Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2023, Vol. 513 Issue (3): 1-19    
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
数字经济如何影响中国通货膨胀?——基于作用机理和动态特征的实证分析
刘珺, 唐建伟, 周边, 鄂永健, 王运良
交通银行股份有限公司,上海 200120
How Does the Digital Economy Influence China's Inflation? Empirical Tests on the Influence Mechanism and Dynamic Characteristics
LIU Jun, TANG Jianwei, ZHOU Bian, E Yongjian, WANG Yunliang
Bank of Communications
下载:  PDF (990KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 数字经济给人类社会经济活动带来广泛而深刻的变化,对各国宏观经济运行产生重要而深远的影响。研究数字经济如何影响中国通货膨胀,其作用机理如何,对把握数字经济的宏观效应、研判中国通货膨胀长期走势及改进宏观调控政策具有一定现实意义。本文借鉴现有的理论分析框架并结合中国数字经济实际,总结梳理出数字经济通过数字化产品及服务价格低增长、生产率提升、电商平台竞争三个渠道抑制通货膨胀,并使用中国的数据进行实证检验。主要研究结论为:数字经济对通货膨胀的抑制作用及其三个影响渠道在中国基本得到了证实,数字经济发展对中国通货膨胀的长期趋势产生了抑制作用。同时,本文还利用VEC模型分别模拟线下价格指数、线上价格指数和两者加权平均的综合价格指数对货币政策冲击的响应情况。结果表明,线上销售的扩大增强了整体通货膨胀对货币政策的敏感性。本文结论为研究中国通货膨胀走势、改进价格指数的统计核算、优化货币政策调控等提供了启示和参考。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
刘珺
唐建伟
周边
鄂永健
王运良
关键词:  数字经济  通货膨胀  作用机理  动态特征    
Summary:  The digital economy has brought extensive and profound changes to social and economic activities, which in turn have important and far-reaching effects on macroeconomic operations. A global low inflation occurred almost at the same time as the emergence of the digital economy. In recent years, the international literature on the impact of the digital economy on inflation has gradually increased, but unfortunately there is a dearth of relevant domestic literature. Studying how the digital economy affects China's inflation is of great practical significance for judging the long-term trend of China's inflation and improving macro-adjustment policies. Based on the literature, this paper explores the mechanism through which the digital economy affects China's inflation and analyzes the short-term dynamic characteristics of China's inflation against the background of the digital economy. Compared with the literature, the main contributions of this paper are as follows. First, Chinese data are used to empirically test the relationship between the digital economy and inflation, enriching the relevant empirical literature. Second, this paper empirically tests the channels and verifies the mechanism through which the digital economy affects China's inflation. Third, this paper analyzes the characteristics of the short-term dynamic response of inflation to monetary policy shocks under the digital economy, and provides a reference for improving macro-policy adjustments.
Based on the theoretical framework of Riksbank (2015) and the actual situation of China's digital economy, this paper summarizes and determines that the digital economy suppresses inflation through three channels: the low price growth of digital products and services, improved productivity, and e-commerce platform competition. The fixed-effect panel model is used for empirical testing. This paper uses the CPI and PPI growth rates released by the National Bureau of Statistics to measure inflation, and uses the annual digitalization degree index in the Peking University Digital Financial Inclusion Index as the proxy variable of the digital economy. The change rate of the Zhongguancun electronic product price index, the change rate of total factor productivity in each province, and the proportion of e-commerce enterprises in each province are used as the proxy variables of digital product price, productivity, and e-commerce platform competition, respectively. The empirical results show that the inhibitory effect of the digital economy on inflation and its three influence channels are basically confirmed in China. Among them, the digital product channel mainly acts on the annual growth rate of the PPI, the e-commerce platform channel mainly acts on the annual growth rate of the CPI, and the productivity channel has an effect on the annual growth rate of both the CPI and PPI.
To explore the short-term dynamic characteristics of inflation in the context of the digital economy, this paper takes the CPI released by the National Bureau of Statistics as the offline price index, the consumer price index based on online data constructed by Liu Taoxiong et al. (2019) as the online price index (iCPI), and the weighted average of the CPI and iCPI to construct a comprehensive price index (JCPI) based on the proportion of online retail sales to the total retail sales of consumer goods. The VEC model is used to simulate the response of the CPI, iCPI, and JCPI to monetary policy shocks. It is found that the iCPI has the shortest response time to interest rate shocks, the CPI has the longest response time, and the JCPI is in between. The iCPI has the greatest response to money supply and interest rate shocks, followed by the JCPI, and finally, the CPI. As a result, the expansion of online sales has increased the sensitivity of overall inflation to monetary policy. However, due to the sample size, this conclusion needs to be viewed with caution.
