Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2022, Vol. 502 Issue (4): 97-113    
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
消费者投诉冲击与保险公司业绩
卓志, 张晓涵
西南财经大学金融学院, 四川成都 611130
Insurance Consumer Complaints and Insurance Company Performance
ZHUO Zhi, ZHANG Xiaohan
School of Finance, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics
下载:  PDF (775KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 保险消费者权益保护是保险监管的目标之一,也是保险市场健康发展与成熟的标志。本文以中国保险监管部门开通首个保险消费者投诉热线作为外生政策变量,利用2009-2018年中国163家保险公司数据设计准自然实验,研究了保险消费者投诉热线的外部监督职能及其对保险公司业绩的影响。研究结果表明:保险消费者投诉热线的开通显著降低了消费者权益保护水平更差的保险公司业绩;佣金激励水平越高,保险消费者投诉冲击对消费权益保护水平更差的保险公司业绩的负向影响越显著;区分人身保险公司与财产保险公司后发现,保险消费者投诉冲击对消费者权益保护水平更差的财产保险公司业绩的负向影响更显著。本文研究成果丰富了消费者权益与保险公司治理理论,对保险消费者权益保护实践和保险市场高质量发展具有启示意义。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
卓志
张晓涵
关键词:  消费者投诉  消费者权益保护  保险公司业绩  准自然实验    
Summary:  With the transformation of China's economy from high-speed development to high-quality development, China's insurance industry has gradually stepped into the stage of high-quality development. In the long-term development of China's insurance industry, problems such as information asymmetry, moral hazard, and adverse selection always exist in the insurance market, and insurance disputes frequently occur due to the inconsistency between the maximum utility goal of consumers and the maximum benefit goal of companies. The objective existence of insurance consumers' rights and interests infringement has hindered the high-quality development of the insurance industry. Insurance consumer protection is one of the goals of insurance regulation and also a symbol of healthy development.
In the past, research on consumer rights was mainly studied in insurance consumer rights system and legal system, while lacking empirical research. This paper studies the effect of the insurance consumer complaint hotline on insurance Company performance. This study complements the literature on consumer protection and corporate finance in the field of insurance. Based on the panel data of 163 Insurance companies in China from 2009 to 2018, a quasi-natural experiment was designed using the insurance consumer complaint hotline as an exogenous policy variable. Specifically, we establish a difference-in-differences (DID) model to investigate the impact of the insurance consumer complaint hotline on insurance company performance and its influence mechanism. The individual grouping variable of this paper is divided based on the data of insurance letters and visits in 2011, in which the insurance companies with a larger number of letters and visits in 2011 are regarded as those with poorer protection of consumer rights and interests. The time grouping variable in this paper is divided based on the year 2012. The time grouping variable multiplied by the individual grouping variable is the DID variable, which is also the key independent variable. The main dependent variables in this paper are proxies of company performance, including sales, market share, and ROA.
The results show that the opening of the insurance consumer complaint hotline significantly reduces the performance of insurance companies with poor consumer rights and interests protection. Further, this study finds that the higher the commission incentive level, the more significant the negative impact of insurance consumer complaints on company performance. Unsuitable high commission system is easy to make insurance sales staff ignore consumer rights and interests, making it difficult to eliminate the sales misleading phenomenon. The high commission is the promotion factor of insurance consumer's rights infringement and increases the difficulty of insurance consumer's rights protection. Through heterogeneity analysis, this paper finds that the results between life insurance companies and property insurance companies are different. Although life insurance companies are also affected by consumer complaints, the consumer complaint hotline has a more significant negative impact on property insurance companies which with poor consumer rights and interests protection.
The results enrich the theory of consumer rights and insurance company governance and have important guiding significance for the practice of insurance consumer protection and the high-quality development of the insurance market.
Keywords:  Insurance Consumer Conplaints    Insurance Consumer Protection    Insurance Company Performance    Quasi-natural Experiment
JEL分类号:  D18   G3   G22  
基金资助: * 本文感谢国家社科基金重点项目(16AZD019)的资助。感谢匿名审稿人的宝贵意见,文责自负。
通讯作者:  张晓涵,经济学博士研究生,西南财经大学金融学院,E-mail:zxiaohan94@qq.com.   
作者简介:  卓 志,经济学博士(后),教授,西南财经大学,E-mail:zzhuo@swufe.edu.cn.
引用本文:    
卓志, 张晓涵. 消费者投诉冲击与保险公司业绩[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 502(4): 97-113.
