Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2018, Vol. 459 Issue (9): 56-73    
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
城市毗邻效应与出口比较优势
蒋灵多, 陆毅, 陈勇兵
对外经济贸易大学国际经济贸易学院,北京 100029;
清华大学经济管理学院,北京 100084;
厦门大学经济学院,福建厦门 361005
Neighbor-Cities Effects and Export Comparative Advantage
JIANG Lingduo, LU Yi, CHEN Yongbing
School of International Trade and Economics,University of International Business and Economics;
School of Economics and Management, Tsinghua University;
School of Economics, Xiamen University
下载:  PDF (1622KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 培育出口新优势与拓展区域发展空间是“十三五”规划中培育经济发展新动力的重要举措,城市群建设为出口新优势的培育提供了可能。本文采用2000-2006年中国海关与城市统计年鉴数据考察了城市空间邻近对城市出口比较优势的动态影响。研究表明,城市间交互作用对毗邻城市新产品与现有产品出口优势的培育具有显著促进作用,在以长珠江三角洲城市群为主的东南地区最为显著;且更大程度促进了毗邻城市非优势出口产品与中低技能技术密集型产品的出口优势培育;空间毗邻是城市间发挥交互作用的必要条件。政府应加快城市群建设步伐,促进邻近城市间知识外溢等交互作用的便利化,推动中国出口新优势培育。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
蒋灵多
陆毅
陈勇兵
关键词:  毗邻效应  知识外溢  出口比较优势    
Abstract:  Fostering new export advantages and expanding regional development space are important initiatives for cultivating economic development power in the 13th Five Year Plan. The construction of urban agglomeration provides the possibility for cultivation of new export advantages. We use a matching data of Chinese export data and city-level data over the period 2000-2006 to study the dynamic effect of intercity spatial proximity on the cities' export comparative advantages. The results reveal that intercity interactions have significant effects on both the export of new products and incumbent products of adjacent cities, and the effects are most significant in southeast of China which mainly includes the Yangtze River Delta and the Pearl River Delta; The effects are also mainly reflected on adjacent cities' non-advantage export products, mid-and low-skilled technology-intensive products. Adjacent cities are necessary conditions for the effects. The government should accelerate the construction of urban agglomeration to facilitate the intercity interactions to promote the export comparative advantage cultivation.
Key words:  Neighbor-Cities Effects    Knowledge Diffusion    Export Comparative Advantage
JEL分类号:  F10   F14   F63  
基金资助: 本文系清华大学中国经济社会数据研究中心“如何有效推进去产能与结构性去杠杆”项目的阶段性成果,得到“中华思源工程扶贫基金会闽善公益基金”的资助;感谢国家自然科学基金重点项目(71433002)、国家自然科学基金面上项目(71573278)的资助。
通讯作者:  陆 毅,经济学博士,教授,清华大学经济管理学院,Email: luyi@sem.tsinghua.edu.cn.陈勇兵,经济学博士,教授,厦门大学经济学院,Email: yongbingchen@163.com.   
作者简介:  蒋灵多,经济学博士,讲师,对外经济贸易大学国际经济贸易学院,Email: lingduo_2007@163.com.
引用本文:    
蒋灵多, 陆毅, 陈勇兵. 城市毗邻效应与出口比较优势[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 459(9): 56-73.
