Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2019, Vol. 464 Issue (2): 98-116    
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
融资约束与中国企业的进口行为
魏浩, 白明浩, 郭也
北京师范大学经济与工商管理学院,北京 100875;
北京大学国家发展研究院,北京 100871
Financial Constraints and Import Behavior of Chinese Firms
WEI Hao, BAI Minghao, GUO Ye
Business School, Beijing Normal University;
National School of Development, Peking University
下载:  PDF (1495KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 本文采用贸易四元边际的分析框架,实证分析了融资约束对企业进口行为的影响,并对比了非金融危机、金融危机背景下融资约束对企业进口行为影响的差异性。主要发现:(1)融资约束对企业进口决策存在显著的抑制作用,融资约束会显著抑制企业的进口行为,包括进口规模、进口来源国数量、进口产品种类。(2)相对于外资企业,内资企业的进口行为更容易受融资约束的影响;相对于一般贸易,企业的加工贸易进口更容易受融资约束的影响;相对于只进口的企业,同时具有进口和出口行为的企业更容易受到融资约束的影响。另外,不同行业的企业、不同地区的企业受融资约束的影响也具有较大的差异。(3)不同的外部金融环境导致融资约束对企业进口行为的影响存在显著差异。金融危机导致企业的进口行为对融资约束表现出更强的敏感性,高融资约束企业与低融资约束企业在进口四元边际上的差距被进一步拉大。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
魏浩
白明浩
郭也
关键词:  融资约束  企业异质性  进口贸易  四元边际    
Summary:  Since China's accession to the WTO in 2001, its foreign trade has developed rapidly and total imports have greatly increased. Firms that wish to further expand their scale of imports or import new products from different countries need more funds to pay the fixed and variable import costs. Therefore, financial constraints are an important factor affecting firm import behavior. The greater the financial constraints on firms, the more difficult it is for them to obtain funds through internal cash flow, bank loans, and other means, which may have a significant negative effect on their import behavior. Against this background, it is highly relevant to investigate the impact of financial constraints on firm import behavior.
   Previous research has studied the impact of financial constraints on export growth at the firm level using both theoretical and empirical methods. While import firms and export firms have many similarities, such as large scale, high productivity, and similar trade patterns at both product and national levels, the determinants of imports are more complicated and quite different from those of exports. Generally speaking, the effect of financial constraints on firm imports has scarcely been studied and demands urgent attention.
   Based on the methods of Muûls (2014) and Bernard et al. (2009), this study divides firm import value into four parts: the number of markets imported from, the number of products imported, the density of imports, and the average value of imports. The number of markets imported from and the number of products imported indicate the extensive margin, and the average value of imports indicates the intensive margin. Following the literature, we measure the financial constraints firms face by defining a new comprehensive indicator Score A and Score B based on seven financial indicators: the operating cash flow as the total assets ratio, accounts receivable turnover rate, interest coverage ratio, current ratio, liquidation ratio, tangible assets ratio, and total return on assets. We then combine product-level data from Chinese customs trade data and comprehensive firm-level data of Chinese industrial firms to empirically analyze the impact of financial constraints on firm import behavior. We also analyze the different effects of financial constraints on the import behavior of different firms from five angles, including ownership pattern, import mode, export status, industry type, and province and city level. Finally, we compare the differences in the impact of financial constraints on imports of firms with and without a financial crisis.
   The main contributions of this study are as follows. (1) We focus on firm import rather than export behavior and analyze the impact of financial constraints. (2) We expand the margins of trade from the two or three used in prior studies to four margins. (3) Instead of a single index, we build a comprehensive index to measure firm financial constraints based on both internal financial liquidity and external credit characteristics. (4) We analyze the different effects of financial constraints on firm import behavior from multiple perspectives.
   Our study draws the following conclusions. (1) Financial constraints have no significant impact on the intensive margin, but negatively affect the extensive margin and the decision to import, indicating that it is difficult for firms to bear the fixed cost of expanding new markets or importing new products. (2) The impact of financial constraint on imports is greater for domestic firms, processing trades, and firms that both import and export compared to foreign firms, general trades, and firms that only import. (3) Different external financial environments lead to significant differences in the impact of financial constraints on firm import behavior such that the financial crisis increased the sensitivity of firm import behavior to financial constraints.
