Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2022, Vol. 504 Issue (6): 16-35    
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
公开市场操作与利率期限结构行为——基于混频数据信息的研究视角
尚玉皇, 李炜祺, 董青马
西南财经大学中国金融研究院, 四川成都 611130
Open Market Operation and the Term Structure of Interest Rates: Evidence from Mixed-Frequency Data
SHANG Yuhuang, LI Weiqi, DONG Qingma
Institute of Chinese Financial Studies, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics
下载:  PDF (2490KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 在混频数据信息环境中,精准识别公开市场操作(央行政策利率)和国债收益率曲线(基准利率体系)之间的关联机制至关重要,其影响了货币政策期限结构传导的有效性。本文在混频Nelson-Siegel(N-S)利率期限结构模型框架下,引入央行政策利率,揭示公开市场操作与利率期限结构(水平、斜率、曲度)因子之间的作用机制。实证结果表明:混频数据信息条件下,引入的公开市场操作信息显著改进国债收益率曲线的拟合效果;斜率因子冲击对公开市场操作具有显著的正向影响,而利率期限结构因子对政策调控的反应不敏感。进一步研究表明,2015年以来,公开市场操作对斜率因子的影响逐渐扩大,政策利率向国债收益率曲线的传导效率得到显著提高,我国现代货币政策框架日益健全。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
尚玉皇
李炜祺
董青马
关键词:  公开市场操作  利率期限结构  混频Nelson-Siegel模型  政策利率    
Summary:  China has already established a relatively comprehensive market-oriented interest rate system. The central bank releases monetary policy signals in its short-term open market operations interest rate and medium-term lending facility interest rate to guide market benchmark interest rate the Treasury bond yield curve. Interest rate liberalization has improved the term structure of interest rate formation, which indirectly affects the transmission of central bank-set interest rates to the bond market. Under China's open market operation, bonds are the facility with which the market adjusts liquidity according to the macroeconomic situation, and thereby guides the expected changes in market interest rates. It is essential to study the effectiveness of the transmission of short-term open market operations interest rates to the medium-and long-term bond yield curve.
In this paper, we summarize data from the second half of 2009 to the end of 2019, and divides this sample into two stages:In the former stage(2009.7-2014.12), open market operations were dominated by an alternation between forward and reverse repurchases.The latter stage(2015.1-2019.12) was dominated by reverse repurchase operations as the open market operation model was being regularized;and the relationship of treasury bond yields and open market interest rates is affected by macro circumstance. The key to explaining the above facts lies in analyzing the transmission of open market policy interest rates to the yield curve, understanding the relationship between open market operation and the behavior of the interest rate term structure, and exploring whether the mechanism governing this relationship changes with the business cycle.
There are mang researches on the impact of monetary policy on the bond yield curve (and the term structure factor) but few research on the impact of open market operation policies on the term structure of interest rates. Overseas studies find that monetary policy is the key link between the term structure of interest rates and the macroeconomy. Domestic scholars have different opinion on whether monetary policy can effectively adjust the term structure of interest rates. Some call for a single policy tool for open market operation, as they argue that the open market acts on the Treasury bond yield curve via liquidity effects and expected effects, and transmits short-term interest rates to long-term interest rates. In addition, the term structure of interest rates is a forward-looking economic indicator and thus contains abundant monetary policy information. However, studies do not focus on the transmission of open market operating interest rates to the yield curve under the theoretical framework of the term structure of interest rates.Further more they do not discuss the scenario of mixed-frequency data. Most studies also ignore the impact of structural changes, such as the economic policy cycle, on the transmission of monetary policy.
The main research conclusions of this study are as follows. First, under the condition of mixed-frequency data, the introduction of open market interest rate information significantly improves the fitting of the interest rate term structure factor and of the yield curve in each period of Treasury bonds.
Second, the transmission efficiency of short-term open market policy interest rates to the yield curve is low, and there is an asymmetric relation between open market operation policies and the term structure of interest rates. On the one hand, during the immature period of China's bond market, market were unable to form sufficient policy expectations for open market operations, resulting in a lag response in the transmission of policy changes to the yield curve. On the other hand, the level factor and the slope factor have a positive impact on the open market operation policy. It indicates that the macroeconomic forward-looking information contained in the rate term structure (especially the slope factor) is an important reference for the central bank.
