Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2020, Vol. 483 Issue (9): 117-135    
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
劳动力成本与中小企业融资约束
刘晓光, 刘嘉桐
中国人民大学国家发展与战略研究院, 北京 100872;
清华大学五道口金融学院, 北京 100083
Labor Costs and Financing Constraints of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises
LIU Xiaoguang, LIU Jiatong
National Academy of Development and Strategy, Renmin University of China;
PBC School of Finance, Tsinghua University
下载:  PDF (601KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 本文利用世界银行提供的中国企业调查数据,基于信贷配给理论,考察劳动力成本对企业融资约束的影响。分别以劳动力成本占企业总成本的比重和劳动力成本相对于企业销售额的比值作为劳动力成本代理指标,通过考察企业是否需要银行贷款的自主决策与贷款可得性两方面信息,甄别企业受到的不同类型的信贷配给,进而系统考察劳动力成本对企业信贷约束的影响。研究发现:第一,劳动力成本显著地提高了企业受到信贷配给约束的概率,信贷对劳动力成本较高的企业具有明显的“筛选效应”;第二,劳动力成本对企业受到银行信贷配给和自我信贷配给约束的概率均有显著的正向影响,说明劳动力成本较高的企业不仅会受到更高的来自银行的信贷约束,还会受到来自自身的信贷约束,形成双重“筛选效应”;第三,机制分析表明,较高的金融发展程度和市场化水平通过减轻信息不对称问题,能够显著缓解“筛选效应”的不利影响。本研究为深化金融供给侧结构性改革、破解企业融资难题提供了新的政策启示。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
刘晓光
刘嘉桐
关键词:  劳动力成本  融资约束  筛选效应  金融供给侧结构性改革    
Summary:  For a long time, low labor costs have been the cornerstone of the international competitiveness of Chinese enterprises, especially labor-intensive manufacturing enterprises. In recent years, with the aging of China's population structure, the slowdown of rural labor force migration, the implementation of the new “Labor Contract Law”, and the improvement of the minimum wage standard, labor costs in China have increased rapidly. Consequently, there is great pressure on the production costs of Chinese enterprises, and the cost advantage of these enterprises is gradually diminishing. Studies in the literature focus more on the impact of labor costs on enterprise cost advantage and innovation incentive and less on the impact of labor costs on enterprise financing constraints. However, we find that in the context of rapidly increasing labor costs, due to information asymmetry, there may be overreaction and discrimination in the credit market. This is especially true for labor-intensive enterprises, which are subject to the “screening effect” of bank credit, leading to more severe financing constraints. These labor-intensive enterprises are facing the “double pressure” of rising production costs and tightening financing constraints, which makes it more difficult for them to transform and upgrade.
Based on the credit rationing theory, we use the survey data of Chinese enterprises provided by the World Bank to examine the impact of labor costs on corporate financing constraints. In terms of specific research methods, we do not study financing constraints based on whether enterprises obtain bank loans. Instead, based on the credit rationing theory, we examine whether enterprises need and apply for bank loans and the availability of such loans, identify the enterprises that are subject to credit rationing, and distinguish between two types of credit rationing: enterprise self-credit rationing and bank credit rationing. Under this framework, we use the ratio of labor costs to total cost and the ratio of labor costs to enterprise sales volume as proxy indicators of labor costs to systematically investigate the various effects of labor costs on the credit decisions of banks and enterprises.
The main findings of this paper can be summarized in three points. First, an increase in labor costs significantly increases the probability of enterprises being constrained by credit rationing, which indicates that bank credit has an adverse “screening effect” on enterprises with higher labor costs. Meanwhile, the increase in labor costs reduces the credit demand of enterprises, which reflects the social capital allocation effect in the transformation brought about by rising costs. Second, the rise in labor costs has a significant positive effect on the probability of enterprises being constrained by both self-credit rationing and bank credit rationing. Therefore, increased labor costs not only subject enterprises to higher credit rationing from banks, but also to higher self-credit rationing, thus inducing a double “screening effect.” Third, mechanism analysis shows that labor costs affect enterprise credit rationing through information asymmetry. Higher financial development and a higher level of marketization and state ownership of enterprises can significantly alleviate the adverse impacts of labor costs on credit constraints.
