Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2020, Vol. 481 Issue (7): 153-171    
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
关系型借贷视角下购房融资方式与家庭创业行为——基于2017年中国家庭金融调查的实证研究
廖红君, 樊纲治, 弋代春
西南财经大学经济与管理研究院,四川成都 611130;
广州大学管理学院,广东广州 510006;
西南财经大学中国家庭金融调查与研究中心,四川成都 610074
Housing Finance Methods and Entrepreneurship from the Perspective of Relationship Lending: Empirical Studies Based on the 2017 China Household Finance Survey
LIAO Hongjun, FAN Gangzhi, YI Daichun
Research Institute of Economics and Management, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics;
School of Management, Guangzhou University;
Survey and Research Center for China Household Finance, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics
下载:  PDF (556KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 本文利用2017年中国家庭金融调查数据深入考察购房融资方式对家庭创业行为的影响。研究结果显示,相较于民间借贷购房的家庭,按揭贷款购房的家庭参与创业活动的可能性更高,且更倾向于主动创业。进一步机制分析发现,相较于民间借贷购房,按揭贷款购房能够降低家庭的流动性约束,缓解家庭的资金压力,从而促进创业。同时,按揭贷款购房能使家庭获得充足的贷款额度与较长的贷款期限,进而有助于家庭创业。而且在偿还按揭贷款的过程中,家庭能与银行建立长期良好的信贷关系,从而有助于提高家庭获得正规信贷的可能性,促进家庭创业。为了积极推进创业创新的战略部署,应进一步健全银行信贷体系,发展和完善住房金融制度,从而有利于缓解小微企业融资难、融资贵的问题,释放和激发家庭创业活力。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
廖红君
樊纲治
弋代春
关键词:  购房融资决策  家庭创业  流动性约束  信贷可得性    
Summary:  Entrepreneurship usually needs to meet certain start-up capital requirements, but due to the imperfect credit market, most entrepreneurs are faced with the problem of credit constraints. As a result, family-owned funds are often the main source of capitals for entrepreneurs. However, families usually also need to spend a great deal of money in purchasing houses, and borrowing to buy houses has become the norm for Chinese families. Chinese households can usually obtain housing mortgages through formal financial institutions, such as commercial loans, housing provident fund loans, and their portfolio loans. They can also borrow from informal credit channels such as private financial institutions and friends or relatives, namely private lending. In addition to their different sources, these two types of home financing channels have significant differences in terms of loan amount and duration. Thus, they might have different effects on the wealth levels of families, and even family entrepreneurial behavior.
Using 2017 China Household Finance Survey (CHFS) data, we employ the Probit model to empirically examine the effects of house financing methods on family entrepreneurial behavior and their influencing mechanism based on relationship lending theory and liquidity constraint theory. Our findings indicate that obtaining mortgage loans is more conducive to family entrepreneurship than purchasing houses through informal financing channels. The amounts borrowed through mortgage loans are higher and the loan terms are longer, so there households are more able to mitigate their liquidity constraint, which makes it easier for them to start businesses. Longer-term and better credit relationships between households and banks during the mortgage repayment periods can also effectively increase the likelihood of family access to formal credit, thus promoting family entrepreneurship. Our results also suggest that the development of the housing market and housing credit market is important in the process of implementing entrepreneurship and innovation strategies, and thus should not be ignored. The current housing finance system should be developed further and closely linked with the entrepreneurial credit market, thus alleviating the problems and expense of financing for small and micro businesses. Our study is both theoretically and practically significant, because it contributes to research in the fields of household lending behavior and entrepreneurial behavior and provides a new perspective on the methods that can be used to encourage entrepreneurial activities .