JIANG Lingduo, LU Yi, CHEN Yongbing. Neighbor-Cities Effects and Export Comparative Advantage. Journal of Financial Research, 2018, 459(9): 56-73.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2018/V459/I9/56
[1]包群、邵敏和Ligang Song,2012,《地理集聚、行业集中与中国企业出口模式的差异性》,《管理世界》第9期,第61~75页。
[2]薄文广,2007,《外部性与产业增长—来自中国省级面板数据的研究》,《中国工业经济》第1期,第37~44页。
[3]陈旭、邱斌和刘修岩,2016,《空间集聚与企业出口:基于中国工业企业数据的经验研究》,《世界经济》第8期,第94~117页。
[4]范剑勇、冯猛和李方文,2014,《产业集聚与企业全要素生产率》,《世界经济》第5期,第51~73页。
[5]蒋灵多和陈勇兵,2015,《出口企业的产品异质性与出口持续时间》,《世界经济》第7期,第3~26页。
[6]李善同和侯永志,2003,《中国大陆:划分8大社会经济区域》,《经济前沿》第5期,第12~23页。
[7]文东伟和冼国明,2014,《中国制造业的空间集聚与出口:基于企业层面的研究》,《管理世界》第10期,第57~74页。
[8]温忠麟和叶宝娟,2014,《中介效应分析:方法与模型发展》,《心理科学进展》第5期,第731~745页。
[9]吴玉鸣,2007,《中国区域研发、知识溢出与创新的空间计量经济研究》,北京:人民出版社。
[10]叶宁华、包群和邵敏,2014,《空间集聚、市场拥挤与我国出口企业的过度扩张》,《管理世界》第1期,第58~72页。
[11]易靖韬,2009,《企业异质性、市场进入成本、技术溢出效应与出口参与决定》,《经济研究》第9期,第106~115页。
[12]余泳泽、刘大勇和宣烨,2016,《生产性服务业集聚对制造业生产效率的外溢效应及其衰减边界——基于空间计量模型的实证分析》,《金融研究》第2期,第23~36页。
[13]张国峰、王永进和李坤望,2016,《产业集聚与企业出口:基于社交与沟通外溢效应的考察》,《世界经济》第2期,第48~74页。
[14]Arrow, Kenneth J., 1969, “Classificatory Notes on the Production and Transmission of Technological Knowledge”, American Economic Review, 59 (2):29~35.
[15]Autant-Bernard, C. and James P. L., 2011, “Quantifying Knowledge Spillovers Using Spatial Econometric Models”, Journal of Regional Science, 51:471~96.
[16]Bahar, D., Hausmann, R. and Hidalgo C.A., 2014, “Neighbors and the Evolution of the Comparative Advantage of Nations: Evidence of International Knowledge Diffusion?” Journal of International Economics, 92: 111~123.
[17]Bai, C., Ma H. and Pan W., 2012, “Spatial Spillover and Regional Economic Growth in China”, China Economic Review, 23(4):982~990.
[18]Balassa, B., 1965, “Trade Liberalisation and Revealed Comparative Advantage”, The Manchester School, 33 (2):99~123.
[19]Branstetter, L. G., 2006, “Is Foreign Direct Investment a Channel of Knowledge Spillovers? Evidence from Japan's FDI in the United States”, Journal of International Economics, 68 (2):325~344.
[20]Finger, J.M. and Kreinin, M.E., 1979, “A Measure of ‘Export Similarity' and Its Possible Uses”, Econometrica, 89 (356):905~912.
[21]Fischer, M.M., Scherngell, T . and Jansenberger, E ., 2006, “The Geography of Knowledge Spillovers between High-Technology Firms in Europe: Evidence from a Spatial Interaction Modeling Perspective”, Geographical Analysis, 38(3):288~309.
[22]Funke, M. and Niebuhr, A., 2005, “Regional Geographic Research and Development Spillovers and Economic Growth: Evidence from West Germany”, Regional Studies, 39(1):143~153.
[23]Hu, C., Xu, Z. and Yashiro, N., 2015, “Agglomeration and Productivity in China: Firm Level Evidence”, China Economic Review, 33:50~66.
[24]Ibrahim, S. and Fallah, M. H., 2005, “Drivers of Innovation and Influence of Technological Clusters”, Engineering Management Journal, 2005, 17(3):33~41.
[25]Ito, B., Xu, Z. and Yashiro, N., 2015, “Does Agglomeration Promote Internationalization of Chinese Firms?” China Economic Review, 34:109~121.
[26]Jaffe, A .B., Trajtenberg, M. and Henderson, R., 1993, “Geographic Localization of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations”, Quarterly Journal of Economics,108:577~598.
[27]Kang, Y., 2016, “Is Agglomeration a Free Lunch for New Exporters? Evidence from Chile”, The Annals of Regional Science, 57(1):195~222.
[28]Keller, W., 2002, “Geographic Localization of International Technology Diffusion”, American Economic Review. 92 (1):120~142.
[29]Keller,W. and Yeaple, S. R., 2009, “Multinational Enterprises, International Trade, and Productivity Growth: Firm-level Evidence from the United States”, Review of Economics and Statistics, 91:821~831.
[30]Koenig, P.; Mayneris, F. and Poncet, S. 2010, “Local Export Spillovers in France”, European Economic Review, 54(4): 622~641.
[31]Lall, S., 2000, “The Technological Structure and Performance of Developing Country Manufactured Exports, 1985–98”, Oxford Development Studies, 28 (3):337~369.