Keywords:  Financial Constraint    Firm Heterogeneity    Import    Four Margins of Trade
JEL分类号:  F10   F23   G10  
基金资助: 本文是国家自然科学基金面上项目“中国进口增长及其对国内经济发展促进作用研究”(71473020)、教育部哲学社会科学项目“中国货物贸易进口价格问题研究”(18JHQ056)、国家万人计划青年拔实人才项目(2018年)的阶段性成果。作者感谢匿名审稿人的建议,付天博士对本文亦有贡献,文责自负。
作者简介:  魏 浩,经济学博士,教授,北京师范大学经济与工商管理学院,E-mail:weihao9989@163.com.
白明浩,硕士研究生,北京大学国家发展研究院。
郭 也,博士研究生,北京师范大学经济与工商管理学院,E-mail:guoye0901@hotmail.com.
引用本文:    
魏浩, 白明浩, 郭也. 融资约束与中国企业的进口行为[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 464(2): 98-116.
WEI Hao, BAI Minghao, GUO Ye. Financial Constraints and Import Behavior of Chinese Firms. Journal of Financial Research, 2019, 464(2): 98-116.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2019/V464/I2/98
[1]魏浩、赵春明和李晓庆,2016,《中国进口商品结构变化的估算:2000-2014年》,《世界经济》第4期,第70~94页。
[2]魏浩和巫俊,2018a,《知识产权保护、进口贸易与创新型领军企业创新》,《金融研究》第9期,第91~106页。
[3]魏浩和巫俊,2018b,《知识产权保护与中国工业企业进口》,《经济学动态》第3期,第82-98页。
[4]许家云和毛其淋,2016,《中国企业的市场存货分析:中间品进口重要吗?》,《金融研究》第10期,第127~142页。
[5]许家云、毛其淋和胡鞍钢,2017,《中间品进口与企业出口产品质量升级》,《世界经济》第3期,第52~75页。
[6]于洪霞、龚六堂和陈玉宇,2011,《出口固定成本融资约束与企业出口行为》,《经济研究》第4期,第55~67页。
[7]Amiti, M. and J. Konings, 2007, “Trade Liberalization, Intermediate Inputs, and Productivity: Evidence from Indonesia,” The American Economic Review, 97(4), pp.1611~1638.
[8]Antràs, P., T. C. Fort and F. Tintelnot, 2017, “The Margins of Global Sourcing: Theory and Evidence from U.S. Firms,” The American Economic Review, 107(9), pp.2514~2564.
[9]Bellone, F., P. Musso and L. Nesta, 2010, “Financial Constraints and Firm Export Behavior,” The World Economy, 33(3), pp.347~373.
[10]Berman, N. and J. Héricourt, 2010, “Financial Factors and the Margins of Trade: Evidence from Cross-Country Firm-Level Data,” Journal of Development Economics, 93(2), pp.206~217.
[11]Bernard, A. B., J. B. Jensen, S. J. Redding and P. K. Schott, 2009, “The Margins of U.S. Trade,” The American Economic Review, 99(2), pp.487~493.
[12]Blyde, J., 2010, “Trade, Resource Reallocation and Industry Heterogeneity,” MPRA Paper, No. 24767.
[13]Chaney, T., 2008, “Distorted Gravity: The Intensive and Extensive Margin of International Trade,” The American Economic Review, 98(4), pp.1707~1721.
[14]Chaney, T., 2016, “Liquidity Constrained Exporters,” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, vol. 72(C), pp.141~154.
[15]Clementi, G. L. and H. A. Hopenhayn, 2004, “Theory of Financing Constraints and Firm Dynamics,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(2), pp.229~265.
[16]Eaton, J., J. B. Jensen, S. Kortum and A. B. Bernard, 2003, “Plants and Productivity in International Trade,” The American Economic Review, 93(4), pp.1268~1290.
[17]Hovakimian, G., 2009, “Determinants of Investment Cash Flow Sensitivity,” Financial Management, 38(1), pp.161~183.
[18]Manova, K., Z. Zhang and D. Fitzgerald, 2009, “Firm Exports and Multinational Activity Under Credit Constraints,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 97(3), pp.574~588.
[19]Manova, K., 2012, “Credit Constraints, Heterogeneous Firms, and International Trade,” The Review of Economic Studies, 80(2), pp.711~744.
[20]Melitz, M. J., 2003, “The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity, ” Econometrica, 71(6), pp.1695~1725.
[21]Melitz, M. J., 2008, “Market Size, Trade, and Productivity,” Review of Economic Studies, 75(1), pp.295~316.
