinthal. 1990. “Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation.” Administrative Science Quarterly: 128~152.
[23] Eberhart, Allan, William Maxwell, and Akhtar Siddique. 2008. “A Reexamination of the Tradeoff between the Future Benefit and Riskiness of R&D Increases.” Journal of Accounting Research, 46(1): 27~52.
Eberhart, Allan, William Maxwell, and Akhtar Siddique. 2008. “A Reexamination of the Tradeoff between the Future Benefit and Riskiness of R&D Increases.” Journal of Accounting Research, 46(1): 27~52.
[24] Entezarkheir, Mahdiyeh, and Saeed Moshiri. 2016. “Mergers and Innovation: Evidence from a Panel of US Firms.” Available at SSRN 2757293.
Entezarkheir, Mahdiyeh, and Saeed Moshiri. 2016. “Mergers and Innovation: Evidence from a Panel of US Firms.” Available at SSRN 2757293.
[25] García-Manjón, Juan V., and M. Elena Romero-Merino. 2012. “Research, Development, and Firm Growth. Empirical Evidence from European top R&D Spending Firms.” Research Policy, 41(6): 1084~1092.
García-Manjón, Juan V., and M. Elena Romero-Merino. 2012. “Research, Development, and Firm Growth. Empirical Evidence from European top R&D Spending Firms.” Research Policy, 41(6): 1084~1092.
[26] Govindarajan, Vijay, and Praveen K. Kopalle. 2006. “Disruptiveness of Innovations: Measurement and an Assessment of Reliability and Validity.” Strategic Management Journal, 27(2): 189~199.
Govindarajan, Vijay, and Praveen K. Kopalle. 2006. “Disruptiveness of Innovations: Measurement and an Assessment of Reliability and Validity.” Strategic Management Journal, 27(2): 189~199.
[27] Hagedoorn, John, and Geert Duysters. 2002. “External Sources of Innovative Capabilities: The Preferences for Strategic Alliances or Mergers and Acquisitions.” Journal of Management Studies, 39(2): 167~188.
Hagedoorn, John, and Geert Duysters. 2002. “External Sources of Innovative Capabilities: The Preferences for Strategic Alliances or Mergers and Acquisitions.” Journal of Management Studies, 39(2): 167~188.
[28] Hall, Bronwyn H., Adam Jaffe, and Manuel Trajtenberg. 2005. “Market Value and Patent Citations.” RAND Journal of economics, 16~38.
Hall, Bronwyn H., Adam Jaffe, and Manuel Trajtenberg. 2005. “Market Value and Patent Citations.” RAND Journal of economics, 16~38.
[29] Hirshleifer, David, Po-Hsuan Hsu, and Dongmei Li. 2013. “Innovative Efficiency and Stock Returns.” Journal of Financial Economics, 107(3): 632~654.
Hirshleifer, David, Po-Hsuan Hsu, and Dongmei Li. 2013. “Innovative Efficiency and Stock Returns.” Journal of Financial Economics, 107(3): 632~654.
[30] Jansen, Justin JP, Frans AJ Van Den Bosch, and Henk W. Volberda. 2006. “Exploratory Innovation, Exploitative Innovation, and Performance: Effects of Organizational Antecedents and Environmental Moderators.” Management Science, 52(11): 1661~1674.
Jansen, Justin JP, Frans AJ Van Den Bosch, and Henk W. Volberda. 2006. “Exploratory Innovation, Exploitative Innovation, and Performance: Effects of Organizational Antecedents and Environmental Moderators.” Management Science, 52(11): 1661~1674.
[31] Lane, Peter J., and Michael Lubatkin. 1998. “Relative Absorptive Capacity and Interorganizational Learning.” Strategic Management Journal, 461~477.
Lane, Peter J., and Michael Lubatkin. 1998. “Relative Absorptive Capacity and Interorganizational Learning.” Strategic Management Journal, 461~477.
[32] Lubatkin, Michael. 1983. “Mergers and the Performance of the Acquiring Firm.” Academy of Management Review, 8(2): 218~225.
Lubatkin, Michael. 1983. “Mergers and the Performance of the Acquiring Firm.” Academy of Management Review, 8(2): 218~225.
