Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2018, Vol. 456 Issue (6): 109-122    
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
存款保险制度如何影响公众对不同银行的信心?——来自中国的证据
王永钦, 陈映辉, 熊雅文
复旦大学中国社会主义市场经济研究中心/经济学院,上海 200433;
中南财经政法大学会计学院,湖北武汉 430073
How does Deposit Insurance System Affect Different Banks? Evidence from China
WANG Yongqin, CHEN Yinghui, XIONG Yawen
China Center for Economic Studies, Fudan University;
School of Accounting, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law;
School of Economics, Fudan University
下载:  PDF (1388KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 在政府对于银行具有隐性担保的经济体中,引入存款保险制度会对不同的银行带来什么影响,是个有待学术界研究的重要问题。本文利用中国推出存款保险制度这个准自然实验, 首次通过事件研究法实证检验和识别了市场对于隐性担保和存款保险的看法。研究发现,短期内,存款保险制度让公众对于某些银行的存款更加不放心: 存款保险制度的推出对于规模较大、全国性的国有银行和股份制银行的冲击并不显著,而对于规模较小、地方性的城市商业银行有较为显著的负向效应。一个可能的解释是,存款保险制度将政府隐性担保显性化; 这种冲击对小银行更明显,而公众还是相信大型国有银行和全国性股份制银行会“大而不倒”。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
王永钦
陈映辉
熊雅文
关键词:  隐性担保  大而不倒  存款保险  事件研究法    
Abstract:  It is still an open question what effects introducing deposit insurance systems (hereafter, “DIS”) have on financial institutions in economies with implicit government guarantees. The paper exploits a quasi-natural experiment and uses event study methodology to estimate the effects. The results show that DIS actually makes smaller banks less trustworthy; DIS had more negative effects on small and local banks than large state-owned and shareholding banks. One explanation is that DIS has made implicit government guarantees explicit, leading to fears that guarantees for smaller banks will only be partial, while state-owned banks are believed to be “too big to fail”.
Key words:  Implicit Guarantee    Too Big to Fail    Deposit Insurance    Event Study
JEL分类号:  G21  
基金资助: 本文感谢国家自然科学基金(71673058)、国家自然科学基金(71772179)、中国保险学会教保人身保险高校课题研究基金“低利率环境下我国寿险公司资产负债管理研究”、教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目(15JJD790008)、上海市重点学科建设项目(B101)、复旦大学经济学院高峰计划和上海高校智库(复旦大学中国经济研究中心)的资助。
作者简介:  王永钦,经济学博士,教授,复旦大学中国社会主义市场经济研究中心,Email: yongqinwang@ fudan.edu.cn.
陈映辉(通讯作者),经济学博士,讲师,中南财经政法大学会计学院,Email: yinghuichen@foxmail.com.
熊雅文,硕士研究生,复旦大学经济学院,email:xyw_fdu@163.com.
引用本文:    
王永钦, 陈映辉, 熊雅文. 存款保险制度如何影响公众对不同银行的信心?——来自中国的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 456(6): 109-122.
WANG Yongqin, CHEN Yinghui, XIONG Yawen. How does Deposit Insurance System Affect Different Banks? Evidence from China. Journal of Financial Research, 2018, 456(6): 109-122.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2018/V456/I6/109
[1] 谢平和王素珍,2001,《存款制度的理论研究与国际比较》,《金融研究》第5期,第1~12页。
[2] 钱小安,2004,《存款保险的道德风险、约束条件与制度设计》,《金融研究》第8期,第21~27页。
[3] 王永钦、刘思远和杜巨澜,2014,《信任品市场的竞争效应与传染效应:理论和基于中国食品行业的事件研究》,《经济研究》第2期,第141~154页。
[4] 王永钦、陈映辉和杜巨澜,2016,《软预算约束与中国地方政府债务的违约风险: 来自金融市场的证据》,《经济研究》第11期,第96~109页。
[5] 朱宁,2016,《刚性泡沫》,中信出版社。
[6] Acharya, V. V., D. Anginer and A. J. Warburton. 2015. “The End of Market Discipline? Investor Expectations of Implicit Government Guarantees”, Social Science Electronic Publishing,
[7] Acharya, V. V. and N. Kulkarni. 2013. “Government Guarantees and Bank Vulnerability During the Financial Crisis of 2007–09: Evidence from an Emerging Market”, Working Paper, NYU Stern School of Business.
[8] Acharya, V.V., Matthew Richardson, Stijn Van Nieuwerburgh and Lawrence J. White,2011, Guaranteed to Fail: Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and the Debacle of Mortgage Finance, Princeton University Press.
[9] Acharya, V.V., J.Qian, and Z. Yang, 2016. “In the Shadow of Banks: Wealth Management Products and Issuing Banks' Risk in China”, Working Paper, NYU.
[10] Brown, S.J. and J. B. Warner. 1985. “Using Daily Stock Returns: The Case of Event Studies”, Journal of Financial Economics, 14(1):3~31.
[11] Bryant, J.. 1980. “A Model of Reserves, Bank Runs, and Deposit Insurance”, Journal of Banking & Finance, 4(4):335~344.
[12] Campbell, C. J. and C. E. Wasley. 1993. “Measuring Security Price Performance Using Daily Returns: Issues Associated with Using NASDAQ Securities”, Journal of Financial Economics, 33(1):73~92.
