Abstract:
This paper intends to provide a new insight to understand why migrant workers in China have a low consumption rate. We focus on the effects of social comparison, or relative income, on household consumption rate. The survey data of Rural-to-Urban Migration in China from 2008 to 2009 was used to identify the relative comparisons among migrant workers, urban residents, and rural residents. We decompose relative deprivation index into relative income ranking and income inequality, and explore their impacts on household consumption jointly. On one hand, relative income ranking leads to conspicuous consumption motivation at present; on the other hand, this motivation is mitigated when relative income increases. Our results imply that households with lower relative income tend to consume more proportionally, while rise in inequality among migrant workers or urban residents can lower the current consumption rate of migrant workers, particularly for the poorer ones. Low relative income compared to urban residents will decrease current consumption, and this effect is especially strong for migrant households who intend to stay in the city in the long-run. Also, our result has significant policy implication that wage gap between urban and rural areas will curb the consumption in the long run.
王湘红, 陈坚. 社会比较和相对收入对农民工家庭消费的影响——基于RUMiC数据的分析[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 438(12): 48-62.
WANG Xianghong, CHEN Jian. The Impact of Social Comparison and Relative Income on Migrant Workers’Consumption: Evidence from RUMiC Data. Journal of Financial Research, 2016, 438(12): 48-62.
Akay, Alpaslan, Olivier Bargain, and Klaus F. Zimmermann. 2012. “Relative Concerns of Rural-to-urban Migrants in China.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 81(2):421~441.
[8]
Carroll, Christopher D., Jody Overland, and David N. Weil. 2000. “Saving and Growth with Habit formation.” American Economic Review, 90(3):341~355.
[9]
Chen, Binkai, Ming Lu, and Ninghua Zhong. 2015. “How Urban Segregation Distorts Chinese Migrants’ Consumption?” World Development, 70:133~146.
[10]
Clark, Andrew E., Paul Frijters, and Michael A. Shields. 2008. “Relative Income, Happiness, and Utility: An Explanation for the Easterlin Paradox and Other Puzzles.” Journal of Economic Literature, 46(1):95~144.
[11]
Deaton, Angus. 2001. “Relative Deprivation, Inequality, and Mortality. ” No.8099. National Bureau of Economic Research,.
[12]
Dixon, Philip M., Jacob Weiner, Thomas Mitchell-Olds and Robert Woodley. 1987. “Bootstrapping the Gini Coefficient of Inequality.” Ecology, 68(5):1548~1551.
[13]
Dreger, Christian, Tongsan Wang, and Yanqun Zhang. 2015. “Understanding Chinese Consumption: The Impact of Hukou.” Development and Change, 46(6):1331~1344.
[14]
Duesenberry, James Stemble. 1949. “Income, Saving, and the Theory of Consumer Behavior.” Harvard University Press.
[15]
Frank, Robert. 2007. “Falling Behind: How Rising Inequality Harms the Middle Class.” Vol. 4. University of California Press
[16]
Friedman, Milton. 1957. “A Theory of the Consumption.” Princeton: Princeton University Press.
[17]
Jin, Ye, Hongbin Li, and Binzhen Wu. 2011. “Income Inequality, Consumption, and Social-Status Seeking.” Journal of Comparative Economics, 39(2):191~204.
[18]
Kosicki, George. 1987. “A Test of the Relative Income Hypothesis.” Southern Economic Journal, 54(2):422~434.
[19]
Palley, Thomas I. 2010. “The Relative Permanent Income Theory of Consumption: A Synthetic Keynes–Duesenberry–Friedman model.” Review of Political Economy, 22(1):41~56.
[20]
Pollak, Robert A. 1970. “Habit Formation and Dynamic Demand Functions.” Journal of Political Economy, 78(4):745~63.
[21]
Stark, Oded. 2006. “Status Aspirations, Wealth Inequality, and Economic Growth.” Review of Development Economics, 10(1):171~176.
[22]
Stark, Oded, and Shlomo Yitzhaki. 1988. “Labour Migration as a Response to Relative Deprivation.” Journal of Population Economics, 1(1):57~70.
[23]
Sun,Wenkai, Xianghong Wang. 2013. “Do Relative Income and Income Inequality Affect Consumption? Evidence from the Villages of Rural China.” The Journal of Development Studies, 49(4):533~546.
