Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2022, Vol. 506 Issue (8): 132-151    
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
汇率敏感性会影响企业贷款利率吗?——基于中国上市公司的分析
何青, 刘尔卓
中国人民大学财政金融学院/中国财政金融政策研究中心, 北京 100872;
首都经济贸易大学财政税务学院, 北京 100070
Does Exchange Rate Exposure Affect Firms' Loan Interest Rates? Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies
HE Qing, LIU Erzhuo
School of Finance, Remin University of China, Beijing;
School of Public Finance and Taxation, Capital University of Economics and Business Beijing
下载:  PDF (536KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 本文基于中国A股上市公司2009-2018年的数据,测算了企业价值对人民币汇率变动的敏感性。在此基础上,实证检验了汇率敏感性(企业价值对汇率变动的敏感程度)对企业贷款利率的影响和作用机制。研究发现:汇率敏感性与企业贷款利率之间显著正相关,且这种关系在拥有境外收入、境外投资和使用外汇衍生品的公司中更加显著。进一步分析发现,对于存在密切银企关系、较大的股东债权人利益冲突以及抵押品价值较低的企业,汇率敏感性与贷款利率之间的正相关关系更加显著。本文研究结果表明,随着我国市场化改革的进一步深化,贷款利率将会更加显著地反映企业的汇率敏感性特征。这种效应对于存在海外业务、银行更了解借款公司信息,以及违约可能性更高的公司更加明显。本文研究对于增强我国企业应对汇率风险能力,完善金融机构风险定价能力,引导金融机构服务实体企业具有一定参考意义。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
何青
刘尔卓
关键词:  汇率敏感性  贷款利率  境外收入  境外子公司  外汇衍生品    
Summary:  Since the 2005 reform, the RMB exchange rate has been market-oriented, fluctuating in a wide band against the world's major currencies. The “8·11 Exchange Rate Reform” of 2015 streamlined the RMB mid-price mechanism further, switching the RMB/USD exchange rate from one-way to two-way movement, so that the market now plays a decisive role in the RMB exchange rate. The RMB exchange rate is more elastic at a reasonable equilibrium level. As the RMB exchange rate has become more flexible, the impact of RMB exchange rate fluctuations on firms' performance has grown. Especially in recent years, because of increased trade frictions between China and the U.S., RMB exchange rate fluctuations have increased. Chinese enterprises have become increasingly sensitive to exchange rate risk, a material factor affecting their operations (He et al., 2021a). Thus, it is critical to mitigate the adverse impact of exchange rate risk on businesses.
In a bank-dominated financial system, Chinese enterprises rely heavily on bank loans for funds. Loan rates directly affect their investment decisions, which in turn affect their performance and long-term competitiveness (He et al., 2017). The importance of loans makes bank credit a major channel through which exchange rate sensitivity affects businesses. However, few scholars have focused on the relationship between exchange rate exposure and business loan rates. Because of rising exchange rate uncertainty and successive reforms of the interest rate system, a full clarification of this relationship will benefit Chinese enterprises in hedging exchange rate risk and financial institutions in pricing the risk.
This paper investigates the impact of exchange rate exposure on business loan interest rates using data from A-share listed companies in China from 2009-2018. The findings show that there is a significant positive correlation between exchange rate exposure and corporate loan interest rates. The positive relationship between negative exchange rate exposure and corporate loan interest rates is stronger than the positive relationship between positive exchange rate exposure and corporate loan interest rates, indicating that corporate loan interest rates better reflect the potential loan default risk associated with exchange rate exposure, particularly negative exchange rate exposure. A moderation effect test shows that the positive relationship between exchange rate exposure and corporate loan interest rates is more significant for companies with higher foreign income, more investment in foreign subsidiaries, and more use of foreign exchange derivatives. This suggests that Chinese companies have poor risk diversification in their foreign operations and may misuse foreign exchange derivatives. The basic findings remain robust to the use of the generalized method of moments estimation (GMM), the inclusion of alternative indicators, and different group regressions.
We further compare the heterogeneity of the relationship between exchange rate exposure and corporate lending rates across different bank-firm relationships, different collateral values, and firms with different shareholder-creditor conflicts of interest to explore the mechanisms by which exchange rate exposure affects corporate lending rates. We find that the positive relationship between exchange rate exposure and corporate loan interest rates is more significant under closer bank-firm relationships and more intense shareholder-creditor conflicts of interest. Under lesser collateral value, the positive relationship between exchange rate exposure and corporate loan interest rate is even stronger.
The contributions of this paper are as follows. First, it is the first to demonstrate the extent and mechanism of the impact of exchange rate exposure on corporate loan interest rates in China. The research results can help commercial banks cope with exchange rate risks, reduce financing costs in the credit market, and guide financial institutions to serve the real economy. Second, this paper explores the mechanism by which exchange rate exposure affects corporate loan interest rates based on the heterogeneity test. Focusing on the U.S. market, Francis and Hunter (2012) explored the relationship between exchange rate exposure and lending rates; however, the influence mechanism remains unclear. Our paper further discusses the moderating effects of firms' foreign operations, investments, and use of foreign exchange derivatives on their exchange rate exposure and lending rates. This paper also uses empirical evidence to explain the mechanism of the effect of exchange rate exposure on loan interest rates from three perspectives: the bank-firm relationship, firms' collateral value, and shareholder-creditor conflict of interest.
