Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2019, Vol. 474 Issue (12): 58-69    
  “货币政策与宏观审慎政策双支柱调控框架”专辑 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
货币政策与宏观审慎政策的协调
马骏, 何晓贝
清华大学国家金融研究院,北京 100085
On Coordination between Monetary Policy and Macroprudential Policy
MA Jun, HE Xiaobei
National Institute for Financial Research, Tsinghua University
下载:  PDF (639KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 本文在梳理学术文献和国际经验基础上,讨论了货币政策与宏观审慎政策之间的潜在冲突和协调机制。国际文献的初步结论是,为了同时实现价格稳定和金融稳定目标,大部分情况下需要货币政策与宏观审慎政策反向操作(由于政策的替代性),但有时也需要两者同向操作(由于政策的互补性),最优政策组合取决于宏观冲击的类别和风险的来源。本文认为,选择最优组合是一个复杂的理论和实证问题,除了冲击类别和风险来源外,不同的金融体制和经济周期阶段也会影响选择结果。因此,货币政策当局与宏观审慎当局之间需要建立有效的协调机制,并加强对货币政策和宏观审慎政策“溢出效应”的分析能力。基于上述理论,针对我国“双支柱”决策的现状和问题提出如下改革建议:一是从法律上明确中央银行的金融稳定职责。二是建立在同一框架内分析货币政策与宏观审慎政策的方法和工具。三是将金融监管部门的主要宏观审慎政策决策权集中至中央银行。四是建立货币政策与宏观审慎政策的协调流程与机制。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
马骏
何晓贝
关键词:  货币政策  宏观审慎政策  协调    
Summary:  In this paper, we discuss the interaction between monetary policy and macroprudential policy from both theoretical and practical perspectives based on a literature review, identify the problems and challenges facing the current “twin-pillar” regulatory framework in China and propose a number of reform measures. While monetary policies affect financial stability through the risk-taking channel, macroprudential polices affect price stability and output. Recent studies suggest that, depending on the types of shocks and parameter calibrations, monetary policy instruments and macroprudential instruments are either substitutes for each other, or complementary to each other.
   It has been shown in the literature that under conventional parameter calibrations, the optimal policy mix in response to a positive cost-push shock could involve interest rate hikes and relaxation of the countercyclical buffer requirement. That is, monetary policy and macroprudential policy instruments are substitutes in this scenario. On the other hand, the optimal policy mix in response to a positive credit demand shock could involve rate hikes and tightening of the countercyclical buffer requirement. That is, the two policy instruments are complements in this second scenario. In addition, model parameters pertaining to country-specific factors, such as economic and financial market structures, also play an important role in shaping the optimal policy mixes. Therefore, it is essential for policymakers to fully consider the types of shocks as well as country-specific conditions in their analytical framework and policy decisions of optimal monetary and macro-prudential policy mix.
   Given the subtle interplay of the two polices, an effective coordination framework is key to achieve both macroeconomic stability and financial stability. In practice, the effectiveness of the coordination mechanism depends on the governance structure (especially the communications between monetary and macroprudential policy makers) and policy makers' ability to understand the spill-over effects of monetary policy and macroprudential policy.
   While the PBC has set up the broad governance structure of the “twin-pillar” policy framework, a number of challenges are still lying ahead. First, financial stability is not yet formally listed as one of the specific mandates of the PBC in the Central Bank Law. This lack of clarity in legal mandate is partially responsible for the limited allocation of resources to macro-prudential issues especially the analysis of impact of monetary policy on financial stability. Second, the Macroprudential Assessment (MPA) system of the PBC is, in practice, mainly intended to facilitate the implementation of monetary and credit policies. Third, the lack of coordination mechanism between the MPA and the macro-prudential and micro-prudential instruments of the CBIRC leads to regulatory overlap and duplication. Forth, the macro-prudential authorities lack the appropriate analytical tools for assessing policy spill-over effects and developing optimal policy mixes.
   Based on our analysis of the problems facing China and international experiences, we propose the following reform measures. First, adding “financial stability” to the mandate list for the PBC by amending the Central Bank Law. Second, developing methodologies and analytical tools for assessing policy spillover effects and selecting optimal policy mixes of monetary and macroprudential policies. Capacity building and international collaboration is essential to achieve these goals. Third, transfering several macroprudential decision-making roles from CBIRC to the PBC. Fourth, establishing a process and mechanism for coordinating monetary policy and macroprudential policy. The Macroprudential Bureau should be able to conduct quantitative assessment of the effects of monetary policy changes on financial stability, while the Monetary Policy Department should be able to conduct quantitative assessment of the macroeconomic effects of macroprudential policy adjustments.
