Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2017, Vol. 441 Issue (3): 176-191    DOI: 10.12094/1002-7246(2017)03-0176-16
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
期权激励会促进公司创新吗?——基于中国上市公司专利产出的证据
王姝勋, 方红艳, 荣昭
西南财经大学经济与管理研究院,四川成都 611130
西南财经大学金融学院,四川成都 611130
西南财经大学经济与管理研究院,四川成都 611130
Does Stock Option Promote Firm Innovation? Evidence from Chinese Listed Firms’ Patenting
WANG Shuxun, FANG Hongyan, RONG Zhao
WANG Shuxun FANG Hongyan RONG Zhao(Research Institute of Economics and Management/School of Finance, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics
下载:  PDF (1234KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 本文利用倾向得分匹配和双重差分法,考察了2006-2011年期间我国上市公司实施期权激励对企业创新的影响。结果显示,期权激励提高了企业的专利产出,其增加幅度高达30%;本文进一步发现,期权激励对创新的促进作用分别在非国有企业、基金持股较多的企业、期权行权期较长的企业和高管期权授予相对规模较大的企业中更加明显。本文为理解期权激励制度的合理性提供了新的视角,对于希望提升公司创新的政策制定者和公司决策者都具有一定的参考价值。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
王姝勋
方红艳
荣昭
关键词:  期权激励  公司创新  专利产出    
Abstract:  Using panel data of Chinese listed firms from 2006 to 2011 and applying both the Difference-in-Difference approach and Propensity Score Matching method, we investigate the effect of stock option compensation on firm innovation. Our empirical results show that the adoption of stock option compensation promotes firm patenting and the increasing is more than 30%. We further find that this effect is more pronounced for non-SOEs, firms with higher mutual fund ownership, firms with longer option duration, and firms with heavier weight on top management. Our paper sheds light on the rationale of stock option compensation and has important implications for policy makers who aim to stimulate innovation.
Key words:  Stock Option Compensation    Corporate Innovation    Patenting
JEL分类号:  G30   G38   O31  
基金资助: 国家自然科学基金项目(71202174)、中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(HK1607031)
作者简介:  王蛛励,金融学博士生,西南财经大学经济与管理研究院,Email:wangshuxunl990@163.com.方红艳,金融学博士,西南财经大学金融学院副教授,Email:fanghy@swufe.edu.cn.荣昭(通讯作者),经济学博士,西南财经大学经济与管理研究院副教授,Emal:zhaorong@swufe.edu.cn.
引用本文:    
王姝勋, 方红艳, 荣昭. 期权激励会促进公司创新吗?——基于中国上市公司专利产出的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 441(3): 176-191.
WANG Shuxun, FANG Hongyan, RONG Zhao. Does Stock Option Promote Firm Innovation? Evidence from Chinese Listed Firms’ Patenting. Journal of Financial Research, 2017, 441(3): 176-191.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/10.12094/1002-7246(2017)03-0176-16  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2017/V441/I3/176
[1] 李春涛和宋敏,2010,《中国制造业企业的创新活动:所有制和CEO激励的作用》,《经济研究》第五期,第55~67页。
李春涛和宋敏,2010,《中国制造业企业的创新活动:所有制和CEO激励的作用》,《经济研究》第五期,第55~67页。
[2] 李小荣和张瑞君,2014,《股权激励影响风险承担:代理成本还是风险规避?》,《会计研究》第一期,第57~63页。
[3] 林大庞和苏冬蔚,2011,《股权激励与公司业绩》,《金融研究》第9期,第162~177页。
[2] 李小荣和张瑞君,2014,《股权激励影响风险承担:代理成本还是风险规避?》,《会计研究》第一期,第57~63页。
[4] 卢锐,2014,《企业创新投资与高管薪酬业绩敏感性》,《会计研究》第10期,第36~42页。
[5] 吕长江和张海平,2011,《股权激励计划对公司投资行为的影响》,《管理世界》第11期,第60~70页。
[6] 史宇鹏和顾全林,2013,《知识产权保护、异质性企业与创新:来自中国制造业的证据》,《金融研究》第八期,第136~149页。
[7] 唐跃军和左晶晶,2014,《所有权性质、大股东治理与公司创新》,《金融研究》第六期,第177~192页。
[8] 吴延兵,2012,《中国哪种所有制类型企业最具创新性?》,《世界经济》第六期,第3~27页。
[3] 林大庞和苏冬蔚,2011,《股权激励与公司业绩》,《金融研究》第9期,第162~177页。
[4] 卢锐,2014,《企业创新投资与高管薪酬业绩敏感性》,《会计研究》第10期,第36~42页。
[5] 吕长江和张海平,2011,《股权激励计划对公司投资行为的影响》,《管理世界》第11期,第60~70页。
[6] 史宇鹏和顾全林,2013,《知识产权保护、异质性企业与创新:来自中国制造业的证据》,《金融研究》第八期,第136~149页。
[7] 唐跃军和左晶晶,2014,《所有权性质、大股东治理与公司创新》,《金融研究》第六期,第177~192页。
[9] Aghion P., VanReenen J. and Zingales L., 2013. “Innovation and Institutional Ownership,” American Economic Review, 103: 227~304.
