Abstract:
Based on the database of Fintech research center, National Institute of Financial Research, Tsinghua University and other statistical P2P data, this paper focuses on investor's ability to identify risky platforms and normal platforms according to the degree of information disclosure. Constructing the logit model and the Cox proportional risk regression model to study the Ezubao event in December 2015 and the “explosion” phenomenon after the record postponement in June 2018,this paper examines the relationship between information disclosure, risk and trading volume of platforms. It is found that information disclosure is an important factor affecting platforms' risk. The higher degree of platform information disclosure, the longer the operation time is, and the lower the possibility of risk. In addition, the higher the degree of information disclosure, the stronger the ability to resist risks. During the period of risk contagion, the higher the degree of information disclosure, the higher the platform turnover is, and less influenced by the market's negative emotions. These two points indicate that investors attach importance to information disclosed by platforms and have certain ability to identify information. Finally, it is also found that there are significant differences between the risky platforms that appear in the two risky events and those that are still in normal operation, indicating that it is a normal phenomenon of market clearance. There is no evidence that a large number of normal platforms have been dragged into risky platforms.
李苍舒, 沈艳. 风险传染的信息识别——基于网络借贷市场的实证[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 461(11): 98-118.
LI Cangshu, SHEN Yan. Information Identification of Risk Contagion: An Empirical Study Based on P2P Lending Market. Journal of Financial Research, 2018, 461(11): 98-118.
[1] 廉永辉,2016,《同业网络中的风险传染———基于中国银行业的实证研究》,《财经研究》第9期,第63~74页. [2] 林琳、曹勇和肖寒,2016,《中国式影子银行下的金融系统脆弱性》,《经济学季刊》第4期,第1113~1135页. [3] 童中文、范从来、朱辰和张炜,2017,《金融审慎监管与货币政策的协同效应——考虑金融系统性风险防范》,《金融研究》第3期,第16~32页. [4] 汪静、陈晓红和杨立,2018,《P2P 网贷平台信息披露水平、投资人信任与投资风险》,《中国经济问题》第3期,第106~121页. [5] 杨海军和胡敏文,2017,《基于核心-边缘网络的中国银行风险传染》,《管理科学学报》第10期,第44~56页. [6] Calomiris,C. W. and Kahn,C. M.,1991. “The Role of Demandable Debt in Structuring Optimal Banking Arrangements”,The American Economic Review,81(3):497-513. [7] Calomiris,C. W. and Mason,J.,1997. “Contagion and Bank Failures During the Great Depression: The June 1932 Chicago Banking Panic”,The American Economic Review,87(5):863-883. [8] Chari,V. V. and Jagannathan,R.,1988.“Banking Panics, Information, and Rational Expectations Equilibrium”,The Journal of Finance,43(3):749-761. [9] Chen,Y.,1999. “Banking Panics: The Role of the First-Come,First-Served Rule and Information Externalities”,Journal of Political Economy,107(5):946-968. [10] Diamond, D. W. and Dybvig,P. H.,1983. “Banks Runs, Deposit Insurance, and Liquidity”,Journal of Political Economy,91(3):401-419. [11] Gennotte,G. and Leland,H.,1990. “Market Liquidity,Hedging and Crashes”,The American Economic Review,80(5):999-1021. [12] Goldstein,I. and Pauzner,A.,2005.“Demand-Deposit Contracts and the Probability of Bank Runs”,Journal of Finance,60(3):1293-1327. [13] Iyer,R. and Puri,M.,2012. “Understanding Bank Runs: The Importance of Depositor-Bank Relationships and Networks”,The American Economic Review,102(4):1414-1445. [14] Jacklin,C. J. and Bhattacharya,S.,1988. “Distinguishing Panics and Information-Based Bank Runs: Welfare and Policy Implications”,Journal of Political Economy,96(3):568-592. [15] Kodres, L. E. and Pritsker M.,2002. “A Rational Expectations Model of Financial Contagion”,The Journal of Finance,57(2):769-799. [16] Mishkin,F.S.,1996. “Understanding Financial Crises: A Developing Country Perspective”,Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics. [17] Morris,S. and Shin,H.S.,2003.“Global Games: Theory and Applications,Advances in Economics and Econometrics (Proceedings of the Eighth World Congress of the Econometric Society) ”,Cambridge University Press,56-114. [18] Stiglitz,J.E. and Weiss,A.,1981. “Credit Rationing in Markets with Imperfect Information”,The American Economic Review,71(3):393-410.