Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2021, Vol. 495 Issue (9): 30-50    
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
经济开放与货币需求:国际金融风险及持币成本的测度
秦朵, 卢珊, 王惠文, Sophie van Huellen, 王庆超
伦敦大学亚非学院,英国伦敦;中央财经大学统计与数学学院,北京 100081;
北京航空航天大学经济管理学院,北京 100191;
Expedia Group,英国伦敦
Openness and Money Demand: Measuring the Opportunity Cost Effects of International Financial Markets
QIN Duo, LU Shan, WANG Huiwen, Sophie van Huellen, WANG Qingchao
School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London;
School of Statistics and Mathematics, Central University of Finance and Economics;
School of Economics and Management, Beihang University;Expedia Group
下载:  PDF (1337KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 在中国开放经济体制下的基准货币需求模型中,本文将源于国际金融市场的持币成本设为遗漏潜变量,并构建特定的国际金融综合指数(CIFI)作为该潜变量的测度。借鉴机器学习与测度理论,本文利用对数误差修正模型提出了分步降维的CIFI构造算法,构造了长期CIFI和短期CIFI。结果表明,CIFI构造中的无监督降维步骤有助于减少高维金融数据中的冗余信息。实证分析发现,国际机会成本对中国货币需求具有规律性的前导影响,而在2007至2008年国际金融危机期间,央行的应急措施对长期CIFI所代表的非均衡冲击起到明显的阻截效果,对短期CIFI的影响基本是持续不变的。通过综合指数构造与宏观货币需求模型的算法连接,可以利用CIFI的构成结构从前导时间与影响强度两方面追踪冲击货币需求的国际金融风险的具体来源,这为宏观决策者监测国际金融市场提供了颇有规律的信息。在方法论上,本研究为如何利用模型监测国际金融市场影响宏观经济开辟了一条新路。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
秦朵
卢珊
王惠文
Sophie van Huellen
王庆超
关键词:  货币需求  国际金融风险  复合型测度  无监督降维  有监督降维  指数构造    
Summary:  Standard money demand models neglect the direct effects of economic openness. This omission is problematic when domestic opportunity cost variables fail to fully reflect the dynamics of international financial markets. Examining the effect of this omission is of great practical importance given the ever-increasing openness of China's economy. We propose composite international financial indices (CIFIs) to measure the latent variables that are omitted in standard money demand models. Using techniques from machine learning and measurement theory, we develop a novel model-based approach to construct CIFIs that combines both unsupervised and supervised dimension reduction methods. The choice of the popular error-correction model for the money demand function leads us to construct two types of CIFIs: long-run and short-run CIFIs.
We collect a large set of around 100 financial input indicators to construct CIFIs using monthly data for the 1993M9-2015M6 period. These input indicators are obtained from 21 economies, covering almost all of China's major trading partners. The CIFI construction algorithm contains two stages of aggregation. First, it produces composite financial input indicators by aggregating groups of financial indicators. These groups are formed using clustering methods under the unsupervised learning approach. Second, it uses supervised dimension reduction methods to aggregate the composite financial input indicators following the principle of partial least-squares (PLS). The algorithm produces short-run CIFIs by targeting money growth rates, whereas it forms the target of long-run CIFIs using the error-correction term of standard money demand models. The second supervised aggregation stage sets the input indicators as leading indicators by construction, allows for dynamic dis-synchronization among them, and performs dynamic backward selection of different lags to make the dynamic input forms of the leading indicators as simple as possible. Concatenation is imposed on the resulting CIFIs during regular data updates.
Experiments with CIFI-enhanced money demand models yield positive outcomes. Our key findings are as follows: (i) We find strong evidence of the effects of foreign opportunity costs on China's money demand based on the statistical significance and constancy of the coefficients of CIFIs and overall comparisons of model explanatory power; (ii) the effect of the short-run CIFIs is particularly robust, as evidenced by the 2007-2008 US-led financial crisis; however, in the enhanced error-correction term of the long-run CIFIs, a temporary coefficient variation toward insignificance is observed, which is interpreted as resulting from the emergency measures taken by the People's Bank of China in response to the crisis; (iii) model performance comparisons of the CIFIs produced with and without the first step of unsupervised dimension reduction show the necessity of this step in that it helps reduce redundant information in large financial datasets; (iv) tracing the compositions of CIFIs back to individual financial input indicators yields various patterns and features that enable the identification of the sources of the aggregate foreign opportunity cost effects.
The explicit links between disaggregate input indicators and aggregate CIFIs provide valuable tools for policymakers to monitor external financial shocks from different geographical regions and markets and assess their aggregate risks in real time. Our CIFI algorithm opens a novel route of model-based composite construction. This route also sheds light on why the conventional route of principal component-based factor analysis is insufficient to construct composite indices for macro-modeling.
