Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2022, Vol. 508 Issue (10): 170-188    
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
注册制改革会产生溢出效应吗?——基于企业投资行为的视角
刘瑞琳, 李丹
清华大学经济管理学院,北京 100084
Spillover Effects of the Registration System Reform from an Investment Perspective
LIU Ruilin, LI Dan
School of Economics and Management, Tsinghua University
下载:  PDF (611KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 提高资本市场资源配置效率是注册制推行的重要目标之一,本文以此为出发点,构建了多期倍分法(DID)模型,探究了科创板(试点注册制)公司信息披露对同行业公司的溢出效应。研究发现,科创板公司信息披露会促使同行业公司提高研发投入,且该效应随着信息披露内容的丰富、精确度的增加而有所提高。机制分析表明,该溢出效应源自信息不确定性的降低和竞争压力的产生。同时,创板信息披露提高了同行业公司管理层对创新的认知程度以及增加了媒体关注度,进而促进公司研发投入。进一步研究发现,同行业公司研发投入受到正向溢出效应影响的同时,固定资产投入有所降低,投资结构的改变最终导致投资效率提升,显著抑制了过度投资。本文为强制性信息披露的溢出效应研究提供了因果证据,也为注册制改革政策效果的全面评估提供了支持。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
刘瑞琳
李丹
关键词:  溢出效应  注册制改革  投资行为    
Summary:  Improving the capital market's resource allocation efficiency and TFP are the key objectives of the registration system reform. It is unknown whether China's registration-based initial public offerings have a significant effect on the efficiency of the capital market and business choices. As a result, we examine this question from the perspective of firm investment.
Information disclosure is the foundation of the registration system, and firms listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchange Sci-Tech Innovation Board (STAR Market) typically have higher information disclosure standards and richer content, including comprehensive, advanced, and multidimensional industry information, as well as information specific to these high-tech firms. It improves the capital market's information richness, lowers investment uncertainty, and benefits other firms in the same industry in making economic decisions (Edmans et al., 2012, 2015; Badertscher et al., 2013). The STAR Market focuses primarily on scientific and technology innovation firms that are at the forefront of technology in those fields and meet the needs of the government in terms of critical core technologies. As a result, the competitive pressure within the same industry increases and leads to learning through imitation (Lieberman and Asaba, 2006). The aforementioned two factors may lead firms in the same industry to modify their strategies for dealing with potential growth and changes.
Based on a firm-year sample from 2017 to 2020, we use a time-varying difference-in-differences framework to explore the spillover effects of information disclosure by STAR Market listed firms on firms in the same industry. We find that the information disclosure of STAR Market listed firms increases the research and development (R&D) expenditure of firms in the same industry, and the effect improves as the content and accuracy of information disclosure increase. The results remain constant when we address endogeneity issues. The mechanism analysis shows that the spillover effects are due to the reduction in information uncertainty and the increase in competitive pressure. Meanwhile, information disclosure by STAR Market firms improves peer managers' awareness of innovation and increased media attention, thereby promoting R&D expenditure.
Further analysis indicates that while R&D expenditure is affected by the positive spillover effects of information disclosure, firms tend to reduce their investment in fixed assets and change their investment structure, resulting in improved investment efficiency and reduced over-investment. In conclusion, this paper shows that information disclosure by STAR Market firms improves the investment decisions of peer firms and enhances the efficiency of the capital market.
This paper contributes to the literature in several ways. First, the externality of accounting information is attracting increasing attention (Roychowdhury et al., 2019). Examining the spillover effects of information disclosure is important for researchers and policy makers. Using the implementation of the STAR Market, this paper provides evidence for the spillover effects of compulsory information disclosure as well as theoretical support and empirical evidence for the comprehensive evaluation of the effects of registration system reform. Second, endogeneity issues are the primary concern in the literature on peer effects. The most effective method to determine the effect of peer firms is to identify an exogenous event that can result in a change in peer firms' information disclosure (Seo, 2021). In this paper, we use the registration system reform that was recently implemented in China as a natural experiment to identify causality. Third, the goal of the registration system reform is to advance the marketization process of factor allocation and boost resource allocation effectiveness. The findings of our study provide a policy effect evaluation and policy implications related to how firm behavior can improve the function of the capital market.
