Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2016, Vol. 438 Issue (12): 17-31    
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
双边政治关系、东道国制度环境与对外直接投资
刘晓光, 杨连星
中国人民大学国家发展与战略研究院/经济学院,北京 100872
Bilateral Political Relation, Host Country Institutional Environment and Outward Foreign Direct Investment
LIU Xiaoguang, YANG Lianxing
National Academy of Development and Strategy / School of Economics, Renmin University of China
下载:  PDF (1335KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 在企业对外直接投资中,双边政治关系能否对东道国制度环境起到一定的优化补充效应?以往研究往往忽略了双边政治关系与东道国制度环境间的交互影响。本文基于2005-2014年中国企业对外直接投资数据,通过构建双边政治关系、东道国制度环境差异等指标,实证分析表明:第一,友好的双边政治关系对东道国制度环境具有一定的优化效应,促进企业海外投资;相反,双边政治冲突则表现出一定的恶化效应;第二,不论是正式制度还是非正式制度,友好的双边政治关系对东道国制度差异均起到了一定的补充效应,降低了东道国制度距离的阻碍,增强了企业海外投资的合法性;第三,进一步,友好的双边政治关系与东道国制度环境的互补效应,能够显著提升企业对外直接投资的成效;第四,在较差的东道国制度中,双边政治关系的优化互补效应更为显著。基于上述分析,在中国“一带一路”战略实施进程中,一方面要增强与投资东道国的互联互通,注重与制度环境差异较大的国家进行政治交流,同时要积极构筑企业自身的所有权优势,保障企业对外投资收到实效。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
刘晓光
杨连星
关键词:  双边政治关系  东道国制度环境  制度差异  双边政治冲突  二元边际    
Abstract:  With respect to enterprises' outward foreign direct investments (OFDI), could bilateral political relationships have a complementary effect on institutional environment of host countries? Existing Literature does not place enough emphasis on the interactions between bilateral political relationships and institutional environment of host countries. This paper constructs a set of related indexes such as Bilateral Political Relationship and Differences with Host Country InstitutionalEnvironment, based on data of China's enterprises'OFDIfrom 2005 to 2014. The paper makes several important findings through empirical analysis. Firstly, amicable bilateral political relationship has a complementary effect on institutional environment of host countries, which boostsenterprises' OFDI; on the contrary, bilateral political conflicts lead toa deterioration effect on OFDI. Secondly, on either formal or informal institutional environment, amicable bilateral political relationship has a complementary effect by reducing institutionalobstacles in the host countries. Thirdly, the complementary effectbetween amicable bilateral political relationship and institutional environment of the host countriesalso promote the profits of enterprises' OFDI. Fourthly, the complementary effect is more significant in host countries with poor institutional environment. Based on the above analysis, in theimplementation of“the Belt and Road” strategy, Chinese government needs to strengthen relationship with host countries, in particular communicating with countries whose institutionalenvironment is diverse from China; meanwhile, it is also curialfor enterprises to build their own competitiveadvantages and ensure profits from outward investment.
Key words:  Bilateral Political Relationship    Institutional Environment    Institutional Differences    Political Conflicts    Binary Margin
JEL分类号:  F21   F23   F50  
基金资助: *本文感谢国家社科艺术学基金一般项目(15BN108)资助。感谢匿名审稿人的宝贵意见。文责自负。
通讯作者:  杨连星,通讯作者,经济学博士研究生,中国人民大学经济学院,Email:yanglianstar@163.com.   
作者简介:  刘晓光,经济学博士,讲师,中国人民大学国家发展与战略研究院,Email:lxg2015@ruc.edu.cn.
引用本文:    
刘晓光, 杨连星. 双边政治关系、东道国制度环境与对外直接投资[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 438(12): 17-31.
LIU Xiaoguang, YANG Lianxing. Bilateral Political Relation, Host Country Institutional Environment and Outward Foreign Direct Investment. Journal of Financial Research, 2016, 438(12): 17-31.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2016/V438/I12/17
[1] 郭桂霞、赵岳和巫和懋,2016,《我国“走出去”企业的最优融资模式选择——基于信息经济学的视角》,《金融研究》第8期,第111~126页。
[2] 郭杰和黄保东,2010,《储蓄、公司治理、金融结构与对外直接投资:基于跨国比较的实证研究》,《金融研究》第2期,第76~90页。
[3] 黄胜、叶广宇、周劲波、靳田田和李玉米,2015,《二元制度环境、制度能力对新兴经济体创业企业加速国际化的影响》,《南开管理评论》第18卷第3期,第71~84页。
[4] 冀相豹,2014,《制度差异、累积优势效应与中国 OFDI 的区位分布》,《世界经济研究》第1期,第73~80页。
[5] 蒋冠宏和蒋殿春,2012,《中国对发展中国家的投资——东道国制度重要吗?》,《管理世界》第11期,第45~56页。
[6] 潘镇和金中坤,2015,《双边政治关系、东道国制度风险与中国对外直接投资》,《财贸经济》第6期,第85~97页。
[7] 邱立成和赵成真,2012,《制度环境差异, 对外直接投资与风险防范:中国例证》,《国际贸易问题》第12期, 第112~122页。
[8] 邱泰如,1990,《论发展对外直接投资的战略意义和对策》,《金融研究》第1期,第59~63页。
[9] 王永钦、杜巨澜和王凯,2014,《中国对外直接投资区位选择的决定因素:制度、税负和资源禀赋》,《经济研究》第12期,第126~142页。
[10] 岳咬兴和范涛,2014,《制度环境与中国对亚洲直接投资区位分布》,《财贸经济》第6期,第69~78页。
[11] 张建红和姜建刚,2012,《双边政治关系对中国对外直接投资的影响研究》,《世界经济与政治》第12期,第133~155页。
[12] 宗芳宇、路江涌和武常岐,2012,《双边投资协定、制度环境和企业对外直接投资区位选择》,《经济研究》第5期,第71~82页。
[13] Büthe, T. and Milner, H.V.. 2008. “The Politics of Foreign Direct Investment into Developing Countries: Increasing FDI through International Trade Agreements?” American Journal of Political Science, 52(4), pp. 741~762.
