Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2017, Vol. 450 Issue (12): 143-157    
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
系统风险外溢、市场约束机制与银行股票回报率——基于CoVaR和时变条件β指标的研究
张晓明, 李泽广
北京交通大学经济管理学院,北京 100044;
南开大学金融学院,天津 300071
Systemic Risk, Market Discipline and Return of Bank Stocks:Based on CoVaR and Time Varying Conditional β
ZHANG Xiaoming, LI Zeguang
School of Economics and Management, Beijing Jiaotong University;
School of Finance, Nankai University
下载: 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 风险外溢意味着私人成本更多地由社会来承担,作为市场机制的自然反应,投资者是否会因此对系统风险外溢明显的银行股票要求更高收益率?本文借助DCC-MGARCH方法构建时变协方差系数CoVaR和时变条件β指标测度上市银行间的风险外溢程度,未发现“大而不能倒”的证据,大型银行反而在系统风险上升时会发挥“稳定器”效果;从周期性视角来看,银行的风险外溢具有顺周期特征,且风险外溢因子可以较好地解释银行股收益率的变化。市场约束机制可以对“负外部性”的银行提出更高的风险补偿要求,表现出一定的矫正机制,但对尾部风险定价失灵,仍需监管者实施流动性指标监管和稳健货币政策以规避系统危机。此外,ΔCoVaR指标能够较好地吸收和反映宏观变量信息,时变条件β指标则能够更好地吸收和反映资本充足率指标和流动性比率等银行层面信息,二者具有互补性。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
张晓明
李泽广
关键词:  ΔCoVaR  时变条件β指标  周期性  风险外溢    
Abstract:  The interdependence of commercial banks' risks has become urgent research topics currently. This paper measures the time-varying covariance coefficient by using DCC-MGARCH methods. Meanwhile, we try to build Beta indicators, with the stock price variables of listed banks to quantify the spillover risk measure its extent effects. The market discipline mechanism can increase higher required return on banks with systemic risk, showing intrinsic leveling mechanism of the market, but the failure at tail risk pricing reminds the necessary of regulators' liquidity and approporiate monetary policy in order to avoid the systemic crisis. At the same time, with the macro-level and bank-level data analysis of the main determinants of the risk of spillover of the banks, we use Shapley decomposition approach to decompose the contribution structure of systematic risk. Conclusions are drawn that the risk of spillover Overall, commercial banks have some pro-cyclical characteristics, ΔCoVaR indicators of joint-stock commercial banks are more significant; and macro variables are the key factors that determine ΔCoVaR indicators, capital adequacy ratios, liquidity ratios, and Beta Index are indicators the key decision variables. This shows that different indicators have strong complementarily in monitoring various risk factors.
Key words:  ΔCoVaR    Time Varying Conditional β    Cyclicality    Risk Spillover
JEL分类号:  G21   G28   G32  
基金资助: * 本文感谢国家自然科学基金面上项目(71772091和71372096)、国家社科基金青年项目(11CJY094)、北京交通大学基本科研业务费人文社会科学专项基金项目(2015jbwj010)和南开大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(2018)的资助; 感谢匿名审稿人的宝贵意见; 文责自负
作者简介:  张晓明(通讯作者),金融学博士,讲师,北京交通大学经济管理学院,Email: thinkming@163.com.李泽广,金融学博士,副教授,南开大学金融学院,Email: lizj@nankai.edu.cn.
引用本文:    
张晓明, 李泽广. 系统风险外溢、市场约束机制与银行股票回报率——基于CoVaR和时变条件β指标的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 450(12): 143-157.
ZHANG Xiaoming, LI Zeguang. Systemic Risk, Market Discipline and Return of Bank Stocks:Based on CoVaR and Time Varying Conditional β. Journal of Financial Research, 2017, 450(12): 143-157.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2017/V450/I12/143
[1] 方意、赵胜民和王道平,2012,《我国金融机构系统性风险测度》,《金融监管研究》第12期,第26-42页.<br />
[2] 范小云、王道平和刘澜飚,2012,《规模、关联系与中国系统重要性银行的衡量》,《金融研究》第11期,第16-30页.<br />
[3] 马君潞、范小云和曹元涛,2007,《中国银行间市场双边传染的风险估测及其系统性特征分析》,《经济研究》第1期,第68-78页.<br />
[4] Adrian, Tobias,Markus K Brunnermeier, 2016, “CoVaR”,American Economic Review, 106(7): 1705-1741.<br />
[5] Allen, Franklin, 2001, “Do Financial Institutions Matter”,Journal of Finance, 56: 1165-1175.<br />
[6] Baum C. F., Caglayan M., Ozkan N., 2009, “The Second Moment Matters: the Impact of Macroeconomic Uncertainty on the Allocation of Loanable Funds”.Economics Letters,102, 87-89.<br />
[7] Bhattacharyya S.,J.C. Leach, 1999, “Risk Spillovers and Required Returns in Capital Budgeting”,Review of Financial Studies,12(3): 461-479.<br />
[8] Billio, Monica, Mila Getmansky, Andrew W. Lo, Loriana Pelizzon, 2012, “Econometric Measures of Connectedness and Systemic Risk in the Finance and Insurance Sectors”,Journal of Financial Economics, 104(3): 535-559.<br />
[9] Boman, Arthur, 2014, “What Can We Learn from a Consumption Based Asset Pricing Model with Systemic Risk”, University of California at Berkeley, Working paper.<br />
[10] Br?mer, P., Horst Gischer,Christine Lücke, 2014, “A Simulation Approach to Evaluate Systemic Risk”,European Journal of Political Economy, 34(34):S53-S64<br />
