Countercyclical Capital Regulation of Commercial Banks in China: Selecting an Anchoring Indicator
WANG Qing, LIU Peng, TIAN Jiao
Institute of Chinese Financial Studies, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics; China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission; Business School, Southwest University of Political Science and Law
Summary:
As an important part of macroprudential supervision, countercyclical capital requirements play a primary role in alleviating systemic risks caused by excessive bank credit and promoting financial stability. Although countercyclical capital regulation has been proposed for more than eight years, China has not yet promulgated the specific regulatory rules and requirements. A key reason is the lack of both a unified specific method and time-tested indicators as a reference to establish the anchoring indicator, which is an important basis for calculating, dynamically adjusting, and releasing countercyclical capital. Should the generalized “credit/GDP” guide recommended by the Basel Committee be adopted？ Is it in line with the risk characteristics of the Chinese banking industry？ Are there any other indicators and elements of particular concern？ What is the mechanism for selecting indicators？ Discussing these issues will enrich the discussion surrounding countercyclical capital supervision and promote policy implementation in China. This paper first reviews the countercyclical capital regulation guidance proposed by the Basel Committee and its latest implementation in various countries, and chooses 15 candidates widely used in practice, together with three classes of anchor variables proposed by the Bank for International Settlements (Drehmann et al., 2011). Considering the risk characteristics of the Chinese banking industry and data accessibility, six credit variables are added to reflect the actual loan structure in China. Altogether, these 21 candidates provide 84 anchor variables through four forms of transformation and finally yield 105 candidate indicators. The candidate indicators are then screened and verified. First, this paper replaces “systemic financial risk/financial crisis,” which has not happened in China, with the “downward stage” of the middle-term financial cycle. Based on the latest literature, the first quarter of 2011 is set as the starting point of the “downward stage”, which serves as a reference time node for operating the countercyclical regulation. Second, by making use of the method in Drehmann and Juselius (2014), this paper draws the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve with the data at the time of the first quarter of 2010 and respectively calculates the Area Under the Curve (AUC) value, which measures the candidate indicators' ability to predict the outbreak of systemic financial risks one year later. Third, this paper ranks each indicator by examining whether it meets the criteria of static timeliness, dynamic stability, economic interpretability, and data accessibility when used for early warning of systemic risk, so as to complete the identification process of anchor indicators. Finally, this paper carries out robustness tests by determining the starting time nodes of the “downward stage” in three financial short cycles and checking whether the ROC curve method used obtains consistent indicators in different contexts in a financial downturn period. The empirical results show that specific industry indicators such as the trend gap of real estate price, and specific categories of credit indicators, such as the trend gap of real estate loan, the trend gap of personal housing mortgage, and the trend gap of consumer credit, can track potential risks from multiple dimensions, and thus can be used as anchor indicators for countercyclical capital supervision. In addition, the combined anchor index has a higher early warning ability and stability than single anchor indicators. These conclusions improve the precision of optimal anchor indicators to reflect systemic risk by focusing on classified credit and industry credit instead of general credit. By exploring anchor indicators and improving the early warning effect of linked variables, this paper provides practical guidelines for decision making and promoting the operation of countercyclical capital regulation in China. Its findings may also provide inspiration for other countries or regions. This paper contributes to the literature in several ways. First, the ROC curve method is used for the first time to identify the pros and cons of China's countercyclical anchor indicators and ensure the reliability of the conclusions. Second, the candidate indicators have been comprehensively arranged and scientifically transformed, which makes it possible to select the most effective anchor indicators. Third, the period from 2004 through 2018 contains relatively complete economic and financial cycles, and thus reflects rich information and offers a basis for empirical research on countercyclical policies. Finally, this paper links countercyclical capital regulation in China to personal housing credit and consumer credit as anchor indicators, which suggests avenues for viable countercyclical capital regulation mechanisms in China.
王擎, 刘鹏, 田娇. 我国商业银行逆周期资本监管的锚定指标选取[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 473(11): 112-132.
WANG Qing, LIU Peng, TIAN Jiao. Countercyclical Capital Regulation of Commercial Banks in China: Selecting an Anchoring Indicator. Journal of Financial Research, 2019, 473(11): 112-132.
