Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2023, Vol. 513 Issue (3): 20-37    
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
金融服务发展与制造业全球价值链升级
张天顶, 魏丽霞
武汉大学经济与管理学院,湖北武汉 430072
Financial Service Development and Global Value Chain Upgrading of Manufacturing Industry
ZHANG Tianding, WEI Lixia
School of Economics and Management, Wuhan University
下载:  PDF (597KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 本文通过构建具有部门联系的理论模型,将金融服务和制造业全球价值链(GVC)分工地位纳入统一框架之下,刻画了本国金融服务对制造业GVC升级的影响及其机制。随后,本文利用亚洲开发银行2007—2018年45个国家14个制造业的投入产出数据进行实证检验。结果表明:本国金融服务发展水平的提升有助于本国金融服务投入密度高的制造业GVC分工地位的提升,主要通过加速制造业生产流程数字化转型和推动生产环节向研发端攀升两条机制发挥作用;对本国金融服务投入密度高的行业来说,金融服务对外开放程度的提升对其GVC分工地位具有显著的负向影响,金融服务对外开放程度越高,本国金融服务对这类行业GVC分工地位的提升作用越强;对于本国金融服务投入密度低的制造业而言,本国金融服务发展对其GVC分工地位的影响作用并不显著,金融服务对外开放程度提高则有助于提升这类行业的GVC分工地位,国外金融服务有助于弥补本国金融服务对这类行业投入不足的问题。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
张天顶
魏丽霞
关键词:  制造业  金融服务发展  金融服务开放  全球价值链升级    
Summary:  Since the 1980s, global value chains (GVCs) have changed the pattern of international trade by decomposing production across borders. With the development of technology, the servitization of manufacturing has become an important trend in the development of the manufacturing industry. Services not only act as intermediate inputs in the manufacturing industry's production process (creating value added for the manufacturing industry) but also increase the market value of manufacturing products along with sales of the industry's final products. Therefore, services may positively affect GVC production in the manufacturing industry. A report issued by the World Bank points out that due to the increasingly close connection between the commodity and service economies, researchers should pay more attention to a series of business services, such as communication, finance, and transportation, that support the manufacturing industry. In 2022, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission proposed that “to improve the professional level of financial services, banking and insurance institutions should combine their market positioning and development planning, and incorporate better services to the manufacturing industry into corporate strategy.” In the manufacturing value chain, financial services act like glue that is used to optimize the allocation of resources and plays a vital role in the overall operation of the manufacturing value chain. There is a need for more research linking financial services with manufacturing GVCs and exploring their impact mechanisms. Accordingly, this paper explores the direction and mechanism of domestic financial services' impact on the upgrading of the manufacturing industry's GVC with different input intensities of financial services. Based on the above-described research, we further explore the impact of the opening of financial services on upgrading of the manufacturing industry's GVC.
By constructing a theoretical model with sectoral linkages, this paper incorporates financial services and the GVC of manufacturing sectors under a unified framework and studies the impact of domestic financial services on the upgrading of the GVC of manufacturing and its impact mechanism. Next, we use the Asian Development Bank's input-output data of 14 manufacturing sectors in 45 countries from 2007 to 2018 to conduct an empirical test. Improvement in the development of domestic financial services has a positive effect on the GVC position of the manufacturing industry with high input intensity of domestic financial services, mainly through the mechanisms of accelerating the digital transformation of manufacturing production processes and encouraging the manufacturing industry to increase its engagement in research and development and design-related production. For industries with a high input intensity of domestic financial services, the increase in the degree of the opening of financial services has a significant negative impact on their GVC position. The higher the degree of the opening of financial services, the stronger the role of domestic financial services in improving the industry's GVC position. For manufacturing industries with a low input intensity of domestic financial services, the impact of domestic financial service development on its GVC position is non-significant, and the increase in the degree of opening of financial services can help improve their GVC position. Foreign financial services can help compensate for this industry's lack of domestic financial services.
Our marginal contributions are as follows. First, we provide a theoretical basis for studying how domestic financial services affect the global value chain position of the manufacturing industry. We incorporate financial services into the model framework of GVC production, construct a production theory model with sectoral production linkages, and describe the impact mechanism of domestic financial services on the upgrading of the manufacturing industry's GVC. Second, we improve, at least to an extent, how the input intensity of service in the manufacturing industry's GVC activities is measured. Because the value added of the manufacturing industry cannot fully reflect the characteristics of its GVC activities, we measure the internal relationship between financial services and the manufacturing industry's GVC activities by using the proportion of the input of value-added in financial services to the value added of the manufacturing industry's GVC activities. Third, we analyze the impact of domestic financial services and the degree of openness of financial services on the manufacturing industry's GVC position with different input intensities of financial services. We explore the impact mechanism of domestic financial services on the manufacturing industry's GVC position. To a certain extent, we enrich the conclusions in the research on how domestic financial services affect the upgrade direction of manufacturing global value chains.