[14] Desbordes, R. and Vicard V.. 2009. “Foreign Direct Investment and Bilateral Investment Treaties: An International Political Perspective.” Journal of Comparative Economics, 37(3), pp. 372 ~386.
[15] Duanmu, J.L.. 2014. “State-owned MNCs and Host Country Expropriation Risk: The Role of Home State Soft Power and Economic Gunboat Diplomacy.” Journal of International Business Studies, 45(8), pp. 1044~1060.
[16] Dunning, J.H., 1988. “The Theory of International Production.” The International Trade Journal, 3(1), pp. 21~66.
[17] Habib M, and Zurawicki L. 2002. “Corruption and Foreign Direct Investmen.” Journal of International Business Studies, 33(2), pp. 291~307.
[18] Hayashi, F.. 2000. Econometrics. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, pp.60~69.
[19] Hofstede, G., 2014. Dimensions of National Culture.
[20] Kesternich, I. and Schnitzer, M.. 2010. “Who is Afraid of Political Risk? Multinational Firms and Their Choice of Capital Structure.” Journal of International Economics, 82(2), pp.208~218.
[21] Keuschnigg, C., 2008. “Exports, Foreign Direct Investment, and the Costs of Corporate Taxation.” International Tax and Public Finance, 15(4), pp.460~477.
[22] Li, Q. and Vashchilko, T., 2010. “Dyadic Military Conflict, Security Alliances, and Bilateral FDI Flows.” Journal of International Business Studies, 41(5), pp.765~782.
[23] Luo, Y., Xue, Q., Han, B.. 2010. “How Emerging Market Governments Promote Outward FDI: Experience from China.” Journal of World Business, 45(1), pp. 68~79.
[24] Makino, S. and Tsang, E.W.. 2011. “Historical Ties and Foreign Direct Investment: An Exploratory Study.” Journal of International Business Studies, 42(4), pp.545~557.
[25] Neumayer, E. and Spess, L. 2005. “Do Bilateral Investment Treaties Increase Foreign Direct Investment to Developing Countries.” World Development, 33(10), pp.1567~1585.
[26] Peng, M. W., Wang, D. Y., Jiang, Y.. 2008. “An Institution-based View of International Business Strategy: A Focus on Emerging Economies.” Journal of International Business Studies, 39(5), pp. 920~936.
[27] Plötscher, C. and Rottmann, H.. 2002. “Investment Behavior and Financing Constraints in German Manufacturing and Construction Firms: A Bivariate Ordered Probit Estimation.” CESifo Economic Studies, 48(3), pp.383.
[28] Siegel, J.I., Licht, A.N. and Schwartz, S.H.. 2012. “Egalitarianism, Cultural Distance, and FDI: A New Approach.” Organization Science.
[29] Stock, J. H., and Yogo, M. 2002. “Testing for Weak Instruments in Linear Iv Regression.” NBER Technical Working Papers, 14(1), pp. 80~108.
[30] Wiig, A. and Kolstad, I.. 2010. “Multinational Corporations and Host Country Institutions: A Case Study of CSR Activities in Angola.” International Business Review, 19(2), pp.178~190.
[1] 王曦, 朱立挺, 王凯立. 我国货币政策是否关注资产价格?——基于马尔科夫区制转换BEKK多元GARCH模型[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 1 -17 .
[2] 刘勇政, 李岩. 中国的高速铁路建设与城市经济增长[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 18 -33 .
[3] 况伟大, 王琪琳. 房价波动、房贷规模与银行资本充足率[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 34 -48 .
[4] 祝树金, 赵玉龙. 资源错配与企业的出口行为——基于中国工业企业数据的经验研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 49 -64 .
[5] 陈德球, 陈运森, 董志勇. 政策不确定性、市场竞争与资本配置[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 65 -80 .
[6] 牟敦果, 王沛英. 中国能源价格内生性研究及货币政策选择分析[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 81 -95 .
[7] 高铭, 江嘉骏, 陈佳, 刘玉珍. 谁说女子不如儿郎?——P2P投资行为与过度自信[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 96 -111 .
[8] 吕若思, 刘青, 黄灿, 胡海燕, 卢进勇. 外资在华并购是否改善目标企业经营绩效?——基于企业层面的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 112 -127 .
[9] 姜军, 申丹琳, 江轩宇, 伊志宏. 债权人保护与企业创新[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 128 -142 .
[10] 刘莎莎, 孔高文. 信息搜寻、个人投资者交易与股价联动异象——基于股票送转的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 143 -157 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1