Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2023, Vol. 517 Issue (7): 116-133    
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
气候风险与银行盈余管理 ——基于金融监管的视角
申宇, 佘楷文, 许闲
西南财经大学金融学院,四川成都 611130;
复旦大学经济学院,上海 200433
Climate Risk and Bank Earnings Management from the Perspective of Financial Regulation
SHEN Yu, SHE Kaiwen, XU Xian
School of Finance, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics;
School of Economics, Fudan University
下载:  PDF (546KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 近年来全球气候风险加剧,影响经济发展和金融体系稳定,给银行监管带来了新的挑战。在防范和化解重大风险的背景下,探索气候风险与银行盈余管理之间的关系,对银行治理和金融监管工作具有重要意义。本文选取2007—2019年中国地方商业银行样本,研究气候风险对银行盈余管理的影响。研究发现:(1)气候风险显著提高了银行向下的盈余管理程度,银行以气候风险为名超额计提贷款损失准备;(2)气候风险爆发时,管理层的防御性动机和气候风险信息披露不足是影响银行超额计提的重要机制;(3)银行盈余平滑动机越强,气候风险冲击下的贷款损失超额计提越明显;(4)银行金融监管有助于抑制以气候风险为名的盈余管理。本文的研究为气候风险与银行盈余管理的研究提供了新的证据,也为银行监管提供了一定的政策启示。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
申宇
佘楷文
许闲
关键词:  气候风险  银行盈余管理  贷款损失计提  金融监管    
Summary:  Climate change has adverse effects on the banking system, and interest in climate change in banking and finance has increased in recent years. In February 2020, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision established the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Risks. However, climate-related financial risks in the Chinese banking system have not received much attention, even though China is one of the countries most severely affected by climate disasters.
In this study, we extend the literature by examining whether climate change is associated with banks' discretionary loan loss provisions. Furthermore, we suggest that earnings management may be a consequence of climate-related financial risks in the banking industry. Specifically, we hypothesize that in the presence of climate change risk, a bank's management team has a better excuse to manipulate earnings via loan loss provisions. First, a bank's management team is motivated to manipulate earnings. Due to the separation of ownership and control, a bank's management team has sufficient incentives to manipulate earnings to satisfy their own interests. Second, from the perspective of the costs and benefits of bank earnings management, manipulation of earnings can result in significant regulatory costs. We argue that the regulatory costs of earnings management decrease in the presence of climate change risk, thus increasing the benefits of earnings management, leading a bank's management team to increase their earnings management behavior. On the one hand, due to information asymmetry between regulators and banks, it is difficult for regulators to estimate the actual impact of climate risk on banks and how much loan loss provision banks should set aside. On the other hand, the change in financial performance due to climate risk is not related to a bank management team's ability, and thus there is no reputational cost suffered by a management team's manipulation of their bank's earnings in the name of climate risk. Therefore, it is reasonable to manipulate bank earnings in the presence of opportunism of bank managers and climate risk.
We use annual reports from 2007 to 2019 to construct a comprehensive sample of China's local commercial banks. First, we document a positive link between climate change and banks' discretionary loan loss provisions after controlling for bank fixed effects and year fixed effects. The effects are statistically and economically significant. We also exclude an alternative explanation and conduct a series of robustness tests. Second, we find that decreased manipulation costs for a bank's management team and a lack of bank disclosure of climate risk information lead to banks engaging in earnings management in the name of climate risk. Specifically, decreased manipulation costs are manifested in the fact that current climate-risk shocks do not negatively affect a management team's compensation in the current period. In addition, banks' lack of information disclosure makes it difficult for external supervisors to detect banks' earnings management in the name of climate risk. Third, we find that this positive association is nonsignificant for banks with low earnings growth rates but significant for banks with high earnings growth rates. Consistent with “cookie jar reserves” practice, we find that earnings hidden by a bank during natural disasters are released by the bank in the first year after the natural disaster to achieve income smoothing. Finally, we find that banks that face increases in regulation from the China Banking Regulatory Commission and China Securities Regulatory Commission at the time of listing cease participating in earnings management practices in the name of climate change.
In this study, we contribute to the literature in several ways. First, we complement the literature on climate change impacts—which focuses on the impact of climate change on individuals and firms—by exploring the impact of climate-related financial risks on bank earnings management. Second, we extend the literature on the identification and motivation of bank earnings management. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to introduce a climate change-induced motivation for bank earnings management. This addresses the issue of whether and to what extent climate-related financial risks affect financial reporting quality. Finally, our study has significant policy implications. In November 2021, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision issued a public consultation on principles for the effective management and supervision of climate-related financial risks. This consultation seeks to promote a principles-based approach to improving banks' risk management and supervisors' practices related to climate-related financial risks. Nevertheless, little attention has been paid to the climate-related financial risks that China may encounter in addressing climate change. The findings of the current study echo public consultation on climate-related financial risks and provide insights not only to academics but also to the banking industry and regulators in China.
