Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2019, Vol. 463 Issue (1): 35-53    
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
信任被定价了吗? ——来自债券市场的证据
杨国超,盘宇章
中南财经政法大学会计学院,湖北武汉 430073;
湘财证券股份有限公司,上海 200120
Is Trust Priced? Evidence from the Bond Market
YANG Guochao,PAN Yuzhang
School of Accounting, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law;
Xiangcai Securities Co., Ltd
下载:  PDF (1619KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 仅依赖法律等正式制度无法确保金融或经济的长期发展,信任等非正式制度在其中的作用不可或缺。鉴于此,本文研究信任这一非正式制度在债券市场中的价值。研究发现,信任不仅有助于提高债券信用评级,还有助于降低债券信用利差。同时,利用最高法“失信被执行人”数据还发现,失信及失信程度的增加会降低债券信用评级,提高债券信用利差。此外,本文还利用路径分析法发现,信任不仅会直接影响债券评级和定价,还会通过提升公司财务报告质量间接地发挥作用,即不仅投资者主观上更愿相信高信任度地区的企业,客观上这些企业也的确更为可信。进一步地,信任对债券评级和定价的积极作用在国有企业、金融业更发达地区的企业以及发债次数更多的企业中更为显著,即投资者与发行人之间的重复博弈机会越多,信任的价值也越大。本文研究结论提醒政府在推动企业融资成本下降时,应着重加强对信任这种地区乃至国家公共品的培育和建设。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
杨国超
盘宇章
关键词:  信任  债券市场  信用评级  信用利差  债券融资成本    
Summary:  Formal institutions can promote financial development and economic growth by reducing contract execution costs. However, once informal institutions such as trust are lacking, the implementation cost of a contract may be too high. Economists and sociologists have long acknowledged the importance of trust, but empirical studies on trust in financial markets have only emerged in recent years (Zingales, 2015). The literature focuses only on trust in the stock market (Li, 2006), bank credit market (Zhang and Li, 2012), and firm supply chains (Liu et al., 2009), while its impact on the bond market has not yet been studied. Yet the issue of trust in the bond market is crucial. First, compared with the bank credit market, the problem of information asymmetry in the bond market is difficult to alleviate effectively, especially when the credibility of credit rating agencies in China is questioned. Moreover, as the bond market has relatively low requirements for formal institutions relative to the stock market, the role of trust becomes even more important. Second, trust is a “public good” at the regional level. In recent years, many bond defaults in China have caused bond investors to distrust individual companies, and this distrust has spread to other companies in the same region. This paper takes all of the corporate bonds, enterprise bonds, and medium-term notes issued in China's bond market from 2008 to 2015 as the research sample, and uses the questionnaire survey conducted by Professor Zhang in 2000 through the “Chinese Entrepreneur Survey System” to obtain the level of trust in the provinces (Zhang and Ke, 2002). Relying on these data, we study the role of trust as an informal institution in the bond market. Bond issuance data and financial data are taken from the Wind database, the bond market index is from the China Bond Information Network, and the provincial macroeconomic data comes from the CSMAR database. Our results show that trust does help to improve the bond credit rating and reduce the bond credit spread, and this conclusion remains valid after applying different trust metrics, including possible omitted variables and instrumental variables. At the same time, this paper uses the data from The Supreme People's Court's “List of Defaulters” to construct indicators for the level of untrustworthiness in each province, and finds that an increase in untrustworthiness lowers the bond credit rating and increases the bond credit spread. Further, using path analysis, trust is found to affect bond financing both directly and indirectly by improving the quality of financial reporting. The results show that investors are not only subjectively more willing to believe in companies in high-trust areas, but that these companies are also objectively more credible. We also find that the positive effect of trust on bond ratings and pricing is more pronounced for state-owned enterprises, companies in areas with a developed financial industry, and companies that issue bonds more often. That is, the more repeated opportunities for interaction between investors and issuers, the greater the level of trust. The contributions of this paper are as follows. First, the existing research focuses on the impact of formal institutions on bond credit ratings and pricing, whereas this paper focuses on the crucial role of deep cultural factors such as trust in the bond market. Second, this paper seeks a new theoretical premise for the question of how trust develops—through repeated interaction opportunities. Studies have shown that informal institutions such as trust play an important role when investor protection is weaker or disclosure quality is lower (Aghion et al., 2010; Guiso et al., 2004; Pevzner et al., 2015). This paper identifies three variables related to repeated interactions and finds that when there are more opportunities for interaction, the role of trust is greater. It can be seen that the relationship between trust and the external environment is not simple. Our findings help to clarify the underlying reasons why trust plays a role in economic activity, and provide new evidence for the literature on the conditions under which trust can develop. The conclusions have important policy implications. The Chinese government takes formal institutions into account when promoting enterprises to reduce corporate financing costs. This paper shows that informal institutions such as trust are equally important to the development of China's bond market. It is even more important to strengthen the construction of trust as a regional public good when the crisis of distrust of individual companies spreads to other enterprises in the same region.
