Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2021, Vol. 491 Issue (5): 189-206    
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
企业家前台化影响企业价值吗?——基于新浪微博的实证证据
孙彤, 薛爽, 崔庆慧
浙江万里学院商学院,浙江宁波 315100;
上海财经大学会计与财务研究院/会计学院,上海 200433;
上海财经大学商学院,上海 200433
Does the Front-stage Behavior of Entrepreneurs Affect Firm Value? Evidence from Sina Microblogs
SUN Tong, XUE Shuang, CUI Qinghui
School of Business, Zhejiang Wanli University;
Institute of Accounting and Finance/School of Accounting, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics;
College of Business, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics
下载:  PDF (553KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 互联网时代信息传递成本和沟通成本显著降低。微博作为自媒体的主要代表之一,为企业家从企业的幕后走向台前提供了一条便捷的途径。本文以信息传递理论为基础,利用新浪微博数据,检验了企业家前台化行为对企业价值的影响。实证结果表明:(1)企业家发布微博这一前台化行为有助于提升企业价值。从对价值影响的路径看,企业家微博发布后,企业经营活动现金流增加,系统性风险降低;(2)针对企业家微博进行文本分析,发现企业家微博中个性化微博比例越高、“艾特”人数越多或者微博内容中正向语调比例越高,对企业价值的正向影响越显著;(3)相对于信息不对称程度较低的企业,信息不对称程度较高的企业中企业家更倾向于发布微博。上述实证结果说明自媒体对缓解企业、企业家与投资者之间的信息不对称具有一定作用,为企业家前台化决策及路径选择提供了参考。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
孙彤
薛爽
崔庆慧
关键词:  企业家  前台化  微博  企业价值  信息传递    
Summary:  Entrepreneurs who serve as board directors or CEOs play an important role in the development of enterprises. Traditionally, they influence enterprise value mainly through back-stage behaviors, such as mapping the firm's strategy, making financing and investing decisions, or conducting operational management. With the development of information transmission in the Internet era, a revolution is occurring in business models and the management of enterprises. Increasingly, entrepreneurs are moving from the back stage to the front stage and actively interacting with the public.
With the rapid development of the Internet, the influence of we-media has increased dramatically. We-media is becoming a powerful method for transmitting information. Sina microblogs is an example of we-media that has been popular since 2010. Some entrepreneurs have registered their own Sina microblog account and use it to post news or express their viewpoints. Microblogs offer a rapid, comprehensive, and low-cost channel through which to engage with the public. However, it is a significant time investment for entrepreneurs to write or maintain a blog. Entrepreneurs are busy, and the time cost is higher for an entrepreneur than for a regular employee. There is also a reputation risk for an entrepreneur writing a blog. Considering the benefits and costs of microblogs for entrepreneurs, is it beneficial for entrepreneurs to disclose or share information or viewpoints on a microblog? There is no clear answer to this question in the literature.
Some studies focus on firms' official microblogs and find that they can effectively promote communication between enterprises and investors. Although a few papers investigate the behavior of entrepreneurs on we-media platforms and attempt to explain the effect of this behavior from the perspective of the entrepreneur's image or spirit, the impact of an entrepreneur's personal microblog on his/her firm's valuation remains unknown.
Based on the theory of information transmission, we investigate the impact of the release and content of entrepreneurs' microblogs on their firms' valuation. We use a Python script to search and process entrepreneurs' microblog data from the Sina microblog platform. Other data come from the China Stock Market and Accounting Research Database. The empirical results reveal the following. (1) The front-stage behavior of an entrepreneur, which is defined as the release of a microblog, has a positive impact on the firm's value in terms of operating cash flow and reduced systematic risk. (2) Text analysis of entrepreneurs' microblogs reveals that enterprise value is increased when the proportion of a microblog's content that is personal, frequency of the use of “@,” and proportion of text with a positive tone are higher. (3) The higher the degree of information asymmetry, the more likely the entrepreneur will be to choose to open a microblog account.
