Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2021, Vol. 488 Issue (2): 153-170    
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
高管团队内部治理与企业资本结构调整——基于非CEO高管独立性的视角
张博, 韩亚东, 李广众
中国人民大学商学院,北京 100872;
中山大学管理学院/高级金融研究院,广东广州 510000
Internal Governance and Capital Structure Adjustment: Evidence from the Perspective of Non-CEO Executives' Independence
ZHANG Bo, HAN Yadong, LI Guangzhong
School of Business, Renmin University of China;
School of Business/Advanced Institute of Finance, Sun Yat-sen University
下载:  PDF (531KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 本文以2001-2017年A股上市公司为研究样本,实证检验了高管团队内部治理对企业资本结构的影响。研究发现:当企业负债不足时,高管团队内部治理效应能够显著提高企业(尤其是非国有企业)的负债水平,降低企业实际资本结构与目标资本结构的偏离程度。这种高管团队内部治理效应在第一类委托代理问题比较严重以及非CEO高管监督动机较强的企业中更加显著。作用机制分析表明,高管团队内部治理效应能够通过降低第一类代理成本来降低企业资本结构与目标资本结构的偏离程度。本文的研究结论为改善我国上市公司治理提供了新的思路,对于优化企业融资结构、深化金融供给侧结构性改革具有一定的启示意义。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
张博
韩亚东
李广众
关键词:  高管团队  高管团队内部治理  资本结构  代理成本    
Summary:  Decisions regarding capital structure directly affect long-term corporate performance and value. Morellec, Nikolov, and Schurhoff (2012) emphasize the role of agency conflicts in corporate financing decisions and develop a tradeoff model to investigate the importance of manager-shareholder conflicts in capital structure choice. Following Morellec et al. (2012), other studies investigate the roles of various corporate governance mechanisms, such as external governance mechanisms, board oversight, and executive compensation contracts, in alleviating the problem of sub-optimal capital structures caused by the conflicts between shareholders and managers.
However, most studies focus on individual CEOs as the representatives of the top management team, the roles of non-CEO executives in corporate decision-making have not been fully examined. Non-CEO executives have a significant influence on corporate decision-making as they are the implementers of business decisions, and thus monitor and constrain the self-interested behavior of CEOs. The internal monitoring that takes place from the bottom up within a top management team (TMT) is known as TMT internal governance.
The effectiveness of internal governance within a TMT requires non-CEO executives to be independent from the CEO. In China, a CEO has the right to propose the appointment or dismissal of non-CEO executives. The CEO may prefer to select non-CEO executives who share similar values, and these executives may also be grateful to the CEO who hired them, thus diminishing their monitoring role. In this study, we use the proportion of the top four highest-paid non-CEO executives appointed before a current CEO’s arrival to measure TMT internal governance. The larger this proportion, the greater the independence of non-CEO executives and the stronger the TMT internal governance.
Using a sample of Chinese listed companies from 2001 to 2017, we investigate the effect of TMT internal governance on capital structure decisions. We find that TMT internal governance significantly increases a firm's leverage when its actual leverage is lower than the target leverage ratio, particularly for non-state-owned enterprises (non-SOEs). In addition, the effect of TMT internal governance is greater for firms with more severe agency problems and those with non-CEO executives who have stronger incentives to monitor the CEO. Our analysis of the mechanism reveals that TMT internal governance reduces the degree of deviation from the target leverage ratio by reducing the agency costs.
Our study contributes to the literature on corporate governance and capital structure and has important policy implications for the further development of the corporate governance of Chinese listed companies. Our study contributes to the literature focusing on the impact of corporate governance on capital structure decisions by taking the perspective of TMT internal governance, which has previously been neglected. Our study also provides policy implications for improving corporate governance and optimizing capital structures.
Keywords:  Top Management Team    TMT Internal Governance    Capital Structure    Agency Cost
JEL分类号:  G32   G34  
基金资助: * 本文感谢国家自然科学基金项目(71772190、 U1811462、71991474)的资助。 同时,感谢匿名审稿人对本文富有建设性的意见,文责自负。
通讯作者:  李广众,经济学博士,金融学博士,教授,中山大学管理学院/高级金融研究院,E-mail: liguangzhong@mail.sysu.edu.cn.   
