Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2022, Vol. 504 Issue (6): 189-206    
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
线上销售与未来股票收益
张然, 平帆, 汪荣飞
中国人民大学商学院,北京 100872;
中国投资有限责任公司,北京 100010
Online Sales and Expected Returns
ZHANG Ran, PING Fan, WANG Rongfei
Business School, Renmin University of China;
China Investment Corporation
下载:  PDF (790KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 本文通过分析相关上市公司在电商平台的线上销售数据,发现线上销售增长可以预测未来股票收益。根据线上销售增长率构建投资组合可以获得月均1.27%的超额收益,经三因子、五因子模型调整后收益率分别为1.40%和1.35%,并且该超额收益在较长时间内不会逆转。横截面回归结果显示,线上销售增长与未来股票收益显著正相关,并在控制其他市场异象因子后仍然显著。此外,本文还发现线上销售数据的预测能力主要集中在投资者关注有限、线上销售占比高以及套利成本高的公司,其投资价值来源于对公司未来基本面信息的预测能力。进一步研究表明,同时利用线上销售指标和营业收入指标进行投资可以获得更高的超额收益。在考虑业绩预告和业绩快报对线上销售指标预测能力的潜在影响后,结果依然稳健。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
张然
平帆
汪荣飞
关键词:  线上销售  股票收益  投资策略    
Summary:  E-commerce has become an important component and driving force of China's economic development. As a representative of the Internet economy, online sales show great potential. Against the background of the booming digital economy, this paper studies the value of online sales to predict future returns, using the sales data of the e-commerce platforms of listed companies.
Why do online sales predict expected returns? First, online sales data provide incremental information to financial reports. With the rapid development of Internet technology, online sales have become an increasingly important business model. As the proportion of companies' online sales continues to grow, online sales are increasingly relevant to the companies' overall revenue. Online sales information is also instantly available. Therefore, it provides more timely and granular information on company operating performance than traditional financial statement data.
Second, investors are not fully aware of the content of online sales information. According to the theory of limited investor attention, investors have limited time and energy, and they may not fully understand all of the available information in a timely manner, which creates a temporary pricing bias. The A-share market has a large proportion of individual investors and an intense, speculative atmosphere in which investors mainly pursue short-term interests and lack the non-financial information that reflects a firm's fundamentals. Because online sales information is costly, this information may not be fully acquired and understood by investors in the A-share market.
Using the online sales data of 275 companies from January 2015 to April 2020, this paper shows that online sales data predicts future returns. Hedge portfolios based on online sales growth earn a 1.27% monthly excess return. The three-factor and five-factor adjusted returns are 1.40% and 1.35%, respectively. The Fama and MacBeth (1973) regression results show that online sales growth is positively correlated with future stock returns when we control for other related factors.
To further illustrate the value of online sales, we investigate the predictability of online sales over a longer period. The results show that online sales predict stock returns for the next two months. The cross-sectional analyses show that the predictability of online sales is more pronounced for firms with limited investors' attention, a higher proportion of online sales and higher arbitrage cost. Furthermore, we find that the investment value of online sales stems from their ability to predict future firm fundamentals. Further analysis shows that combining online sales and operating revenue may earn higher expected returns. In the robustness test, the predictability of online sales is still significant when we consider the potential impact of management forecasts.
Our study builds on and contributes to two strands of the literature. First, from the perspective of online sales, this paper shows the informational content of non-financial data, and it is supplemental to traditional financial statement information. Research has documented the investment value of non-financial information, but no study has examined the ability of online sales to predict stock returns. This paper expands the literature by investigating online sales data, which is an important form of non-financial information. Second, our study enriches the investing strategy research by showing that online sales information has investment value and that investors may obtain abnormal returns by constructing hedge portfolios based on online sales. From the theory perspective, the market anomaly based on online sales information challenges the efficient market theory. We take advantage of the unique big data on online sales in China. Our results have important practical value for improving the efficiency of the Chinese stock market and protecting minority investors.
Keywords:  Online Sales    Stock Returns    Investment Strategies
JEL分类号:  G11 G12 M41  
基金资助: * 本文受到国家自然科学基金(批准号:71872007和71273013)、中国人民大学“中央高校建设世界一流大学(学科)和特色发展引导专项资金”(批准号:KYGJD2022007)、中国人民大学商学院境内外联合培养奖学金项目的支持。感谢匿名审稿人的宝贵意见,文责自负。
通讯作者:  平帆,会计学博士生,中国人民大学商学院,E-mail:pingfan@ruc.edu.cn.   
作者简介:  张然,会计学与计量经济学博士,教授,中国人民大学商学院,E-mail:zhangran@rmbs.ruc.edu.cn.
汪荣飞,会计学博士,中国投资有限责任公司,E-mail:cnwangrongfei@163.com.