[32]Lucas, R E., 1988, “On the Mechanics of Economic Development”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 22 (1):3~42.
[33]Magrini, S ., 2004, “Regional Convergence”, in:Henderson, J .V. and Thisse, J .-F.(eds .), Handbook of Urban and Regional Economics, Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing, 4:2741~2796.
[34]Melitz M. J. 2003, “The Impact of Trade on Intra-industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity”, Econometrica, 71(6):1695~1725.
[35]Patacchini, E., Picard, P. M. and Zenou, Y. 2015, “Urban Social Structure, Social Capital and Spatial Proximity”, CEPR Discussion Paper, No. DP10501.
[36]Peri, G., 2005, “Determinants of Knowledge Flows and Their Effects on Innovation”, Review of Economics and Statistics, 87(2):308~322.
[37]Romer, P. M., 1990, “Endogenous Technical Change”, Journal of Political Economy, 98 (5):71~102.
[38]Storper, M. and Venables, A. J. 2004, “Buzz: Face-to-face Contact and the Urban Economy”, Journal of Economic Geography, 4(4):351~370.
[39]Tavares, J., and Wacziarg R., 2001, “How Democracy Affects Growth”, European Economic Review, 45(8):1341~1378.
[40]Valderrama, D., García, A. F. and Argüello, R. 2013, “Information Externalities and Export Duration at the Firm Level. Evidence for Colombia”, Working Papers, Freit. org.
[41]Verspagen, B., 1993, “Uneven Growth between Interdependent Economies: A[n]Evolutionary View on Technology Gaps, Trade, and Growth”, Aldershot, England: Avebury; Brookfield, Vt., USA: Ashgate Pub. Co.
[42]Wagner, R. and Zahler, A., 2015, “New Exports from Emerging Markets: Do Followers Benefit from Pioneers?” Journal of Development Economics, 114: 203~223.
[1] 魏浩, 白明浩, 郭也. 融资约束与中国企业的进口行为[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 464(2): 98-116.
[2] 许家云. 海归与企业出口行为:来自中国的微观证据[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 452(2): 118-134.
[3] 殷明明, 陈平, 王伟. 第三方市场竞争效应、投资效应与人民币有效汇率指数测算[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 450(12): 33-47.
[4] 綦建红, 刘慧. 对我国“出口脱媒”现象的另一种解释——基于贸易中介应对汇率水平变动的视角[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 447(9): 35-50.
[5] 许家云, 毛其淋. 中国企业的市场存活分析:中间品进口重要吗?[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 436(10): 127-142.
[6] 沈沁, 谢丹阳. 全球经济增长的可持续性:不容置疑[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 428(2): 86-95.
[7] 许家云, 佟家栋, 毛其淋. 人民币汇率与企业生产率变动——来自中国的经验证据[J]. 金融研究, 2015, 424(10): 1-16.
[8] 孙浦阳, 张龑, 黄玖立. 出口行为、边际成本与销售波动——基于中国工业企业数据的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2015, 423(9): 159-173.
[1] 王曦, 朱立挺, 王凯立. 我国货币政策是否关注资产价格?——基于马尔科夫区制转换BEKK多元GARCH模型[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 1 -17 .
[2] 刘勇政, 李岩. 中国的高速铁路建设与城市经济增长[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 18 -33 .
[3] 况伟大, 王琪琳. 房价波动、房贷规模与银行资本充足率[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 34 -48 .
[4] 祝树金, 赵玉龙. 资源错配与企业的出口行为——基于中国工业企业数据的经验研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 49 -64 .
[5] 陈德球, 陈运森, 董志勇. 政策不确定性、市场竞争与资本配置[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 65 -80 .
[6] 牟敦果, 王沛英. 中国能源价格内生性研究及货币政策选择分析[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 81 -95 .
[7] 高铭, 江嘉骏, 陈佳, 刘玉珍. 谁说女子不如儿郎?——P2P投资行为与过度自信[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 96 -111 .
[8] 吕若思, 刘青, 黄灿, 胡海燕, 卢进勇. 外资在华并购是否改善目标企业经营绩效?——基于企业层面的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 112 -127 .
[9] 姜军, 申丹琳, 江轩宇, 伊志宏. 债权人保护与企业创新[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 128 -142 .
[10] 刘莎莎, 孔高文. 信息搜寻、个人投资者交易与股价联动异象——基于股票送转的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 143 -157 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1