Keywords:  Exchange Rate Exposure    Loan Interest Rates    Overseas Revenue    Offshore Subsidiary    Foreign Exchange Derivatives
JEL分类号:  O24   G30   G15  
基金资助: * 本文感谢国家社科基金重大项目“推动建立国际宏观经济政策协调机制研究”(项目号:20ZDA053)、国家社科基金重点项目“中国资本市场汇率风险研究”(项目号:19AJY028)资助。感谢南开大学金融学院刘澜飚教授和中国金融论坛·第十一届《金融研究》论坛等专家评委的宝贵建议。感谢匿名审稿人的建设性意见,文责自负。
通讯作者:  刘尔卓,经济学博士,讲师,首都经济贸易大学财政税务学院,E-mail:erzhuoliu@ruc.edu.cn.   
作者简介:  何 青,经济学博士,教授,中国人民大学财政金融学院、中国财政金融政策研究中心,E-mail:qinghe@ruc.edu.cn.
引用本文:    
何青, 刘尔卓. 汇率敏感性会影响企业贷款利率吗?——基于中国上市公司的分析[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 506(8): 132-151.
HE Qing, LIU Erzhuo. Does Exchange Rate Exposure Affect Firms' Loan Interest Rates? Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies. Journal of Financial Research, 2022, 506(8): 132-151.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2022/V506/I8/132
[1] 郭飞、游绘新和郭慧敏,2018,《为什么使用外币债务?——中国上市公司的实证证据》,《金融研究》第3期,第137~154页。
[2] 郝项超和梁琪,2019,《外汇风险对冲能否促进中国上市公司创新》,《世界经济》第9期,第151~172页。
[3] 何青、余吉双和涂永红,2019,《人民币与新兴市场货币的联动分析》,《金融评论》第5期,第5~17页。
[4] 宋全云、李晓和钱龙,2019,《经济政策不确定性与企业贷款成本》,《金融研究》第7期,第57~75页。
[5] 王雄元和曾敬,2019,《年报风险信息披露与银行贷款利率》,《金融研究》第1期,第54~71页。
[6] Allayannis George, Ihrig Jane and Weston James P. 2001. “Exchange-Rate Hedging: Financial Versus Operational Strategies”, American Economic Review, 91(2): 391~395.
[7] Ashraf Badar Nadeem and Shen Yinjie. 2019. “Economic Policy Uncertainty and Banks' Loan Pricing”,Journal of Financial Stability,Forthcoming.
[8] Brown Gregory W. 2001. “Managing Foreign Exchange Risk with Derivatives”, Journal of Financial Economics, 60(2-3): 401~448.
[9] Chakraborty Indraneel, Chava Sudheer and Ganduri Rohan. 2021. “Credit Default Swaps and Lender Incentives in Renegotiations of Bank Debt”, Working Paper.
[10] Choi Jongmoo Jay and Jiang Cao. 2009. “Does Multi-nationality Matter? Implications of Operational Hedging for the Exchange Risk Exposure”,Journal of Banking and Finance, 33(11): 1973~1982.
[11] Costello Anna M. 2019. “The Value of Collateral in Trade Finance”, Journal of Financial Economics, 134(1): 70~90.
[12] Fillat José L. and Garetto Stefania. 2015. “Risk, Returns, and Multinational Production”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 130(4): 2027~2073.
[13] Francis Bill B. and Hunter Delroy M. 2012. “Exchange Rate Exposure and The Cost of Debt: Evidence From Bank Loans”, Working Paper.
[14] Gilchrist Simon, Sim Jae W. and Zakrajšek Egon. 2014. “Uncertainty, Financial Frictions, and Investment Dynamics”, NBER Working Paper.
[15] He Qing, Liu Junyi and Zhang Ce. 2021a. “Exchange Rate Exposure and Its Determinants in China”, China Economic Review, 65: 1~19.
[16] He Qing, Xue Chang and Zhu Chenqi. 2017. “Financial Development and Patterns of Industrial Specialization:Evidence from China”, Review of Finance, 21(4): 1593~1638.
[17] Hutson Elaine and Laing Elaine. 2014. “Foreign Exchange Exposure and Multi-nationality”, Journal of Banking and Finance, 43: 97~113.
[18] Whited Toni M. and Wu Guojun. 2006. “Financial Constraints Risk”, The Review of Financial Studies, 19(2): 531~559.
[1] 邓伟, 宋敏, 刘敏. 借贷便利创新工具有效影响了商业银行贷款利率吗?[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 497(11): 60-78.
[2] 王雄元, 曾敬. 年报风险信息披露与银行贷款利率[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 463(1): 54-71.
[1] 王曦, 朱立挺, 王凯立. 我国货币政策是否关注资产价格?——基于马尔科夫区制转换BEKK多元GARCH模型[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 1 -17 .
[2] 刘勇政, 李岩. 中国的高速铁路建设与城市经济增长[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 18 -33 .
[3] 况伟大, 王琪琳. 房价波动、房贷规模与银行资本充足率[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 34 -48 .
[4] 祝树金, 赵玉龙. 资源错配与企业的出口行为——基于中国工业企业数据的经验研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 49 -64 .
[5] 陈德球, 陈运森, 董志勇. 政策不确定性、市场竞争与资本配置[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 65 -80 .
[6] 牟敦果, 王沛英. 中国能源价格内生性研究及货币政策选择分析[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 81 -95 .
[7] 高铭, 江嘉骏, 陈佳, 刘玉珍. 谁说女子不如儿郎?——P2P投资行为与过度自信[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 96 -111 .
[8] 吕若思, 刘青, 黄灿, 胡海燕, 卢进勇. 外资在华并购是否改善目标企业经营绩效?——基于企业层面的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 112 -127 .
[9] 姜军, 申丹琳, 江轩宇, 伊志宏. 债权人保护与企业创新[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 128 -142 .
[10] 刘莎莎, 孔高文. 信息搜寻、个人投资者交易与股价联动异象——基于股票送转的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 143 -157 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1