Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2019, Vol. 468 Issue (6): 39-57    
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
自律机制对Shibor报价的影响研究
谭德凯,何枫
南开大学金融发展研究院,天津 300071;
天津财经大学金融学院,天津 300222
Influence of the Self-regulation Mechanism on the Shibor Ask Price
TAN Dekai,HE Feng
Institute of Finance and Development, Nankai University;
School of Finance, Tianjin University of Finance and Economics
下载:  PDF (1839KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 不够稳定和报价易被操纵是Shibor基准利率地位的两个主要挑战。本文结合ARJI-GARCH模型构造了一种较新的可以检测更轻微羊群行为的方法,在此基础上,基于2007到2017年Shibor报价的日度数据,分析了市场利率自律定价机制对Shibor波动性及报价中羊群行为的影响。研究发现:自律机制明显降低了Shibor的波动程度,尤其是极端波动明显减少;但报价中的羊群行为在自律机制发挥作用后有增强的态势,报价行出于维护声誉动机在Shibor波动较大时会倾向于从众报价。自律机制改善了Shibor的稳定性,但在应对羊群行为方面还需要进一步完善有关制度。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
谭德凯
何枫
关键词:  自律机制  羊群行为  Shibor  ARJI-GARCH    
Summary:  Summary: The Shanghai Interbank Offered Rate (Shibor) is an important candidate for the benchmark interest rate in China's financial market. However, this interest rate has two major shortcomings in that it is unstable and easy to manipulate. In response to these shortcomings, on September 24, 2013, a self-regulation mechanism was introduced. In July 2014, the mechanism was expanded for the first time, with 93 basic members being added alongside the 10 core members. The basic members can participate in off-market quotations and are competitors in on-market quotations. The self-regulation mechanism regularly assesses the quotations of member banks and eliminates banks with low-quality quotations. Although this mechanism will undoubtedly have an important impact on bank quotations, the nature of this effect is still not fully understood. Thus, in this paper, we examine the influence of the self-regulation mechanism on Shibor volatility and the herd behavior in quotations. The results can provide theoretical references to further improve the relevant systems.
   We use the first expansion of the self-regulation mechanism in July 2014 as a dummy variable. We then analyze the daily rate of Shibor from 2007 to 2017 using the ARJI-GARCH model. The results show that after the self-regulation mechanism is implemented, the volatility of the Shibor from overnight to one month decreases significantly. Using the Shibor monthly standard deviation as an explanatory variable, the results of the OLS regressions and propensity score matching also show that the defect of the Shibor fluctuation from overnight to one month is greatly improved after the implementation of the self-regulation mechanism.
   However, because a stable Shibor may not be more effective, we further examine whether the self-regulation mechanism makes the behavior of the quotation banks more conservative and leads them to adopt a more herd-like strategy when quoting. Bohl et al. (2017) pointed out that Chang et al. (2000) may have underestimated the herd behavior in the market. Thus, we improve the ARJI-GARCH model and design a new method that can detect more fragile herding behavior. By comparing the dispersion before and after the self-regulation mechanism is implemented, we are able to generate the following conclusions. First, the degree of quotation dispersion increases significantly after the self-regulation mechanism is implemented, which means that the behavior of the quotation banks is not completely conservative. Second, before the self-regulation mechanism comes into play, the free-riding motive is the main reason for the herding behavior, with the three-month or longer period Shibor showing obvious herding behavior when the interest rate fluctuates significantly. Third, after the self-regulation mechanism is implemented, the motivation for maintaining reputation is the main cause of herding behavior, as the Shibor from overnight to one month begins to show herding behavior when the interest rate fluctuations are large. Thus, although the self-regulation mechanism reduces the overall volatility of Shibor, it also enhances the herd behavior in quotations and fails to address the easy manipulation of Shibor. Therefore, the design of the elimination mechanism in the self-regulation mechanism needs to be improved, and the benchmark interest rate position of Shibor for a period of more than three months should been strengthened. After all, because self-regulation is not compulsory, there is the possibility of industry collusion. In the future, more attention needs to be paid to the construction of relevant legal systems.
   The contributions of this paper are as follows. First, this paper is the first to analyze the impact of the self-regulation mechanism on Shibor quotations, and the motivation and characteristics of the herding behavior of the quotation banks. Second, based on the literature, we construct a new method that can detect more fragile herding behavior. The results show that without this new method, we are unable to find sufficient evidence of herding behavior in the short-term Shibor before the self-regulation mechanism is implemented.
Keywords:  Self-regulation Mechanism    Herding Behavior    Shibor    ARJI-GARCH
JEL分类号:  E43   G21   C22  
基金资助: * 本文得到中央高校专项经费(63172022)、教育部重大课题攻关项目(13JZD006)、国家社会科学基金重大项目(17ZDA071)、国家自然科学基金委-英国ESRC联合基金资助项目(7161101131)以及国家自然科学基金青年项目(71701106)的资助。
作者简介:  谭德凯(通讯作者),经济学博士,助理研究员,南开大学金融发展研究院,E-mail:tandekai@163.com.
何 枫,经济学博士,副教授,天津财经大学金融学院,E-mail:feng_ac@163.com.
引用本文:    
谭德凯, 何枫. 自律机制对Shibor报价的影响研究[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 468(6): 39-57.