Keywords:  Trust    Bond Market    Credit Rating    Credit Spread    Bond Financing Cost
JEL分类号:  E44   G10   H41  
基金资助: * 本文得到国家自然科学青年基金(71702192、71502177)、教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金(17YJC790186)、湖北省技术创新专项软科学项目资助(2017ADC143)以及中南财经政法大学中央高校基本科研业务费资助项目(2722018XT034)的支持。
作者简介:  杨国超(通讯作者),管理学博士,副教授,中南财经政法大学会计学院,E-mail:yang.guochao@outlook.com. 盘宇章,经济学博士,湘财证券股份有限公司研究所,E-mail:panyuzhang@fudan.edu.cn.
引用本文:    
杨国超, 盘宇章. 信任被定价了吗? ——来自债券市场的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 463(1): 35-53.
YANG Guochao, PAN Yuzhang. Is Trust Priced? Evidence from the Bond Market. Journal of Financial Research, 2019, 463(1): 35-53.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2019/V463/I1/35
[1] 方红星、施继坤和张广宝,2013,《产权性质、信息质量与公司债定价——来自中国资本市场的经验证据》,《金融研究》第4期,第170~182页。
[2] 寇宗来、盘宇章和刘学悦,2015,《中国的信用评级真的影响发债成本吗?》,《金融研究》第10期,第81~98页。
[3] 李涛,2006,《社会互动、信任与股市参与》,《经济研究》第1期,第34~45页。
[4] 刘凤委、李琳和薛云奎,2009,《信任、交易成本与商业信用模式》,《经济研究》第8期,第60~72页。
[5] 史永东和田渊博,2016,《契约条款影响债券价格吗?——基于中国公司债市场的经验研究》,《金融研究》第8期,第143~158页。
[6] 史宇鹏、和昂达和陈永伟,2013,《产权保护与企业存续:来自制造业的证据》,《管理世界》第8期,第118~125页。
[7] 王博森、吕元稹和叶永新,2016,《政府隐性担保风险定价:基于我国债券交易市场的探讨》,《经济研究》第10期,第155~167页。
[8] 王小鲁、樊纲和余静文,2016,《中国分省份市场化指数报告(2016)》,社会科学文献出版社。
[9] 张敦力和李四海,2012,《社会信任、政治关系与民营企业银行贷款》,《会计研究》第8期,第17~24页。
[10] 张维迎,2002,《法律制度的信誉基础》,《经济研究》第1期,第3~13页。
[11] 张维迎和柯荣住,2002,《信任及其解释:来自中国的跨省调查分析》,《经济研究》第10期,第59~70页。
[12] Aghion, P., Y.Algan, P.Cahuc and A.Shleifer, 2010, “Regulation and Distrust,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125(3), pp.1015~1049.