The findings in this paper fill a gap in the literature and have important implications for entrepreneurs deciding how to behave when facing the public. This paper makes four main contributions. First, we analyze the front-stage behavior of entrepreneurs through an information asymmetry framework and clarify the channels through which entrepreneurs' front-stage behavior impacts firm value. This not only enriches the literature on the economic consequences of entrepreneurs' front-stage behavior, but also expands the literature on we-media from the perspective of information disclosure and information transmission. Second, in the Internet era, the internal and external information environment of enterprises has changed in important ways. The modes of information collection and transmission must also change to match this evolving environment. Entrepreneurs need to re-examine the modes and channels of information disclosure. The findings of this study have important implications for entrepreneurs hoping to understand whether and how to make use of we-media. Third, the present literature on the impact of we-media on enterprises mainly focuses on enterprises' official microblogs. In contrast, we address entrepreneurs' personal microblogs, which is a more interesting perspective as they contain more diverse information about entrepreneurs. Understanding entrepreneurs' characteristics, viewpoints, and outlooks on life and the world is critical for helping investors to interpret or predict their strategies or decisions. Fourth, This study finds that entrepreneurs can directly or indirectly transmit information related to enterprise value via their personal microblogs, which is an efficient, fair, low-cost, and sustainable method that is also in line with the development concept of modern China.
Keywords:  Entrepreneurs    Front-stage    Microblog    Firm Value    Information Transfer
JEL分类号:  D82   M12   M21  
基金资助: * 本文感谢国家自然科学基金项目(71572102,71872107);教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目(18JJD790010);高等学校学科创新引智计划(B18033)和浙江万里学院科研创新团队的资助。感谢匿名审稿人的宝贵意见,文责自负。
通讯作者:  薛 爽,管理学博士,教授,上海财经大学会计与财务研究院/会计学院,E-mail:xuesh@mail.shufe.edu.cn.   
作者简介:  孙 彤,管理学博士,讲师,浙江万里学院商学院,E-mail:tongsuns@163.com.
崔庆慧,管理学博士研究生,上海财经大学商学院,E-mail:sallycuiqh@163.com.
引用本文:    
孙彤, 薛爽, 崔庆慧. 企业家前台化影响企业价值吗?——基于新浪微博的实证证据[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 491(5): 189-206.
SUN Tong, XUE Shuang, CUI Qinghui. Does the Front-stage Behavior of Entrepreneurs Affect Firm Value? Evidence from Sina Microblogs. Journal of Financial Research, 2021, 491(5): 189-206.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2021/V491/I5/189
[1] 何贤杰、王孝钰、赵海龙和陈信元,2016,《上市公司网络新媒体信息披露研究:基于微博的实证分析》,《财经研究》第3期,第16~27页。
[2] 黄静、俞钰凡和林青蓝,2012,《企业家代言人的慈善行为对消费者的作用机制研究》,《中国工业经济》第2期,第119~127页。
[3] 黄静、朱丽娅和周南,2014,《企业家微博信息对其形象评价的影响机制研究》,《管理世界》第9期,第107~119页。
[4] 吴璇、田高良、司毅和于忠泊,2017,《网络舆情管理与股票流动性》,《管理科学》第6期,第51~64页。
[5] 谢庆红、付晓蓉、李永强和何嫱,2013,《企业家微博对企业品牌形象的影响及作用机制》,《营销科学学报》第4期,第101~119页。
[6] 徐巍和陈冬华,2016,《自媒体披露的信息作用——来自新浪微博的实证证据》,《金融研究》第3期,第157~173页。
[7] 余明桂、李文贵和潘红波,2013,《管理者过度自信与企业风险承担》,《金融研究》第1期,第149~163页。
[8] 章卫东、黄一松、李斯蕾和鄢翔,2017,《信息不对称、研发支出与关联股东认购定向增发股份——来自中国证券市场的经验数据》,《会计研究》第1期,第68~74页。
[9] Bang D N. 2016. “Is More News Good News? Media Coverage of CEOs, Firm Value, and Rent Extraction”, Quarterly Journal of Finance, 5(4):241~291.
[10] Dong J P., and Bruce K B. 2004. “The Presentation of CEOs in the Press, 1990-2000: Increasing Salience, Positive Valence, and a Focus on Competency and Personal Dimensions of Image”, Journal of Public Relations Research, 16(1): 93~125.
[11] Dyck A., Volchkova N., and Zingales L. 2008. “The Corporate Governance Role of the Media: Evidence from Russia”, The Journal of Finance, 63(3): 1093~1135.
[12] Elliott W B., Grant S M., and Hodge F D. 2018. “Negative News and Investor Trust: The Role of $Firm and #CEO Twitter Use”, Journal of Accounting Research, 56(5): 1~31.