TAN Dekai, HE Feng. Influence of the Self-regulation Mechanism on the Shibor Ask Price. Journal of Financial Research, 2019, 468(6): 39-57.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2019/V468/I6/39
[1] 曹凤岐,2014,《利率市场化进程中基准利率在货币政策体系中的地位与构建》,《中央财经大学学报》第4期,第26~33页。
[2] 常健和郭薇,2011,《行业自律的定位、动因、模式和局限》,《南开学报》(哲学社会科学版)第1期,第133~140页。
[3] 陈文新和祝艳梅,2016,《人民币汇率市场与货币市场的波动及溢出效应》,《金融论坛》第1期,第50~58页。
[4] 李成、王彬和黎克俊,2010,《次贷危机前后中美利率联动机制的实证研究》,《国际金融研究》第9期,第4~11页。
[5] 李冕,2017,《市场利率定价自律的国际经验及启示——基于货币市场与信贷市场视角》,《西部金融》第12期,第47~49页。
[6] 李维林和朱文君,2017,《我国市场基准利率的选择与培育——基于价格型货币政策传导渠道的分析》,《宏观经济研究》第8期,第59~68页。
[7] 李悦雷、郭阳和张维,2013,《中国P2P小额贷款市场借贷成功率影响因素分析》,《金融研究》第7期,第126~138页。
[8] 刘芸,1999,《制定“行业自律价”之我见》,《商业研究》第9期,第100~101页。
[9] 马勇,2013,《社会自律文化、银行发展与金融监管》,《当代经济科学》第4期,第1~12页。
[10] 孙培源和施东晖,2002,《基于CAPM的中国股市羊群行为研究——兼与宋军、吴冲锋先生商榷》,《经济研究》第2期,第64~69页。
[11] 田利辉、谭德凯和王冠英,2015,《我国大宗商品期货市场存在羊群行为吗?》,《金融研究》第6期,第144~158页。
[12] 温彬,2004,《我国利率市场化后基准利率选择的实证研究》,《国际金融研究》第11期,第54~60页。
[13] 易纲,2008,《进一步确立Shibor的基准性地位》,《中国货币市场》第1期,第7~12页。
[14] 易纲,2009,《中国改革开放三十年的利率市场化进程》,《金融研究》第1期,第1~14页。
[15] 于建忠和刘湘成,2009,《Shibor定价理论模型研究及其应用》,《金融研究》第2期,第40~53页。
[16] 袁宜,2005,《金融机构自律机制的博弈分析》,《世界经济》第10期,第41~50页。
[17] 张坤贤和甄峰,2017,《我国商业银行基准利率报价行为集聚性研究》,《金融监管研究》第4期,第17~30页。
[18] 郑挺国和王霞,2011,《泰勒规则的实时分析及其在我国货币政策中的适用性》,《金融研究》第8期,第31~46页。
[19] Abadie, A. and G. W. Imbens, 2006, “Large Sample Properties of Matching Estimators for Average Treatment Effects”, Econometrica, 74(1): 235~267.
[20] Bohl, M. T., N. Branger, and M. Trede, 2017, “The Case for Herding is Stronger than You Think”, Journal of Banking and Finance, 85: 30~40.
[21] Chan, W. H. and J. M. Maheu, 2002, “Conditional Jump Dynamics in Stock Market Returns”, Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 20(3): 377~389.
[22] Chang, E. C., J. W. Cheng, and A. Khorana, 2000, “An Examination of Herd Behavior in Equity Markets: An International Perspective”, Journal of Banking and Finance, 24: 1651~1679.
[23] Gray, S. F., 1996, “Modeling the Conditional Distribution of Interest Rates as a Regime-switching Process”, Journal of Financial Economics, 42: 27~62.
[24] Jong, A., D. V. DeJong, and G. Mertens, et al., 2005, “The Role of Self-regulation in Corporate Governance: Evidence and Implications from The Netherlands”, Journal of Corporate Finance, 11(3): 473~503.
[1] 朱菲菲, 李惠璇, 徐建国, 李宏泰. 短期羊群行为的影响因素与价格效应——基于高频数据的实证检验[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 469(7): 191-206.
[1] 王曦, 朱立挺, 王凯立. 我国货币政策是否关注资产价格?——基于马尔科夫区制转换BEKK多元GARCH模型[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 1 -17 .
[2] 刘勇政, 李岩. 中国的高速铁路建设与城市经济增长[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 18 -33 .
[3] 况伟大, 王琪琳. 房价波动、房贷规模与银行资本充足率[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 34 -48 .
[4] 祝树金, 赵玉龙. 资源错配与企业的出口行为——基于中国工业企业数据的经验研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 49 -64 .
[5] 陈德球, 陈运森, 董志勇. 政策不确定性、市场竞争与资本配置[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 65 -80 .
[6] 牟敦果, 王沛英. 中国能源价格内生性研究及货币政策选择分析[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 81 -95 .
[7] 高铭, 江嘉骏, 陈佳, 刘玉珍. 谁说女子不如儿郎?——P2P投资行为与过度自信[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 96 -111 .
[8] 吕若思, 刘青, 黄灿, 胡海燕, 卢进勇. 外资在华并购是否改善目标企业经营绩效?——基于企业层面的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 112 -127 .
[9] 姜军, 申丹琳, 江轩宇, 伊志宏. 债权人保护与企业创新[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 128 -142 .
[10] 刘莎莎, 孔高文. 信息搜寻、个人投资者交易与股价联动异象——基于股票送转的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 143 -157 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1