Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2015, Vol. 421 Issue (7): 45-59    
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
问题银行的判断与破产早期干预机制
黄志凌
中国建设银行,北京 100033
Recognition of Troubled Banks and Early Intervention Mechanism of Bankruptcy
HUANG Zhiling
China Construction Bank
下载: 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 由于银行具有很突出的外部性特点,破产的外部负效应明显大于普通工商企业,尤其是大型银行破产会带来金融系统的连锁反应,进而波及经济社会各个领域,引发系统性风险甚至经济危机。经济学上的逻辑推理与经济发展史上的大量案例,都可以佐证上述判断。从实践来看,当银行面临技术层面或经济意义上的破产风险时,政府往往会不惜成本采取注资、再贷款、信用担保、购买资产等救助手段,不会动辄实施破产清算。另一方面,政府救助预期形成的银行“大而不倒”的道德风险,以及纳税人为商业银行过度风险行为负责也被广为诟病。为有效平衡银行破产的风险和成本,应着眼于提升银行体系整体竞争力和金融市场运行效率,通过完善银行破产立法、实施前瞻性的宏观审慎监管、改进“坏银行”救助手段和措施、优化银行微观层面治理,建立防范银行破产风险的多道防线,对银行破产风险进行层层拦截和有效缓释,将残余风险控制在可承受范围内。从国际实践看,金融危机之后一套以预警和前瞻性管理为核心的“坏银行”预防、化解和有序退出的银行破产风险治理框架已初现雏形。完善银行破产风险治理和金融风险基础设施,既是当下中国金融改革的题中之意,也是下一步推进金融市场化改革的压舱石。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
黄志凌
关键词:  问题银行  系统性风险  恢复与处置计划    
Abstract:  Due to prominent externality of commercial banks, the negative external effect of the banks’ bankruptcy is significantly greater than that of other non-banking enterprises. Particularly the failure of large-scale banks would bring on chain reaction of entire financial system, resulting in some systematic risk, and even severe economic crisis. In the circumstance that a bank is confronting risks leading to technical or economical bankruptcy, actual bankruptcy and liquidation would hardly be carried out, instead the government would bail out the bank regardless of cost by the means of fund injecting, re-lending, credit guaranteeing or asset purchasing. On the other hand, it is widely criticized that the moral hazard is induced by bailing out “too big to fail” banks and taxpayers are forced to bear financial cost of saving the banks taking excessive risks. In order to effectively balance of risk and return during bankruptcy processing, comprehensive competency of banking system and efficiency of financial market should be paid more attention to enhance, and a multi-line defense mechanism preventing banks from failures should be established by strengthening the legislation to regulating bank failures, carrying out macro-prudential regulations in a forward-looking fashion, optimizing “troubled banks” resorting tools, and improving banking governance in the micro management level. This mechanism would be so designed for the residual risks to be restricted within a tolerant range through various means of risk controlling and mitigating. Recent international banking practice since the financial crisis in 2008 has shown that a risk management framework avoiding banks from failures by risk preventing, risk mitigating, and orderly exiting in a pre-cautionary and forward-looking fashion has come to the fore. The enhancement of bankruptcy risk governance and fundamental financial risk managements is a critical issue for financial reform in China as well as a pedestal further boosting the financial market-oriented movements.
Key words:  Troubled banks    Systematic risk    Recovery and disposal plan living wills
JEL分类号:  G21   G32  
作者简介:  黄志凌,博士,研究员,中国建设银行,Email:zillion9@126.com.
引用本文:    
黄志凌. 问题银行的判断与破产早期干预机制[J]. 金融研究, 2015, 421(7): 45-59.
HUANG Zhiling. Recognition of Troubled Banks and Early Intervention Mechanism of Bankruptcy. Journal of Financial Research, 2015, 421(7): 45-59.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2015/V421/I7/45
[1] 周小川等,1999,《重建与再生—化解银行不良资产的国际经验》,中国金融出版社,1999年6月第一版。
[2] 《危机管理:联邦存款保险公司(FDIC)与处置信托公司(RTC)之经验1980-1994年》中文版,中国经济出版社2004年10月第一版。
[3] 黄志凌,2011,《金融风险管理的新视角—宏观应对与微观经营》,商务印书馆2011年3月第一版。
[4] Financial Stability Board (FSB), 2013.“Guidance on Developing Effective Resolution Strategies”, July.
[5] Financial Stability Board (FSB), 2013.“Guidance on Identification of Critical Functions and Critical Shared Services”, July.
[6] Financial Stability Board (FSB), 2013.“Guidance on Recovery Triggers and Stress Scenarios”, July.
[7] Financial Stability Board (FSB) ,2014.“Adequacy of Loss-absorbing Capacity of Global Systemically Important Banks in Resolution (Consultative Document)”,Nov.
[1] 李政, 梁琪, 方意. 中国金融部门间系统性风险溢出的监测预警研究——基于下行和上行ΔCoES指标的实现与优化[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 464(2): 40-58.
[2] 何青, 钱宗鑫, 刘伟. 中国系统性金融风险的度量——基于实体经济的视角[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 454(4): 53-70.
[3] 黄卓, 邱晗, 沈艳, 童晨. 测量中国的金融不确定性——基于大数据的方法[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 461(11): 30-46.
[4] 李志辉, 李源, 李政. 中国银行业系统性风险监测研究——基于SCCA技术的实现与优化[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 429(3): 92-106.
[5] 苟文均, 袁鹰, 漆鑫. 债务杠杆与系统性风险传染机制—基于CCA模型的分析[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 429(3): 74-91.
[6] 刘圣尧, 李怡宗, 杨云红. 中国股市的崩盘系统性风险与投资者行为偏好[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 428(2): 55-70.
[7] 王道平. 利率市场化、存款保险制度与系统性银行危机防范[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 427(1): 50-65.
[1] 王曦, 朱立挺, 王凯立. 我国货币政策是否关注资产价格?——基于马尔科夫区制转换BEKK多元GARCH模型[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 1 -17 .
[2] 刘勇政, 李岩. 中国的高速铁路建设与城市经济增长[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 18 -33 .
[3] 况伟大, 王琪琳. 房价波动、房贷规模与银行资本充足率[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 34 -48 .
[4] 祝树金, 赵玉龙. 资源错配与企业的出口行为——基于中国工业企业数据的经验研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 49 -64 .
[5] 陈德球, 陈运森, 董志勇. 政策不确定性、市场竞争与资本配置[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 65 -80 .
[6] 牟敦果, 王沛英. 中国能源价格内生性研究及货币政策选择分析[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 81 -95 .
[7] 高铭, 江嘉骏, 陈佳, 刘玉珍. 谁说女子不如儿郎?——P2P投资行为与过度自信[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 96 -111 .
[8] 吕若思, 刘青, 黄灿, 胡海燕, 卢进勇. 外资在华并购是否改善目标企业经营绩效?——基于企业层面的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 112 -127 .
[9] 姜军, 申丹琳, 江轩宇, 伊志宏. 债权人保护与企业创新[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 128 -142 .
[10] 刘莎莎, 孔高文. 信息搜寻、个人投资者交易与股价联动异象——基于股票送转的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 143 -157 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1