Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2019, Vol. 470 Issue (8): 113-132    
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
中国上市企业投资的资本成本敏感性估计
徐明东, 陈学彬
复旦大学经济学院,上海 200433
Estimating the Sensitivity of Listed Firms' Investments to the Cost of Capital in China
XU Mingdong, CHEN Xuebin
School of Economics, Fudan University
下载:  PDF (646KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 企业投资对资本成本的敏感性是识别货币政策利率传导渠道是否畅通以及IS曲线斜率的重要参数。本文基于新古典投资模型框架,使用2004-2017年中国上市公司非平衡面板数据,估计了中国上市企业投资的资本成本敏感性,并侧重检验了融资约束对企业投资资本成本敏感性的影响。估计结果显示:(1)上市企业投资的加权资本成本弹性显著为负,且已具有较强敏感性(长期弹性系数为-0.16~-0.27),价格型货币政策工具的传导条件在上市公司投资环节正逐渐具备 ;(2)对加权资本成本的结构性估计显示,企业投资主要对债务资本成本的变动较为敏感且系数显著为负,而对股权资本成本的变动敏感程度较低且不稳定;(3)与传统观点相反的是,非国有控股上市企业投资的资本成本敏感性显著低于国有控股上市企业;较强的融资约束是导致非国有控股上市企业投资的资本成本敏感性较低的重要原因,应重视民营经济面临较强的融资约束对价格型货币政策工具传导机制的负面影响。本文的研究为中国货币政策框架的转型以及价格型货币政策传导机制的有效性提供了微观经验证据的支持。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
徐明东
陈学彬
关键词:  企业投资  资本成本敏感性  融资约束  利率渠道    
Summary:  The sensitivity of corporate investment to the cost of capital is a micro-foundation prerequisite for the effectiveness of price-based monetary policy tools. Traditionally, it was thought that Chinese state-owned enterprises' investment displayed low capital cost sensitivity, as these firms' non-marketization functions and soft budget constraints blocked the interest rate transmission mechanism. In recent years, with quantitative monetary policy tools facing increasing limitations, the People's Bank of China has been actively trying to transform from a quantity-based to a price-based monetary policy framework. However, amid widespread corporate governance reform, interest rate marketization, and rapid financial innovation, the micro-foundation of China's monetary policy has undergone great changes. Therefore, it is necessary to estimate the capital cost sensitivity of corporate investment to test the transmission effectiveness of price-based monetary policy instruments.
   Based on the new classical investment model, this paper uses the generalized method of moments (GMM) dynamic panel method to estimate the capital cost sensitivity of Chinese listed companies' investment from 2004 to 2017, and it focuses on the impact of financial constraints on the capital cost sensitivity of corporate investment. The empirical results are as follows. First, the weighted capital cost sensitivity of firms' investment in China is significantly negative, and the long-term elasticity coefficients vary from-0.16 to-0.27, which shows that the transmission of price-based monetary policy tools is gradually getting better. Second, firms' investment is mainly sensitive to the cost of debt, while the coefficients of the cost of equity are insignificant and unstable. Third, contrary to the traditional view, the capital cost sensitivity of non-state-owned companies is significantly lower than that of state-owned ones, which can be explained by the stronger financial constraints faced by non-state-owned companies. This paper provides some supportive empirical evidence for the transformation of China's monetary policy framework.
   The evidence in this paper that runs contrary to the traditional view is consistent with other recent studies on Chinese companies' investment behavior. Deng and Zeng (2014) and Yu et al. (2014) find that investment efficiency in recent years is significantly lower for non-state-owned enterprises than for state-owned ones. As a result of financial institutions' lower risk appetite (caused by slowing economic conditions) and frequent monetary policy shocks, the gap in financial constraints between state-owned enterprises and non-state-owned ones has widened. As non-state-owned enterprises' credit resources were gradually squeezed out, serious financial constraints led to declining investment efficiency for these firms.
   The main contributions of this paper are as follows. First, two important factors affecting the capital cost sensitivity of corporate investment, namely the internal agency (business objectives and soft budget constraints) problem and financial constraints, are analyzed, and the special influence of financial constraints is emphasized. Second, this paper extends the research of Xu and Chen (2012), who use data from all above-scale industrial enterprises in China from 1999 to 2007, and it yields some results different from the literature. Third, this paper examines the impact of financial constraints on the capital cost sensitivity of corporate investment and finds that stronger financial constraints faced by non-state-owned listed companies explain their low capital cost sensitivity of investment.
   It is worth noting that the estimation result applies to public firms in China. For a large number of non-listed companies (especially small and medium-sized enterprises) with low information transparency and weak corporate governance, or various government financing platforms, more data and further work are needed to examine the capital cost sensitivity of their investment.