[13] Corrado, C. J., 1989. “A Nonparametric Test for Abnormal Security-price Performance in Event Studies”, Journal of Financial Economics, 23(2):385~395.
[14] Corrado, C. J. and T. L. Zivney. 1992. “The Specification and Power of the Sign Test in Event Study Hypothesis Tests Using Daily Stock Returns”, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 27(3):465~478.
[15] Demirgüç-Kunt, A. and H. Huizinga, 2004. “Market Discipline and Deposit Insurance.” Journal of Monetary Economics 51(2): 375~399.
[16] Eichengreen. B, and P. Gupta, 2013. “The Financial Crisis and Indian Banks: Survival of the Fittest?”Journal of International Money and Finance, 39: 138~152.
[17] Fama, E. F., L. Fisher, M. Jensen, and R. Roll. 1969. “The Adjustment of Stock Prices to New Information”, International Economic Review, 10(1):1~21.
[18] Gelbach, J. B., Helland, E., and Klick, J. 2013 “Valid Inference in Single-firm, Single-event Studies.” American Law and Economics Review 15(2): 495~541.
[19] Gorton, G.2012. Misunderstanding financial crises: Why we don't see them coming. Oxford University Press.
[20] Gropp, R. and J. M. Vesala. 2001. “Deposit Insurance and Moral Hazard: Does the Counterfactual Matter?” Quebec a Montreal-Recherche en gestion:551~574.
[21] Hein, S. E. and Westfall, P. 2004. “Improving Tests of Abnormal Returns by Bootstrapping the Multivariate Regression Model with Event Parameters”, Journal of Financial Econometrics 2(3): 451~471.
[22] Imai, M., 2006, “Market Discipline and Deposit Insurance Reform in Japan”, Journal of Banking and Finance, 30(12), 3433~3452.
[23] Iyer, R. and M. Puri, 2012, “Understanding Bank Runs: The Importance of Depositor-Bank Relationships and Networks”, American Economic Review, 102(4): 1414~1445.
[24] Kramer, L. A. 2001. “Alternative for Robust Analysis in Event Study Applications”, Advances in Investment Analysis and Portfolio Management, 8: 109~132.
[25] Nys, E., Tarazi, A., and Trinugroho, I., 2015. “Political Connections, Bank Deposits, and Formal Deposit Insurance”, Journal of Financial Stability, 19: 83~104.
[26] O'Hara, M. and W. Shaw. 1990. “Deposit Insurance and Wealth Effects: The Value of Being ‘Too Big to Fail’”, Journal of Finance, 45(5):1587~1600.
[27] Rajan, R. G.2011. Fault Lines: How Hidden Fractures Still Threaten the World Economy. Princeton University Press.
[28] Shiller, B., 2012. Finance and Good Society, Princeton University Presss.
[29] Strahan, P. E., 2013. “Too Big to Fail: Causes, Consequences, and Policy Responses”, Annual Review of Financial Economics, 5(1): 43~61.
[30] Zivney, T. L. and D. J. Thompson. 1989. “The Specification and Power of the Sign Test in Measuring Security Price Performance: Comments and Analysis”, Financial Review, 24(4):581~588.
[1] 闫先东, 张鹏辉. 土地价格、土地财政与宏观经济波动[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 471(9): 1-18.
[2] 杨青, 王亚男, 唐跃军. “限薪令”的政策效果:基于竞争与垄断性央企市场反应的评估[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 451(1): 156-173.
[3] 金鹏辉, 王营, 张立光. 稳增长条件下的金融摩擦与杠杆治理[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 442(4): 78-94.
[4] 张学勇, 柳依依, 罗丹, 陈锐. 创新能力对上市公司并购业绩的影响[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 441(3): 159-175.
[5] 罗荣华, 刘劲劲. 地方政府的隐性担保真的有效吗?——基于城投债发行定价的检验[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 430(4): 83-98.
[6] 王道平. 利率市场化、存款保险制度与系统性银行危机防范[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 427(1): 50-65.
[7] 汪莉, 陈诗一. 政府隐性担保、债务违约与利率决定[J]. 金融研究, 2015, 423(9): 66-81.
[1] 王曦, 朱立挺, 王凯立. 我国货币政策是否关注资产价格?——基于马尔科夫区制转换BEKK多元GARCH模型[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 1 -17 .
[2] 刘勇政, 李岩. 中国的高速铁路建设与城市经济增长[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 18 -33 .
[3] 况伟大, 王琪琳. 房价波动、房贷规模与银行资本充足率[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 34 -48 .
[4] 祝树金, 赵玉龙. 资源错配与企业的出口行为——基于中国工业企业数据的经验研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 49 -64 .
[5] 陈德球, 陈运森, 董志勇. 政策不确定性、市场竞争与资本配置[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 65 -80 .
[6] 牟敦果, 王沛英. 中国能源价格内生性研究及货币政策选择分析[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 81 -95 .
[7] 高铭, 江嘉骏, 陈佳, 刘玉珍. 谁说女子不如儿郎?——P2P投资行为与过度自信[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 96 -111 .
[8] 吕若思, 刘青, 黄灿, 胡海燕, 卢进勇. 外资在华并购是否改善目标企业经营绩效?——基于企业层面的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 112 -127 .
[9] 姜军, 申丹琳, 江轩宇, 伊志宏. 债权人保护与企业创新[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 128 -142 .
[10] 刘莎莎, 孔高文. 信息搜寻、个人投资者交易与股价联动异象——基于股票送转的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 143 -157 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1