[13] Allen, F., J.Qian and M.Qian, 2005, “Law, Finance, and Economic Growth in China,” Journal of Financial Economics, 77(1), pp.57~116.
[14] Ang, J.S., Y.Cheng and C.Wu, 2015, “Trust, Investment, and Business Contracting,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 50(3), pp.569~595.
[15] Arrow, K.J., 1969, “The Organization of Economic Activity: Issues Pertinent to the Choice of Market versus Nonmarket Allocation,” The Analysis and Evaluation of Public Expenditure: The PPB System, 1, pp.59~73.
[16] Chen, D., X.Liu and C.Wang, 2016, “Social Trust and Bank Loan Financing: Evidence from China,” Abacus, 52(3), pp.374~403.
[17] Dechow, P.M., R.G.Sloan and A.P.Sweeney, 1995, “Detecting Earnings Management,” The Accounting Review, 70(2), pp.193~225.
[18] Diamond, D.W., 1984, “Financial Intermediation and Delegated Monitoring,” The Review of Economic Studies, 51(3), pp.393~414.
[19] Fukuyama, F., 1995, Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity, Free Press Paperbacks.
[20] Gambetta, D. ,2000, “Can We Trust Trust?”, in Gambetta, D. (eds.) Trust:Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations, electronic edition, Department of Sociology,University of Oxford, pp. 213~237.
[21] Gentzkow, M.A.and J.M.Shapiro, 2004, “Media, Education and Anti-Americanism in the Muslim World,” The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18(3), pp.117~133.
[22] Guiso, L., P.Sapienza and L.Zingales, 2009, “Cultural Biases in Economic Exchange?” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(3), pp.1095~1131.
[23] Guiso, L., P.Sapienza and L.Zingales, 2004, “The Role of Social Capital in Financial Development,” The American Economic Review, 94(3), pp.526~556.
[24] Guiso, L., P.Sapienza and L.Zingales, 2008, “Trusting the Stock Market,” The Journal of Finance, 63(6), pp.2557~2600.
[25] Holmstro..m, B. ,2015, “Understanding the Role of Debt in the Financial System,” BIS working paper, No. 479.
[26] Kothari, S.P., A.J.Leone and C.E.Wasley, 2005, “Performance Matched Discretionary Accrual Measures,” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39(1), pp.163~197.
[27] Kreps, David M.,1990, “Corporate Culture and Economic Theory,” in J. E. Alt and K. A. Shepsle(eds.) Perspectives on Positive Political Economy, Cambridge, England:Cambridge University Press, pp. 90~143.
[28] La Porta, R., F.Lopez-De-Silanes, A.Shleifer and R.W.Vishny, 1997, “Legal Determinants of External Finance,” The Journal of Finance, 52(3), pp.1131~1150.
[29] Mansi, S.A., W.F.Maxwell and J.K.Wald, 2009, “Creditor Protection Laws and the Cost of Debt,” Journal of Law and Economics, 52(4), pp.701~717.
[30] Pevzner, M., F.Xie and X.Xin, 2015, “When Firms Talk, Do Investors Listen? The Role of Trust in Stock Market Reactions to Corporate Earnings Announcements,” Journal of Financial Economics, 117(1), pp.190~223.
[31] Putnam, R.D. ,1993, Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy, Princeton University Press.
[32] Qi, Y.X., L.Roth and J.K.Wald, 2010, “Political Rights and the Cost of Debt,” Journal of Financial Economics, 95(2), pp.202~226.
[33] Sobel, M.E., 1982, “Asymptotic Confidence Intervals for Indirect Effects in Structural Equation Models,” Sociological Methodology, 13, pp.290~312.
[34] Uslaner, E.M., 2002, The Moral Foundations of Trust, Cambridge University Press.
[35] Wu, W., M.Firth and O.M.Rui, 2014, “Trust and the Provision of Trade Credit,” Journal of Banking & Finance, 39, pp.146~159.