[33] Moeller, Sara B., Frederik P. Schlingemann, and René M. Stulz. 2004. “Firm Size and the Sains from Scquisitions.” Journal of Financial Economics, 73(2): 201~228.
Moeller, Sara B., Frederik P. Schlingemann, and René M. Stulz. 2004. “Firm Size and the Sains from Scquisitions.” Journal of Financial Economics, 73(2): 201~228.
[34] Mueller, Dennis C. 1969. “A Theory of Conglomerate Mergers.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 83(4): 643~659.
Mueller, Dennis C. 1969. “A Theory of Conglomerate Mergers.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 83(4): 643~659.
[35] Porter, Michael E. 1985. “Technology and Competitive Advantage.” Journal of Business Strategy, 5(3): 60~78.
Porter, Michael E. 1985. “Technology and Competitive Advantage.” Journal of Business Strategy, 5(3): 60~78.
[36] Roll, Richard. 1986. “The Hubris Hypothesis of Corporate Takeovers.” Journal of Business, 197~216.
Roll, Richard. 1986. “The Hubris Hypothesis of Corporate Takeovers.” Journal of Business, 197~216.
[37] Sevilir, Merih, and Xuan Tian. 2012. “Acquiring Innovation.” AFA 2012 Chicago Meetings Paper.
Sevilir, Merih, and Xuan Tian. 2012. “Acquiring Innovation.” AFA 2012 Chicago Meetings Paper.
[38] Sorescu, Alina B., Rajesh K. Chandy, and Jaideep C. Prabhu. 2007. “Why some acquisitions do better than others: product capital as a driver of long-term stock returns.” Journal of Marketing Research, 44(1): 57~72.
Sorescu, Alina B., Rajesh K. Chandy, and Jaideep C. Prabhu. 2007. “Why some acquisitions do better than others: product capital as a driver of long-term stock returns.” Journal of Marketing Research, 44(1): 57~72.
[1] 龙小宁, 易巍, 林志帆. 知识产权保护的价值有多大?——来自中国上市公司专利数据的经验证据[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 458(8): 120-136.
[2] 王永钦, 陈映辉, 熊雅文. 存款保险制度如何影响公众对不同银行的信心?——来自中国的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 456(6): 109-122.
[3] 杨青, 王亚男, 唐跃军. “限薪令”的政策效果:基于竞争与垄断性央企市场反应的评估[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 451(1): 156-173.
[4] 张劲帆, 李汉涯, 何晖. 企业上市与企业创新——基于中国企业专利申请的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 443(5): 160-175.
[5] 王姝勋, 方红艳, 荣昭. 期权激励会促进公司创新吗?——基于中国上市公司专利产出的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 441(3): 176-191.
[6] 王兰芳, 胡悦. 创业投资促进了创新绩效吗?——基于中国企业面板数据的实证检验[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 439(1): 177-190.
[7] 潘越, 潘健平, 戴亦一. 专利侵权诉讼与企业创新[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 434(8): 191-206.
[1] 王曦, 朱立挺, 王凯立. 我国货币政策是否关注资产价格?——基于马尔科夫区制转换BEKK多元GARCH模型[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 1 -17 .
[2] 刘勇政, 李岩. 中国的高速铁路建设与城市经济增长[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 18 -33 .
[3] 况伟大, 王琪琳. 房价波动、房贷规模与银行资本充足率[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 34 -48 .
[4] 祝树金, 赵玉龙. 资源错配与企业的出口行为——基于中国工业企业数据的经验研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 49 -64 .
[5] 陈德球, 陈运森, 董志勇. 政策不确定性、市场竞争与资本配置[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 65 -80 .
[6] 牟敦果, 王沛英. 中国能源价格内生性研究及货币政策选择分析[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 81 -95 .
[7] 高铭, 江嘉骏, 陈佳, 刘玉珍. 谁说女子不如儿郎?——P2P投资行为与过度自信[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 96 -111 .
[8] 吕若思, 刘青, 黄灿, 胡海燕, 卢进勇. 外资在华并购是否改善目标企业经营绩效?——基于企业层面的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 112 -127 .
[9] 姜军, 申丹琳, 江轩宇, 伊志宏. 债权人保护与企业创新[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 128 -142 .
[10] 刘莎莎, 孔高文. 信息搜寻、个人投资者交易与股价联动异象——基于股票送转的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 143 -157 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1