[8] 吴延兵,2012,《中国哪种所有制类型企业最具创新性?》,《世界经济》第六期,第3~27页。
[10] Aghion P. and Tirole J., 1994. “The Management of Innovation,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109(4): 1185~1209.
[9] Aghion P., VanReenen J. and Zingales L., 2013. “Innovation and Institutional Ownership,” American Economic Review, 103: 227~304.
[11] Bertrand M. and Mullainathan S., 2003. “Enjoying the Quiet Life? Corporate Governance and Managerial Preferences,” Journal of Political Economy, 111(5): 1043~1075.
[10] Aghion P. and Tirole J., 1994. “The Management of Innovation,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109(4): 1185~1209.
[12] Chang X., Fu K.K., Low A. and Zhang W. R., 2015. “Non-executive Employee Stock Options and Corporate Innovation,” Journal of Financial Economics, 115: 168~188.
[11] Bertrand M. and Mullainathan S., 2003. “Enjoying the Quiet Life? Corporate Governance and Managerial Preferences,” Journal of Political Economy, 111(5): 1043~1075.
[12] Chang X., Fu K.K., Low A. and Zhang W. R., 2015. “Non-executive Employee Stock Options and Corporate Innovation,” Journal of Financial Economics, 115: 168~188.
[13] Chemmanur T., Loutskina E. and Tian X., 2014. “Corporate Venture Capital, Value Creation and Innovation,” Review of Financial Studies, 27(8): 2434~2473.
Chemmanur T., Loutskina E. and Tian X., 2014. “Corporate Venture Capital, Value Creation and Innovation,” Review of Financial Studies, 27(8): 2434~2473.
[14] Chava S. and Purnanandam A., 2010. “CEOs versus CFOs: Incentives and Corporate Policies,” Journal of Financial Economics, 97(2): 263~278.
Chava S. and Purnanandam A., 2010. “CEOs versus CFOs: Incentives and Corporate Policies,” Journal of Financial Economics, 97(2): 263~278.
[15] Chen Q., Chen X., Schipper K., Xu Y. X. and Xue J., 2012. “The Sensitivity of Corporate Cash Holdings to Corporate Governance,” Review of Financial Studies, 25(12): 3610~3644.
Chen Q., Chen X., Schipper K., Xu Y. X. and Xue J., 2012. “The Sensitivity of Corporate Cash Holdings to Corporate Governance,” Review of Financial Studies, 25(12): 3610~3644.
[16] Core J. E. and Guay W. R., 2001. “Stock Option Plans for Non-executive Employees,” Journal of Financial Economics, 61(2): 253~287.
Core J. E. and Guay W. R., 2001. “Stock Option Plans for Non-executive Employees,” Journal of Financial Economics, 61(2): 253~287.
[17] Cornett M. M., Marcus A. J., Saunders A., and Tehranian H., 2007. “The Impact of Institutional Ownership on Corporate Operating Performance,” Journal of Banking and Finance, 31(6): 1771~1794.
Cornett M. M., Marcus A. J., Saunders A., and Tehranian H., 2007. “The Impact of Institutional Ownership on Corporate Operating Performance,” Journal of Banking and Finance, 31(6): 1771~1794.
[18] Edmans A., Fang V. W. and Lewellen K. A., 2015. “Equity Vesting and Managerial Myopia,” Working Paper.
Edmans A., Fang V. W. and Lewellen K. A., 2015. “Equity Vesting and Managerial Myopia,” Working Paper.
[19] Fang H., John R. and Quan J., 2015. “The Effects of Employee Stock Option Plans on Operation Performance in Chinese Firms,” Journal of Banking and Finance, 54: 141~159.
Fang H., John R. and Quan J., 2015. “The Effects of Employee Stock Option Plans on Operation Performance in Chinese Firms,” Journal of Banking and Finance, 54: 141~159.
[20] Fang V., Tian X. and Tice S., 2014. “Does Stock Liquidity Enhance or Impede Firm Innovation?” Journal of Finance, 69(5): 2085~2125.
[21] Frydman C. and Jenter D., 2010. “CEO Compensation,” Annual Review of Financial Economics, 2: 75~102.
[20] Fang V., Tian X. and Tice S., 2014. “Does Stock Liquidity Enhance or Impede Firm Innovation?” Journal of Finance, 69(5): 2085~2125.
