Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2016, Vol. 433 Issue (7): 191-206    
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
股市对业绩预告修正一视同仁吗?
罗玫, 魏哲
清华大学经济管理学院,北京 100084
Does the Stock Market Treat Management Earnings Forecast Equally?
LUO Mei, WEI Zhe
School of Economics and Management, Tsinghua University
下载:  PDF (1551KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 本文搜集我国A股上市公司2002年至2011年间发布的所有业绩预告修正公告中董事会披露的业绩修正原因说明,首次系统地分析了我国独特的业绩预告制度下的业绩修正原因如何影响股市投资者对业绩修正的判断。研究结果显示,公司解释业绩预告变动原因时带有倾向性,公司对利好消息和利空消息的解释会倾向于不同的原因,而且业绩变动原因对股市投资人理解业绩预告有重大的影响。如果公司将原因归于公司不可控的宏观原因、不可控的会计因素和会计记账错误,股市对利好的业绩修正反应更强烈,也能削弱利空消息对股市的打击程度。如果是其它原因或公司不说明原因,股市的反应会更加糟糕。本文为资本市场投资者了解业绩修正原因说明的经济后果提供了实证证据。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
罗玫
魏哲
关键词:  业绩预告修正  业绩原因说明  股市反应    
Abstract:  This paper hand-collect the explanations for revisions of management earnings forecast for all companies in the A-share Chinese market from 2002 to 2011. It examines how various explanations that the board of directors is required to disclose affect the stock market reactions to the management forecast revisions. The results show that companies tend to explain the positive news and negative news differently, and that the explanations provided have significant impact to how investors interpret the revisions. When companies attribute the forecast revisions to uncontrollable macro-economic factors, uncontrollable accounting rule changes, or accounting errors discovered by auditors, the market reacts more significantly to positive revisions and less to negative news than under other reasons. Additionally, when companies attribute the forecast revisions to other operating reasons or provide no reasons to explain the forecast revisions, the stock market tends to ignore positive news and punish bad news. This paper provides empirical evidence on the significant economic consequences of disclosing reasons for management earnings forecast revisions by the board of directors.
Key words:  Management Earnings Forecast Revision    Explanations for Forecast Revisions    Market Reaction
JEL分类号:  C31   D73   M41  
基金资助: 罗玫非常感谢国家自然科学基金项目“中国股市是否相信上市公司发布的业绩预告”(项目批准号71173125)和教育部清华大学自主科研项目(2015THZ02-1)的资助。
作者简介:  罗玫,副教授,清华大学经济管理学院会计系,Email:luomei@sem.tsinghua.edu.cn;魏哲,博士研究生,清华大学经济管理学院会计系,Email:weizh.11@sem.tsinghua.edu.cn.
引用本文:    
罗玫, 魏哲. 股市对业绩预告修正一视同仁吗?[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 433(7): 191-206.
LUO Mei, WEI Zhe. Does the Stock Market Treat Management Earnings Forecast Equally?. Journal of Financial Research, 2016, 433(7): 191-206.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2016/V433/I7/191
[1] 郭娜和祁怀锦,2010,《业绩预告披露与盈余管理关系的实证研究——基于中国上市公司的经验证据》,《经济与管理研究》第2期,第81~88页。
[2] 罗玫和宋云玲,2012,《中国股市的业绩预告可信吗?》,《金融研究》第9期,第168~180页。
[3] 宋云玲和罗玫,2010,《业绩预告对中国股市有效性的影响——基于应计异象的实证检验》,《清华大学学报(自然科学版)》第50卷第12期,第1963~1967页。
[4] 孙蔓莉,王竹君和蒋艳霞,2012,《代理问题、公司治理模式与业绩自利性归因倾向-基于美、中、日三国的数据比较》,《会计研究》第1期,第68~74页。
[5] 王玉涛和王彦超,2012,《业绩预告信息对分析师预测行为有影响吗》,《金融研究》第6期,第193~206页。
[6] Baginski, Stephen P., John M. Hassell, and William A. Hillison. 2000. “Voluntary Causal Disclosures: Tendencies and Capital Market Reaction.” Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 15(4):371~389.
[7] Baginski, Stephen P., John M. Hassell, and Michael D. Kimbrough. 2004. “Why Do Managers Explain Their Earnings Forecasts?.” Journal of Accounting Research, 42(1):1~29.
[8] Bettman, James R., and Barton A. Weitz. 1983. “Attributions in the Board Room: Causal Reasoning in Corporate Annual Reports.” Administrative Science Quarterly:165~183.
[9] Brennan, Niamh M. 1999. “Voluntary Disclosure of Profit Forecasts by Target Companies in Takeover Bids.” Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 26(7/8):883~917.
