Abstract:
This paper portrays FX intervention and monetary policy transition factors into NK-DSGE theoretical model framework, introducing risk-averse foreign exchange trader, adding capital controls factor in the conventional UIP to study the impact of macroeconomic variables under different types of shocks and different foreign exchange intervention scenarios. The results show that: the effects on the extent of fluctuations in exchange rates are not the same; contrast to discretional intervention, rule-based intervention would be more robust and cost saving; in response to shocks, discretional intervention had no significant effect, and rule-based intervention had stronger stabilization power; in addition, the foreign exchange intervention and monetary policy has a strong interaction in general equilibrium framework. Central bank should build foreign exchange intervention strategy, establish foreign exchange intervention target system, set the RMB exchange rate intervention interval, and select a reasonable and transparent intervention on this basis, quantify the effect of the intervention in order to guarantee the steady operation of the macro economy.
王爱俭, 邓黎桥. 中央银行外汇干预:操作方式与效用评价[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 437(11): 15-31.
WANG Aijian, DENG Liqiao. Central Bank Foreign Exchange Intervention: Operation and Effectiveness Evaluation. Journal of Financial Research, 2016, 437(11): 15-31.
Adler, Gustavo, and Camilo Tovar. 2011. “Foreign Exchange Market Intervention: How Good a Defense Against Appreciation Winds?”, IMF Working Paper 11/165.
[14]
Bacchetta, P., and E. Wincoop. 2006. “Can Information Heterogeneity Explain the Exchange Rate Determination Puzzle?”, American Economic Review, 96: 552~76.
[15]
Benes, J., A. Berg, R. Portillo, and D. Vabra. 2013. “Modeling Sterilized Interventions and Balance Sheet Effects of Monetary Policy in a New-Keynesian Framework”, IMF Working Paper 13/11.
[16]
Benigno, P., and M. Woodford. 2005. “Inflation Stabilization and Welfare: the Case of a Distorted Steady State”, Journal of the European Economic Association, 3(6): 1185~236.
[17]
Calvo, G.. 1983. “Staggered Prices in a Utility-Maximizing Framework,”Journal of Monetary Economics,12(3):383~398.
[18]
Devereux, M., and J. Yetman. 2014. “Globalisation, Pass-through and the Optimal Policy Response to Exchange Rates”, BIS working paper, No. 450.
[19]
Dominguez, M., and Jeffrey A. Frankel. 1993. “Does Foreign-exchange Intervention Matter? The Portfolio Effect”, The American Economic Review, Vol. 83 (5): 1356~1369.
[20]
Fiess, N., and Shankar R. 2009. “Determination of Exchange Rate Regime Switching”, Journal of International Money and Finance, Vol.1: 68~98.
[21]
Gadanecz, B., A. Mehrotra, and S. Mohanty. 2014. “Foreign Exchange Intervention and the Banking System Balance Sheet in Emerging Market Economies”, BIS working paper, No. 445.
[22]
Gersl, A., and T. Holub. 2006. “Foreign Exchange Interventions Under Inflation Targeting: The Czech Experience,” Contemporary Economic Policy, Vol. 24: 475~491.
[23]
Kamil, Herman. 2008. “Is Central Bank Intervention Effective Under Inflation Targeting Regimes? The Case of Colombia”, IMF Working Paper 08/88.
[24]
Liu, P.. 2010. “Stabilization Bias for a Small Open Economy: The Case of New Zealand.” Journal of Macroeconomics, 32(3): 921~935.
[25]
Miyajima, K.. 2013. “Foreign Exchange Intervention and Expectation in Emerging Economies”. BIS working paper, No. 414.
[26]
Carlos, M., and O. Marco. 2013. “Foreign Exchange Intervention and Monetary Policy Design: a Market Microstructure Analysis”, BIS working paper.
[27]
Obstfeld, M., and K Rogoff. 1995. “Exchange Rate Dynamics Redux”, Journal of Political Economy, 103(3): 624~60.
[28]
Vitale, P.. 2011. “The Impact of FX Intervention on FX Markets: A Market Microstructure Analysis”, International Journal of Finance & Economics, vol. 16 (1): 41~62.