作者简介:  张 博,会计学博士,副教授,中国人民大学商学院,E-mail:zhangbo@rmbs.ruc.edu.cn.韩亚东,管理学博士研究生,中国人民大学商学院,E-mail:hanyadong@ruc.edu.cn.
引用本文:    
张博, 韩亚东, 李广众. 高管团队内部治理与企业资本结构调整——基于非CEO高管独立性的视角[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 488(2): 153-170.
ZHANG Bo, HAN Yadong, LI Guangzhong. Internal Governance and Capital Structure Adjustment: Evidence from the Perspective of Non-CEO Executives' Independence. Journal of Financial Research, 2021, 488(2): 153-170.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2021/V488/I2/153
[1] 成瑾、白海青和刘丹,2017,《CEO如何促进高管团队的行为整合——基于结构化理论的解释》,《管理世界》第2期,第159~193页。
[2] 戴亦一、肖金利和潘越,2016,《“乡音”能否降低公司代理成本?——基于方言视角的研究》,《经济研究》第12期,第147~160页。
[3] 方军雄,2007,《所有制、制度环境与信贷资金配置》,《经济研究》第12期,第82~92页。
[4] 黄继承、阚铄、朱冰和郑志刚,2016,《经理薪酬激励与资本结构动态调整》,《管理世界》第11期,第156~171页。
[5] 黄继承和姜付秀,2015,《产品市场竞争与资本结构调整速度》,《世界经济》第7期,第99~119页。
[6] 姜付秀和黄继承,2011,《市场化进程与资本结构动态调整》,《管理世界》第3期,第124~134页。
[7] 姜付秀和黄继承,2013,《CEO财务经历与资本结构决策》,《会计研究》第5期,第27~34页。
[8] 李培功和肖珉,2012,《CEO任期与企业资本投资》,《金融研究》第2期,第127~141页。
[9] 林毅夫和李志赟,2004,《政策性负担,道德风险与预算软约束》,《经济研究》第2期,第17~27页。
[10] 凌鸿程,2019,《金融发展与企业资本结构调整》,《南京审计大学学报》第1期,第96~105页。
[11] 刘运国和刘雯,2007,《我国上市公司的高管任期与R&D支出》,《管理世界》第1期,第134~142页。
[12] 陆正飞、祝继高和樊铮,2009,《银根紧缩,信贷歧视与民营上市公司投资者利益损失》,《金融研究》第8期,第128~140页。
[13] 罗炜和朱春艳,2010,《代理成本与公司自愿性披露》,《经济研究》第8期,第145~157页。
[14] 麦勇、胡文博和于东升,2011,《上市公司资本结构调整速度的区域差异及其影响因素分析——基于 2000-2009 年沪深 A 股上市公司样本的研究》,《金融研究》第7期,第196~206页。
[15] 潘红波和韩芳芳,2016,《纵向兼任高管、产权性质与会计信息质量》,《会计研究》第7期,第19~26页。
[16] 盛明泉、张春强和王烨,2016,《高管股权激励与资本结构动态调整》,《会计研究》第2期,第44~50页。
[17] 温忠麟,2004,《中介效应检验程序及其应用》,《心理学报》第5期,第614~620页。
[18] 巫岑、黎文飞和唐清泉,2019,《产业政策与企业资本结构调整速度》,《金融研究》第4期,第92~110页。
[19] 肖作平,2005,《公司治理结构对资本结构类型的影响——一个 Logit 模型》,《 管理世界》第9期,第137~147页。
[20] 张博、庄汶资和袁红柳,2018,《新会计准则实施与资本结构优化调整》,《会计研究》第11期,第21~27页。
[21] 张蕊、王洋洋和廖佳,2020,《关键下属高管晋升锦标赛的创新激励效应研究》,《会计研究》第2期,第143~153页。
[22] Acharya, V. V., Myers, S. C. and Rajan R. G. 2011. “The Internal Governance of Firms”, The Journal of Finance, 66(3): 689~720.
