Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2019, Vol. 474 Issue (12): 38-57    
  “货币政策与宏观审慎政策双支柱调控框架”专辑 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
货币政策和宏观审慎政策的关联及启示——基于英格兰银行的经验
王信, 贾彦东
中国人民银行研究局,北京 100800
The Relationship between Monetary Policy and Macroprudential Policy: The Experience of The Bank of England
WANG Xin, JIA Yandong
Research Bureau, the People's Bank of China
下载:  PDF (1225KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 时至今日,宏观审慎政策在内涵、工具和框架等方面快速发展,不仅政策目标更加清晰,工具类型更加丰富,相关理论基础也在不断完善。作为危机后形成的新政策框架,宏观审慎政策在工具有效性、作用机制、政策框架设计及与货币政策的关系方面都还有待深入研究。特别是在制度框架中,如何考虑宏观审慎政策与货币政策的关联,合理设计政策决策框架均已成为关键。对中国而言,系统风险识别、监测与分析更加复杂、困难,需要对宏观审慎政策开展更加精细、深入研究,尤其应吸收借鉴国际经验,建立、完善适合中国的宏观审慎政策框架。基于此,本文首先对宏观审慎政策的理论基础、政策目标及工具等进行系统综述,而后从两类政策关联中涉及的三个重要问题出发,着重分析宏观审慎政策与货币政策之间关系,并分别从组织架构设计、货币政策框架改革、金融政策框架设计等方面,系统介绍了英格兰银行在货币政策和宏观审慎政策框架改革的经验,重点阐述英格兰银行如何实现理论发展与制度设计的较好融合。最后,给出我国宏观审慎政策发展的若干启示和政策建议。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
王信
贾彦东
关键词:  宏观审慎政策  货币政策  外部性  英格兰银行    
Summary:  The international financial crisis in 2008 had a profound impact on global economic and financial systems and also posed a major challenge to financial supervision and macro policy frameworks. This launched wide-ranging theoretical and practical discussions and reflections, which concluded that the complex relationships between financial institutions, high leverage and shadow banking problems, underestimation of liquidity risk, financial procyclicality, and the lack of effective mechanisms to deal with systemically important institutions are all important reasons for the failure of regulatory authorities to effectively identify and resolve systemic risks. Traditional micro supervision and monetary policy cannot guarantee the overall stability of the financial system; it is necessary to develop macro-prudential policies to deal with system risks. After the 2008 crisis, this recognition promoted the reform of macro policy and financial supervision systems.
   Macro-prudential policy is rapidly developing. Not only are the policy objectives clearer and the types of tools more standardized, but there has also been constant improvement in the relevant theoretical frameworks. As a new policy framework formed after the 2008 crisis, the effectiveness of macro-prudential tools, mechanisms, and policy frameworks needs further study, as does the relationship between macro-prudential policy and monetary policy. In particular, it is necessary to study how to apply the new theories to the design of macro-prudential system frameworks in different economic and institutional environments. Important practical tasks are to strengthen the coordination between monetary policy and macro-prudential policy and enhance the policy effect of the “two pillars.” How can we draw on successful international experience and practice, and establish a suitable macro-prudential policy framework? These questions have become the focus of theoretical research and policy practice. In the Chinese setting, systematic risk identification, monitoring, and analysis are complex and difficult tasks, and more detailed and in-depth studies of macro-prudential policies are required. Within the institutional framework, the relationship between macro-prudential policy and monetary policy, and how to reasonably design a policy-making framework, have become the key issues.
   First, we systematically review the theoretical basis, policy objectives, and tools of macro-prudential policy. Second, we analyze the relationship between macro-prudential policy and monetary policy with reference to three important aspects of the relationship between the two types of policies. Third, we systematically examine the Bank of England in terms of organizational structure design, monetary policy framework reform, and financial policy framework design. Focusing on the reform of its monetary policy and macro-prudential policy framework, we examine how the Bank of England could better integrate theoretical development and institutional design. Finally, the study offers some policy suggestions for the development of macro-prudential policy in China.
   This study has a number of policy implications. (1) Policy makers should clarify the independent decision-making modes of macro-prudential policy and monetary policy. On this basis, we can establish strategies, objectives, tools, and operating rules for macro-prudential policy and a comprehensive and systematic financial risk analysis system that will have the advantages of a central bank in terms of macro-economic analysis and policy making. (2) Policy makers should integrate and standardize the existing macro-prudential policy tools and add counter cyclical capital requirements and counter cyclical leverage constraints into the macro-prudential policy toolbox as soon as possible. (3) Policy makers should further promote the integration of financial statistical data, establish a set of core indicators of systematic risk at different levels, strengthen the unified monitoring of systematic risk, and form an intermediate goal for macro-prudential policy development. (4) Methodologically, policy makers should speed up the establishment of China's systematic risk model, correctly evaluate the role of stress testing in macro-prudential policy-making, and coordinate the implementation of stress testing. (5) A standardized mechanism for communication and information release should be established to actively guide market expectations. (6) It is important to strengthen the integration of institutions and departments in the “before, during and after” phases of systematic risk response, and promote the coordination of monetary policy and macro-prudential policy. At the same time, we should promote the use of technology for the mutual verification and complementarity of our macroeconomic and system risk models.