Keywords:  Spillover Effect    Registration System Reform    Investment
JEL分类号:  D80   M41   G18  
基金资助: * 本文感谢国家自然科学基金面上项目(72172073)、清华大学自主科研项目(2019THZWLJ13)以及清华大学小林实中国经济研究基金的资助。感谢匿名审稿人的宝贵意见,文责自负。
作者简介:  刘瑞琳,会计学博士研究生,清华大学经济管理学院,E-mail:liurl.18@sem.tsinghua.edu.cn.
李 丹,管理学博士,副教授,清华大学经济管理学院,E-mail:lidan@sem.tsinghua.edu.cn.
引用本文:    
刘瑞琳, 李丹. 注册制改革会产生溢出效应吗?——基于企业投资行为的视角[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 508(10): 170-188.
LIU Ruilin, LI Dan. Spillover Effects of the Registration System Reform from an Investment Perspective. Journal of Financial Research, 2022, 508(10): 170-188.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2022/V508/I10/170
[1] 胡珺、黄楠和沈洪涛,2020,《市场激励型环境规制可以推动企业技术创新吗?——基于中国碳排放权交易机制的自然实验》,《金融研究》第1期,第171~189页。
[2] 胡楠、薛付婧和王昊楠,2021,《管理者短视主义影响企业长期投资吗?——基于文本分析和机器学习》,《管理世界》第5期,第139~156页。
[3] 胡志强和王雅格,2021,《审核问询、信息披露更新与IPO市场表现——科创板企业招股说明书的文本分析》,《经济管理》第4期,第155~172页。
[4] 姜付秀和刘志彪,2005,《行业特征、资本结构与产品市场竞争》,《管理世界》第10期,第74~81页。
[5] 蒋尧明和张雷云,2021,《科创板审核问询函能提升关键事项信息披露水平吗》,《当代财经》第9期,第126~136页。
[6] 李晓溪、饶品贵和岳衡,2019,《年报问询函与管理层业绩预告》,《管理世界》第8期,第173~188+192页。
[7] 刘慧龙、吴联生和王亚平,2012,《国有企业改制、董事会独立性与投资效率》,《金融研究》第9期,第127~140页。
[8] 罗长远和季心宇,2015,《融资约束下的企业出口和研发:“鱼”与“熊掌”不可得兼?》,《金融研究》第9期,第140~158页。
[9] 汝毅、薛健和张乾,2019,《媒体新闻报道的声誉溢出效应》,《金融研究》第8期,第189~206页。
[10] 谭劲松、冯飞鹏和徐伟航,2017,《产业政策与企业研发投资》,《会计研究》第10期,第58~64+97页。
[11] 王克敏、刘静和李晓溪,2017,《产业政策、政府支持与公司投资效率研究》,《管理世界》第3期,第113~124页。
[12] 温军和冯根福,2012,《异质机构、企业性质与自主创新》,《经济研究》第3期,第53~64页。
[13] 杨海生、柳建华、连玉君和江颖臻,2020,《企业投资决策中的同行效应研究:模仿与学习》,《经济学(季刊)》第4期,第1375~1400页。
[14] 杨志强、唐松和李增泉,2020,《资本市场信息披露、关系型合约与供需长鞭效应——基于供应链信息外溢的经验证据》,《管理世界》第7期,第89~105+217~218页。
[15] 叶小杰和徐可,2020,《科创板与创业板IPO信息披露差异研究——基于首批上市公司的比较分析》,《管理现代化》第4期,第7~10页。
[16] 诸竹君、宋学印、张胜利和陈丽芳,2021,《产业政策、创新行为与企业加成率——基于战略性新兴产业政策的研究》,《金融研究》第6期,第59~75页。
[17] Badertscher,B.,N. Shroff,and H. White. 2013. “Externalities of Public Firms' Disclosures: Evidence from Private Firms' Investment Decisions”, Journal of Financial Economics, 109(3):682~706.
[18] Beatty,A.,Liao,S.,Yu and J. J. 2013. “The Spillover Effect of Fraudulent Financial Reporting on Peer Firms' Investments”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 55(2-3):183~205.