Keywords:  Monetary Policy    Macroprudential Policy    Policy Coordination
JEL分类号:  E44   E52   E61  
作者简介:  马骏,经济学博士,研究员,清华大学国家金融研究院,E-mail:maj@pbcsf.tsinghua.edu.cn.何晓贝,经济学博士,清华大学国家金融研究院金融与发展研究中心,E-mail:hexb@pbcsf.tsinghua.edu.cn.
引用本文:    
马骏, 何晓贝. 货币政策与宏观审慎政策的协调[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 474(12): 58-69.
MA Jun, HE Xiaobei. On Coordination between Monetary Policy and Macroprudential Policy. Journal of Financial Research, 2019, 474(12): 58-69.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2019/V474/I12/58
[1] 马骏,何晓贝和唐晋荣,2019, 《金融危机的预警、传染与政策干预》,中国金融出版社:北京。
[2] Aikman, David, Julia Giese, Sujit Kapadia and Michael McLeay, 2018, “Targeting Financial Stability: Macroprudential or Monetary Policy?” Bank of England Working Paper No. 734.
[3] Ajello, Andrea, Thomas Laubach, David Lopez-Salido and Taisuke Nakata. ,2016,“Financial Stability and Optimal Interest-Rate Policy”, Federal Reserve Board.
[4] Altunbas, E., L. Gambacorta and David Marques-Ibanez, 2010, “Does Monetary Policy Affect Bank Risk-taking?,” BIS Working Papers 298, Bank for International Settlements.
[5] Aydinbas, C. Yasin, Craig Hardt, Jahangir Rzayev, Murat Soker , and Ted Taylor , Dinah Walker and Pei Zhao.,2015, “Frameworks for Implementing Macroprudential Policy A Comparative Examination of the BoE and FSOC”, School of International and Public Affairs, Columbia University in the City of New York.
[6] Borio, Claudio.,2014, “Macroprudential frameworks: (too) Great Expectations?”, BIS Speech, the 25th Anniversary Edition of Central Banking Journal.
[7] Broadbent, Ben.,2018, “Monetary and macro-prudential policies: The Case for a Separation of Powers”, Reserve Bank of Australia, Sydney via videolink from Bank of England.
[8] Cecchetti, S. and Marion Kohler, 2014, “When Capital Adequacy and Interest Rate Policy Are Substitutes (And When They Are Not),” International Journal of Central Banking, Vol. 10(3), pages 205~231, September.
[9] Cerutti, Eugenio ,Claessens, Stijn and Laeven, Luc, 2017. “The Use and Effectiveness of Macroprudential Policies:New Evidence,”?Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 203~224.
[10] Collard, Fabrice, Harris Dellas, Behzad Diba, and Olivier Loisel. 2017. “Optimal Monetary and Prudential Policies.” American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 9 (1): 40~87.
[11] Dell'Ariccia, G., Luc Laeven and Gustavo A. Suarez, 2017. “Bank Leverage and Monetary Policy's Risk-Taking Channel: Evidence from the United States,” Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, Vol. 72(2), pages 613~654.
[12] Edge, Rochelle and Nellie Liang.,2017, “New Financial Stability Governance 1and Central Banks”, Reserve Bank of Australia, Conference Volume.
[13] Filardo, Andrew.,2004, “Monetary Policy and Asset Price Bubbles: Calibrating the Monetary Policy Trade-offs”, BIS Working Papers No. 155.
[14] Fischer, Stanley., 2015. Macroprudential Policy in the U.S. Economy, speech at 59th Economic Conference of the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, Boston, Massachusetts.
[15] IMF, 2016,“Key Aspects of Macroprudential Policy”.
[16] Kohn, Donald.,2015, “Implementing Macroprudential and Monetary Policies: The Case for Two Committees”, Presentation Delivered at FRB Conference.
[17] Maddaloni, A. and Jose-Luis Peydro, 2011, “Bank Risk-taking, Securitization, Supervision, and Low Interest Rates: Evidence from the Euro-area and the U.S. Lending Standards,” Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies,Vol. 24(6), pages 2121~2165.
[18] Maddalonia, A. and Jose-Luis Peydro, 2013, “Monetary Policy, Macroprudential Policy, and Banking Stability: Evidence from the Euro Area,” International Journal of Central Banking, International Journal of Central Banking, Vol. 9(1), pages 121~169, March.