[11] Brownlees, Christian T.,Robert Engle, 2011, “Volatility, Correlation, and Tails for Systemic Risk Management,” Stern Center for Research Computing (New York: NYU Stern School of Business).<br />
[12] Bryan K.,H. Lustig,S. Van Nieuwerburgh, 2016, “Too-Systemic-to-Fail: What Option Markets Imply about Sector-Wide Government Guarantees”,American Economic Review, 106(6):1278-1319.<br />
[13] Claeys, P., B Va?íCek, 2014, “Measuring Bilateral Spillover and Testing Contagion on Sovereign Bond Markets in Europe”,Journal of Banking & Finance, 46(1) :151-165.<br />
[14] De Nicolo, G., M Lucchetta,“Quantifying Systemic Risk: Systemic Risks and the Macroeconomy”, Social Science Electronic Publishing, 2011 (2) :1-40.<br />
[15] Drehmann M., N. Tarashev, 2013, “Measuring the Systemic Importance of Interconnected Banks”, Bis Working Papers, 22(4) :586-607<br />
[16] Fama, Eugene F., Kenneth R. French, 1993, “Common Risk Factors in the Returns on Stocks and Bonds”,Journal of Financial Economics,33(93):3-56.<br />
[17] Ferson, W.E., RA Korajczyk,1995, “Do Arbitrage Pricing Models Explain the Predictability of Stock Returns?”,Journal of Business,68(3) :309-349<br />
[18] Galí J.,2014, “Monetary Policy and Rational Asset Price Bubble”The American Economic Review, 104(3), 721-752.<br />
[19] Galvao, Antonio F., 2011, “Quantile Regression for Dynamic Panel Data with Fixed Effects”.Journal of Econometrics, 164(1):142-157.<br />
[20] Gandhi, P,H Lustig, 2015, “Size Anomalies in U.S. Bank Stock Returns”,Journal of Finance, 70∶733-768.<br />
[21] Ghysels, Eric, 1998, “On Stable Factor Structures in the Pricing of Risk: do time-varying Betas Help or Hurts”,Journal of Finance, 53(2):549-573.<br />
[22] Girardi Giulio, A. Tolga Ergün, 2013,“Systemic Risk Measurement: Multivariate GARCH Estimation of CoVaR”,Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(8):3169-3180.<br />
[23] Jagannathan, Ravi and Wang Zhenyu, 1996, “The Conditional CAPM and the Cross-Section of Expected Returns”,Journal of Finance, 51(1):3-53.<br />
[24] Koenker, R. W., J Gilbert Bassett, 1978, “Regression Quantiles”Econometrica, 46(1), pp. 33-50.<br />
[25] López-Espinosa Germ n,A. Moreno, A Rubia, L. Valderrama, 2012, “Short-term Wholesale Funding and Systemic Risk: A Global CoVaR Approach”,Journal of Banking & Finance, 36(12):3150-3162.<br />
[26] Narayan, Paresh Kumar, Seema Narayan, Kannan Sivananthan Thuraisamy, 2014, “Can Institutions and Macroeconomic Factors Predict Stock Returns in Emerging Markets?”,Emerging Markets Review, 19(4):77-95.<br />
[27] Ramakrishnan, Ram T. S. and Anjan V. Thakor, 1984, “Information Reliability and a Theory of Financial Intermediation”,Review of Economic Studies, 51(3):415-32.<br />
[28] Viale, Ariel M., James W. Kolari, Donald R. Fraser,2009, “Common Risk Factors in Bank Stocks”,Journal of Banking & Finance, 33: 464-472.<br />
[29] Weiβ, Gregor N.F., Denefa Bostandzic, Sascha Neumann, 2014, “What Factors Drive Systemic Risk during International Financial Crises?”,Journal of Banking & Finance, 41(2):78-96.
[1] 莫万贵, 袁佳, 魏磊, 高海燕. 中国结构性通缩中的周期性与结构性问题[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 465(3): 37-52.
[2] 严宝玉. 我国跨境资金流动的顺周期性、预警指标和逆周期管理[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 456(6): 22-39.
[3] 王倩, 赵铮. 同业融资视角下的商业银行杠杆顺周期性[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 460(10): 89-105.
[4] 方先明, 权威. 信贷型影子银行顺周期行为检验[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 444(6): 64-80.
[1] 王曦, 朱立挺, 王凯立. 我国货币政策是否关注资产价格?——基于马尔科夫区制转换BEKK多元GARCH模型[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 1 -17 .
[2] 刘勇政, 李岩. 中国的高速铁路建设与城市经济增长[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 18 -33 .
[3] 况伟大, 王琪琳. 房价波动、房贷规模与银行资本充足率[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 34 -48 .
[4] 祝树金, 赵玉龙. 资源错配与企业的出口行为——基于中国工业企业数据的经验研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 49 -64 .
[5] 陈德球, 陈运森, 董志勇. 政策不确定性、市场竞争与资本配置[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 65 -80 .
[6] 牟敦果, 王沛英. 中国能源价格内生性研究及货币政策选择分析[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 81 -95 .
[7] 高铭, 江嘉骏, 陈佳, 刘玉珍. 谁说女子不如儿郎?——P2P投资行为与过度自信[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 96 -111 .
[8] 吕若思, 刘青, 黄灿, 胡海燕, 卢进勇. 外资在华并购是否改善目标企业经营绩效?——基于企业层面的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 112 -127 .
[9] 姜军, 申丹琳, 江轩宇, 伊志宏. 债权人保护与企业创新[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 128 -142 .
[10] 刘莎莎, 孔高文. 信息搜寻、个人投资者交易与股价联动异象——基于股票送转的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 143 -157 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1