[22] Gopalan R., Milbourn T., Song F. H. and Thakor A. V., 2014. “Duration of Executive Compensation,” Journal of Finance, 69(6): 2777~2817.
[21] Frydman C. and Jenter D., 2010. “CEO Compensation,” Annual Review of Financial Economics, 2: 75~102.
[23] Gormley T. A., Matsa D. A. and Milbourn T., 2013. “CEO Compensation and Corporate Risk: Evidence from A Natural Experiment,” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 56(2): 79~101.
[22] Gopalan R., Milbourn T., Song F. H. and Thakor A. V., 2014. “Duration of Executive Compensation,” Journal of Finance, 69(6): 2777~2817.
[24] Griliches Z., Pakes A. and Hall B., 1988. “The Value of Patents as Indicators of Inventive Activity,” Working paper.
[23] Gormley T. A., Matsa D. A. and Milbourn T., 2013. “CEO Compensation and Corporate Risk: Evidence from A Natural Experiment,” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 56(2): 79~101.
[24] Griliches Z., Pakes A. and Hall B., 1988. “The Value of Patents as Indicators of Inventive Activity,” Working paper.
[25] Guay W. R., 1999. “The Sensitivity of CEO Wealth to Equity Risk: An Analysis of the Magnitude and Determinants,” Journal of Financial Economics, 53(1): 43~71.
Guay W. R., 1999. “The Sensitivity of CEO Wealth to Equity Risk: An Analysis of the Magnitude and Determinants,” Journal of Financial Economics, 53(1): 43~71.
[26] Hirshleifer D. and Thakor A. V., 1992. “Managerial Conservatism, Project Choice, and Debt,” Review of Financial Studies, 5(3): 437~470.
Hirshleifer D. and Thakor A. V., 1992. “Managerial Conservatism, Project Choice, and Debt,” Review of Financial Studies, 5(3): 437~470.
[27] Holmstrom B. and Costa J., 1986. “Managerial Incentives and Capital Management,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 101(4): 835~860.
Holmstrom B. and Costa J., 1986. “Managerial Incentives and Capital Management,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 101(4): 835~860.
[28] Holmstrom B., 1989. “Agency Costs and Innovation,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 12(3): 305~327.
Holmstrom B., 1989. “Agency Costs and Innovation,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 12(3): 305~327.
[29] Hochberg Y. V. and Lindsey L., 2010. “Incentives, Targeting, and Firm Performance: Analysis of Non-Executive Stock Options,” Review of Financial Studies, 23: 4148~4186.
Hochberg Y. V. and Lindsey L., 2010. “Incentives, Targeting, and Firm Performance: Analysis of Non-Executive Stock Options,” Review of Financial Studies, 23: 4148~4186.
[30] Hsu P. H, Tian X. and Xu Y., 2014. “Financial Development and Innovation: Cross-country Evidence,” Journal of Financial Economics, 112(1): 116~135.
Hsu P. H, Tian X. and Xu Y., 2014. “Financial Development and Innovation: Cross-country Evidence,” Journal of Financial Economics, 112(1): 116~135.
[31] Jensen M. C. and Meckling W. H., 1976. “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure,” Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4): 305~360.
[32] Kim E.H. and Ouimet P., 2014. “Broad-based Employee Stock Ownership: Motives and Outcomes,” Journal of Finance, 69(3): 1273~1319.
[31] Jensen M. C. and Meckling W. H., 1976. “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure,” Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4): 305~360.
[33] Lemmon M. and M. R. Roberts, 2010. “The Response of Corporate Financing and Investment to Changes in the Supply of Credit,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 45: 555~587.
[32] Kim E.H. and Ouimet P., 2014. “Broad-based Employee Stock Ownership: Motives and Outcomes,” Journal of Finance, 69(3): 1273~1319.
[34] Li Z. and Wang L. L., 2013. “Executive Compensation Incentives Contingent on Long-term Accounting Performance,” Working Paper.
[33] Lemmon M. and M. R. Roberts, 2010. “The Response of Corporate Financing and Investment to Changes in the Supply of Credit,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 45: 555~587.
[34] Li Z. and Wang L. L., 2013. “Executive Compensation Incentives Contingent on Long-term Accounting Performance,” Working Paper.
[35] Manso G., 2011. “Motivating Innovation,” Journal of Finance, 66(5): 1823~1860.
Manso G., 2011. “Motivating Innovation,” Journal of Finance, 66(5): 1823~1860.
[36] Narayanan M. P., 1985. “Managerial Incentives for Short-term Results,” Journal of Finance, 40(5): 1469~1484.
Narayanan M. P., 1985. “Managerial Incentives for Short-term Results,” Journal of Finance, 40(5): 1469~1484.