[19] Bernard,D.,Blackburne,T. and Thornock,J. 2020. “Information Flows among Rivals and Corporate Investment”,Journal of Financial Economics, 136(3):760~779.
[20] Biddle,G. C.,G.,Hilary and R. S. Verdi. 2009. “How does Financial Reporting Quality Relate to Investment Efficiency? ”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 48(2-3):112~131.
[21] Bonsall IV,S.B.,Bozanic,Z. and Fischer,P.E. 2013. “What Do Management Earnings Forecasts Convey about the Macroeconomy? ”, Journal of Accounting Research, 51(2):225~266.
[22] Bourveau,T.,She,G. and Žaldokas,A. 2020. “Corporate Disclosure as A Tacit Coordination Mechanism: Evidence from Cartel Enforcement Regulations”, Journal of Accounting Research, 58(2):295~332.
[23] Bushee, B. J. 1998. “The Influence of Institutional Investors on Myopic R&D Investment Behavior”, The Accounting Review, 73(3):305~333.
[24] Bustamante,M. C. and Frésard,L. 2021. “Does Firm Investment Respond to Peers' Investment? ”, Management Science, 67(8):4703~4724.
[25] Dougal,C.,Parsons,C. A. and Titman,S. 2015. “Urban Vibrancy and Corporate Growth”, The Journal of Finance, 70(1):163~210.
[26] Durnev,A.and Mangen,C. 2009. “Corporate Investments: Learning from Restatements”, Journal of Accounting Research, 47(3):679~720.
[27] Durnev,A. and Mangen,C. 2020. “The Spillover Effects of MD&A Disclosures for Real Investment: The Role of Industry Competition”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 70(1):101~299.
[28] Dyer,T.,Lang,M. and Stice-Lawrence, L. 2017. “The Evolution of 10-K Textual Disclosure: Evidence from Latent Dirichlet Allocation”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 64(2-3):221~245.
[29] Edmans,A.,Goldstein,I. and Jiang,W. 2012. “The real Effects of Financial Markets: The Impact of Prices on Takeovers”, The Journal of Finance, 67(3):933~971.
[30] Edmans,A.,Goldstein,I. and Jiang,W. 2015. “Feedback Effects, Asymmetric Trading, and the Limits to Arbitrage”, American Economic Review,105(12):3766~97.
[31] Gordon,E. A.,Hsu,H. T. and Huang, H. 2020. “Peer R&D Disclosure and Corporate Innovation: Evidence from American Depositary Receipt Firms”, Advances in Accounting, 49:100471.
[32] Hanlon,M.,Maydew,E. L. and Shevlin,T. 2008. “An Unintended Consequence of Book-tax Conformity: A loss of Earnings Informativeness”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 46(2-3):294~311.
[33] Karuna,C. 2007. “Industry Product Market Competition and Managerial Incentives”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 43(2-3):275~297.
[34] Li,V. 2016. “Do false Financial Statements Distort Peer Firms' Decisions? ”, The Accounting Review, 91(1):251~278.
[35] Lieberman,M. B.,Asaba,S. 2006. “Why do Firms Imitate Dach Other? ”, Academy of Management Review, 31(2):366~385.
[36] Loughran,T. and McDonald,B. 2014. “Measuring Readability in Financial Disclosures”, Journal of Finance, 69(4):1643~1671.
[37] Loughran,T. and McDonald,B. 2016. “Textual Analysis in Accounting and Finance: A Survey”, Journal of Accounting Research, 54(4):1187~1230.
[38] Pandit,S.,Wasley,C. E. and Zach,T. 2011. “Information Externalities along the Supply Chain: The Economic Determinants of Suppliers' Stock Price Reaction to Their Customers' Earnings Announcements”, Contemporary Accounting Research, 28(4):1304~1343.
[39] Piotroski J. D.,T. J. Wong and T. Zhang. 2017. “Political Bias in Corporate News: The Role of Conglomeration Reform in China”, The Journal of Law and Economics, 60(1):173~207.
[40] Qin, Y.,and Xiao,H. 2021. “Market-based Financing Reforms and Shareholder Valuations: Event Study Evidence from the Chinese Sci-Technology Innovation Board”, Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting and Economics, 28(1):1~24.