引用本文:    
张然, 平帆, 汪荣飞. 线上销售与未来股票收益[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 504(6): 189-206.
ZHANG Ran, PING Fan, WANG Rongfei. Online Sales and Expected Returns. Journal of Financial Research, 2022, 504(6): 189-206.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2022/V504/I6/189
[1] 程新生、谭有超和刘建梅,2012,《非财务信息、外部融资与投资效率——基于外部制度约束的研究》,《管理世界》第7期,第137~150+188页。
[2] 何光辉、杨咸月和陈诗一,2012,《入世以来中国证券市场动态国际一体化研究》,《经济研究》第10期,第82~96页。
[3] 鞠雪楠、赵宣凯和孙宝文,2020,《跨境电商平台克服了哪些贸易成本?——来自“敦煌网”数据的经验证据》,《经济研究》第2期,第181~196页。
[4] 孔东民、刘莎莎、陈小林和邢精平,2015,《个体沟通、交易行为与信息优势:基于共同基金访问的证据》,《经济研究》第11期,第106~119+182页。
[5] 连立帅、朱松和陈关亭,2019,《资本市场开放、非财务信息定价与企业投资——基于沪深港通交易制度的经验证据》,《管理世界》第8期,第136~154页。
[6] 林虎、孙博和刘力,2013,《换手率波动、转售期权与股票横截面收益率》,《金融研究》第12期,第181~193页。
[7] 马述忠和房超,2020,《线下市场分割是否促进了企业线上销售——对中国电子商务扩张的一种解释》,《管理世界》第7期,第123~139页。
[8] 宋献中,2006,《论企业核心能力信息的自愿披露》,《会计研究》第2期,第47~52+97页。
[9] 田高良、田皓文、吴璇和吴其霖,2019,《经营业务竞争与股票收益——基于财务报告文本附注的分析》,《会计研究》第10期,第78~84页。
[10] 汪荣飞和张然,2018,《基本面分析在中国A股市场有用吗?——来自季度财务报表的证据》,《金融学季刊》第1期。
[11] 俞庆进和张兵,2012,《投资者有限关注与股票收益——以百度指数作为关注度的一项实证研究》,《金融研究》第8期,第152~165页。
[12] 赵涛、张智和梁上坤,2020,《数字经济、创业活跃度与高质量发展——来自中国城市的经验证据》,《管理世界》第10期,第65~76页。
[13] 钟凯、孙昌玲、王永妍和王化成,2018,《资本市场对外开放与股价异质性波动——来自“沪港通”的经验证据》,《金融研究》第7期,第174~192页。
[14] Amir, E., and B. Lev. 1996. “Value-relevance of Nonfinancial Information: The Wireless Communications Industry”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 22(1-3): 3~30.
[15] Barber, B. M., and M. N. Darrough. 1996. “Product Reliability and Firm Value: The Experience of American and Japanese Automakers, 1973-1992”, Journal of Political Economy, 105(5):1084~1099.
[16] Babenko, I., and R. Sen. 2016. “Do Nonexecutive Employees Have Valuable Information? Evidence from Employee Stock Purchase Plans”, Management Science, 62(7): 1843~2147.
[17] Beneish, M., C. M. Lee, and D. Nichols. 2015. “In Short Supply: Short-Sellers and Stock Returns”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 60(2-3): 33~57.
[18] Bushman, R. M., A. J. Smith. 2001. “Financial Accounting Information and Corporate Governance”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 32(1): 237~333.
[19] Carhart, M. M. 1997. “On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance”, The Journal of finance, 52(1): 57~82.
[20] Chen, H., P. De, Y. J. Hu, and B. Hwang. 2014. “Wisdom of Crowds: The Value of Stock Opinions Transmitted through Social Media”, The Review of Financial Studies, 27(5): 1367~1403.
[21] Edmans, A. 2011. “Does the Stock Market Fully Value Intangibles? Employee Satisfaction and Equity Prices”, Journal of Financial Economics, 101(3): 621~640.
[22] Fama, E. F., and K. R. French. 1993. “Common Risk Factors in the Returns on Stocks and Bonds”, Journal of Financial Economics, 33:3~56.
[23] Fama, E. F., and J. D. MacBeth. 1973. “Risk, Return, and Equilibrium: Empirical Tests”, Journal of Political Economy, 81(3): 607~636.
[24] Fama, E. F., and K. R. French. 2015. “A Five-factor Asset Pricing Model”, Journal of Financial Economics, 116(1): 1~22.
[25] Fang, L., and J. Peress. 2009. “Media Coverage and the Cross-section of Stock Returns”, The Journal of Finance, 64(5): 2023~2052.
[26] Green, T. C., R. Huang, Q. Wen, and D. Zhou. 2019. “Crowdsourced Employer Reviews and Stock Returns”, Journal of Financial Economics, 134(1): 236~251.