There are three innovations in our study. First, the relationship between housing and entrepreneurship is examined from the perspective of house financing methods, based on the theories of relationship lending and liquidity constraints. At present, most scholars mainly focus on the impacts of housing prices, housing assets, housing ownership, housing property rights on entrepreneurial behavior, while our findings extend the research into the relationship between house financial channels and entrepreneurship. Second, the lack of high-quality household level survey data in China has prevented extensive research into household financing decision-making. We use the recent household survey data from the CHFS, which is collected through scientific sampling and survey methods, and which includes detailed information on household loans and entrepreneurial activities. Thus, we have good data support for this study. Third, the numerous studies on home purchase financing decisions in Western countries mainly focus on fixed-rate mortgages, adjustable-rate mortgages, and housing refinancing. However, China's housing finance system is very different from those of Western countries, and the ability of families to finance housing is closely related to their levels of wealth. Thus, examining the impacts of home purchase financing methods on family entrepreneurship in China both reflects the characteristics of its housing credit market and provides valuable insights into the effects the development of Chinese housing finance system has on its private economy.
Keywords:  House Financing Decision    Family Entrepreneurship    Liquidity Constraint    Credit Availability
JEL分类号:  G21   L26   R21  
作者简介:  廖红君,金融学博士研究生,西南财经大学经济与管理研究院,E-mail:liaohongjun@chfs.cn.
樊纲治(通讯作者),哲学博士,教授,广州大学管理学院, E-mail:fangz@gzhu.edu.cn.
弋代春,经济学博士,讲师,西南财经大学中国家庭金融调查与研究中心, E-mail:daichunyi@chfs.cn.
引用本文:    
廖红君, 樊纲治, 弋代春. 关系型借贷视角下购房融资方式与家庭创业行为——基于2017年中国家庭金融调查的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 481(7): 153-171.
LIAO Hongjun, FAN Gangzhi, YI Daichun. Housing Finance Methods and Entrepreneurship from the Perspective of Relationship Lending: Empirical Studies Based on the 2017 China Household Finance Survey. Journal of Financial Research, 2020, 481(7): 153-171.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2020/V481/I7/153
[1] 蔡栋梁、邱黎源、孟晓雨和马双,2018,《流动性约束、社会资本与家庭创业选择——基于CHFS数据的实证研究》,《管理世界》第9期,第79~94页。
[2] 何韧、刘兵勇和王婧婧,2012,《银企关系、制度环境与中小微企业信贷可得性》,《金融研究》第11期,第103~115页。
[3] 李宏彬、李杏、姚先国、张海峰和张俊森,2009,《企业家的创业与创新精神对中国经济增长的影响》,《经济研究》第10期,第99~108页。
[4] 林毅夫和孙希芳,2005,《信息、非正规金融与中小企业融资》,《经济研究》第7期,第35~44页。
[5] 刘西川、杨奇明和陈立辉,2014,《农户信贷市场的正规部门与非正规部门:替代还是互补?》,《经济研究》第11期,第145~158页。
[6] 马光荣和杨恩艳,2011,《社会网络、非正规金融与创业》,《经济研究》第3期,第83~94页。
[7] 陶春生,2017,《家庭金融学的构建与进展》,《管理世界》第11期,第176~177页。
[8] 吴晓瑜、王敏和李力行,2014,《中国的高房价是否阻碍了创业?》,《经济研究》第9期,第121~134页。
[9] 尹志超、宋全云、吴雨和彭嫦燕,2015,《金融知识、创业决策和创业动机》,《管理世界》第1期,第87~98页。
[10] 尹志超和甘犁,2011,《信息不对称、企业异质性与信贷风险》,《经济研究》第9期,第121~132页。
[11] 张龙耀和张海宁,2013,《金融约束与家庭创业——中国的城乡差异》,《金融研究》第9期,第123~135页。
[12] 张一林和樊纲治,2016,《信贷紧缩、企业价值与最优贷款利率》,《经济研究》第6期,第71~82页。
[13] 周京奎和黄征学,2014,《住房制度改革、流动性约束与“下海”创业选择——理论与中国的经验研究》,《经济研究》第3期,第158~170页。
[14] 臧旭恒和张欣,2018,《中国家庭资产配置与异质性消费者行为分析》,《经济研究》第3期,第21~34页。
[15] Beatriz, M., J. Coffinet and T. Nicolas, 2018, “Relationship Lending and SMEs' Funding Costs over the Cycle: Why Diversification of Borrowing Matters”, Journal of Banking & Finance.