Keywords:  Manufacturing Industry    Financial Service Development    Financial Service Openness    Global Value Chain Upgrade
JEL分类号:  F414  
基金资助: * 本研究受国家自然科学基金面上项目(71673205)资助。感谢匿名审稿人的宝贵建议,文责自负。
作者简介:  张天顶,经济学博士,教授,武汉大学经济与管理学院,E-mail:ordin@126.com.
魏丽霞,博士研究生,武汉大学经济与管理学院,E-mail:2021101050012@whu.edu.cn.
引用本文:    
张天顶, 魏丽霞. 金融服务发展与制造业全球价值链升级[J]. 金融研究, 2023, 513(3): 20-37.
ZHANG Tianding, WEI Lixia. Financial Service Development and Global Value Chain Upgrading of Manufacturing Industry. Journal of Financial Research, 2023, 513(3): 20-37.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2023/V513/I3/20
[1] 顾雪芹,2020,《中国生产性服务业开放与制造业价值链升级》,《世界经济研究》第3期,第121~134页。
[2] 韩峰和阳立高,2020,《生产性服务业集聚如何影响制造业结构升级?——一个集聚经济与熊彼特内生增长理论的综合框架》,《管理世界》第2期,第72~94页。
[3] 侯欣裕、陈璐瑶和孙浦阳,2019,《金融服务、外资政策调整与企业出口——基于中国微观数据的验证》, 《金融研究》第11期,第94~111页。
[4] 李雪松、党琳和赵宸宇,2022,《数字化转型、融入全球创新网络与创新绩效》,《中国工业经济》第10期,第43~61页。
[5] 刘斌、魏倩、吕越和祝坤福,2016,《制造业服务化与价值链升级》,《经济研究》第3期,第151~162页。
[6] 刘斌和赵晓斐,2020,《制造业投入服务化、服务贸易壁垒与全球价值链分工》,《经济研究》第7期,第159~174页。
[7] 刘奕、夏杰长和李垚,2017,《生产性服务业集聚与制造业升级》,《中国工业经济》第7期,第24~42页。
[8] 吕越、罗伟和刘斌,2016,《融资约束与制造业的全球价值链跃升》,《金融研究》第6期,第81~96页。
[9] 孙伟增和郭冬梅,2021,《信息基础设施建设对企业劳动力需求的影响:需求规模、结构变化及影响路径》,《中国工业经济》第11期,第78~96页。
[10] 唐晓华、张欣珏和李阳,2018,《中国制造业与生产性服务业动态协调发展实证研究》,《经济研究》第3期,第79 ~ 93页。
[11] 张杰,2015,《金融抑制、融资约束与出口产品质量》,《金融研究》第6期,第64~79页。
[12] Baldwin R, Lopez-Gonzalez J. 2015, “Supply-Chain Trade: A Portrait of Global Patterns and Several Testable Hypotheses” , The World Economy, 38(11) : 1682~1721.
[13] Bascle G. 2008,“Controlling for Endogeneity with Instrumental Variables in Strategic Management Research”, Strategic Organization, 6(3) : 285~327.
[14] Beverelli C, Fiorini M, and Hoekman B. 2017,“Services Trade Policy and Manufacturing Productivity: The Role of Institutions”,Journal of International Economics, 104(C) : 166~182.
[15] Caliendo L, Parro F. 2014,“Estimates of the Trade and Welfare Effects of NAFTA”, The Review of Economic Studies, 82(1):1~44.
[16] Chen S, Lan X. 2020,“Tractor VS. Animal: Rural Reforms and Technology Adoption in China”, Journal of Development Economics, 147(C) : 102536.
[17] Chor D. 2019,“Modeling Global Value Chains: Approaches and Insights from Economics”, Handbook of Global Value Chains, 105~118.
[18] Crozet M, Milet E. 2017,“Should Everybody be in Services? The Effect of Servitization on Manufacturing Firm Performance”, Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 26(4) : 820~841.
[19] Dinger V, Kaat D T. 2020,“Cross-Border Capital Flows and Bank Risk-Taking”, Journal of Banking & Finance, 117(C) : 105842.
[20] Edgar T F, Pistikopoulos E N. 2018,Smart Manufacturing and Energy Systems”,Computers & Chemical Engineering, 114(C) : 130~144.
[21] Ghobakhloo M. 2020,“Determinants of Information and Digital Technology Implementation for Smart Manufacturing”,International Journal of Production Research, 58(8) : 2384~2405.