The conclusions of this paper have three policy implications. First, in view of the significantly different operating characteristics of online and offline prices, the need to construct a broader range of price indices that cover the characteristics of the digital economy is increasing, and it is necessary to improve the statistical accounting of China's price indices as soon as possible. Second, monetary policy needs to pay attention to the new characteristics of and changes in inflation in the era of the digital economy. As the scale of online sales is continuing to expand, the overall price is more sensitive to monetary policy shocks, and the timing and rhythm of policy operations may need to be adjusted accordingly. Third, in the face of the current global threat of high inflation, the digital economy, as one of the few important long-term factors with an inflation-suppressing effect, continues to accelerate innovation through digital technology itself, and applies it more vigorously and on a larger scale.
Keywords:  The Digital Economy    Inflation    Influence Mechanism    Dynamic Characteristics of Inflation
JEL分类号:  E31   E58   L86  
基金资助: * 感谢匿名审稿人的宝贵意见,文责自负。
通讯作者:  鄂永健,经济学博士,高级经济师,交通银行发展研究部,E-mail: eyj1977@163.com   
作者简介:  刘珺,工商管理博士,高级经济师,交通银行,E-mail:chongpeng@bankcomm.com.
唐建伟,经济学博士,高级经济师,交通银行发展研究部,E-mail:tangjianwei66@163.com.
周边,经济学博士,交通银行金融科技创新研究院,E-mail:zhoubianlaw@163.com.
王运良,经济学博士,交通银行博士后科研工作站,E-mail:wangyl0518@163.com.
引用本文:    
刘珺, 唐建伟, 周边, 鄂永健, 王运良. 数字经济如何影响中国通货膨胀?——基于作用机理和动态特征的实证分析[J]. 金融研究, 2023, 513(3): 1-19.
LIU Jun, TANG Jianwei, ZHOU Bian, E Yongjian, WANG Yunliang. How Does the Digital Economy Influence China's Inflation? Empirical Tests on the Influence Mechanism and Dynamic Characteristics. Journal of Financial Research, 2023, 513(3): 1-19.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2023/V513/I3/1
[1] 巴曙松、黄文礼和杨可桢,2018,《数字经济:方兴未艾,未来可期》,《现代商业银行》第21期,第34~37页。
[2] 傅秋子和黄益平,2018,《数字金融对农村金融需求的异质性影响——来自中国家庭金融调查与北京大学数字普惠金融指数的证据》,《金融研究》第11期,第68~84页。
[3] 郭峰、王靖一、王芳、孔涛、张勋和程志云,2020,《测度中国数字普惠金融发展:指数编制与空间特征》,《经济学(季刊)》第4期,第1401~1418页。
[4] 郭吉涛和梁爽,2021,《数字经济对中国全要素生产率的影响机理:提升效应还是抑制效果?》,《南方经济》第10期,第9~27页。
[5] 姜婷凤、汤珂和刘涛雄,2022,《基于在线大数据的通货膨胀“现时”预测》,《计量经济学报》第3期,第597~619页。
[6] 荆文君和孙宝文,2019,《数字经济促进经济高质量发展:一个理论分析框架》,《经济学家》第2期,第66~73页。
[7] 刘涛雄、汤珂、姜婷凤和仉力,2019,《一种基于在线大数据的高频CPI指数的设计及应用》,《数量经济技术经济研究》第9期,第81~101页。
[8] 龙少波和陈璋,2013,《引进式技术进步下的中国工业生产率与通货膨胀率关系研究》,《经济与管理研究》第7期,第13~22页。
[9] 卢盼盼和张长全,2013,《金融脱媒对商业银行稳健性影响的实证研究》,《上海金融》第1期,第29~33页。
[10] 田涛,2016,《电商发展对 CPI 的影响研究——基于大数据背景下线上线下价格波动的同步性分析》,《上海经济研究,》第3期,第112~119页。
[11] 万晓榆和罗焱卿,2022,《数字经济发展水平测度及其对全要素生产率的影响效应》,《改革》第1期,第101~118页。
[12] 许小年,2020,《商业的本质和互联网》,机械工业出版社2020年1月第一版。
[13] 张成思,2012,《通货膨胀、经济增长与货币供应:回归货币主义?》,《世界经济》第8期,第3~21页。
[14] 张勋、万广华、张佳佳和何宗樾,2019,《数字经济、普惠金融与包容性增长》,《经济研究》第8期,第71~86页。
[15] 张延群,2021,《基于在线大数据的 iCPI 与 CPI 关系的研究》,《调研世界》第10期,第71~80页。
[16] 周小川,2020,《拓展通货膨胀的概念与度量》,《中国金融》第24期,第9~12页。
[17] Abdirahman, M., D. Coyle, R. Heys, and W. Stewart, 2017, “A Comparison of Approaches to Deflating Telecoms Services Output”, Economic Statistics Centre of Excellence (ESCoE) Discussion Paper, 4(12): 5~23.