[16] Campbell, J. Y. and J. F. Cocco, 2003, “Household Risk Management and Optimal Mortgage Choice”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(4):1449~1494.
[17] Campbell, J. Y., 2006, “Household Finance”, Journal of Finance, 61(4):1553~1604.
[18] Cole, R.A., 1998, “The Importance of Relationships to the Availability of Credit”, Journal of Banking & Finance.
[19] Harding, J.P. and S.S. Rosenthal, 2017, “Homeownership, Housing Capital Gains and Self-employment”, Journal of Urban Economics, 99:120~135.
[20] Ma, S., X. Wu and L. Gan, 2018, “Credit Accessibility, Institutional Deficiency and Entrepreneurship in China”, China Economic Review. 54:160~175.
[21] Manove, M., A. J. Padilla and M. Pagano, 2001, “Collateral Vs. Project Screening: A Model of Lazy Banks”, RAND Jounal of Economics, 32(4):726~744.
[22] Musso, P. and S. Schiavo, 2008, “The Impact of Financial Constraints on Firm Survival and Growth”, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 18(2):135~149.
[23] Petersen, M.A. and R.G. Rajan, 1994, "The Benefits of Lending Relationships: Evidence from Small Business Data”, Journal of Finance, 49(1):3~37.
[24] Schmalz, M. C., D. A. Sraer and D. Thesmar, 2017, “Housing Collateral and Entrepreneurship”, Journal of Finance, 72(1):99~132.
[25] Stiglitz, J. E. and A. Weiss, 1981, “Credit Rationing in Markets with Imperfect Information”, American Economic Review, 71(3):393~410.
[26] Stock, J. H. and M. Yogo, 2005, “Testing for Weak Instruments in Linear IV Regression”. NBER Working Papers.
[1] 郭晔, 房芳. 新型货币政策担保品框架的绿色效应[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 487(1): 91-110.
[2] 徐飞, 花冯涛, 李强谊. 投资者理性预期、流动性约束与股价崩盘传染研究[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 468(6): 169-187.
[3] 蒋涛, 董兵兵, 张远. 中国城镇家庭的资产配置与消费行为:理论与证据[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 473(11): 133-152.
[4] 易行健, 周利. 数字普惠金融发展是否显著影响了居民消费——来自中国家庭的微观证据[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 461(11): 47-67.
[5] 康书隆, 余海跃, 刘越飞. 住房公积金、购房信贷与家庭消费——基于中国家庭追踪调查数据的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 446(8): 67-82.
[6] 张琳琬, 吴卫星. 风险态度与居民财富——来自中国微观调查的新探究[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 430(4): 115-127.
[1] 王曦, 朱立挺, 王凯立. 我国货币政策是否关注资产价格?——基于马尔科夫区制转换BEKK多元GARCH模型[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 1 -17 .
[2] 刘勇政, 李岩. 中国的高速铁路建设与城市经济增长[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 18 -33 .
[3] 况伟大, 王琪琳. 房价波动、房贷规模与银行资本充足率[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 34 -48 .
[4] 祝树金, 赵玉龙. 资源错配与企业的出口行为——基于中国工业企业数据的经验研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 49 -64 .
[5] 陈德球, 陈运森, 董志勇. 政策不确定性、市场竞争与资本配置[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 65 -80 .
[6] 牟敦果, 王沛英. 中国能源价格内生性研究及货币政策选择分析[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 81 -95 .
[7] 高铭, 江嘉骏, 陈佳, 刘玉珍. 谁说女子不如儿郎?——P2P投资行为与过度自信[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 96 -111 .
[8] 吕若思, 刘青, 黄灿, 胡海燕, 卢进勇. 外资在华并购是否改善目标企业经营绩效?——基于企业层面的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 112 -127 .
[9] 姜军, 申丹琳, 江轩宇, 伊志宏. 债权人保护与企业创新[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 128 -142 .
[10] 刘莎莎, 孔高文. 信息搜寻、个人投资者交易与股价联动异象——基于股票送转的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 143 -157 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1