The results of this study have some theoretical value in terms of extending the relationship between labor costs and corporate financing constraints, more accurately identifying the credit rationing status of enterprises, and, hopefully, promoting research in related fields. When faced with a rapid rise in labor costs, labor-intensive industries are not only directly affected by rising costs, but are also subject to credit constraints from both banks and themselves. Therefore, the results of this study help us better understand the transformation dilemma faced by China's labor-intensive enterprises.
This study provides new policy implications for deepening financial supply-side structural reforms and solving the financing problems of enterprises. The enterprises themselves need to consciously accelerate their transformation and upgrade to avoid the serious “double pressure” of rising production costs and tightening financing constraints. In terms of credit policies, the current solutions to the financing problems of enterprises should be improved accordingly. With regard to the financial market environment, by comprehensively deepening financial supply-side structural reforms, we can further improve the degree of financial development and the level of marketization in various regions, reduce the adverse impact of labor costs on enterprise credit constraints, and help labor-intensive enterprises break out of the current transformation dilemma.
Keywords:  Labor Costs    Financing Constraints    Screening Effect    Financial Supply-Side Structural Reform
JEL分类号:  E20   G20   J30  
基金资助: * 本文系北京市习近平新时代中国特色社会主义思想研究中心项目“新时代防范和化解杠杆风险研究”(项目编号:19LLLJA001)的阶段性成果。本文亦感谢国家社会科学基金青年项目“延迟退休对我国劳动力市场的影响及其作用机制研究”(16CJL049)的资助。
作者简介:  刘晓光,经济学博士,副教授,中国人民大学国家发展与战略研究院,E-mail:lxg2015@ruc. edu.cn.
刘嘉桐(通讯作者),金融学博士研究生,清华大学五道口金融学院,E-mail:liujt20@mails.tsinghua. edu.cn.
引用本文:    
刘晓光, 刘嘉桐. 劳动力成本与中小企业融资约束[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 483(9): 117-135.
LIU Xiaoguang, LIU Jiatong. Labor Costs and Financing Constraints of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises. Journal of Financial Research, 2020, 483(9): 117-135.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2020/V483/I9/117
[1] 丁守海,2010,《最低工资管制的就业效应分析——兼论〈劳动合同法〉的交互影响》,《中国社会科学》第1期,第85~102页。
[2] 都阳和曲玥,2009,《劳动报酬、劳动生产率与劳动力成本优势——对2000—2007 年中国制造业企业的经验研究》,《中国工业经济》第5期,第25~35页。
[3] 樊纲和王小鲁,2011,《中国市场化指数》,北京:经济科学出版社。
[4] 方军雄,2010,《民营上市公司真的面临银行贷款歧视吗》,《管理世界》第11期,第133~141页。
[5] 冯伟、邵军和徐康宁,2011,《市场规模、劳动力成本与外商直接投资:基于我国 1990—2009年省级面板数据的研究》,《南开经济研究》第6期,第3~20页。
[6] 苟琴、黄益平和刘晓光,2014,《银行信贷配置真的存在所有制歧视吗》,《管理世界》第1期,第16~26页。
[7] 贺聪、尤瑞章和莫万贵,2009,《制造业劳动力成本国际比较研究》,《金融研究》第7期,第170~194页。
[8] 靳庆鲁、孔祥和侯青川,2012,《货币政策、民营企业投资效率与公司期权价值》,《经济研究》第5期,第96~106页。