Keywords:  Money Demand    International Financial Risk    Composite Measurement    Supervised Learning    Unsupervised Learning    Index Aggregation
JEL分类号:  E17   C22   C53  
基金资助: * 本文科研受益于北京凯恩克劳斯经济研究基金会的大力支持;王庆超在伦敦大学的博士后研究期间,曾为凯恩克劳斯经济研究基金会研究员;卢珊和王惠文在本文的研究工作受国家自然科学基金资助(基金号:72001222,72021001);卢珊还受益于中央财经大学的学科建设经费、科研创新团队支持计划、新兴交叉学科建设项目的支持;我们还感谢陈兴动、金立佐、王海军、徐忠、张维迎、张雪春、张延群、Andy Ho 和Thanos Moraitis 在研究过程中的支持与帮助。感谢匿名审稿人的宝贵意见,文责自负。
通讯作者:  卢 珊,经济学博士,讲师,中央财经大学统计与数学学院,E-mail:shan.lu@cufe.edu.cn.   
作者简介:  秦 朵,经济学博士,荣誉教授,伦敦大学亚非学院,E-mail:dq1@soas.ac.uk.
王惠文,工学博士,教授,北京航空航天大学经济管理学院,E-mail:wanghw@vip.sina.com.
Sophie van Huellen,经济学博士,讲师,伦敦大学亚非学院,E-mail:Svanhuellen@gmail.com.
王庆超,经济学博士,数据科学家,Expedia Group,E-mail:qingchaowan@gmail.com.
引用本文:    
秦朵, 卢珊, 王惠文, Sophie van Huellen, 王庆超. 经济开放与货币需求:国际金融风险及持币成本的测度[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 495(9): 30-50.
QIN Duo, LU Shan, WANG Huiwen, Sophie van Huellen, WANG Qingchao. Openness and Money Demand: Measuring the Opportunity Cost Effects of International Financial Markets. Journal of Financial Research, 2021, 495(9): 30-50.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2021/V495/I9/30
[1] 杜浩然和黄桂田,2016,《金融创新、资本市场与中国的货币需求——基于1993—2013年季度数据与Divisia货币总量的经验分析》,《经济学动态》第2期,第78~86页。
[2] 刘程程、苏治和宋 鹏,2020,《全球股票市场间风险传染的测度、监管及预警》,《金融研究》第11期,第94~111页。
[3] 易纲,2001,《全球金融一体化下的金融体制改革与货币政策》,《经济界》第2期,第83~87页。
[4] 杨子晖、陈雨恬和谢锐楷,2018,《我国金融机构系统性金融风险度量与跨部门风险溢出效应研究》,《金融研究》第10期,第19~37页。
[5] Aramonte, S., J. W. Schindler and S. Rosen, 2013, “Assessing and Combining Financial Conditions Indexes,” Finance and Economics Discussion Series, 2013(39), pp.1~38.
[6] Baba, Y., D. F. Hendry and R. M. Starr, 1992, “The Demand for M1 in the U.S.A.1960-1988,” The Review of Economic Studies, 59(1), pp.25~61.
[7] Borio, C., 2011, “Rediscovering the Macroeconomic Roots of Financial Stability Policy: Journey, Challenges, and a Way Forward,” Annu. Rev. Financ. Econ., 3(1), pp.87~117.
[8] Borio, C., 2013, “The Great Financial Crisis: Setting Priorities for New Statistics,” Journal of Banking Regulation, 14(3-4), pp.306~317.
[9] Borio, C., 2014, “The International Monetary and Financial System: its Achilles Heel and What to do about it,” BIS Working Paper, No. 456.
[10] Calza, A., D. Gerdesmeier and J. V. F. Levy, 2001, “Euro Area Money Demand: Measuring the Opportunity Costs Appropriately,” IMF Working Paper, No. 01/179.
[11] Charrad, M., N. Ghazzali, V. Boiteau and A. Niknafs, 2012, “Nbclust Package: Finding the Relevant Number of Clusters in a Dataset,” User.
[12] Chowdhury, A., 1995, “The Demand for Money in a Small Open Economy: the Case of Switzerland,” Open Economies Review, 6(2), pp.131~144.
[13] Clements, M. P. and D. F. Hendry, 2008, A Companion to Economic Forecasting, Published by John Wiley & Sons.
[14] Cox, D. R., 1961, “Tests of Separate Families of Hypotheses,” Proceedings of the Fourth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics, 1, pp.105~123.
[15] El-Shagi, M. and Y. Zheng, 2017, “Money Demand in China: A Meta-Study,” CFDS Discussion Paper Series 2017/3.
[16] Engle, R. F., D. F. Hendry, and J.-F. Richard, 1983, “Exogeneity,” Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 51, pp.277~304.