Finally, with the gradual improvement of the monetary policy communication mechanism, the central bank's ability to guide and manage market expectations has been significantly improved. Moreover, the transmission channel from the open market interest rate to the yield curve has been effectively dredged, and the effect of open market interest rates on the term structure factors(especially the slope factor) has become increasingly prominent.
Keywords:  Open Market Operation    Term Structure    Mixed Frequency Nelson-Siegel Model    Policy Interest Rate
JEL分类号:  C32 E43 E52  
基金资助: * 本文感谢国家社科基金一般项目(20BJY255),国家社科基金重大项目(20&ZD081)的资助。感谢匿名审稿人的宝贵意见,文责自负。
通讯作者:  董青马,经济学博士,教授,西南财经大学中国金融研究院,E-mail:qmdong@swufe.edu.cn.   
作者简介:  尚玉皇,经济学博士,教授,西南财经大学中国金融研究院,金融安全协同创新中心,E-mail:syh@swufe.edu.cn.
李炜祺,经济学硕士,西南财经大学中国金融研究院,E-mail:liweiqi9710@163.com.
引用本文:    
尚玉皇, 李炜祺, 董青马. 公开市场操作与利率期限结构行为——基于混频数据信息的研究视角[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 504(6): 16-35.
SHANG Yuhuang, LI Weiqi, DONG Qingma. Open Market Operation and the Term Structure of Interest Rates: Evidence from Mixed-Frequency Data. Journal of Financial Research, 2022, 504(6): 16-35.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2022/V504/I6/16
[1] 费兆奇和杨晓龙,2020,《2020年货币政策的着力点分析》,《中国金融》第5期,第49~51页。
[2] 韩晓峰和陈师,2017,《中国利率期限结构对宏观经济政策的动态响应研究——基于DSGE框架下的宏观金融建模》,《现代财经:天津财经大学学报》第1期,第40~52页。
[3] 黄宪和王旭东,2015,《我国央行货币政策实施力度和节奏的规律及效果研究》,《金融研究》第11期,第15~32页。
[4] 金雯雯、陈亮、毛德勇和叶茜茜,2014,《利率期限结构内含的宏观经济信息——基于TVP-VAR模型的时变参数研究》,《经济评论》第5期,第123~147页。
[5] 林木材和牛霖琳,2020,《基于高频收益率曲线的中国货币政策传导分析》,《经济研究》第2期,第101~116页。
[6] 马骏和王红林,2014,《政策利率传导机制的理论模型》,《金融研究》第12期,第1~22页。
[7] 马骏、洪浩、贾彦东、张施杭胤、李宏瑾和安国俊,2016,《收益率曲线在货币政策传导中的作用》,中国人民银行工作论文。
[8] 尚玉皇、郑挺国和夏凯,2015,《宏观因子与利率期限结构:基于混频Nelson-Siegel模型》,《金融研究》第6期,第14~29页。
[9] 沈根祥,2011,《货币政策对利率期限结构的影响——基于动态Nelson-Siegel模型的实证分析》,《当代财经》第3期,第59~66页。
[10] 孙皓和石柱鲜,2011,《中国的货币政策与利率期限结构:基于宏观金融模型的研究途径》,《经济科学》第1期,第49~59页。
[11] 王志强和贺畅达,2012,《时变货币政策规则对利率期限结构的动态影响分析》,《宏观经济研究》第10期,第21~62页。
[12] 肖卫国和兰晓梅,2019,《公开市场操作、货币市场利率与利率走廊》,《武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》第4期,第163~172页。
[13] 徐忠,2017,《中国稳健货币政策的实践经验与货币政策理论的国际前沿》,《金融研究》第1期,第1~21页。
[14] 易纲,2021,《中国的利率体系与利率市场化改革》,《金融研究》第9期,第1~11页。
[15] 元惠萍、吴明州和刘堂勇,2018,《常备借贷便利与逆回购操作对货币市场利率的影响》,《财贸经济》第7期,第65~80页。
[16] 袁婧和薛伟,2012,《中国利率期限结构与货币政策联合建模的实证研究》,《统计研究》第2期,第42~47页。
[17] 郑挺国和王霞,2013,《中国经济周期的混频数据测度及实时分析》,《经济研究》第6期,第58~70页。
[18] 郑振龙和莫天瑜,2011,《政策利率引导市场利率的走势吗?——央票发行利率与央票市场利率双向互动关系研究》,《财贸经济》第1期,第49~136页。
[19] Ang, A., Boivin J., Sen D., and Rudy L. K. 2011. “Monetary Policy Shifts and the Term Structure”, Review of Economic Studies, 78(2):429~457.
