Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2022, Vol. 506 Issue (8): 152-170    
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
系统性风险与企业财务危机预警——基于前沿机器学习的新视角
杨子晖, 张平淼, 林师涵
中山大学岭南学院, 广东广州 510275;
中山大学高级金融研究院, 广东广州 510275
Systemic Risk and Corporate Financial Distress Forecasting from the New Perspective of Machine Learning
YANG Zihui, ZHANG Pingmiao, LIN Shihan
Lingnan College, Sun Yat-Sen University;
Advanced Institute of Finance, Sun Yat-Sen University
下载:  PDF (1306KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 本文采用Logit回归模型以及随机森林模型、梯度提升模型等前沿机器学习方法,深入考察系统性风险指标对我国企业财务危机的预测能力。结果表明,系统性风险对中下游企业的财务危机具有显著的预测能力,而基于因子分析构建的系统性风险指标,结合随机森林模型可取得更好的预测效果。本文进一步区分财务危机的不同成因并发现,基于随机森林模型和Logit回归模型的预测框架能够对我国大多数财务危机事件进行有效预警。在此基础上,本文对我国上市企业监管提出相关建议,从而为完善金融风险处置机制提供一定参考。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
杨子晖
张平淼
林师涵
关键词:  财务危机  系统性风险  机器学习  部分依赖图  风险防范    
Summary:  The implementation of a financial security strategy was made a high priority in the 14th Five-Year Plan, which includes the aim to “improve financial risk prevention, early warning, handling and accountability systems.” Frequent black swan incidents have accentuated the shocks of systemic risk on global production activities and enterprise financial stability. Thus, using systemic risk indicators to improve predictions of financial distress is of academic and practical value.
This paper contributes to the research on financial distress forecasting. First, few studies consider the potential impact of systemic risk on production. Thus, we introduce systemic risk indicators into our prediction of financial distress to provide a more comprehensive analysis. Second, research into financial distress mainly focuses on bankruptcy events, although reductions in corporate valuation and creditor losses typically occur before bankruptcies (Gupta and Chaudhry, 2019). Instead of bankruptcy events, we regard special treatment (ST) designation as a signal of corporate financial distress, as it increases foresight and enables the early warning of potential corporate crises, thus preventing huge losses for firms and creditors. Third, current prediction models of financial distress mainly forecast bankruptcy events only one month or one quarter ahead, and thus, they cannot provide early warnings. Instead, we predict the risk event one year in advance, which gives regulators sufficient time to intervene. Finally, conventional parametric models are typically applied for predicting bankruptcies, whereas we utilize newly developed machine learning models to improve the accuracy of our prediction, and we provide references for optimizing the early warning system for corporate financial distress.
Our sample consists of 3,806 Chinese listed companies, with the time period spanning from January 1, 2010 to May 31, 2020. All of the data are obtained from the CSMAR and Wind Databases.
First, we run logit regressions and find that systemic risk indicators serve as powerful predictors of the financial failure of firms, particularly those in mid and downstream industries. Next, a relative importance analysis suggests that the predictive power of systemic risk indicators is independent from that of financial information and market performance. As the partial dependence plots show, the probability that a company faces a financial crisis rises sharply in response to its systemic risk level reaching a certain threshold. We also apply the out-of-sample test and out-of-time test methods proposed by Petropoulos et al. (2020) to compare the predictive abilities of the conventional logit model and our newly developed machine learning model. The results suggest that systemic risk indicators improve the prediction accuracy of these models and that the random forest model outperforms other predictive models, thus highlighting the relative advantages of machine learning methods in financial distress forecasting. In addition, the combination of systemic risk indicators derived from factor analysis and random forest is better suited to the forecasting system in China than other construction methods of systemic risk indicators and predictive models. After we remove the samples in which the distress is due to financial fraud, shrinking net worth, or sudden operating losses, the prediction framework based on random forest and logit regression provides effective early warnings for most financial failure events in China.
Based on this, our study offers three policy implications concerning the listed company regulations in China. First, systemic risk indicators should be included in the early warning system for the financial distress of enterprises to improve the mechanism for the long-term prevention of financial risks. Second, regulators should apply discriminative supervision to different industries. Finally, from a technical perspective, the introduction of newly developed machine learning methods can conduce to a prudent regulation mechanism. This will not only improve the forecasting system for financial distress but also enhance the financial risk disposal mechanism.
Keywords:  Financial Distress    Systemic Risk    Machine Learning    Partial Dependence Plot    Risk Prevention
JEL分类号:  C5   G33  
基金资助: * 本文感谢2021年度国家社会科学基金重大项目“‘双循环’新格局下我国金融风险演化及防控措施研究”(项目批准号:21&ZD114)的资助。感谢审稿人提出的宝贵意见,文责自负。
作者简介:  杨子晖,经济学博士,教授,中山大学岭南学院,中山大学高级金融研究院,E-mail: yangzhui@mail.sysu.edu.cn.