[22] Goldsmith-Pinkham P, Sorkin I, and Swift H. 2020,“Bartik Instruments: What, When, Why, and How”, American Economic Review, 110(8) : 2586~2624.
[23] Hall B H. 2002,“The Financing of Research and Development”, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 18(1) : 35~51.
[24] Iftikhar S F. 2016,“The Impact of Financial Reforms on Bank's Interest Margins: A Panel Data Analysis”, Journal of Financial Economic Policy, 8(1) : 120~138.
[25] Koopman R, Powers W, Wang Z, and Wei S-J. 2010,“Give Credit Where Credit is Due: Tracing Value Added in Global Production Chains”, NBER Working Paper, No.16426.
[26] Lewbel A. 1997,“Constructing Instruments for Regressions with Measurement Error When No Additional Data are Available, with an Application to Patents and R&D”, Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 65(5) : 1201~1213.
[27] Lindner S, Legault J, and Guan D. 2012,“Disaggregating Input-Output Models with Incomplete Information”, Economic Systems Research, 24(4) : 329~347.
[28] Liu X, Mattoo A, Wang Z, and Wei S-J. 2020,“Services Development and Comparative Advantage in Manufacturing”, Journal of Development Economics, 144(C) : 102438.
[29] Long N V, Riezman R G, and Soubeyran A. 2005,“Fragmentation and Services”, North American Journal of Economics & Finance, 16(1) : 137~152.
[30] Markus, Kelle. 2013,“Crossing Industry Borders: German Manufacturers as Services Exporters”, The World Economy, 36(12) : 1494~1515.
[31] Miroudot S, Cadestin C. 2017,“Services in Global Value Chains: From Inputs to Value-Creating Activities”, OECD Trade Policy Papers, No. 197.
[32] Rajan R G, Zingales L. 1998,“Financial Dependence and Growth”, American Economic Review, 88(3) : 559~586.
[33] Wang Z, Wei S-J, Yu X, and Zhu K. 2017,“Characterizing Global Value Chains: Production Length and Upstreamness”, NBER Working Paper, No.23261.
[34] Weintraub P, Mckee M. 2019,“Leadership for Innovation in Healthcare: An Exploration”, International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 8(3) : 138~144.
[1] 郭凯明, 陈昊, 颜色. 贸易成本与中国制造[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 501(3): 1-19.
[2] 皮建才, 宋大强. 中国制造业与房地产业协调发展的测度与判断[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 495(9): 72-90.
[3] 许家云. 进口与企业员工收入——以中国制造业企业为例[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 484(10): 131-149.
[4] 张鹏杨, 徐佳君, 刘会政. 产业政策促进全球价值链升级的有效性研究——基于出口加工区的准自然实验[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 467(5): 76-95.
[5] 李瑞琴, 王汀汀, 胡翠. FDI与中国企业出口产品质量升级——基于上下游产业关联的微观检验[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 456(6): 91-108.
[6] 罗长远, 毛成学, 柴晴圆. 美国对外直接投资:中国是一个特别的目的地吗?[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 462(12): 72-90.
[7] 吕越, 罗伟, 刘斌. 融资约束与制造业的全球价值链跃升[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 432(6): 81-96.
[8] 许家云, 佟家栋, 毛其淋. 人民币汇率与企业生产率变动——来自中国的经验证据[J]. 金融研究, 2015, 424(10): 1-16.
[1] 步丹璐, 狄灵瑜. 治理环境、股权投资与政府补助[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 448(10): 193 -206 .
[2] 王曦, 朱立挺, 王凯立. 我国货币政策是否关注资产价格?——基于马尔科夫区制转换BEKK多元GARCH模型[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 1 -17 .
[3] 刘勇政, 李岩. 中国的高速铁路建设与城市经济增长[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 18 -33 .
[4] 况伟大, 王琪琳. 房价波动、房贷规模与银行资本充足率[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 34 -48 .
[5] 祝树金, 赵玉龙. 资源错配与企业的出口行为——基于中国工业企业数据的经验研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 49 -64 .
[6] 陈德球, 陈运森, 董志勇. 政策不确定性、市场竞争与资本配置[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 65 -80 .
[7] 牟敦果, 王沛英. 中国能源价格内生性研究及货币政策选择分析[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 81 -95 .
[8] 王丽艳, 马光荣. 帆随风动、人随财走?——财政转移支付对人口流动的影响[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 448(10): 18 -34 .
[9] 李少昆. 美国货币政策是全球发展中经济体外汇储备影响因素吗?[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 448(10): 68 -82 .
[10] 高铭, 江嘉骏, 陈佳, 刘玉珍. 谁说女子不如儿郎?——P2P投资行为与过度自信[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 96 -111 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1