[17] Hansen, B. E., 1992, “Testing for Parameter Instability in Linear Models,” Journal of policy Modeling, 14 (4), pp.517~533.
[18] Hatzius, J., P. Hooper, F. S. Mishkin, K. L. Schoenholtz and M.W.Watson, 2010, “Financial Conditions Indexes: A Fresh Look after the Financial Crisis,” NBER Working Paper, No. w16150.
[19] Hendry, D. F. and N. R. Ericsson, 1991, “An Econometric Analysis of uk Money Demand in Monetary Trends in the United States and the United Kingdom by Milton Friedman and anna j. schwartz,” The American Economic Review, pp.8~38.
[20] Howell, R. D., E. Breivik and J. B. Wilcox, 2013, “Formative Measurement: A Critical Perspective,” ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, 44(4), pp.44~55.
[21] Leroux, M., R. Kotchoni and D. Stevanovic, 2017, “Macroeconomic Forecast Accuracy in a Data-rich Environment,” Technical Report, CIRANO, 2017(5).
[22] Marcellino, M., 2013, “Leading Indicators,” Handbook of Economic Forecasting, 1, pp.879~960
[23] Markus, K. A. and D. Borsboom, 2013, Frontiers of Test Validity Theory: Measurement, Causation, and Meaning, Published by Routledge.
[24] Qin, D. and X. He, 2012, “Modelling the impact of Aggregate Financial Shocks External to the Chinese Economy,” BOFIT Discussion Paper, No. 25/2012.
[25] Qin, D., S. van Huellen, Q.C. Wang and T. Moraitis, 2018, “Algorithm Modelling of Financial Conditions for Macro Predictive Purposes: Pilot Application on the USA,” Technical Report, SOAS Department of Economics Working Paper Series, No. 212.
[26] Sokal, R. R., 1958, “A Statistical Method for Evaluating Systematic Relationship,” University of Kansas Science Bulletin, 28, pp.1409~1438.
[27] Stiglitz, J. E., 2018, “Where Modern Macroeconomics went Wrong,” Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 34(1-2), pp.70~106.
[28] Terry, L. and K. Kelley, 2012, “Sample Size Planning for Composite Reliability Coefficients: Accuracy in Parameter Estimation via Narrow Confidence Intervals,” British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 65(3), pp.371~401.
[29] Van Huellen, S., D. Qin, S. Lu, H. Wang, Q.C. Wang and T. Moraitis, 2020, “Modelling Opportunity Cost Effects in Money Demand due to Openness,” International Journal of Finance & Economics, pp.1~48.
[30] Wang, Q.-C., 2017, Testing a New Approach to Construct International Financial Market indices: an Application to Asian-Pacific Economies, Published by PhD thesis, SOAS University of London.
[31] Wold, H, 1966, “Estimation of Principal Components and Related Models by Iterative Least Squares,” Multivariate analysis, pp.391~420.
[32] Wold, H, 1975, “Path Models with Latent Variables: The Nipals Approach,” Quantitative Sociology, pp.307~357.
[33] Wold, H, 1980, “Model Construction and Evaluation When Theoretical Knowledge is Scarce: Theory and Application of Partial Least Squares,” Evaluation of Econometric Models, pp.47~74.
[1] 尹志超, 公雪, 潘北啸. 移动支付对家庭货币需求的影响——来自中国家庭金融调查的微观证据[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 472(10): 40-58.
[1] 王曦, 朱立挺, 王凯立. 我国货币政策是否关注资产价格?——基于马尔科夫区制转换BEKK多元GARCH模型[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 1 -17 .
[2] 刘勇政, 李岩. 中国的高速铁路建设与城市经济增长[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 18 -33 .
[3] 况伟大, 王琪琳. 房价波动、房贷规模与银行资本充足率[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 34 -48 .
[4] 祝树金, 赵玉龙. 资源错配与企业的出口行为——基于中国工业企业数据的经验研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 49 -64 .
[5] 陈德球, 陈运森, 董志勇. 政策不确定性、市场竞争与资本配置[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 65 -80 .
[6] 牟敦果, 王沛英. 中国能源价格内生性研究及货币政策选择分析[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 81 -95 .
[7] 高铭, 江嘉骏, 陈佳, 刘玉珍. 谁说女子不如儿郎?——P2P投资行为与过度自信[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 96 -111 .
[8] 吕若思, 刘青, 黄灿, 胡海燕, 卢进勇. 外资在华并购是否改善目标企业经营绩效?——基于企业层面的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 112 -127 .
[9] 姜军, 申丹琳, 江轩宇, 伊志宏. 债权人保护与企业创新[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 128 -142 .
[10] 刘莎莎, 孔高文. 信息搜寻、个人投资者交易与股价联动异象——基于股票送转的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 143 -157 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1