[41] Richardson,S. 2006. “Over-investment of Free Cash Flow”, Review of Accounting Studies, 11(2):159~189.
[42] Roychowdhury,S.,Shroff,N.,Verdi,R. S. 2019. “The Effects of Financial Reporting and Disclosure on Corporate Investment: A Review”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 68(2-3):101246.
[43] Seo,H. 2021. “Peer Effects in Corporate Disclosure Decisions”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 71(1):101364.
[44] Shroff,N.,Verdi,R. S. and Yost,B. P. 2017. “When Does the Peer Information Environment Matter? ”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 64(2-3):183~214.
[1] 王博, 赵森杨, 罗荣华, 彭龙. 地方政府债务、空间溢出效应与区域经济增长[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 506(8): 18-37.
[2] 张璇, 孙雪丽, 薛原, 李春涛. 卖空机制与食品安全——基于溢出效应的视角[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 501(3): 152-170.
[3] 江轩宇, 贾婧, 刘琪. 债务结构优化与企业创新——基于企业债券融资视角的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 490(4): 131-149.
[4] 张智富, 郭云喜, 张朝洋. 宏观审慎政策协调能否抑制国际性银行危机传染?——基于跨境金融关联视角的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 481(7): 21-37.
[5] 谢里, 郑新业. 理性预期与能源投资——基于中国碳减排承诺的自然实验[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 479(5): 151-169.
[6] 张礼卿, 钟茜. 全球金融周期、美国货币政策与“三元悖论”[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 476(2): 15-33.
[7] 周开国, 邢子煜, 彭诗渊. 中国股市行业风险与宏观经济之间的风险传导机制[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 486(12): 151-168.
[8] 汝毅, 薛健, 张乾. 媒体新闻报道的声誉溢出效应[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 470(8): 189-206.
[9] 周光友, 罗素梅. 互联网金融资产的多目标投资组合研究[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 472(10): 135-151.
[10] 罗棪心, 麻志明, 王亚平. 券商跟踪海外上市公司对国内分析师盈余预测准确性的影响[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 458(8): 190-206.
[11] 张靖佳, 孙浦阳, 古芳. 欧洲量化宽松政策对中国企业出口影响——一个汇率网状溢出效应视角[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 447(9): 18-34.
[12] 尹力博, 吴优. 离岸人民币区域影响力研究——基于信息溢出的视角[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 446(8): 1-18.
[13] 褚剑, 方军雄, 于传荣. 卖空约束放松与银行信贷决策[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 450(12): 111-126.
[14] 耿志祥, 孙祁祥. 金融危机和自然灾害对保险股票市场的影响与溢出效应检验[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 431(5): 65-81.
[15] 王雄元, 彭旋. 稳定客户提高了分析师对企业盈余预测的准确性吗?[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 431(5): 156-172.
[1] 步丹璐, 狄灵瑜. 治理环境、股权投资与政府补助[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 448(10): 193 -206 .
[2] 王曦, 朱立挺, 王凯立. 我国货币政策是否关注资产价格?——基于马尔科夫区制转换BEKK多元GARCH模型[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 1 -17 .
[3] 刘勇政, 李岩. 中国的高速铁路建设与城市经济增长[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 18 -33 .
[4] 况伟大, 王琪琳. 房价波动、房贷规模与银行资本充足率[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 34 -48 .
[5] 祝树金, 赵玉龙. 资源错配与企业的出口行为——基于中国工业企业数据的经验研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 49 -64 .
[6] 陈德球, 陈运森, 董志勇. 政策不确定性、市场竞争与资本配置[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 65 -80 .
[7] 牟敦果, 王沛英. 中国能源价格内生性研究及货币政策选择分析[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 81 -95 .
[8] 王丽艳, 马光荣. 帆随风动、人随财走?——财政转移支付对人口流动的影响[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 448(10): 18 -34 .
[9] 高铭, 江嘉骏, 陈佳, 刘玉珍. 谁说女子不如儿郎?——P2P投资行为与过度自信[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 96 -111 .
[10] 吕若思, 刘青, 黄灿, 胡海燕, 卢进勇. 外资在华并购是否改善目标企业经营绩效?——基于企业层面的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 112 -127 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1