[36] Ziebart, D.A.and S.A.Reiter, 1992, “Bond Ratings, Bond Yields and Financial Information.,” Contemporary Accounting Research, 9(1), pp.252~282.
[37] Zingales, L., 2015, “The ‘Cultural Revolution' in Finance,” Journal of Financial Economics, 117(1), pp.1~4.
[1] 段白鸽, 王永钦, 夏梦嘉. 金融创新如何缓解信任品市场失灵?——中国食品安全责任强制保险的自然实验[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 471(9): 75-93.
[2] 王正位, 王新程, 廖理. 信任与欺骗:投资者为什么陷入庞氏骗局?——来自e租宝88.9万名投资者的经验证据[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 470(8): 96-112.
[3] 常莹莹, 曾泉. 环境信息透明度与企业信用评级——基于债券评级市场的经验证据[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 467(5): 132-151.
[4] 林晚发, 钟辉勇, 李青原. 高管任职经历的得与失?——来自债券市场的经验证据[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 456(6): 171-188.
[5] 陈胜蓝, 刘晓玲. 经济政策不确定性与公司商业信用供给[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 455(5): 172-190.
[6] 许友传. 银行信用评级的信息质量及其次级债事前约束[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 445(7): 105-122.
[7] 黄小琳, 朱松, 陈关亭. 劳动投资效率、企业性质与资产收益率[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 441(3): 130-144.
[8] 纪志宏, 曹媛媛. 信用风险溢价还是市场流动性溢价:基于中国信用债定价的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 440(2): 1-10.
[9] 王雄元, 高开娟. 客户集中度与公司债二级市场信用利差[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 439(1): 130-144.
[10] 郭晔, 黄振, 王蕴. 未预期货币政策与企业债券信用利差——基于固浮利差分解的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 432(6): 67-80.
[11] 钟辉勇, 钟宁桦, 朱小能. 城投债的担保可信吗?——来自债券评级和发行定价的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 430(4): 66-82.
[12] 马永波, 郭牧炫. 做市商制度、双边价差与市场稳定性——基于银行间债券市场做市行为的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 430(4): 50-65.
[13] 李明明, 秦凤鸣. 主权信用评级、债务危机与经济增长——来自欧元区国家的经验证据[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 436(10): 16-31.
[14] 寇宗来, 盘宇章, 刘学悦. 中国的信用评级真的影响发债成本吗?[J]. 金融研究, 2015, 424(10): 81-98.
[1] 王曦, 朱立挺, 王凯立. 我国货币政策是否关注资产价格?——基于马尔科夫区制转换BEKK多元GARCH模型[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 1 -17 .
[2] 刘勇政, 李岩. 中国的高速铁路建设与城市经济增长[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 18 -33 .
[3] 况伟大, 王琪琳. 房价波动、房贷规模与银行资本充足率[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 34 -48 .
[4] 祝树金, 赵玉龙. 资源错配与企业的出口行为——基于中国工业企业数据的经验研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 49 -64 .
[5] 陈德球, 陈运森, 董志勇. 政策不确定性、市场竞争与资本配置[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 65 -80 .
[6] 牟敦果, 王沛英. 中国能源价格内生性研究及货币政策选择分析[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 81 -95 .
[7] 高铭, 江嘉骏, 陈佳, 刘玉珍. 谁说女子不如儿郎?——P2P投资行为与过度自信[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 96 -111 .
[8] 吕若思, 刘青, 黄灿, 胡海燕, 卢进勇. 外资在华并购是否改善目标企业经营绩效?——基于企业层面的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 112 -127 .
[9] 姜军, 申丹琳, 江轩宇, 伊志宏. 债权人保护与企业创新[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 128 -142 .
[10] 刘莎莎, 孔高文. 信息搜寻、个人投资者交易与股价联动异象——基于股票送转的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 143 -157 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1