Keywords:  Climate Risk    Bank Earnings Management    Loan Loss Provisions    Financial Regulation
JEL分类号:  G30   G21   Q54  
基金资助: * 本文感谢国家自然科学基金面上项目(71872150)、教育部人文社科基金一般项目(18YJC790133)、中央高校科研经费(JBK2207064)的资助。感谢匿名审稿人的宝贵意见,文责自负。
通讯作者:  佘楷文,博士研究生,西南财经大学金融学院,E-mail:she2120269@163.com.   
作者简介:  申 宇,经济学博士,教授,西南财经大学金融学院,E-mail:shenyu2071@163.com.
许 闲,经济学博士,教授,复旦大学经济学院,E-mail:xianxu@fudan.edu.cn.
引用本文:    
申宇, 佘楷文, 许闲. 气候风险与银行盈余管理 ——基于金融监管的视角[J]. 金融研究, 2023, 517(7): 116-133.
SHEN Yu, SHE Kaiwen, XU Xian. Climate Risk and Bank Earnings Management from the Perspective of Financial Regulation. Journal of Financial Research, 2023, 517(7): 116-133.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2023/V517/I7/116
[1]陈超、魏静宜和曹利,2015,《中国商业银行通过贷款损失准备计提进行盈余平滑吗?》,《金融研究》第12期,第46~63页。
[2]陈学彬,2005《中国商业银行薪酬激励机制分析》,《金融研究》第7期,第76~94页。
[3]顾海峰和高水文,2020,《盈余管理促进了商业银行流动性创造吗?——外部审计质量和货币政策的调节作用》,《国际金融研究》第9期,第67~76页。
[4]郭飞、李薇和张桂玲,2019,《衍生品复杂性影响商业银行盈余管理决策吗》,《国际金融研究》第2期,第77~86页。
[5]李四海、麻靖涓、朱鹏、江新峰和陈思,2023,《CEO职场晋升与盈余平滑行为研究》,《南开管理评论》,第1期,第206~217页。
[6]覃志年、金龙和何慧,2005,《广西夏季异常降雨量的前馈网络预报模型》,《灾害学》第4期,第23~28页。
[7]施赟、胡为民、陈颖和舒伟,2021,《CEO防御与内控缺陷认定标准》,《审计研究》第4期,第98~108页。
[8]滕飞、夏雪和辛宇,2022,《证监会随机抽查制度与上市公司规范运作》,《世界经济》第8期,第109~132页。
[9]王志强、张玮婷和顾劲尔,2011,《资本结构、管理层防御与上市公司高管薪酬水平》,《会计研究》第2期,第72~78页。
[10]谢露、王欣和张敏,2016,《区域竞争与商业银行的盈余质量——基于我国商业银行的经验证据》,《金融研究》第7期,第134~149页。
[11]郑艳、潘家华、谢欣露、周亚敏和刘昌义,2016,《基于气候变化脆弱性的适应规划:一个福利经济学分析》,《经济研究》第2期,第140~153页。
[12]Abou El Sood, H., 2012, “Loan Loss Provisioning and Income Smoothing In US Banks Pre and Post the Financial Crisis”, International Review of Financial Analysis, 25(C): 64~72.
[13]Acharya, V.V. and S.G Ryan, 2016, “Banks' Financial Reporting and Financial System Stability”, Journal of Accounting Research, 54(2): 277~340.
[14]Altay, N. and A. Ramirez, 2010, “Impact of Disasters on Firms in Different Sectors: Implications for Supply Chains”, Journal of Supply Chain Management, 46(4): 59~80.
[15]Brown, J.R., M.T. Gustafson and I.T. Ivanov, 2021, “Weathering Cash Flow Shocks”, Journal of Finance, 76(4):1731~1772.
[16]Burgstahler, D. and I. Dichev, 1997, “Earnings Management to Avoid Earnings Decreases and Losses”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 24(1): 99~126.
[17]Bushman, R., J. Gao, X. Martin and J. Pacelli, 2021, “The Influence of Loan Officers on Loan Contract Design and Performance”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 71(2-3):101384.
[18]Cameron, A.C., J. B. Gelbach and D. L. Miller, 2008, “Bootstrap-Based Improvements for Inference with Clustered Errors”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 90(3): 414~427.
[19]Chen, L., D. Emanuel, L.Z. Li and M. Yang, 2021, “Regulatory Changes and Loan Loss Provisions Management By Chinese Banks”, Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 11(4): 651~675.
[20]Chen, X. and C.P. Chang, 2021, “The Shocks of Natural Hazards on Financial Systems”, Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, 105(3):2327~2359.
[21]Cornett, M.M., J.J. McNutt and H. Tehranian, 2009, “Corporate Governance and Earnings Management at Large US Bank Holding Companies”, Journal of Corporate Finance, 15(4): 412~430.
[22]Ding, R., M. Liu, T. Wang and Z. Wu, 2021, “The Impact of Climate Risk on Earnings Management: International Evidence”, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 40(2): 106818.