[27] Gul, F. A., J. Kim, and A. A. Qiu. 2010. “Ownership Concentration, Foreign Shareholding, Audit Quality and Stock Price Synchronicity: Evidence from China”, Journal of Financial Economics, 95(3): 425~442.
[28] Herskovic, B., B. Kelly, H. Lustig. 2016. “The Common Factor in Idiosyncratic Volatility: Quantitative Asset Pricing Implications”, Journal of Financial Economics, 119(2): 249~283.
[29] Hirshleifer, D., S. H. Teoh, and J. Yu. 2011. “Short Arbitrage, Return Asymmetry, and the Accrual Anomaly”, The Review of Financial Studies, 24(7): 2429~2461.
[30] Hou, K., M. A. V. Dijk, and Y. Zhang. 2012. “The Implied Cost of Capital: A New Approach”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 53(3): 504~526.
[31] Huang, J. 2018. “The Customer Knows Best: The Investment Value of Consumer Opinions”, Journal of Financial Economics, 128(1): 164~182.
[32] Hutton, A. P., A. J. Marcus, and H. Tehranian. 2009. “Opaque Financial Reports, R2, and Crash Risk”, Journal of Financial Economics, 94: 67~86.
[33] Jegadeesh, N., and S. Titman. 1993. “Returns to Buying Winners and Selling Losers: Implications for Stock Market Efficiency”, The Journal of Finance, 48(1): 65~91.
[34] Jiang, G., C. M. C. Lee, and H. Yue. 2010. “Tunneling Through Intercorporate Loans: The China Experience”, Journal of Financial Economics”, 98(1): 1~20.
[35] Lee C. M. C., S. T. Sun, R. Wang, and R. Zhang. 2019. “Technological Links and Predictable Returns”, Journal of Financial Economics, 132(3): 76~96.
[36] Lee, C. M. C., and B. Swaminathan. 2000. “Price Momentum and Trading Volume”, The Journal of Finance, 55(5): 2017~2069.
[37] McLean, R. D., and J. Pontiff. 2016. “Does Academic Research Destroy Stock Return Predictability?”, The Journal of Finance, 71(1): 5~32.
[38] Wurgler, J., and E. Zhuravskaya. 2002. “Does Arbitrage Flatten Demand Curves for Stocks?”, The Journal of Business, 75(4): 583~608.
[1] 康文津, 顾明. 杠杆投资者融资交易行为模式研究—— 来自A股市场的经验证据[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 493(7): 154-171.
[2] 宫晓莉, 熊熊. 波动溢出网络视角的金融风险传染研究[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 479(5): 39-58.
[3] 谢谦, 唐国豪, 罗倩琳. 上市公司综合盈利水平与股票收益[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 465(3): 189-207.
[4] 李科, 陆蓉, 夏翊, 胡凡. 基金经理更换、股票联动与股票价格[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 463(1): 188-206.
[5] 张然, 汪荣飞, 王胜华. 分析师修正信息、基本面分析与未来股票收益[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 445(7): 156-174.
[6] 江娇, 刘红忠, 曾剑平. 中国股票网络论坛的信息含量分析段[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 448(10): 178-192.
[7] 杨晓兰, 沈翰彬, 祝宇. 本地偏好、投资者情绪与股票收益率:来自网络论坛的经验证据[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 438(12): 143-158.
[8] 李心愉, 段志明. DC型商业养老基金的最优投资策略研究——基于递延型个人所得税的考虑[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 437(11): 128-141.
[1] 王曦, 朱立挺, 王凯立. 我国货币政策是否关注资产价格?——基于马尔科夫区制转换BEKK多元GARCH模型[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 1 -17 .
[2] 刘勇政, 李岩. 中国的高速铁路建设与城市经济增长[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 18 -33 .
[3] 况伟大, 王琪琳. 房价波动、房贷规模与银行资本充足率[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 34 -48 .
[4] 祝树金, 赵玉龙. 资源错配与企业的出口行为——基于中国工业企业数据的经验研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 49 -64 .
[5] 陈德球, 陈运森, 董志勇. 政策不确定性、市场竞争与资本配置[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 65 -80 .
[6] 牟敦果, 王沛英. 中国能源价格内生性研究及货币政策选择分析[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 81 -95 .
[7] 张晓宇, 徐龙炳. 限售股解禁、资本运作与股价崩盘风险[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 158 -174 .
[8] 孙淑伟, 梁上坤, 阮刚铭, 付宇翔. 高管减持、信息压制与股价崩盘风险[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 175 -190 .
[9] 李丹, 庞晓波, 方红生. 财政空间与中国政府债务可持续性[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 448(10): 1 -17 .
[10] 王丽艳, 马光荣. 帆随风动、人随财走?——财政转移支付对人口流动的影响[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 448(10): 18 -34 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1