Keywords:  Macro-prudential Policy    Monetary Policy    Externalities    Bank of England
JEL分类号:  E0   E4   E5   E6  
基金资助: * 本文为国家自然科学基金应急管理项目“防范化解重大金融风险:宏观视角与政策应对”(71850001),国家自然科学基金面上项目“金融网络结构下的中国系统风险模型构建”(71873140)的阶段性成果。
作者简介:  王信,中国人民银行研究局。贾彦东,中国人民银行研究局,E-mail:jyandong@pbc.gov.cn.
引用本文:    
王信, 贾彦东. 货币政策和宏观审慎政策的关联及启示——基于英格兰银行的经验[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 474(12): 38-57.
WANG Xin, JIA Yandong. The Relationship between Monetary Policy and Macroprudential Policy: The Experience of The Bank of England. Journal of Financial Research, 2019, 474(12): 38-57.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2019/V474/I12/38
[1] Acemoglu, Daron, Asuman Ozdaglar and Alireza Tahbaz-Salehi, 2015, “Systemic Risk and Stability in Financial Networks”, American Economic Review, American Economic Association, Vol. 105(2), pp. 564~608, February.
[2] Adrian, T. and N.Liang,2014, “Monetary Policy, Financial Conditions, and Financial Stability”, FRB of New York Staff Report(690).
[3] Akinci, O., and J. Olmstead-Rumsey, 2018. “How Effective are Macroprudential Policies? An Empirical Investigation”, Journal of Financial Intermediation 33, pp. 33~57.
[4] Altunbas, Y., Gambacorta, L. and Marques-Ibanez, D. ,2014, “Does Monetary Policy Affect Bank Risk?”, International Journal of Central Banking 10(1), 95~135.
[5] Altunbas, Y.,L. Gambacorta,and D.Marques-Ibanez, 2012, “Do Bank Characteristics Influence the Effect of Monetary Policy on Bank risk?”, Economics Letters 117(1), 220~222.
[6] Asea, P. K. and B.Blomberg,1998, “Lending Cycles”, Journal of Econometrics 83(1), 89~128.
[7] Benanke, B.and M.Gertler,1989, “Agency Costs, Net Worth, and Business Fluctuation”, Americal Economic Review 1989, 14~31.
[8] Bhattacharya, S. ,1982, “Aspects of Monetary and Banking Theory and Moral Hazard”, The Journal of Finance 37(2), 371~384.
[9] Borio, C. and H.Zhu, 2012, “Capital Regulation, Risk-taking and Monetary Policy: a Missing Link in the Transmission Mechanism?”, Journal of Financial Stability 8(4), 236~251.
[10] Challe, E., Mojon, B. and Ragot, X.,2013, “Equilibrium Risk Shifting and Interest Rate in an Opaque Financial System”, European Economic Review 63, 117~133.
[11] Aikman, David , Julia Giese, Sujit Kapadia and Michael McLeay, 2019, “Targeting Financial Stability: Macroprudential or Monetary Policy?”, European Central Bank Working Paper, No. 2278.
[12] Del Negro, M. and Otrok, C. ,2007, “Luftballons: Monetary Policy and The House Price Boom across US States”, Journal of Monetary Economics 54(7), 1962~1985.
[13] Dell’Ariccia, G., L.Laeven, and G. A.Suarez,2016, “Bank Leverage and Monetary Policy's Risk-Taking Channel: Evidence from the United States”, European Central Bank Working Paper, No. 1903.
[14] Drehmann, M, Borio, C and Tsatsaronis, K, 2011, “Anchoring Countercyclical Capital Buffers: the Role of Credit Aggregates?”, International Journal of Central Banking, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 189~240.
[15] Fahr, Stephan, and John Fell. 2017. “Macroprudential Policy-closing the Financial Stability Gap”, Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, 25(4): 334~359.
[16] Farhi, E. and J.Tirole,2012, “Collective Moral Hazard, Maturity Mismatch and Systemic Bailouts”, American Economic Review 101(1), 60~93.
[17] Farhi, Emmanuel, and Jean Tirole, 2011, “Collective Moral Hazard, Maturity Mismatch, and Systemic Bailouts”,American Economic Review, 102(1): 60~93.
