Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2018, Vol. 459 Issue (9): 37-55    
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
共识规则下的货币演化逻辑与法定数字货币的人工智能发行
姚前
中国人民银行数字货币研究所,北京 100800
Currency Evolution Logic under Consensus Mechanism and Digital Fiat Currency Issuance based on Artificial Intelligence
YAO Qian
Institute of Digital Money,The People's Bank of China
下载:  PDF (2117KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 作为新兴事物,数字货币的出现在一定程度上使传统货币理论出现了“失语”,需要新的解释逻辑。本文基于布坎南的公共选择理论范式,构建了基于交易费用与共识成本优化的逻辑框架,利用一致同意规则重新解释了物物交易、物“权”交易、商品货币、贵金属货币、信用货币到数字货币的货币演化。研究发现,货币是一致同意规则下的社会共识。让所有成员的铸币收益均等的货币方案,才能获得一致同意,成为公众广泛接受的真正货币。私人数字货币不符合货币一致同意规则,因此难以成为真正货币,更遑论取代满足一致同意规则的法定货币。展望未来,法定货币或将出现数字化和智能化趋势,从而更好地降低交易费用和共识成本。本文探索性提出法定数字货币发行的AI模型和学习算法。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
姚前
关键词:  法定数字货币  共识货币  一致同意规则  人工智能    
Abstract:  As an emerging concept, digital currency challenges traditional monetary theories to certain extent. New theoretical framework is needed. Drawing upon Buchanan's public economic paradigm, this paper tries to build a logic framework based on transaction fees and consensus cost optimization and intends to explain, based on unanimity rule, how currency evolves from barter transaction, commodity currency, precious metal currency, credit currency to digital currency. For a currency to be unanimously accepted by the public and becomes real currency, it has to ensure universal seigniorage for every member in the community. Private digital money does not meet the unanimity rule, which means that it cannot become real money, let alone replace fiat money which is unanimously accepted. In the future, fiat currency will be increasingly digitalized and intelligent, lowering transaction costs and consensus costs. This paper tries to propose an AI model and a learning algorithm for issuance of digital fiat currency.
Key words:  Digital Fiat Currency    Consensus Currency    Unanimity Rule    Artificial Intelligence
JEL分类号:  C51   E42   E52  
基金资助: 本文为国家重点研发计划(批准号:2016YFB0800600)阶段性研究成果
作者简介:  姚 前 ,工学博士,中国人民银行数字货币研究所.Email:yaoqian@pbc.gov.cn.
引用本文:    
姚前. 共识规则下的货币演化逻辑与法定数字货币的人工智能发行[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 459(9): 37-55.
YAO Qian. Currency Evolution Logic under Consensus Mechanism and Digital Fiat Currency Issuance based on Artificial Intelligence. Journal of Financial Research, 2018, 459(9): 37-55.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2018/V459/I9/37
[1]范一飞,2016,《 法定中国数字货币的理论依据和架构选择》,《中国金融,》第17期,第10-12页。
[2]米尔顿·弗里德曼,2006,《货币的祸害》,商务印书馆。
[3]马克思,1975,《资本论(第1卷)》,人民出版社,第107页。
[4]姚前,2016,《中国版数字货币设计考量》,《中国金融》第12期,第26-27页。
[5]姚前a,2017,《法定数字货币的理论与技术逻辑:货币演化与央行货币发行创新》,《比较》第9期。
[6]姚前b,2017,《数字货币和银行账户》,《清华金融评论》第7期,第63-67页。
[7]姚前c ,2017,《理解央行数字货币:一个系统性框架 》,《中国科学:信息科学》 , 2017年第11期。
[8]姚前d,2017,《数字加密代币ICO及其监管研究》,《当代金融家》,第7期,第20页。
[9]姚前,2018,《法定数字货币对现行货币体制的优化及其发行设计》,《国际金融研究》第4期。
[10]张琦,2014,《布坎南与公共物品研究新范式》,《经济学动态》第4期,第133页。
[11]周小川,2016,《专访周小川——央行行长周小川谈人民币汇率改革、宏观审慎政策框架和数字货币》,《 财新周刊》第6期,第52-61页。
[12]Bech, M and Garratt R.,2017,“Central Bank Cryptocurrencies”,BIS Quarterly Review.
[13]Bordo, M D and Levin A T,2017, “Central Bank Digital Currency and the Future of Monetary Policy”,NBER Working Paper, No. 23711.
[14]Broadbent, B,2016, “Central Banks and Digital Currencies”, http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/publications/pages/speeches/2016/886.aspx.
[15]Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures, 2015, “Digital Currencies”,Report.
[16]Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures, Markets Committee,2018, “ Central Bank Digital Currencies”,Report.
[17]Elhilali,M,2004, “Neural Basis and Computational Strategies for Auditory Processing”, Ph.D. thesis, University of Maryland.
[18]Glaser F., M. Haferkorn,M.C. Weber and K. Zimmermann,2014, “Bitcoin-asset or Currency ?Revealing Users' Hidden Intentions”,The Twenty Second European Conference on Information Systems.