[9] 李钢、沈可挺和郭朝先,2009,《中国劳动密集型产业竞争力提升出路何在——新〈劳动合同法〉实施后的调研》,《中国工业经济》第9期,第37~46页。
[10] 林炜,2013,《企业创新激励:来自中国劳动力成本上升的解释》,《管理世界》第10期,第95~105页。
[11] 林毅夫和李永军,2001,《中小金融机构发展与中小企业融资》,《经济研究》第1期,第10~18页。
[12] 刘晓光、苟琴和姜天予,2019,《金融结构、经济波动与经济增长——基于最优产业部门配置框架的实证分析》,《管理世界》第5期,第29~43页。
[13] 马双、张劼和朱喜,2012,《最低工资对中国就业和工资水平的影响》,《经济研究》第5期,第132~146页。
[14] 童盼和陆正飞,2005,《负债融资、负债来源与企业投资行为——来自中国上市公司的经验证据》,《经济研究》第5期,第75~84页。
[15] 王怀民,2009,《加工贸易、劳动力成本与农民工就业——兼论新劳动法和次贷危机对我国加工贸易出口的影响》,《世界经济研究》第1期,第15~18页。
[16] 王金营和顾瑶,2011,《中国劳动力供求关系形势及未来变化趋势研究——兼对中国劳动市场刘易斯拐点的认识和判断》,《人口学刊》第3期,第5~15页。
[17] 王彦超,2009,《融资约束、现金持有与过度投资》,《金融研究》第7期,第121~133页。
[18] 王燕武、李文溥和李晓静,2011,《基于单位劳动力成本的中国制造业国际竞争力研究》,《统计研究》第28卷第10期,第60~67页。
[19] 卫兴华和侯为民,2007,《中国经济增长方式的选择与转换途径》,《经济研究》第7期,第15~22页。
[20] 文东伟和冼国明,2014,《企业异质性、融资约束与中国制造业企业的出口》,《金融研究》第4期,第98~113页。
[21] 肖文和薛天航,2019,《劳动力成本上升、融资约束与企业全要素生产率变动》,《世界经济》第1期,第76~94页。
[22] 于洪霞、龚六堂和陈玉宇,2011,《出口固定成本融资约束与企业出口行为》,《经济研究》第4期,第55~67页。
[23] 张杰、郑文平和翟福昕,2016,《融资约束影响企业资本劳动比吗?——中国的经验证据》,《经济学(季刊)》第15卷第3期,第1029~1056页。
[24] 张庆昌和李平,2011,《生产率与创新工资门槛假说:基于中国经验数据分析》,《数量经济技术经济研究》第11期,第4~22页。
[25] 张三峰和张伟,2016,《融资约束、金融发展与企业雇佣——来自中国企业调查数据的经验证据》,《金融研究》第10期,第111~126页。
[26] Aghion, P., Angeletos, G. M., Banerjee, A., and Manova, K. 2010. “Volatility and Growth: Credit Constraints and the Composition of Investment”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 57(3):246~265.
[27] Banister, J. 2007. “Manufacturing in China Today: Employment and Labor Compensation”, Economics Program Working Papers.
[28] Beck, T., Demirguc-Kunt, A. and Maksimovic, V. 2008. “Financing Patterns around the World: Are Small Firms Different?”, Journal of Financial Economics, 89:467~487.
[29] Butler, A., and Cornaggia, J. 2011. “Does Access to External Finance Improve Productivity? Evidence from a Natural Experiment”, Journal of Financial Economics, 99:184~203.
[30] Farrell, D. and Grant, A. J. 2005. “China's Looming Talent Shortage”, The McKinsey Quarterly, 4(56):70~79.
[31] Gatti, R., and Love, I. 2008. “Does Access to Credit Improve Productivity? Evidence from B1ugaria”, Economics of Transition, 16:445~465.
[32] Guariglia, A. and Liu, P. 2014. “To What Extent Do Financing Constraints Affect Chinese Firms' Innovation Activities?”, International Review of Financial Analysis, 36:223~240.
[33] Madsen, J. B., and Damania, R. 2001. “Labour Demand and Wage-induced Innovations: Evidence from the OECD Countries”, International Review of Applied Economics, 15(3):323~334.
[34] Mohnen, P., Palm, F., Schim, S., and Tiwari, A. 2008. “Financial Constraints and Other Obstacles: Are They a Threat to Innovation Activity”, De Economist, 156:201~214.
[35] Rajan, R., and Zingales, L. 1998. “Financial Dependence and Growth”, The American Economic Review, 88(3):559~586.