[18] Battese, G.E. and T. J Coelli, 1995, “A Model for Technical Inefficiency Effects in A Stochastic Frontier Production Function for Panel Data”, Empirical Economics, 20(2): 325~332.
[19] Blanchard, O., 2009, “The State of Macro”, Annual Review of Economics, 1(1): 209~228.
[20] Buchheim, V. and M. Kedert, 2016, “ Digitisations Effects on The Inflation Rate-An Empirical Analysis of Possible Digitisation Channels” Master of Science Thesis INDEK, No. 27.
[21] Byrne, D. and C. Corrado, 2017, “Accounting for Innovation in Consumer Digital Services: Implications for Economic Growth and Consumer Welfare”, International Monetary Fund Statistics Forum.
[22] Cavallo, A., 2018, “More Amazon Effects:Online Competition and Pricing Behaviors”, NBER Working Paper, No. 25138.
[23] Charbonneau, K., A. Evans, S.Sarker, and L. Suchanek, 2017, “Digitalization and Inflation: A Review of the Literature”, Bank of Canada Working Paper.
[24] Csonto, B., Y. Huang, and C.E. Tovar, 2019, “Is Digitalization Driving Domestic Inflation”, International Monetary Fund Working Paper, No. 271.
[25] Engle, R.F. and C.W.J. Granger, 1987, “Co-Integration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation, and Testing”, Econometrica, 55(2): 251~276.
[26] Goolsbee, A. and P. J. Klenow, 2018, “Internet Rising, Prices Falling: Measuring Inflation in a World of E-Commerce”, NBER Working Paper, No. 24649.
[27] Koyuncu, J Y. and M. Unver, 2018, “The Impact of Internet on Inflation in OECD Countries”, Cataloging-In-Publication Data,10: 261~265.
[28] Lorenzani, D. and J. Varga, 2014, “The Economic Impact of Digital Structural Reforms”, European Commission Economic Papers, No. 529.
[29] Riksbank, 2015, “ Digitisation and Inflation. Monetary Policy Report” , Riksbank, February.
[30] Wadhwani, S., 2000, “The Impact of the Internet on UK Inflation” ,Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin,40(2):184~231.
[1] 方明月, 聂辉华, 阮睿, 沈昕毅. 企业数字化转型与经济政策不确定性感知[J]. 金融研究, 2023, 512(2): 21-39.
[2] 罗煜, 甘静芸, 何青. 中国金融形势的动态特征与演变机理分析:1996-2016[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 479(5): 21-38.
[3] 田子方. 集体主义与居民家庭消费——来自中国的经验发现[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 479(5): 132-150.
[4] 林东杰, 崔小勇, 龚六堂. 货币政策、消费品和投资品通货膨胀——基于金融加速器视角[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 465(3): 18-36.
[5] 闫先东, 高文博. 中央银行信息披露与通货膨胀预期管理——我国央行信息披露指数的构建与实证检验[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 446(8): 35-49.
[6] 饶品贵, 罗勇根. 通货膨胀如何影响股票回报——基于债务融资的视角[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 433(7): 160-175.
[7] 彭方平, 周先波, 连玉君, 展凯. 垄断与通货膨胀:理论与证据[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 431(5): 19-34.
[8] 陆前进. 政府税收税率和通货膨胀率关系的理论和实证研究——对Mankiw Principle的理论修正及在中国的实证检验[J]. 金融研究, 2015, 422(8): 64-78.
[9] 李青原, 吴素云, 王红建. 通货膨胀预期与企业银行债务融资[J]. 金融研究, 2015, 425(11): 124-141.
[1] 步丹璐, 狄灵瑜. 治理环境、股权投资与政府补助[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 448(10): 193 -206 .
[2] 王曦, 朱立挺, 王凯立. 我国货币政策是否关注资产价格?——基于马尔科夫区制转换BEKK多元GARCH模型[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 1 -17 .
[3] 刘勇政, 李岩. 中国的高速铁路建设与城市经济增长[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 18 -33 .
[4] 况伟大, 王琪琳. 房价波动、房贷规模与银行资本充足率[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 34 -48 .
[5] 祝树金, 赵玉龙. 资源错配与企业的出口行为——基于中国工业企业数据的经验研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 49 -64 .
[6] 陈德球, 陈运森, 董志勇. 政策不确定性、市场竞争与资本配置[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 65 -80 .
[7] 牟敦果, 王沛英. 中国能源价格内生性研究及货币政策选择分析[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 81 -95 .
[8] 王丽艳, 马光荣. 帆随风动、人随财走?——财政转移支付对人口流动的影响[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 448(10): 18 -34 .
[9] 李少昆. 美国货币政策是全球发展中经济体外汇储备影响因素吗?[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 448(10): 68 -82 .
[10] 高铭, 江嘉骏, 陈佳, 刘玉珍. 谁说女子不如儿郎?——P2P投资行为与过度自信[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 96 -111 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1