张平淼,博士研究生,中山大学岭南学院,E-mail: zhangpm3@mail2.sysu.edu.cn.
林师涵,博士研究生,中山大学高级金融研究院,E-mail: linshh23@mail2.sysu.edu.cn.
引用本文:    
杨子晖, 张平淼, 林师涵. 系统性风险与企业财务危机预警——基于前沿机器学习的新视角[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 506(8): 152-170.
YANG Zihui, ZHANG Pingmiao, LIN Shihan. Systemic Risk and Corporate Financial Distress Forecasting from the New Perspective of Machine Learning. Journal of Financial Research, 2022, 506(8): 152-170.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2022/V506/I8/152
[1] 陈海强、方颖和王方舟,2019,《融资融券制度对尾部系统风险的非对称影响——基于A股市场极值相关性的研究》,《管理科学学报》第5期,第99~109页。
[2] 范小云、荣宇浩和王博,2021,《我国系统重要性银行评估:网络层次结构视角》,《管理科学学报》第2期,第48~74页。
[3] 李政、梁琪和涂晓枫,2016,《我国上市金融机构关联性研究——基于网络分析法》,《金融研究》第8期,第95~110页。
[4] 梁琪、李政和郝项超,2015,《中国股票市场国际化研究:基于信息溢出的视角》,《经济研究》第4期,第150~164页。
[5] 刘晓星、段斌和谢福座,2011,《股票市场风险溢出效应研究:基于EVT-Copula-CoVaR模型的分析》,《世界经济》第11期,第145~159页。
[6] 杨海军和太雷,2009,《基于模糊支持向量机的上市公司财务困境预测》,《管理科学学报》第3期,第102~110页。
[7] 杨子晖,2020,《金融市场与宏观经济的风险传染关系——基于混合频率的实证研究》,《中国社会科学》第12期,第160~180页。
[8] 杨子晖、陈里璇和陈雨恬,2020,《经济政策不确定性与系统性金融风险的跨市场传染——基于非线性网络关联的研究》,《经济研究》第1期,第65~81页。
[9] 郑挺国和刘堂勇,2018,《股市波动溢出效应及其影响因素分析》,《经济学(季刊)》第2期,第669~692页。
[10] Allen, L., T. G. Bali, and Y. Tang. 2012. “Does Systemic Risk in the Financial Sector Predict Future Economic Downturns?”, The Review of Financial Studies, 25(10): 3000~3036.
[11] Altman, E. I. 1968. “Financial Ratios, Discriminant Analysis and the Prediction of Corporate Bankruptcy”, The Journal of Finance, 23(4): 589~609.
[12] Acharya, V. V., L. H. Pedersen, T. Philippon, and M. Richardson. 2017. “Measuring Systemic Risk”, The Review of Financial Studies, 30(1):2~47.
[13] Baboota, R., and Kaur, H. 2019. “Predictive Analysis and Modelling Football Results Using Machine Learning Approach for English Premier League”, International Journal of Forecasting, 35(2): 741~755.
[14] Campbell, J. Y., J. Hilscher, and J. Szilagyi. 2008. “In Search of Distress Risk”, The Journal of Finance, 63(6):2899~2939.
[15] Du Jardin, P. 2021. “Forecasting Corporate Failure Using Ensemble of Self-organizing Neural Networks”, European Journal of Operational Research, 288(3):869~885.
[16] Giglio, S., B. Kelly, and S. Pruitt. 2016. “Systemic Risk and the Macroeconomy: An Empirical Evaluation”, Journal of Financial Economics, 119(3):457~471.
[17] Glover, B. 2016. “The Expected Cost of Default”, Journal of Financial Economics, 119(2):284~299.
[18] Gupta, J., and S. Chaudhry. 2019. “Mind the Tail, or Risk to Fail”, Journal of Business Research, 99:167~185.
[19] Ivashina, V., and D. Scharfstein. 2010. “Bank Lending during the Financial Crisis of 2008”, Journal of Financial Economics, 97(3):319~338.
[20] Jia, Z., Y. Shi, C. Yan, and M. Duygun. 2020. “Bankruptcy Prediction with Financial Systemic Risk”, The European Journal of Finance, 26(7-8):666~690.
[21] Jones, S., D. Johnstone, and R. Wilson. 2015. “An Empirical Evaluation of the Performance of Binary Classifiers in the Prediction of Credit Ratings Changes”, Journal of Banking and Finance, 56:72~85.
[22] Jones, S. 2017. “Corporate Bankruptcy Prediction: A High Dimensional Analysis”, Review of Accounting Studies, 22(3):1366~1422.
[23] Kim, H. S., and S. Y. Sohn. 2010. “Support Vector Machines for Default Prediction of SMEs Based on Technology Credit”, European Journal of Operational Research, 201(3):838~846.