[19]Griffin, John M. and Shams, Amin, 2018, “Is Bitcoin Really Un-Tethered”,SSRN Working Paper, No.3195066 .
[20]Haykin, S, and Z.Chen,2006,“The Machine Cocktail Party Problem”,http://www.cell.com/current-biology/abstract/S0960-9822(09)01680-7.
[21]Ittay, Eyal and Emin Gun Sirer,2013, “Majority is not Enough: Bitcoin Mining is Vulnerable”,https://www.cs.cornell.edu/~ie53/publications/btcProcFC.pdf
[22]Iwamura, M, Y. Kitamura and T.Matsumoto,2014, “Regulating Cryptocurrencies in the United States: Current Issues and Future Directions”, William Mitchell Law Review,40(813).
[23]Jevons,W.S,1893, “Money and Mechanism of Exchange”, D.Appleton Press.
[24]Johan, Roberts,2014, “Estimation of Latent Variables for the FRB/US Model”, Fed Notes November 17.
[25]Joseph E. Stiglitz,2017, “Macro-economic Management in an Electronic Credit/Financial System,NBER woking paper No.23032 ,P3.
[26]Julier,S.and J.Uhlmann, 2004, “Unscented Filtering and Nonlinear Transformation. IEEE Review , 92 (3) :401–422.
[27]Koning,2017,“Evolution in Cash and Payments: Comparing Old and New Ways of Designing Central Bank Payments Systems, Cross-border Payments Networks, and Remittances”,R3 Reports.
[28]Krugman, P.,2013, “Bitcoin is Evil”, The New York Times.
[29]Luther, J.W. and L.H. White,2014, “Can Bitcoin Become a Major Currency”,GMU Working Paper in Economics, No.14~17.
[30]Luther, J.W. and J.Olson,2014, “Bitcoin is Memory”, SSRN Working Paper, No.2275730.
[31]Menger,C .1892, “On the Origin of Money”, Economic Journal, No.2 ,pp.239-255.
[32]Minsky,M.L,1967, “Computation: Finite and Infinite Machines”, Englewood Cliffs,NJ: Prentice Hall,p.55.
[33]Paulin,M.G,1997,“Neural Representations of Moving Systems”, International Journal of Neurobiology, Vol.41,pp.515-533.
[34]Rao, R.P.N and T.J.Sejnowski,2004, “Dynamic Model of Visual Recognition Predicts Neural Response Properties in the Visual Cortex, Neural Computation, Vol.9, pp.721-763.
[35]Ron, D. and A. Shamir,2013, “Quantitative Analysis of the Full Bitcoin Transaction Graph”,Financial Crytography and Data Security∶Lecture Notes in Computer Science,7859,p6~24.
[36]Simon, Haykin,2010,《神经网络与机器学习》,机械工业出版社,第501页。
[37]Smith J., 2014,“An Analysis of Bitcoin Exchange Rates”,SSRN Working Paper, No.2000118.
[38]Yemack, D. ,2013, “Is Bitcoin a Real Currency? An Economic Appraisal”,NBER Working Paper,No.19747.
[1] 潘志远, 毛金龙, 周彬蕊. 高维的相关性建模及其在资产组合中的应用[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 452(2): 190-206.
[2] 孟庆斌, 荣晨. 中国房地产价格泡沫研究——基于马氏域变模型的实证分析[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 440(2): 101-116.
[3] 耿志祥, 孙祁祥. 金融危机和自然灾害对保险股票市场的影响与溢出效应检验[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 431(5): 65-81.
[4] 于建忠, 刘海飞, 宋素荣. 中国影子银行的行为模型[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 428(2): 163-171.
[1] 王曦, 朱立挺, 王凯立. 我国货币政策是否关注资产价格?——基于马尔科夫区制转换BEKK多元GARCH模型[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 1 -17 .
[2] 刘勇政, 李岩. 中国的高速铁路建设与城市经济增长[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 18 -33 .
[3] 况伟大, 王琪琳. 房价波动、房贷规模与银行资本充足率[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 34 -48 .
[4] 祝树金, 赵玉龙. 资源错配与企业的出口行为——基于中国工业企业数据的经验研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 49 -64 .
[5] 陈德球, 陈运森, 董志勇. 政策不确定性、市场竞争与资本配置[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 65 -80 .
[6] 牟敦果, 王沛英. 中国能源价格内生性研究及货币政策选择分析[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 81 -95 .
[7] 高铭, 江嘉骏, 陈佳, 刘玉珍. 谁说女子不如儿郎?——P2P投资行为与过度自信[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 96 -111 .
[8] 吕若思, 刘青, 黄灿, 胡海燕, 卢进勇. 外资在华并购是否改善目标企业经营绩效?——基于企业层面的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 112 -127 .
[9] 姜军, 申丹琳, 江轩宇, 伊志宏. 债权人保护与企业创新[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 128 -142 .
[10] 刘莎莎, 孔高文. 信息搜寻、个人投资者交易与股价联动异象——基于股票送转的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 143 -157 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1