[10] Cameron, A. Colin, Jonah B. Gelbach, and Douglas L. Miller. 2012. “Robust Inference with Multiway Clustering.” Journal of Business & Economic Statistics.
[11] Conyon, M. J. and L. He. 2014. “CEO Turnover in China: the Role of Market-based and Accounting Performance Measures” The European Journal of Finance, 20(7-9):657~680.
[12] Diamond, Douglas W., and Robert E. Verrecchia. 1991. “Disclosure, Liquidity, and the Cost of Capital.” The Journal of Finance, 46(4):1325~1359.
[13] Fisman, Raymond. 2001. “Estimating the Value of Political Connections.” The American Economic Review, 91(4):1095~1102.
[14] Healy, Paul M., and Krishna G. Palepu. 2001. “Information Asymmetry, Corporate Disclosure, and the Capital Markets: A Review of the Empirical Disclosure Literature.” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31(1):405~440.
[15] Hlmstrom, Bengt. 1979. “Moral Hazard and Observability.” The Bell Journal of Economics, 74~91.
[16] Hutton, Amy P., Gregory S. Miller, and Douglas J. Skinner. 2003. “The Role of Supplementary Statements with Management Earnings Forecasts.” Journal of Accounting Research, 41(5): 867~890.
[17] Jenter, Dirk, and Fadi Kanaan. 2015. “CEO Turnover and Relative Performance Evaluation.” The Journal of Finance, 70(5):2155~2184.
[18] Lang, Mark H., and Russell J. Lundholm. 2000. “Voluntary Disclosure and Equity Offerings: Reducing Information Asymmetry or Hyping the Stock?” Contemporary Accounting Research, 17(4): 623~662.
[19] McNichols, Maureen. 1989. “Evidence of Informational Asymmetries from Management Earnings Forecasts and Stock Returns.” The Accounting Review, 1~27.
[20] Miller, G., and J. Piotroski. 2000. “The Role of Disclosure for High Book-to-market Firms.” Unpublished working paper, Harvard University.
[21] Piotroski, Joseph. 1999. “Discretionary Segement Reporting Decisions and the Precision of Investor Beliefs” Workingpaper, University of Chicago.
[22] Pownall, Grace, and Gregory Waymire. 1989. “Voluntary Disclosure Credibility and Securities Prices: Evidence from Management Earnigns Forecasts”, Journal of Accounting Research, 27(2):227~246.
[23] Skinner, Douglas J. 1994. “Why Firms Voluntarily Disclose Bad News.” Journal of Accounting Research, 32(1): 38~60.
[24] Staw, Barry M., Pamela I. McKechnie, and Sheila M. Puffer. 1983. “The Justification of Organizational Performance.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 582~600.
[25] Welker, Michael. 1995. “Disclosure Policy, Information Asymmetry, and Liquidity in Equity Markets.” Contemporary Accounting Research, 11(2):801~827.
[1] 陈国进, 丁杰, 赵向琴. “好”的不确定性、“坏”的不确定性与股票市场定价——基于中国股市高频数据分析[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 469(7): 174-190.
[2] 鄢伟波, 王小华, 温军. 分层制度提升新三板流动性了吗?——来自多维断点回归的经验证据[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 467(5): 170-189.
[3] 高晶, 林曙. 省际边界、方言边界和一价定律[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 454(4): 138-154.
[4] 杜兴强, 谭雪. 国际化董事会、分析师关注与现金股利分配[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 446(8): 192-206.
[1] 王曦, 朱立挺, 王凯立. 我国货币政策是否关注资产价格?——基于马尔科夫区制转换BEKK多元GARCH模型[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 1 -17 .
[2] 刘勇政, 李岩. 中国的高速铁路建设与城市经济增长[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 18 -33 .
[3] 况伟大, 王琪琳. 房价波动、房贷规模与银行资本充足率[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 34 -48 .
[4] 祝树金, 赵玉龙. 资源错配与企业的出口行为——基于中国工业企业数据的经验研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 49 -64 .
[5] 陈德球, 陈运森, 董志勇. 政策不确定性、市场竞争与资本配置[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 65 -80 .
[6] 牟敦果, 王沛英. 中国能源价格内生性研究及货币政策选择分析[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 81 -95 .
[7] 高铭, 江嘉骏, 陈佳, 刘玉珍. 谁说女子不如儿郎?——P2P投资行为与过度自信[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 96 -111 .
[8] 吕若思, 刘青, 黄灿, 胡海燕, 卢进勇. 外资在华并购是否改善目标企业经营绩效?——基于企业层面的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 112 -127 .
[9] 姜军, 申丹琳, 江轩宇, 伊志宏. 债权人保护与企业创新[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 128 -142 .
[10] 刘莎莎, 孔高文. 信息搜寻、个人投资者交易与股价联动异象——基于股票送转的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 143 -157 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1