[19] Smets, Frank.,2014, “Financial Stability and Monetary Policy: How Closely Interlinked?”, European Central Bank.
[20] Stein, Jeremy C., 2013,“Overheating in Credit Markets: Origins, Measurement, and Policy Responses”, Speech Delivered at “Restoring Household Financial Stability after the Great Recession: Why Household Balance Sheets Matter,” a Symposium Sponsored by the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.
[21] Svensson, Lars. E. O., 2018, “Monetary Policy and Macroprudential Policy: Different and Separate?”. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, 51: 802~827.
[22] Van der.Ghote Alejandro.,2018, “Coordinating Monetary and Financial Regulatory Policies”, Presentation Delivered at the 3rd Annual ECB Macroprudential Policy and Research Conference.
[1] 张礼卿, 钟茜. 全球金融周期、美国货币政策与“三元悖论”[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 476(2): 15-33.
[2] 谭小芬, 李源, 苟琴. 美国货币政策推升了新兴市场国家非金融企业杠杆率吗?[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 470(8): 38-57.
[3] 贾盾, 孙溪, 郭瑞. 货币政策公告、政策不确定性及股票市场的预公告溢价效应——来自中国市场的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 469(7): 76-95.
[4] 姜富伟, 郭鹏, 郭豫媚. 美联储货币政策对我国资产价格的影响[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 467(5): 37-55.
[5] 林东杰, 崔小勇, 龚六堂. 货币政策、消费品和投资品通货膨胀——基于金融加速器视角[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 465(3): 18-36.
[6] 陈雨露. 四十年来中央银行的研究进展及中国的实践[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 464(2): 1-19.
[7] 王永钦, 徐鸿恂. 杠杆率如何影响资产价格?——来自中国债券市场自然实验的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 464(2): 20-39.
[8] 张斌, 熊婉婷. 经济结构转型与“双支柱”调控框架[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 474(12): 92-105.
[9] 黄益平, 曹裕静, 陶坤玉, 余昌华. 货币政策与宏观审慎政策共同支持宏观经济稳定[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 474(12): 70-91.
[10] 方意, 王晏如, 黄丽灵, 和文佳. 宏观审慎与货币政策双支柱框架研究——基于系统性风险视角[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 474(12): 106-124.
[11] 芦东, 周梓楠, 周行. 开放经济下的“双支柱”调控稳定效应研究[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 474(12): 125-146.
[12] 李斌, 吴恒宇. 对货币政策和宏观审慎政策双支柱调控框架内在逻辑的思考[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 474(12): 1-17.
[13] 马勇. “双支柱”调控框架的理论与经验基础[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 474(12): 18-37.
[14] 王信, 贾彦东. 货币政策和宏观审慎政策的关联及启示——基于英格兰银行的经验[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 474(12): 38-57.
[15] 司登奎, 葛新宇, 曾涛, 李小林. 房价波动、金融稳定与最优宏观审慎政策[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 473(11): 38-56.
[1] 王曦, 朱立挺, 王凯立. 我国货币政策是否关注资产价格?——基于马尔科夫区制转换BEKK多元GARCH模型[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 1 -17 .
[2] 刘勇政, 李岩. 中国的高速铁路建设与城市经济增长[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 18 -33 .
[3] 况伟大, 王琪琳. 房价波动、房贷规模与银行资本充足率[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 34 -48 .
[4] 祝树金, 赵玉龙. 资源错配与企业的出口行为——基于中国工业企业数据的经验研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 49 -64 .
[5] 陈德球, 陈运森, 董志勇. 政策不确定性、市场竞争与资本配置[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 65 -80 .
[6] 牟敦果, 王沛英. 中国能源价格内生性研究及货币政策选择分析[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 81 -95 .
[7] 高铭, 江嘉骏, 陈佳, 刘玉珍. 谁说女子不如儿郎?——P2P投资行为与过度自信[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 96 -111 .
[8] 吕若思, 刘青, 黄灿, 胡海燕, 卢进勇. 外资在华并购是否改善目标企业经营绩效?——基于企业层面的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 112 -127 .
[9] 姜军, 申丹琳, 江轩宇, 伊志宏. 债权人保护与企业创新[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 128 -142 .
[10] 刘莎莎, 孔高文. 信息搜寻、个人投资者交易与股价联动异象——基于股票送转的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 143 -157 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1