[24] Laeven, L., L. Ratnovski, and H. Tong. 2016. “Bank Size, Capital, and Systemic Risk: Some International Evidence”, Journal of Banking and Finance, 69:S25~S34.
[25] Nucera, F., B. Schwaab, S. J. Koopman, and A. Lucas. 2016. “The Information in Systemic Risk Rankings”, Journal of Empirical Finance, 38:461~475.
[26] Petropoulos, A., V. Siakoulis, E. Stavroulakis, and N. E. Vlachogiannakis. 2020. “Predicting Bank Insolvencies Using Machine Learning Techniques”, International Journal of Forecasting, 36(3):1092~1113.
[27] Pang, C., and Y. Wang. 2020. “Stock Pledge, Risk of Losing Control and Corporate Innovation”, Journal of Corporate Finance, 60, 101534.
[28] Scott, J. 1981. “The Probability of Bankruptcy: A Comparison of Empirical Predictions and Theoretical Models”, Journal of Banking and Finance, 5(3):317~344.
[29] Vrontos, S. D., J. Galakis, and I. D. Vrontos. 2021. “Modeling and Predicting US Recessions Using Machine Learning Techniques”, International Journal of Forecasting, 37(2):647~671.
[1] 陆瑶, 施函青. 我国科技企业融资的决定因素研究——基于科创板企业的机器学习分析[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 507(9): 132-151.
[2] 张伟平, 曹廷求. 中国房地产企业间系统性风险溢出效应分析——基于尾部风险网络模型[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 505(7): 94-114.
[3] 张琳, 廉永辉, 方意. 政策连续性与商业银行系统性风险[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 503(5): 95-113.
[4] 王永钦, 段白鸽, 钱佳辉. 中国的“影子保险”:来自监管自然实验的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 502(4): 18-38.
[5] 赵静, 郭晔. 金融产品持股与银行系统性风险——兼论《商业银行股权管理暂行办法》的影响[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 499(1): 57-75.
[6] 徐国祥, 吴婷, 王莹. 基于共同冲击和异质风险叠加传导的风险传染研究——来自中国上市银行网络的传染模拟[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 490(4): 38-54.
[7] 陈国进, 蒋晓宇, 刘彦臻, 赵向琴. 资产透明度、监管套利与银行系统性风险[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 489(3): 18-37.
[8] 王辉, 梁俊豪. 基于动态因子Copula模型的我国银行系统性风险度量[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 485(11): 58-75.
[9] 李政, 梁琪, 方意. 中国金融部门间系统性风险溢出的监测预警研究——基于下行和上行ΔCoES指标的实现与优化[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 464(2): 40-58.
[10] 方意, 王晏如, 黄丽灵, 和文佳. 宏观审慎与货币政策双支柱框架研究——基于系统性风险视角[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 474(12): 106-124.
[11] 何青, 钱宗鑫, 刘伟. 中国系统性金融风险的度量——基于实体经济的视角[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 454(4): 53-70.
[12] 黄卓, 邱晗, 沈艳, 童晨. 测量中国的金融不确定性——基于大数据的方法[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 461(11): 30-46.
[13] 李志辉, 李源, 李政. 中国银行业系统性风险监测研究——基于SCCA技术的实现与优化[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 429(3): 92-106.
[14] 苟文均, 袁鹰, 漆鑫. 债务杠杆与系统性风险传染机制—基于CCA模型的分析[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 429(3): 74-91.
[15] 刘圣尧, 李怡宗, 杨云红. 中国股市的崩盘系统性风险与投资者行为偏好[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 428(2): 55-70.
[1] 王曦, 朱立挺, 王凯立. 我国货币政策是否关注资产价格?——基于马尔科夫区制转换BEKK多元GARCH模型[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 1 -17 .
[2] 刘勇政, 李岩. 中国的高速铁路建设与城市经济增长[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 18 -33 .
[3] 况伟大, 王琪琳. 房价波动、房贷规模与银行资本充足率[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 34 -48 .
[4] 祝树金, 赵玉龙. 资源错配与企业的出口行为——基于中国工业企业数据的经验研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 49 -64 .
[5] 陈德球, 陈运森, 董志勇. 政策不确定性、市场竞争与资本配置[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 65 -80 .
[6] 牟敦果, 王沛英. 中国能源价格内生性研究及货币政策选择分析[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 81 -95 .
[7] 高铭, 江嘉骏, 陈佳, 刘玉珍. 谁说女子不如儿郎?——P2P投资行为与过度自信[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 96 -111 .
[8] 吕若思, 刘青, 黄灿, 胡海燕, 卢进勇. 外资在华并购是否改善目标企业经营绩效?——基于企业层面的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 112 -127 .
[9] 姜军, 申丹琳, 江轩宇, 伊志宏. 债权人保护与企业创新[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 128 -142 .
[10] 刘莎莎, 孔高文. 信息搜寻、个人投资者交易与股价联动异象——基于股票送转的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 143 -157 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1