[23] Anderson, R. C., and Reeb D. M. 2003. “Founding‐family Ownership and Firm Performance: Evidence from the S&P 500”, The Journal of Finance, 58(3): 1301~1328.
[24] Ang, J. S., Cole, R. A., and Lin J. W. 2000. “Agency Costs and Ownership Structure”, The Journal of Finance, 55(1): 81~106.
[25] Antia, M., Pantzalis, C., and Park J. C. 2010. “CEO Decision Horizon and Firm Performance: An Empirical Investigation”, Journal of Corporate Finance, 16(3): 288~301.
[26] Baron, R. M., and Kenny D. A. 1986. “The Moderator-mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6): 1173~1182.
[27] Brandt, L., and Li H. 2003. “Bank Discrimination in Transition Economies: Ideology, Information, or Incentives?”, Journal of Comparative Economics, 31(3): 387~413.
[28] Brisker, E. R., and Wang W. 2017. “CEO's Inside Debt and Dynamics of Capital Structure”, Financial Management, 46(3): 655~685.
[29] Byoun, S. 2008. “How and When do Firms Adjust Their Capital Structures toward Targets?”, The Journal of Finance, 63(6): 3069~3096.
[30] Cheng, Q., Lee, J., and Shevlin T. 2016. “Internal Governance and Real Earnings Management”, The Accounting Review, 91(4): 1051~1085.
[31] Coles, J. L., Daniel, N. D., and Naveen L. 2014. “Co-opted Boards”, The Review of Financial Studies”, 27(6): 1751~1796.
[32] Cook, D. O., and Tang T. 2010. “Macroeconomic Conditions and Capital Structure Adjustment Speed”, Journal of Corporate Finance, 16(1): 73~87.
[33] Cronqvist, H., Makhija, A. K., and Yonker S. E. 2012. “Behavioral Consistency in Corporate Finance: CEO Personal and Corporate Leverage”, Journal of Financial Economics, 103(1): 20~40.
[34] Dechow P. M, and Sloan R. G. 1991. “Executive Incentives and the Horizon Problem: An Empirical Investigation”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 14(1): 51~89.
[35] Faulkender, M., Flannery, M. J., Hankins, K. W., and Smith J. M. 2012. “Cash Flows and Leverage Adjustments”, Journal of Financial Economics, 103(3): 632~646.
[36] Flannery, M. J., and Rangan K. P. 2006. “Partial Adjustment Toward Target Capital Structures”, Journal of Financial Economics, 79(3): 469~506.
[37] Graham, J. R. 2000. “How Big are the Tax Benefits of Debt?”, The Journal of Finance, 55(5): 1901~1941.
[38] Greene, W. 2002. Econometric Analysis, Fifth Edition Pearson Education, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ.
[39] Hambrick, D. C., and Mason P. A. 1984. “Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of its Top Managers”, Academy of Management Review, 9(2): 193~206.
[40] Hovakimian, A., and Li G. 2011. “In Search of Conclusive Evidence: How to Test for Adjustment to Target Capital Structure”, Journal of Corporate Finance, 17(1): 33~44.
[41] Hovakimian, A., and Li G. 2012. “Is the Partial Adjustment Model a Useful Tool for Capital Structure Research?”, Review of Finance, 16(3): 733~754.
[42] Huang, R., and Ritter J. R. 2009. “Testing Theories of Capital Structure and Estimating the Speed of Adjustment”, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 44(2): 237~271.
[43] Jensen, M. C. 1986. “Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers”, The American Economic Review, 76(2): 323~329.
[44] Jensen, M. C., and Meckling W. H. 1976. “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure”, Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4): 305~360.
[45] Ju, N., Parrino, R., Poteshman, A. M., and Weisbach M. S. 2005. “Horses and Rabbits? Trade-off Theory and Optimal Capital Structure”, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 40(2): 259~281.
[46] Ke, R., Li, M., Ling, Z., and Zhang Y. 2018. “Social Connections Within Executive Teams and Management Forecasts”, Management Science, 65(1): 439~457.
[47] Khanna, V., Kim, E. H., and Lu Y. 2015. “CEO Connectedness and Corporate Fraud”, The Journal of Finance, 70(3): 1203~1252.