[20] Athanasios, O., and Min Wei. 2011. “Evolving Macroeconomic Perceptions and the Term Structure of Interest Rates”, Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control, 36(2):239~254.
[21] Bjørnland, Hilde C. 2008. “Monetary Policy and Exchange Rate Interactions in a Small Open Economy”, Scand. J. of Economics, 110(1):197~221.
[22] Charles, L. Evans., and David A. Marshall. 2001. “Economic Determinants of the Nominal Treasury Yield Curve”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 54(7):1986~2003.
[23] Diebold, Francis X., and Canlin Li. 2006. “Forecasting the Term Structure of Government Bond Yields”, Journal of Econometrics, 130(2):337~364.
[24] Diebold, Francis X., Rudebusch Glenn D., and Boragan S. 2006. “The Macroeconomy and the Yield Curve: A Dynamic Latent Factor Approach”, Journal of Econometrics, 131(1-2):309~338.
[25] Estrella, A., and Mishkin Frederic S. 1995. “The Term Structure of Interest Rates and Its Role in Monetary Policy for The European Central Bank”, Research Paper, No.9526.
[26] Kim, S., and Roubini N. 2000. “Exchange Rate Anomalies in the Industrial Countries: A Solution with a Structural VAR Approach”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 45(3): 561~586.
[27] Lucio, S., and Daniel L. Thornton. 2003. “The Dynamic Relationship between the Federal Funds Rate and the Treasury Bill Rate: An Empirical Investigation”, Journal of Banking and Finance, 27(6):1079~1110.
[28] Nelson, Charles R., and Andrew Siegel F. 1987. “Parsimonious Modeling of Yield Curves”, The Journal of Business, 60(4):473~489.
[29] Ronald, H. Lange. 2013. “The Canadian Macroeconomy and the Yield Curve: A Dynamic Latent Factor Approach”, International Review of Economics and Finance, 27:261:274.
[30] Rudebusch, Glenn D., and Wu Tao. 2008. “A Macro-Finance Model of the Term Structure, Monetary Policy, and the Economy”, The Economic Journal, 118(530):906~926.
[31] Song, D. 2017. “Bond Market Exposures to Macroeconomic and Monetary Policy Risks”, Review of Finance Studies, 30(8):2761~2817.
[1] 李雪, 朱超, 易祯. 人口学特征与利率期限结构:老年社会平缓的收益率曲线[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 480(6): 96-113.
[2] 洪智武, 牛霖琳. 中国通货膨胀预期及其影响因素分析——基于混频无套利Nelson-Siegel利率期限结构扩展模型[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 486(12): 95-113.
[3] 牛霖琳, 林木材. 中国超长期国债的相对流动性溢价与收益率曲线的结构性建模[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 442(4): 17-31.
[1] 王曦, 朱立挺, 王凯立. 我国货币政策是否关注资产价格?——基于马尔科夫区制转换BEKK多元GARCH模型[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 1 -17 .
[2] 刘勇政, 李岩. 中国的高速铁路建设与城市经济增长[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 18 -33 .
[3] 况伟大, 王琪琳. 房价波动、房贷规模与银行资本充足率[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 34 -48 .
[4] 祝树金, 赵玉龙. 资源错配与企业的出口行为——基于中国工业企业数据的经验研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 49 -64 .
[5] 陈德球, 陈运森, 董志勇. 政策不确定性、市场竞争与资本配置[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 65 -80 .
[6] 牟敦果, 王沛英. 中国能源价格内生性研究及货币政策选择分析[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 81 -95 .
[7] 高铭, 江嘉骏, 陈佳, 刘玉珍. 谁说女子不如儿郎?——P2P投资行为与过度自信[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 96 -111 .
[8] 吕若思, 刘青, 黄灿, 胡海燕, 卢进勇. 外资在华并购是否改善目标企业经营绩效?——基于企业层面的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 112 -127 .
[9] 姜军, 申丹琳, 江轩宇, 伊志宏. 债权人保护与企业创新[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 128 -142 .
[10] 刘莎莎, 孔高文. 信息搜寻、个人投资者交易与股价联动异象——基于股票送转的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 143 -157 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1