Keywords:  Corporate Investment    Capital Cost Sensitivity    Financial Constraints    Interest Rate Transmission Channel
JEL分类号:  E22   G30  
基金资助: * 本文感谢国家自科中英合作项目(7161101089)、国家社科基金重大项目(16ZDA043,18ZDA094)、教育部人文社科重点研究基地(16JJD790011)、国家自科基金(71572048)、上海浦江人才项目(15PJC012)的资助。
作者简介:  徐明东,经济学博士,副教授,复旦大学经济学院,E-mail:xumind@fudan.edu.cn.
陈学彬,经济学博士,教授,复旦大学经济学院,E-mail:chenxb@fudan.edu.cn.
引用本文:    
徐明东, 陈学彬. 中国上市企业投资的资本成本敏感性估计[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 470(8): 113-132.
XU Mingdong, CHEN Xuebin. Estimating the Sensitivity of Listed Firms' Investments to the Cost of Capital in China. Journal of Financial Research, 2019, 470(8): 113-132.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2019/V470/I8/113
[1] 邓可斌和曾海舰,2014,《中国企业的融资约束:特征现象与成因检验》,《经济研究》第2期,第47~60页。
[2] 蒋瑛琨、刘艳武和赵振全,2005,《货币渠道与信贷渠道传导机制有效性的实证分析——兼论货币政策中介目标的选择》,《金融研究》第5期,第86~87页。
[3] 鞠晓生、卢荻和虞义华,2013,《融资约束、营运资本管理与企业创新可持续性》,《经济研究》第1期,第4~16页。
[4] 南开大学公司治理评价课题组,2010,《中国上市公司治理状况评价研究——来自2008年1127家上市公司的数据》,《管理世界》第1期,第142~151页。
[5] 彭方平和王少平,2007,《我国利率政策的微观效应——基于动态面板数据模型研究》,《管理世界》第1期,第24~29页。
[6] 徐明东和陈学彬,2012,《中国工业企业投资的资本成本敏感性分析》,《经济研究》第3期,第40~52页。
[7] 易纲,2018,《货币政策回顾与展望》,《中国金融》第3期,第9~11页。
[8] 易纲和林明,2003,《理解中国经济增长》,《中国社会科学》第2期,第45~60页。
[9] 喻坤、李治国、张晓蓉和徐剑刚,2014,《企业投资效率之谜:融资约束假说与货币政策冲击》,《经济研究》第5期,第106~120页。
[10] 张成思和刘贯春,2018,《中国实业部门投融资决策机制研究——基于经济政策不确定性和融资约束异质性视角》,《经济研究》第12期,第51~67页。
[11] 周英章和蒋振声,2002,《货币渠道、信用渠道与货币政策有效性——中国1993-2001年的实证分析和政策含义》,《金融研究》第9期,第34~43页。
[12] Arellano M. and S. Bond. 1991. “Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations”, Review of Economic Studies, 58(2):277~297.
[13] Brunnermeier M. K., T. M. Eisenbach and Y. Sannikov. 2013. “Macroeconomics with Financial Frictions: A Survey”, Cambridge University Press.
[14] Chatelain J., M. Ehrmann, A. Generale, J. Martínez-Pagés, P. Vermeulen and A. Worms. 2003. “Monetary Policy Transmission in the Euro Area: New Evidence From Micro Data On Firms and Banks”, Journal of the European Economic Association, 1(2):731~742.
[15] Claessens S. and K. Tzioumis. 2006. “Measuring Firms' Access to Finance”, World Bank Working Paper.
[16] Conway P., R. Herd and T. Chalaux. 2010. “Reforming China's Monetary Policy Framework to Meet Domestic Objectives”, OECD Economic Department Working Papers, No.822.
[17] Easton P. D. .2004. “Pe Ratios, Peg Ratios, and Estimating the Implied Expected Rate of Return On Equity Capital”, The Accounting Review, 79(1):73~95.
[18] Frank M. Z. and T. Shen. 2016. “Investment and the Weighted Average Cost of Capital”, Journal of Financial Economics, 119(2):300~315.
[19] Gebhardt W. R., C. M. C. Lee and B. Swaminathan. 2001. “Toward an Implied Cost of Capital”, Journal of Accounting Research, 39(1):135~176.
[20] Gilchrist S., V. Yankov and E. Zakrajsek. 2009. “Credit Market Shocks and Economic Fluctuations: Evidence From Corporate Bond and Stock Markets”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 56(4):471~493.
[21] Gordon J. R. and M. J. Gordon. 1997. “The Finite Horizon Expected Return Model”, Financial Analysts Journal, 53(3):52~61.
[22] Guiso L., A. K. Kashyap, F. Panetta and D. Terlizzese. 2002. “How Interest Sensitive is Investment? When the Data are Well Measured”, University of Chicago Working Paper.
[23] Hadlock C. J. and J. R. Pierce. 2010. “New Evidence On Measuring Financial Constraints: Moving Beyond the KZ Index”, Review of Financial Studies, 23(5):1909~1940.
[24] Hou K., M. A. van Dijk and Y. Zhang. 2012. “The Implied Cost of Capital: A New Approach”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 53(3):504~526.