[36] Savignac, Frédérique. 2008. “Impact of Financial Constraints on Innovation: What Can Be Learned from a Direct Measure?”, Economics of Innovation & New Technology, 17(6):553~569.
[37] Silva, F., and Carreira, C. 2011. “Do Financial Constraints Threat the Innovation Process? Evidence from Portuguese Firms”, Economics of Innovation & New Technology, 21(8):1~36.
[38] Stiglitz, J. and Weiss, A. 1981. “Credit Rationing in Markets with Imperfect Information”, The American Economic Review, 71:393~410.
[1] 李波, 朱太辉. 银行价格竞争、融资约束与企业研发投资——基于“中介效应”模型的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 481(7): 134-152.
[2] 张盼盼, 张胜利, 陈建国. 融资约束、金融市场化与制造业企业出口国内增加值率[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 478(4): 48-69.
[3] 顾雷雷, 郭建鸾, 王鸿宇. 企业社会责任、融资约束与企业金融化[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 476(2): 109-127.
[4] 罗长远, 曾帅. “走出去”对企业融资约束的影响——基于“一带一路”倡议准自然实验的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 484(10): 92-112.
[5] 徐明东, 陈学彬. 中国上市企业投资的资本成本敏感性估计[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 470(8): 113-132.
[6] 余明桂, 钟慧洁, 范蕊. 民营化、融资约束与企业创新——来自中国工业企业的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 466(4): 75-91.
[7] 蔡卫星. 银行业市场结构对企业生产率的影响——来自工业企业的经验证据[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 466(4): 39-55.
[8] 魏浩, 白明浩, 郭也. 融资约束与中国企业的进口行为[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 464(2): 98-116.
[9] 张璇, 李子健, 李春涛. 银行业竞争、融资约束与企业创新——中国工业企业的经验证据[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 472(10): 98-116.
[10] 刘行, 吕长江. 企业避税的战略效应——基于避税对企业产品市场绩效的影响研究[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 457(7): 158-173.
[11] 钱雪松, 徐建利, 杜立. 中国委托贷款弥补了正规信贷不足吗?[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 455(5): 82-100.
[12] 黎文靖, 李茫茫. “实体+金融”:融资约束、政策迎合还是市场竞争?——基于不同产权性质视角的经验研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 446(8): 100-116.
[13] 刘啟仁, 黄建忠. 人民币汇率变动与出口企业研发[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 446(8): 19-34.
[14] 吕越, 吕云龙, 包群. 融资约束与企业增加值贸易——基于全球价值链视角的微观证据[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 443(5): 63-80.
[15] 张璇, 王鑫, 刘碧. 吃喝费用、融资约束与企业出口行为——世行中国企业调查数据的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 443(5): 176-190.
[1] 王曦, 朱立挺, 王凯立. 我国货币政策是否关注资产价格?——基于马尔科夫区制转换BEKK多元GARCH模型[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 1 -17 .
[2] 刘勇政, 李岩. 中国的高速铁路建设与城市经济增长[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 18 -33 .
[3] 况伟大, 王琪琳. 房价波动、房贷规模与银行资本充足率[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 34 -48 .
[4] 祝树金, 赵玉龙. 资源错配与企业的出口行为——基于中国工业企业数据的经验研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 49 -64 .
[5] 陈德球, 陈运森, 董志勇. 政策不确定性、市场竞争与资本配置[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 65 -80 .
[6] 牟敦果, 王沛英. 中国能源价格内生性研究及货币政策选择分析[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 81 -95 .
[7] 高铭, 江嘉骏, 陈佳, 刘玉珍. 谁说女子不如儿郎?——P2P投资行为与过度自信[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 96 -111 .
[8] 吕若思, 刘青, 黄灿, 胡海燕, 卢进勇. 外资在华并购是否改善目标企业经营绩效?——基于企业层面的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 112 -127 .
[9] 姜军, 申丹琳, 江轩宇, 伊志宏. 债权人保护与企业创新[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 128 -142 .
[10] 刘莎莎, 孔高文. 信息搜寻、个人投资者交易与股价联动异象——基于股票送转的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 143 -157 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1