Abstract:
This paper focuses on explaining the demographic transition. We show that with the capital accumulation, the output share of mental labor increases and the wage gender gap narrows. In the early stages of economic development, gender discrimination is more prevalent and the substitution effect of capital accumulation is dominated by the income effect, so that the growth rate of the population increases with income. When the degree of wage gender discrimination starts to decline, the increased cost of child rearing induces families to invest more in human capital and the growth rate of the population falls.
Acemoglu, Daron. 2002. “Technical Change, Inequality, and the Labor Market”, Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 7-72.
[10]
Arrow, Kenneth. 1973. The Theory of Discrimination, in Discrimination in labor markets, ed. by O.A. Ashenfelter and A. Rees, Princeton University Press, pp. 3-33.
[11]
Becker, Gary S.. 1960. An Economic Analysis of Fertility, in Demographic and Economic Change in Developed Countries, Universities-National Bureau, pp.225-256.
[12]
Becker, Gary S.. 1981. A Treatise on the Family, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
[13]
Becker, Gary S. and H. G. Lewis. 1973. “On the Interaction between the Quantity and Quality of Children”, Journal of Political Economy, 81, pp. 279-288.
[14]
Cervellati, Matteo and Uwe Sunde. 2011. “Life expectancy and economic growth: the role of the demographic transition”, Journal of Economic Growth, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 99-133.
[15]
de la Croix, David and Matthias Doepke. 2003. “Inequality and Growth: Why Differential Fertility Matters”, American Economic Review, vol.93, no.4, pp.1091-1113.
[16]
Galor, Oded and David N. Weil. 1996. “The Gender Gap, Fertility, and Growth”, American Economic Review, vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 374-387.
[17]
Galor, Oded and David N. Weil. 2000. “Population, Technology, and Growth: From Malthusian Stagnation to the Demographic Transition and beyond”, American Economic Review, vol. 90, no. 4, pp. 806-828.
[18]
Goldin, Claudia.1990.Understanding the Gender Gap: An Economic History of American Women, Cambridge University Press.
[19]
Guzman, Ricardo and Jacob Weisdorf. 2010. “Product Variety and the Demographic Transition”, Economic Letters, 107, pp. 74-76.
[20]
Haveman, Robert and Barbara Wolfe. 1995. “The Determinants of Children’s Attainments: A Review of Methods and Findings”, Journal of Economic Literature, 33(4), pp. 1829-1878.
[21]
Hazan, Moshe and Binyamin Berdugo. 2002. “Child Labour, Fertility, and Economic Growth”, Economic Journal, vol. 112, no. 482, pp. 810-828.
[22]
Lagerlof, Nils-Petter. 2003. “From Malthus to Modern Economic Growth: Can Epidemic Explain the Three Regimes”, International Economic Review, vol. 44, no.2, pp.755-777.
[23]
Li, Honbin, Junsen Zhang and Yi Zhu. 2008. “The Quantity-Quality Trade-off of Children in a Developing Country: Identification Using Chinese Twins”, Demography, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 223-243.
[24]
Lipatov, Mikhail, Shuzhuo Li and Marcus W. Feldman. 2008. “Economics, Culture Transmission, and the Dynamics of the Sex Ratio at Birth in China”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 105, no. 49, pp. 19171-19176.
[25]
Lucas, Robert E. Jr.. 2002. The Industrial Revolution: Past and Future, in Lectures on Economic Growth, Harvard University Press, pp. 109-199.
[26]
Rosenzweig, Mark R. and Junsen Zhang. 2009. “Do Population Control Policies Induce More Human Capital Investment? Twins, Birth Weight, and China’s ‘One-Child’ Policy”, Review of Economic Studies, 76, pp. 1149-1174.
[27]
Solon, Gary. 2002. “Cross-Country Differences in Intergenerational Earnings Mobility”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16(3), pp. 59-66.
[28]
Yin, Ting. 2010. “Parent-child co residence and bequest motives in China”, China Economic Review, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 521-531.
[29]
Zhang, Jie. 1995. “Social Security and Endogenous Growth”, Journal of Public Economics, 58, pp. 185-213.
[30]
Zimmer, Zachary and Julia Kwong. 2003. “Family size and support for older adults in urban and rural China: Current effects and future implications”, Demography, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 23-44.