[18] Fatas, A., Kannan, P., Rabanal, P. Scott, A.,2009, “Lessons for Monetary Policy from Asset Price Fluctuations”, International Monetary Fund (Chapter 3 of the October 2009 World Economic Outlook).
[19] Franklin,Allen, and Douglas Gale, 1994,“Liquidity Preference, Market Participation and Asset Price Volatility”,American Economic Review, Vol. 84, pp. 933~55.
[20] Franklin,Allen, and Douglas Gale, 2000, “Financial Contagion”,Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 108, No. 1, pp. 1~33.
[21] Gan, J., 2004, “Banking Market Structure and Financial Stability: Evidence from the Texas Real Estate Crisis in the 1980s”, Journal of Financial Economics 73(3), 567~601.
[22] Goodhart, C.,1988, “The Evolution of Central Banks”, MIT Press Books. c1988.
[23] Gorton, Gary, and Ping He, 2008, “Bank Credit Cycles”,Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 75, No. 4, pp. 1181~214.
[24] Hahm, J.-H., F. S.Mishkin, H. S.Shin, and K.Shin,2012, “Macroprudential Policies in Open Emerging Economies”, NBER Working Paper(17780).
[25] Igan, D. and Kang, H., 2011, “Do loan-to-value and Debt-to-income Limits work? Evidence from Korea”, IMF Working Paper 11/297.
[26] IMF, 2011, “Macro Prudential policy: An Organizing Framework”, IMF Policy Papers.(2011) 11(17).
[27] IMF, 2013, “The Interaction of Monetary and Macroprudential Policies”, International Monetary Fund, https://www.imf.org/external/np/pp/eng/2013/0127
[28] IMF,2018,“The IMF’s Annual Macroprudential Policy Survey—Objectives, Design, and Count/ry Responses”, International Monetary Fund,2018.
[29] Ioannidou, V., S.,Ongena, and J. L.Peydr'o, 2009, “Monetary Policy and Subprime Lending: a Tall Tale of Low Federal Funds Rates, Hazardous Loans and Reduced Loan Spreads”, European Banking Center Discussion Paper 45.
[30] Jimenez, G., S. Ongena,J.-L.Peydro and Saurina, J.,2014, “Hazardous Times for Monetary Policy: What do twenty-three Million Bank Loans Say about the Effects of Monetary Policy on Credit risk-taking?”, Econometrica 82(2), 463~505.
[31] Kannan, Prakash, Pau Rabanal, and Alasdair Scott, 2009, “Monetary and Macroprudential Policy Rules in a Model with House Price Booms”,IMF Working Paper 09/251.
[32] Kiyotaki, N. & Moore, J.,1997, “Credit Cycles”, The Journal of Political Economy 105(2), 211~248.
[33] Korinek, Anton, 2011,“Systemic Risk-Taking: Amplification Effects, Externalities, and Regulatory Responses”,(unpublished; College Park: University of Maryland).
[34] Landier, A., D. A.Sraer and D.Thesmar,2011, “The Risk-shifting Hypothesis: Evidence from Subprime Originations”, in “AFA 2012 Chicago Meetings Paper”.
[35] Lilit Popoyan,2016,“Macro prudential Policy: a Blessing or a Curse?”,LEM Working Paper Series 2016/21, Laboratory of Economic and Management,Institute of Economics, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy.
[36] Lorenzoni, Guido, 2008,“Inefficient Credit Booms”,Review of Economics Studies, Vol. 75, pp. 809~33.
[37] Merrouche, O. and E.Nier,2010, “What Caused the Global Financial Crisis”, IMF Working Paper 10/265.
[38] Nier, E. W. and O.Merrouche,2010, “What Caused the Global Financial Crisis? Evidence on the Drivers of Financial Imbalances 1999-2007”, IMF Working Paper (10/265).
[39] Quint, D. and P. Rabanal,2014, “Monetary and Macroprudential Policy in an Estimated DSGE model of the Euro Area”, International Journal of Central Banking 10(2), 169~236.
[40] Rajan, R.G. 1994,“Why Bank Credit Policies Fluctuate: A Theory and Some Evidence”,Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 109, pp. 399~441.
[41] Rochelle, M. Edge and J. Nellie Liang, 2019. “New Financial Stability Governance Structures and Central Banks”, Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2019-019, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (US).
[42] Ruckes, Martin, 2004,“Bank Competition and Credit Standards”,Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 17, No. 4, pp.1073~102.
[43] Sengupta, R. ,2010, “Alt-a: The Forgotten Segment of the Mortgage Market”, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review 92, February 2010.