[22]Minetti, R. and S. C. Zhu, 2011, “Credit Constraints and Firm Export: Microeconomic Evidence from Italy,” Journal of International Economics, 83(2), pp.109~125.
[23]Musso, P. and S. Schiavo, 2008, “The Impact of Financial Constraints on Firm Survival and Growth,” Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 18(2), pp.135~149.
[24]Muûls, M. and M. Pisu, 2009, “Imports and Exports at the Level of the Firm: Evidence from Belgium,” The World Economy, 32(5), pp.692~734.
[25]Muûls, M., 2015, “Exporters, Importers and Credit Constraints,” Journal of International Economics, 95(2), pp.333~343.
[26]Wang, H. J., 2003, “A Stochastic Frontier Analysis of Financing Constraints on Investment: The Case of Financial Liberalization in Taiwan,” Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 21(3), pp.406~419.
[1] 徐明东, 陈学彬. 中国上市企业投资的资本成本敏感性估计[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 470(8): 113-132.
[2] 蔡卫星. 银行业市场结构对企业生产率的影响——来自工业企业的经验证据[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 466(4): 39-55.
[3] 余明桂, 钟慧洁, 范蕊. 民营化、融资约束与企业创新——来自中国工业企业的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 466(4): 75-91.
[4] 魏浩, 巫俊. 知识产权保护、进口贸易与创新型领军企业创新[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 459(9): 91-106.
[5] 刘行, 吕长江. 企业避税的战略效应——基于避税对企业产品市场绩效的影响研究[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 457(7): 158-173.
[6] 钱雪松, 徐建利, 杜立. 中国委托贷款弥补了正规信贷不足吗?[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 455(5): 82-100.
[7] 黎文靖, 李茫茫. “实体+金融”:融资约束、政策迎合还是市场竞争?——基于不同产权性质视角的经验研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 446(8): 100-116.
[8] 刘啟仁, 黄建忠. 人民币汇率变动与出口企业研发[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 446(8): 19-34.
[9] 吕越, 吕云龙, 包群. 融资约束与企业增加值贸易——基于全球价值链视角的微观证据[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 443(5): 63-80.
[10] 张璇, 王鑫, 刘碧. 吃喝费用、融资约束与企业出口行为——世行中国企业调查数据的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 443(5): 176-190.
[11] 戴严科, 林曙. 利率波动、融资约束与存货投资——来自中国制造业企业的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 442(4): 95-111.
[12] 张海洋. 融资约束下金融互助模式的演进——从民间金融到网络借贷[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 441(3): 101-115.
[13] 祝树金, 赵玉龙. 资源错配与企业的出口行为——基于中国工业企业数据的经验研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 49-64.
[14] 黄宏斌, 翟淑萍, 陈静楠. 企业生命周期、融资方式与融资约束——基于投资者情绪调节效应的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 433(7): 96-112.
[15] 吕越, 罗伟, 刘斌. 融资约束与制造业的全球价值链跃升[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 432(6): 81-96.
[1] 王曦, 朱立挺, 王凯立. 我国货币政策是否关注资产价格?——基于马尔科夫区制转换BEKK多元GARCH模型[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 1 -17 .
[2] 刘勇政, 李岩. 中国的高速铁路建设与城市经济增长[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 18 -33 .
[3] 况伟大, 王琪琳. 房价波动、房贷规模与银行资本充足率[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 34 -48 .
[4] 祝树金, 赵玉龙. 资源错配与企业的出口行为——基于中国工业企业数据的经验研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 49 -64 .
[5] 陈德球, 陈运森, 董志勇. 政策不确定性、市场竞争与资本配置[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 65 -80 .
[6] 牟敦果, 王沛英. 中国能源价格内生性研究及货币政策选择分析[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 81 -95 .
[7] 高铭, 江嘉骏, 陈佳, 刘玉珍. 谁说女子不如儿郎?——P2P投资行为与过度自信[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 96 -111 .
[8] 吕若思, 刘青, 黄灿, 胡海燕, 卢进勇. 外资在华并购是否改善目标企业经营绩效?——基于企业层面的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 112 -127 .
[9] 姜军, 申丹琳, 江轩宇, 伊志宏. 债权人保护与企业创新[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 128 -142 .
[10] 刘莎莎, 孔高文. 信息搜寻、个人投资者交易与股价联动异象——基于股票送转的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 143 -157 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1