[48] Landier, A., Sraer, D., and Thesmar D. 2009. “Optimal Dissent in Organizations”, Review of Economic Studies, 76(2): 761~794.
[49] Landier, A., Sauvagnat, J., Sraer, D., and Thesmar D. 2013. “Bottom-up Corporate Governance”, Review of Finance, 17(1): 161~201.
[50] Leary, M. T., and Roberts M. R. 2005. “Do Firms Rebalance Their Capital Structures?”, The Journal of Finance, 60(6): 2575~2619.
[51] Lemmon, M. L., Roberts, M. R., and Zender J. F. 2008. “Back to the Beginning: Persistence and the Cross-Section of Corporate Capital Structure”, The Journal of Finance, 63(4): 1575~1608.
[52] Liao, L. K., Mukherjee, T., and Wang W. 2015. “Corporate Governance and Capital Structure Dynamics: An Empirical Study”, Journal of Financial Research, 38(2): 169~192.
[53] Morellec, E., and Boris N. and Norman S. 2012. “Corporate Governance and Capital Structure Dynamics”, The Journal of Finance, 67(3): 803~848.
[54] Öztekin, Ö. 2015. “Capital Structure Decisions Around the World: Which Factors are Reliably Important?”, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 50(3): 301~323.
[55] Schoenfeld, J. 2017. “The Effect of Voluntary Disclosure on Stock Liquidity: New Evidence from Index Funds”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 63 (1): 51~74.
[56] Warr, R. S., Elliott, W. B., Koëter-Kant, J., and Öztekin Ö. 2012. “Equity Mispricing and Leverage Adjustment Costs”, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 47(3): 589~616.
[57] Zwiebel, J. 1996. “Dynamic Capital Structure Under Managerial Entrenchment”, The American Economic Review,86(5): 1197~1215.
[1] 赵乐, 王琨. 高管团队内部网络与并购绩效[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 485(11): 170-187.
[2] 巫岑, 黎文飞, 唐清泉. 产业政策与企业资本结构调整速度[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 466(4): 92-110.
[3] 王亮亮, 王跃堂. 工资税盾、替代效应与资本结构[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 433(7): 113-133.
[4] 倪婷婷, 王跃堂. 增值税转型、集团控制与企业投资[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 427(1): 160-175.
[5] 甄红线, 张先治, 迟国泰. 制度环境、终极控制权对公司绩效的影响——基于代理成本的中介效应检验[J]. 金融研究, 2015, 426(12): 162-177.
[6] 李青原, 吴素云, 王红建. 通货膨胀预期与企业银行债务融资[J]. 金融研究, 2015, 425(11): 124-141.
[1] 王曦, 朱立挺, 王凯立. 我国货币政策是否关注资产价格?——基于马尔科夫区制转换BEKK多元GARCH模型[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 1 -17 .
[2] 刘勇政, 李岩. 中国的高速铁路建设与城市经济增长[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 18 -33 .
[3] 况伟大, 王琪琳. 房价波动、房贷规模与银行资本充足率[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 34 -48 .
[4] 祝树金, 赵玉龙. 资源错配与企业的出口行为——基于中国工业企业数据的经验研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 49 -64 .
[5] 陈德球, 陈运森, 董志勇. 政策不确定性、市场竞争与资本配置[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 65 -80 .
[6] 牟敦果, 王沛英. 中国能源价格内生性研究及货币政策选择分析[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 81 -95 .
[7] 高铭, 江嘉骏, 陈佳, 刘玉珍. 谁说女子不如儿郎?——P2P投资行为与过度自信[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 96 -111 .
[8] 吕若思, 刘青, 黄灿, 胡海燕, 卢进勇. 外资在华并购是否改善目标企业经营绩效?——基于企业层面的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 112 -127 .
[9] 姜军, 申丹琳, 江轩宇, 伊志宏. 债权人保护与企业创新[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 128 -142 .
[10] 刘莎莎, 孔高文. 信息搜寻、个人投资者交易与股价联动异象——基于股票送转的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 143 -157 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1