[25] Lamont O., C. Polk and J. Saaá-Requejo. 2001. “Financial Constraints and Stock Returns”, Review of Financial Studies, 14(2):529~554.
[26] Laurens B. J. and R. Maino. 2007. “China: Strengthening Monetary Policy Implementation”, IMF Working Papers, No.07/14.
[27] Mojon B. T., F. Smets and P. Vermeulen. 2002. “Investment and Monetary Policy in the Euro Area”, Journal of Banking and Finance, 26(11):2111~2129.
[28] Ohlson J. A. and B. E. Juettner-Nauroth. 2005. “Expected EPS and EPS Growth as Determinants of Value”, Review of Accounting Studies, 10(2):349~365.
[29] Schaller H.. 2013. “Corporate Savings, the Marginal Value of Cash, and the Discount Rate: Can Persistent Financial Constraints be Detected in Aggregate Data? ”, Carleton University Working Paper.
[30] Sharpe S. A. and G. Suarez. 2015. “Why isn't Investment More Sensitive to Interest Rates: Evidence From Surveys”, Federal Reserve Working Paper.
[31] Song Z., K. Storesletten and F. Zilibotti. 2011.“Growing Like China”, American Economic Review, 101(1):196~233.
[32] Whited T. M. and G. Wu. 2006. “Financial Constraints Risk”, Review of Financial Studies, 19(2):531~559.
[1] 顾雷雷, 郭建鸾, 王鸿宇. 企业社会责任、融资约束与企业金融化[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 476(2): 109-127.
[2] 蔡卫星. 银行业市场结构对企业生产率的影响——来自工业企业的经验证据[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 466(4): 39-55.
[3] 余明桂, 钟慧洁, 范蕊. 民营化、融资约束与企业创新——来自中国工业企业的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 466(4): 75-91.
[4] 魏浩, 白明浩, 郭也. 融资约束与中国企业的进口行为[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 464(2): 98-116.
[5] 张璇, 李子健, 李春涛. 银行业竞争、融资约束与企业创新——中国工业企业的经验证据[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 472(10): 98-116.
[6] 刘行, 吕长江. 企业避税的战略效应——基于避税对企业产品市场绩效的影响研究[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 457(7): 158-173.
[7] 钱雪松, 徐建利, 杜立. 中国委托贷款弥补了正规信贷不足吗?[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 455(5): 82-100.
[8] 才国伟, 吴华强, 徐信忠. 政策不确定性对公司投融资行为的影响研究[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 453(3): 89-104.
[9] 刘啟仁, 黄建忠. 人民币汇率变动与出口企业研发[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 446(8): 19-34.
[10] 黎文靖, 李茫茫. “实体+金融”:融资约束、政策迎合还是市场竞争?——基于不同产权性质视角的经验研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 446(8): 100-116.
[11] 张璇, 王鑫, 刘碧. 吃喝费用、融资约束与企业出口行为——世行中国企业调查数据的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 443(5): 176-190.
[12] 吕越, 吕云龙, 包群. 融资约束与企业增加值贸易——基于全球价值链视角的微观证据[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 443(5): 63-80.
[13] 戴严科, 林曙. 利率波动、融资约束与存货投资——来自中国制造业企业的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 442(4): 95-111.
[14] 张海洋. 融资约束下金融互助模式的演进——从民间金融到网络借贷[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 441(3): 101-115.
[15] 祝树金, 赵玉龙. 资源错配与企业的出口行为——基于中国工业企业数据的经验研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 49-64.
[1] 王曦, 朱立挺, 王凯立. 我国货币政策是否关注资产价格?——基于马尔科夫区制转换BEKK多元GARCH模型[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 1 -17 .
[2] 刘勇政, 李岩. 中国的高速铁路建设与城市经济增长[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 18 -33 .
[3] 况伟大, 王琪琳. 房价波动、房贷规模与银行资本充足率[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 34 -48 .
[4] 祝树金, 赵玉龙. 资源错配与企业的出口行为——基于中国工业企业数据的经验研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 49 -64 .
[5] 陈德球, 陈运森, 董志勇. 政策不确定性、市场竞争与资本配置[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 65 -80 .
[6] 牟敦果, 王沛英. 中国能源价格内生性研究及货币政策选择分析[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 81 -95 .
[7] 高铭, 江嘉骏, 陈佳, 刘玉珍. 谁说女子不如儿郎?——P2P投资行为与过度自信[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 96 -111 .
[8] 吕若思, 刘青, 黄灿, 胡海燕, 卢进勇. 外资在华并购是否改善目标企业经营绩效?——基于企业层面的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 112 -127 .
[9] 姜军, 申丹琳, 江轩宇, 伊志宏. 债权人保护与企业创新[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 128 -142 .
[10] 刘莎莎, 孔高文. 信息搜寻、个人投资者交易与股价联动异象——基于股票送转的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 143 -157 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1