[23]Fan, Y., Y. Jiang, X. Zhang and Y. Zhou, 2019, “Women on Boards and Bank Earnings Management: From Zero to Hero”, Journal of Banking & Finance, 107(10): 105607.
[24]Ginglinger, E. and Q. Moreau, 2019, “Climate Rsk and Capital Structure”, Université Paris-Dauphine Research Paper, No. 02291383.
[25]Harbaugh, R., 2004, “China's High Savings Rates”, The Rise of China Revisited: Perception and Reality, 18: 12.
[26]Huang, H.H., J. Kerstein and C. Wang, 2018, “The Impact of Climate Risk on Firm Performance and Financing Choices: An International Comparison”, Journal of International Business Studies, 49(5): 633~656.
[27]Jensen, M.C. and W.H. Meckling, 2019, “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure, in: Corporate Governance”, Gower, 77~132.
[28]Kanagaretnam, K., G.V. Krishnan and G.J. Lobo, 2010, “An Empirical Analysis of Auditor Independence in the Banking Industry”, The Accounting Review, 85(6): 2011~2046.
[29]Kanagaretnam, K., G.J. Lobo and D.H. Yang, 2004, “Joint Tests of Signaling and Income Smoothing Through Bank Loan Loss Provisions”, Contemporary Accounting Research, 21(4): 843~884.
[30]Leone, A. J. and S. Rock, 2002, “Empirical Tests of Budget Ratcheting and Its Effect on Managers' Discretionary Accrual Choices”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 33(1): 43~67.
[31]Ning, Z. and S. Li, 2017, “Executive Compensation and Managerial Ability: Large-Sample Evidence”, Journal of Accounting and Finance, 17(9): 9~14.
[32]Magnis, C. and G.E. Iatridis, 2017, “The Relation Between Auditor Reputation, Earnings and Capital Management in The Banking Sector: An International Investigation”, Research in International Business and Finance, 39(A): 338~357.
[33]Motha, R.P., 2011, “The Impact of Extreme Weather Events on Agriculture in The United States”, in Challenges and Opportunities In Agrometeorology, Springer: 397~407.
[34]Wang, M., C. Liao, S. Yang, W. Zhao, M. Liu and P. Shi, 2012, “Are People Willing to Buy Natural Disaster Insurance in China? Risk awareness, insurance acceptance, and willingness to pay”, Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 32(10): 1717~1740.
[1] 郭杰, 饶含. 商业银行债券融资与货币政策传导[J]. 金融研究, 2023, 515(5): 38-57.
[2] 李金甜, 毛新述. 资本市场制度型开放与流动性共性效应——兼论气候风险的影响[J]. 金融研究, 2023, 515(5): 170-188.
[3] 吕之安, 郭雪寒, 刘冲, 刘莉亚. 第三方合作存款与商业银行风险承担[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 507(9): 39-56.
[4] 丁宇刚, 孙祁祥. 气候风险对中国农业经济发展的影响——异质性及机制分析[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 507(9): 111-131.
[5] 杨子晖, 陈雨恬, 林师涵. 系统性金融风险文献综述:现状、发展与展望[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 499(1): 185-217.
[6] 陈雨露. 工业革命、金融革命与系统性风险治理[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 487(1): 1-12.
[7] 江嘉骏, 高铭, 卢瑞昌. 网络借贷平台风险:宏观驱动因素与监管[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 480(6): 152-170.
[8] 童中文, 范从来, 张炜, 朱辰. 金融审慎监管与货币政策的协同效应——虑及金融系统性风险防范[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 441(3): 16-32.
[9] 詹向阳. 对当前银行业发展中几个焦点问题的思考[J]. 金融研究, 2015, 421(7): 37-44.
[1] 王曦, 朱立挺, 王凯立. 我国货币政策是否关注资产价格?——基于马尔科夫区制转换BEKK多元GARCH模型[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 1 -17 .
[2] 刘勇政, 李岩. 中国的高速铁路建设与城市经济增长[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 18 -33 .
[3] 况伟大, 王琪琳. 房价波动、房贷规模与银行资本充足率[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 34 -48 .
[4] 祝树金, 赵玉龙. 资源错配与企业的出口行为——基于中国工业企业数据的经验研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 49 -64 .
[5] 陈德球, 陈运森, 董志勇. 政策不确定性、市场竞争与资本配置[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 65 -80 .
[6] 牟敦果, 王沛英. 中国能源价格内生性研究及货币政策选择分析[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 81 -95 .
[7] 高铭, 江嘉骏, 陈佳, 刘玉珍. 谁说女子不如儿郎?——P2P投资行为与过度自信[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 96 -111 .
[8] 吕若思, 刘青, 黄灿, 胡海燕, 卢进勇. 外资在华并购是否改善目标企业经营绩效?——基于企业层面的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 112 -127 .
[9] 姜军, 申丹琳, 江轩宇, 伊志宏. 债权人保护与企业创新[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 128 -142 .
[10] 刘莎莎, 孔高文. 信息搜寻、个人投资者交易与股价联动异象——基于股票送转的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 143 -157 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1