[13] Fischer E., and Reuber A R. 2011. “Social Interaction via New Social Media: (How) Can Interactions on Twitter Affect Effectual Thinking and Behavior?”, Journal of Business Venturing, 26(1):1~18.
[14] Freiden J B. 1984. “Advertising Spokesperson Effects: An Examination of Endorser Type and Gender on Two Audiences”, Journal of Advertising Research, 24(5):33~41.
[15] Goffman E. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, Published by Anchor.
[16] Hogan B. 2010. “The Presentation of Self in the Age of Social Media: Distinguishing Performances and Exhibitions Online”, Bulletin of Science Technology and Society, 30(6):377~386.
[17] Miller G S. 2006. “The Press as A Watchdog for Accounting Fraud”, Journal of Accounting Research, 44(5): 1001~1033.
[18] Naidoo L J., and Lord R G. 2008. “Speech Imagery and Perceptions of Charisma: The Mediating Role of Positive Affect”, The Leadership Quarterly, 19(3):283~296.
[19] Nguyen B D. 2015. “Is More News Good News? Media Coverage of CEOs, Firm Value, and Rent Extraction”, Quarterly Journal of Finance, 5(4):1~38.
[20] Rubin V., Mager C., and Friedman H H. 1981. “Company President Versus Spokesperson in Television Commercials”, Journal of Advertising Research, 22(4):31~33.
[21] Toombs L A., and Harlow R M. 2014. “More Than Just "Like": an Entrepreneurial Approach to Creating a Social Media Ethos in Small Firms”, Academy of Marketing Studies Journal, 18(2):275~286.
[22] Thomas Y T., Marco N., and Eliza W. 2018. “Analyst Coverage and the Quality of Corporate Investment Decisions”, Journal of Corporate Finance, 51:164~181.
[23] Uyar A., Boyar E., and Kuzey C. 2018. “Does Social Media Enhance Firm Value? Evidence from Turkish Firms Using Three Social Media Metrics”, Electronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation, 21(2):131~142.
[24] Waldman D., Ramirez G G., House R J., and Puranam P. 2001. “CEO Leadership and Organizational Performance: The Moderating Effect of Environmental Uncertainty”, Academy of Management Journal, 44(2):134~143.
[1] 刘波, 刘彦, 赵洪江, 冷梦玥. 预售众筹与股权众筹的选择: 基于众筹平台与企业家声誉的视角[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 445(7): 175-191.
[2] 闫海洲, 陈百助. 气候变化、环境规制与公司碳排放信息披露的价值[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 444(6): 142-158.
[3] 徐巍, 陈冬华. 自媒体披露的信息作用——来自新浪微博的实证证据[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 429(3): 157-173.
[4] 李丹, 王丹. 供应链客户信息对公司信息环境的影响研究——基于股价同步性的分析[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 438(12): 191-206.
[5] 胡军, 王甄. 微博、特质性信息披露与股价同步性[J]. 金融研究, 2015, 425(11): 190-207.
[1] 王曦, 朱立挺, 王凯立. 我国货币政策是否关注资产价格?——基于马尔科夫区制转换BEKK多元GARCH模型[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 1 -17 .
[2] 刘勇政, 李岩. 中国的高速铁路建设与城市经济增长[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 18 -33 .
[3] 况伟大, 王琪琳. 房价波动、房贷规模与银行资本充足率[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 34 -48 .
[4] 祝树金, 赵玉龙. 资源错配与企业的出口行为——基于中国工业企业数据的经验研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 49 -64 .
[5] 陈德球, 陈运森, 董志勇. 政策不确定性、市场竞争与资本配置[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 65 -80 .
[6] 牟敦果, 王沛英. 中国能源价格内生性研究及货币政策选择分析[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 81 -95 .
[7] 高铭, 江嘉骏, 陈佳, 刘玉珍. 谁说女子不如儿郎?——P2P投资行为与过度自信[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 96 -111 .
[8] 吕若思, 刘青, 黄灿, 胡海燕, 卢进勇. 外资在华并购是否改善目标企业经营绩效?——基于企业层面的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 112 -127 .
[9] 姜军, 申丹琳, 江轩宇, 伊志宏. 债权人保护与企业创新[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 128 -142 .
[10] 刘莎莎, 孔高文. 信息搜寻、个人投资者交易与股价联动异象——基于股票送转的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 143 -157 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1