Abstract:
Industrial policy has been widely used in most countries, but its effect on the performance of enterprises has not yet formed a consistent conclusion. From the perspective of government’s “resource-control needs” motivation, this paper analyzes the effect of industrial policy on nationalization of private enterprises. With a large sample of firm-level data from 1998-2007, we find that those enterprises who are encouraged by industrial policies has significantly greater possibility to be nationalized. Further tests find those enterprises that have experienced nationalization won more government subsidies and paid less tax significantly after nationalization, and also employ more staff, confirmed more overheads and paid higher level of wages significantly. We still find that nationalization has significantly negative impact on the firm performance. These findings also provide some empirical evidence for the government’s “resource-control needs” motivation to promote the nationalization of private enterprises from the perspective of nationalization’s economicconsequences.
Aghion,P.,M. Dewatripont,L. Du,A. Harrison,and P. Legros,2012,“Industry Policy and Competition”. NBER Working Paper,No. 18048.
[24]
Baer,W.,and G. Montes-Rojas,2008,“From Privatization to Re-nationalization: What Went Wrong with Privatizations in Argentina?” Oxford Development Studies,36(3): 323~338.
[25]
Blonigen,Bruce A.,and Wesley W. Wilso,2010,“Foreign Subsidization and Excess Capacity”. Journal of International Economics,80(2): 200~211.
[26]
Carney,Richard W.,and Travers B. Child,2008,“Changes to the Ownership and Control of East Asian Corporations between 1996 and 2008: The Primacy of Politics”,Journal of Financial Economics,107(2): 494~513.
[27]
Champion,Margaret Y.,2001,“Nationalization and Privatization in Peru: Social-Economic Images in Perpetual Conflict?”,Journal of Socio-Economics,30(6): 517~532.
[28]
Chang,R.,C. Hevia,and Norman V. Loayza,2015,“Privatization and Nationalization Cycles”. NBER Working paper.
[29]
Chernykh,L.,2011,“Profit or Politics? Understanding Renationalizations in Russia”. Journal of Corporate Finance,17(5): 1237~1253.
[30]
Duncan,R.,2006,“Price or Politics? An Investigation of the Causes of Expropriation”,Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics,2006,50(1): 85~101.
[31]
Guriev,S.,A. Kolotilin,and K. Sonin,2011,“Determinants of Nationalization in the Oil Sector: A Theory and Evidence from Panel Data”,Journal of Law,Economics and Organization,27(2): 301~323.
[32]
Huang,Zhang K.,Li X. Li,Guang R. Ma,and J. Qian,2015,“The Reversal of Privatization: Determinants and Consequences”,Tsinghua University Working Paper,SSRN.
[33]
Manzano,O.,F. Monaldi,and F. Sturzenegger,2008,“The Political Economy of Oil Production in Latin American”,Economia,9(1): 59~103.
[34]
Nunn,N.,and D. Trefler,2010,“The Structure of Tariffs and Long-term Growth”. American Economic Journal,2(4): 158~194.
[35]
Rosa,J.,and E. Perard,2008,“When to Private? When to Nationalize?——A Competition for Ownership Approach”,Working Paper.
[36]
Shleifer,A.,and Robert. W. Vishny,1994,“Politicians and Firms”. Quarterly Journal of Economics,109(4): 995~1026.