[1]陈雨露和马勇,2012,《中国逆周期资本缓冲的“挂钩变量”选择:一个实证评估》,《教学与研究》第12期,第5～16页。 [2]崔光华,2017,《巴塞尔协议Ⅲ逆周期资本缓冲机制在我国的适用性》,《财经问题研究》第3期,第60～66页。 [3]范小云、袁梦怡和肖立晟,2017,《理解中国的金融周期:理论、测算与分析》,《国际金融研究》第1期,第28～38页。 [4]李文泓和林凯旋,2013,《关于用广义信贷/GDP分析我国银行业系统性风险的研究》,《金融监管研究》第6期,第13～30页。 [5]李文泓和罗猛,2011,《巴塞尔委员会逆周期资本框架在我国银行业的实证分析》,《国际金融研究》第6期,第81～87页。 [6]马勇、冯心悦和田拓,2016,《金融周期与经济周期——基于中国的实证研究》 ,《国际金融研究》第10期,第3～14页。 [7]王博和李昊然,2018,《中国金融周期测度及国际比较研究》,《经济学动态》第6期,第63～78页。 [8]王周伟、胡德红和伏开宝,2015,《基于系统性风险指数的逆周期资本缓冲动态提取机制研究》 ,《东南大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》第5期,第59～67页。 [9]杨新兰和吴博,2016,《逆周期缓冲机制在中国的适用性——基于巴塞尔委员会推荐模型的检验》,《中南财经政法大学学报》第1期,第107～113页。 [10]伊楠和张斌,2016,《度量中国的金融周期》,《国际金融研究》第6期,第13～23页。 [11]张小波,2014,《逆周期资本缓冲机制的拓展及其在中国的适用性分析》 ,《国际金融研究》第5期,第71～79页。 [12]朱波和卢露,2013,《中国逆周期缓冲资本调整指标研究——基于金融体系脆弱时期的实证分析》 ,《国际金融研究》第10期,第86～96页。 [13]朱太辉和黄海晶,2018,《中国金融周期:指标、方法和实证》,《金融研究》第12期,第59～75页。 [14]Basel Committee of Banking Supervision, 2010a, “Basel III: A Global Regulatory Framework for More Resilient Banks and Banking System”, http://www.bis.orgpublbcbs189.pdf/2010a. [15]Basel Committee of Banking Supervision, 2010b, “Guidance for Nation Authorities Operating the Countercyclical Capital Buffer”, http://www.bis.orgpublbcbs187.pdf/2010b. [16]Basel Committee of Banking Supervision, 2017, “Range of Practices in Implementing the Countercyclical Capital Buffer Policy”, http://www.bis.orgbcbspubl/d407.pdf/2017. [17]Borio, C., and P. Lowe, 2002, “Assessing the Risk of Banking Crises”, BIS Quarterly Review, 12:43-54. [18]Borio, C., 2014, “The Financial Cycle and Macroeconomics: What Have We Learnt？”, Journal of Banking & Finance, 45(8):182-198. [19]Drehmann, M., C.E.V. Borio, L. Gambacorta, G. Jiminez, and C. Trucharte, 2010, “Countercyclical Capital Buffers: Exploring Options”, SSRN Electronic Journal, 68(317):1-18. [20]Drehmann, M, C. Borio, K. Tsatsaronis, 2011, “Anchoring Countercyclical Capital Buffers: The Role of Credit Aggregates”, BIS Working Papers, 7(4):189-240. [21]Drehmann, M., and K. Tsatsaronis, 2014, “The Credit-to-GDP Gap and Countercyclical Capital Buffers: Questions and Answers”, BIS Quarterly Review, 3:55-73. [22]Drehmann, M., and M. Juselius, 2014, “Evaluating Early Warning Indicators of Banking Crises: Satisfying Policy Requirements”, International Journal of Forecasting, 30(3):759-780. [23]Edge, R. M., and R. R. Meisenzahl, 2011, “The Unreliability of Credit-to-GDP Ratio Gaps in Real-Time: Implications for Countercyclical Capital Buffers”, SSRN Electronic Journal, 7(4):261-298. [24]Ferreira, L. N., and M. I. Nakane, 2015, “Macroprudential Policy in a DSGE Model: Anchoring the Countercyclical Capital Buffer”, Banco Central de Brasil Working Papers, (407). [25]Gonzalez, R. B., J. Lima, and L. Marinho, 2015, “Countercyclical Capital Buffers: Bayesian Estimates and Alternatives Focusing on Credit Growth”, Central Bank of Brazil Working Papers, No 384. [26]Kalatie, S., H. Laakkonen, and E. Tölö, 2015, “Indicators Used in Setting the Countercyclical Capital Buffer”, Social Science Electronic Publishing, 4(3):230-37. [27]Kauko, K., 2012, “Triggers for Countercyclical Capital Buffers”, https://helda.helsinki.fi/bof/bitstream/handle/ 123456789/8516/170303.pdf/2012. [28]Laeven, L., and F. Valencia, 2012, “Systemic Banking Crisis: A New Database”, International Monetary Fund, WP/12/163. [29]Pepe, M., G. Longton, and H. Janes, 2009, “Estimation and Comparison of Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves”, Stata Journal, 9(1):1. [30]Repullo, R., and S. J. Saurina, 2011, “The Countercyclical Capital Buffer of Basel III: A Critical Assessment”, CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP8304.