[44] Shin, H. S. ,2015, “Macroprudential Tools, Their Limits and Their Connection with Monetary Policy”, Panel remarks at IMF Spring Meeting event: Rethinking macro policy III: progress or confusion? 15 April 2015, Washington, DC.
[45] Shin, H. S.2005, “Financial System Liquidity, Asset Prices and Monetary Policy”, The Changing Nature of the Business Cycle,’Reserve Bank of Australia pp. 312~335.
[46] Stein, Jeremy, 2012,“Monetary Policy as Financial Stability Regulation”,Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 127, No. 1, 57~95.
[47] Stijn, Claessens, 2014, “An Overview of Macroprudential Policy Tools”, International Monetary Fund Working Paper 14/214.
[48] Svensson, Lars. ,2017, “Cost-Benefit Analysis of Leaning Against the Wind”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 90: 193~213.
[49] Svensson, Lars. ,2018, “The Future of Monetary Policy and Macroprudential Policy”, Speech in The Future of Central Banking: An ECB Colloquium Held in Honour of Vítor Constâncio, Frankfurt, May 16~17, 2018.
[50] Svensson, Lars. ,2019,“Monetary policy and Macroprudential policy: Different and separate?” Canadian Journal of Economics (2018) 51(3) 802~827.
[1] 张礼卿, 钟茜. 全球金融周期、美国货币政策与“三元悖论”[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 476(2): 15-33.
[2] 谭小芬, 李源, 苟琴. 美国货币政策推升了新兴市场国家非金融企业杠杆率吗?[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 470(8): 38-57.
[3] 贾盾, 孙溪, 郭瑞. 货币政策公告、政策不确定性及股票市场的预公告溢价效应——来自中国市场的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 469(7): 76-95.
[4] 姜富伟, 郭鹏, 郭豫媚. 美联储货币政策对我国资产价格的影响[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 467(5): 37-55.
[5] 林东杰, 崔小勇, 龚六堂. 货币政策、消费品和投资品通货膨胀——基于金融加速器视角[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 465(3): 18-36.
[6] 陈雨露. 四十年来中央银行的研究进展及中国的实践[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 464(2): 1-19.
[7] 王永钦, 徐鸿恂. 杠杆率如何影响资产价格?——来自中国债券市场自然实验的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 464(2): 20-39.
[8] 马骏, 何晓贝. 货币政策与宏观审慎政策的协调[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 474(12): 58-69.
[9] 李斌, 吴恒宇. 对货币政策和宏观审慎政策双支柱调控框架内在逻辑的思考[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 474(12): 1-17.
[10] 马勇. “双支柱”调控框架的理论与经验基础[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 474(12): 18-37.
[11] 张斌, 熊婉婷. 经济结构转型与“双支柱”调控框架[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 474(12): 92-105.
[12] 黄益平, 曹裕静, 陶坤玉, 余昌华. 货币政策与宏观审慎政策共同支持宏观经济稳定[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 474(12): 70-91.
[13] 方意, 王晏如, 黄丽灵, 和文佳. 宏观审慎与货币政策双支柱框架研究——基于系统性风险视角[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 474(12): 106-124.
[14] 芦东, 周梓楠, 周行. 开放经济下的“双支柱”调控稳定效应研究[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 474(12): 125-146.
[15] 司登奎, 葛新宇, 曾涛, 李小林. 房价波动、金融稳定与最优宏观审慎政策[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 473(11): 38-56.
[1] 王曦, 朱立挺, 王凯立. 我国货币政策是否关注资产价格?——基于马尔科夫区制转换BEKK多元GARCH模型[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 1 -17 .
[2] 刘勇政, 李岩. 中国的高速铁路建设与城市经济增长[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 18 -33 .
[3] 况伟大, 王琪琳. 房价波动、房贷规模与银行资本充足率[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 34 -48 .
[4] 祝树金, 赵玉龙. 资源错配与企业的出口行为——基于中国工业企业数据的经验研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 49 -64 .
[5] 陈德球, 陈运森, 董志勇. 政策不确定性、市场竞争与资本配置[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 65 -80 .
[6] 牟敦果, 王沛英. 中国能源价格内生性研究及货币政策选择分析[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 81 -95 .
[7] 高铭, 江嘉骏, 陈佳, 刘玉珍. 谁说女子不如儿郎?——P2P投资行为与过度自信[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 96 -111 .
[8] 吕若思, 刘青, 黄灿, 胡海燕, 卢进勇. 外资在华并购是否改善目标企业经营绩效?——基于企业层面的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 112 -127 .
[9] 姜军, 申丹琳, 江轩宇, 伊志宏. 债权人保护与企业创新[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 128 -142 .
[10] 刘莎莎, 孔高文. 信息搜寻、个人投资者交易与股价联动异象——基于股票送转的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 143 -157 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1