[37] Porter M., 1992. “Capital Disadvantage: America’s Failing Capital Investment System,” Harvard Business Review, 70(5): 65~82.
Porter M., 1992. “Capital Disadvantage: America’s Failing Capital Investment System,” Harvard Business Review, 70(5): 65~82.
[38] Rong Z. and Wu X., 2015. “Institutional Ownership, State Ownership, and Firm Patenting: Evidence from High-Tech Listed Firms in China” Working Paper.
Rong Z. and Wu X., 2015. “Institutional Ownership, State Ownership, and Firm Patenting: Evidence from High-Tech Listed Firms in China” Working Paper.
[39] Rosenbaum P. R. and Rubin D. B., 1983. “The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects,” Biometrika, 70(1): 41~55.
Rosenbaum P. R. and Rubin D. B., 1983. “The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects,” Biometrika, 70(1): 41~55.
[40] Smith C. W. and Watts R. L., 1982. “Incentive and Tax Effects of Executive Compensation Plans,” Australian Journal of Management, 7(2): 139~157.
Smith C. W. and Watts R. L., 1982. “Incentive and Tax Effects of Executive Compensation Plans,” Australian Journal of Management, 7(2): 139~157.
[41] Solow R., 1957. “Technological Change and the Aggregate Production Function,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 39(3): 312~320.
Solow R., 1957. “Technological Change and the Aggregate Production Function,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 39(3): 312~320.
[42] Stein J. C., 1989. “Efficient Capital Markets, Inefficient Firms: A Model of Myopic Corporate Behavior,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 104(4): 655~669.
Stein J. C., 1989. “Efficient Capital Markets, Inefficient Firms: A Model of Myopic Corporate Behavior,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 104(4): 655~669.
[43] Seru A., 2014. “Firm Boundaries Matter: Evidence from Conglomerates and R&D Activity,” Journal of Financial Economics, 111(2): 381~405.
[44] Tan Y. X., Tian X., Zhang X. D. and Zhao H., 2015. “The Real Effect of Privatization: Evidence from China’s Split Share Structure Reform,” Working paper.
[43] Seru A., 2014. “Firm Boundaries Matter: Evidence from Conglomerates and R&D Activity,” Journal of Financial Economics, 111(2): 381~405.
[45] Yuan R., Xiao J. Z. and Zou H., 2008. “Mutual Funds’ Ownership and Firm Performance: Evidence from China,” Journal of Banking and Finance, 32(8): 1552~1565.
[44] Tan Y. X., Tian X., Zhang X. D. and Zhao H., 2015. “The Real Effect of Privatization: Evidence from China’s Split Share Structure Reform,” Working paper.
[46] Zhang A., Zhang Y. and R. Zhao, 2003. “A Study of the R&D Efficiency and Productivity of Chinese Firms,” Journal of Comparative Economics, 31(1): 444~464.
[45] Yuan R., Xiao J. Z. and Zou H., 2008. “Mutual Funds’ Ownership and Firm Performance: Evidence from China,” Journal of Banking and Finance, 32(8): 1552~1565.
[46] Zhang A., Zhang Y. and R. Zhao, 2003. “A Study of the R&D Efficiency and Productivity of Chinese Firms,” Journal of Comparative Economics, 31(1): 444~464.
[1] 陆瑶, 张叶青, 贾睿, 李健航. “辛迪加”风险投资与企业创新[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 444(6): 159-175.
[1] 王曦, 朱立挺, 王凯立. 我国货币政策是否关注资产价格?——基于马尔科夫区制转换BEKK多元GARCH模型[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 1 -17 .
[2] 刘勇政, 李岩. 中国的高速铁路建设与城市经济增长[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 18 -33 .
[3] 况伟大, 王琪琳. 房价波动、房贷规模与银行资本充足率[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 34 -48 .
[4] 祝树金, 赵玉龙. 资源错配与企业的出口行为——基于中国工业企业数据的经验研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 49 -64 .
[5] 陈德球, 陈运森, 董志勇. 政策不确定性、市场竞争与资本配置[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 65 -80 .
[6] 牟敦果, 王沛英. 中国能源价格内生性研究及货币政策选择分析[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 81 -95 .
[7] 高铭, 江嘉骏, 陈佳, 刘玉珍. 谁说女子不如儿郎?——P2P投资行为与过度自信[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 96 -111 .
[8] 吕若思, 刘青, 黄灿, 胡海燕, 卢进勇. 外资在华并购是否改善目标企业经营绩效?——基于企业层面的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 112 -127 .
[9] 姜军, 申丹琳, 江轩宇, 伊志宏. 债权人保护与企业创新[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 128 -142 .
[10] 刘莎莎, 孔高文. 信息搜寻、个人投资者交易与股价联动异象——基于股票送转的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 143 -157 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1