ZHUO Zhi, ZHANG Xiaohan. Insurance Consumer Complaints and Insurance Company Performance. Journal of Financial Research, 2022, 502(4): 97-113.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2022/V502/I4/97
[1]董成武,2017,《基于委托代理理论的金融消费者权益保护机制研究》,中国农业大学。
[2]杜湘红,2004,《浅议消费者对公司治理的影响》,《消费经济》第6期,第50~52页。
[3]郝臣、付金薇和李维安,2018,《国外保险公司治理研究最新进展——基于2008~2017年文献的综述》,《保险研究》第4期,第112~127页。
[4]贾立文和万鹏,2019,《保险科技对财产保险公司业绩影响的实证分析——基于DID模型》,《江汉学术》第1期,第70~77页。
[5]李慧聪、李维安和郝臣,2015,《公司治理监管环境下合规对治理有效性的影响——基于中国保险业数据的实证研究》,《中国工业经济》第8期,第98~113页。
[6]李蕾蕾和盛丹,2018,《地方环境立法与中国制造业的行业资源配置效率优化》,《中国工业经济》第7期,第136~154页。
[7]李艺华和郝臣,2019,《外部治理对保险公司风险承担的影响研究——基于外部监管和产品市场竞争视角》,《保险研究》第12期,第65~80页。
[8]凌士显和白锐锋,2017,《董事高管责任保险的公司治理作用——基于双重代理成本的视角》,《财贸经济》第12期,第95~110页。
[9]刘兴丽和赵磊,2013,《我国保险消费者权益保护机制研究》,《海南金融》第3期,第58~62页。
[10]刘迎霜,2011,《我国金融消费者权益保护路径探析——兼论对美国金融监管改革中金融消费者保护的借鉴》,《现代法学》第3期,第91~98页。
[11]刘玉焕和邵全权,2013,《营销员规模、佣金成本与寿险经营绩效》,《上海财经大学学报:哲学社会科学版》第4期,第65~72页。
[12]马丽波和倪慧强,2015,《外部监管、社会责任与企业绩效》,《东北财经大学学报》第2期,第67~72页。
[13]盛丹和刘灿雷,2016,《外部监管能够改善国企经营绩效与改制成效吗》,《经济研究》第10期,第97~111页。
[14]宋卉,2017,《论可回溯管理制度对保险消费者权益的促进》,《重庆社会科学》第12期,第87~92页。
[15]王湘红、宋爱娴和孙文凯,2018,《消费者保护与消费——来自国家工商总局投诉数据的证据》,《金融研究》第6期,第123~137页。
[16]徐思、何晓怡和钟凯,2019,《“一带一路”倡议与中国企业融资约束》,《中国工业经济》第7期,第155~173页。
[17]郑伟,2012,《保险消费者权益保护:机制框架、国际经验与政策建议》,《保险研究》第3期,第3~11页。
[18]周开国、应千伟和钟畅,2016,《媒体监督能够起到外部治理的作用吗?——来自中国上市公司违规的证据》,《金融研究》第6期,第193~206页。
[19]朱南军和王文健,2017,《公司治理与风险承担——来自中国保险业的证据》,《经济科学》第2期,第101~115页。
[20]卓志和孟祥艳,2018,《寿险公司规模、产品多元化与经营效率》,《经济管理》第6期,第174~190页。
[21]Begley T. A., and A. Purnanandam. 2017. “Design of Financial Securities: Empirical Evidence from Private-label RMBS Deals”, The Review of Financial Studies, 30(1):120~161.
[22]Bruneau C., and N. Sghaier. 2015. “Cyclicity in the French Property-Liability Insurance Industry: New Findings Over the Recent Period”, Journal of Risk and Insurance, 82(2):433~462.
[23]Cengiz H.2016.“ Corporate Governance and Firm Profitability: Evidence from Turkey”, International Journal of Trade, Economics and Finance, 7(6): 229~241.
[24]Cheng J, W. Qian, and D.M. Reeb. 2016. “Financial Intermediaries and Consumer Complaints”, Working Paper, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics and National University of Singapore.
[25]Dou Y., and Y. Roh. 2020. “Public Disclosure and Consumer Financial Protection”, SSRN, No.3647491.
[26]Felício J A., and Rodrigues R. 2015. “Organizational Factors and Customers' Motivation Effect on Insurance Companies' Performance”, Journal of Business Research, 68(7):1622~1629.
[27]Fier S. G., and A.P. Liebenberg. 2013. “Market Reaction to Potential Federal Regulation in the Insurance Industry”, Journal of Insurance Issues, 36(1):1~34.
[28]Gilly M C., and Gelb B D. 1982. “Post-purchase Consumer Processes and the Complaining Consumer”, Journal of Consumer Research, 9(3):323~328.
[29]Hardwick P., and M. Adams. 2002. “Firm Size and Growth in the United Kingdom Life Insurance Industry”, Journal of Risk and Insurance, 69(4):577~593.
[30]Heckman J J., Ichimura H., and Todd P. 1998. “Matching as an Econometric Evaluation Estimator”, The review of Economic Studies, 65(2):261-294.
[31]Inderst R., and M. Ottaviani. 2012. “How (not) to Pay for Advice: A Framework for Consumer Financial Protection”, Journal of Financial Economics, 105(2):393~411.
[32]Jacobson L S, LaLonde R J, and Sullivan D G. 1993. “Earnings Losses of Displaced Workers”, The American Economic Review, 83(4):685~709.
[33]Kallamu B S., and Saat N A M. 2015. “Audit Committee Attributes and Firm Performance: Evidence from Malaysian Finance Companies”, Asian Review of Accounting, 23(3):206~231.
[34]Raval D. 2020. “Whose Voice Do We Hear in the Marketplace? Evidence from Consumer Complaining Behavior”, Marketing Science, 39(1):168~187.
[1] 徐思, 潘昕彤, 林晚发. “一带一路”倡议与公司债信用利差[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 500(2): 135-152.
[2] 诸竹君, 黄先海, 王煌. 交通基础设施改善促进了企业创新吗?——基于高铁开通的准自然实验[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 473(11): 153-169.
[3] 陈胜蓝, 刘晓玲. 中国城际高铁与商业信用供给——基于准自然实验的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 472(10): 117-134.
[1] 李丹, 庞晓波, 方红生. 财政空间与中国政府债务可持续性[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 448(10): 1 -17 .
[2] 纪志宏, 曹媛媛. 信用风险溢价还是市场流动性溢价:基于中国信用债定价的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 440(2): 1 -10 .
[3] 纪敏, 严宝玉, 李宏瑾. 杠杆率结构、水平和金融稳定——理论分析框架和中国经验[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 440(2): 11 -25 .
[4] 况伟大, 王琪琳. 房价波动、房贷规模与银行资本充足率[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 34 -48 .
[5] 吕若思, 刘青, 黄灿, 胡海燕, 卢进勇. 外资在华并购是否改善目标企业经营绩效?——基于企业层面的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 112 -127 .
[6] 尹力博, 吴优. 离岸人民币区域影响力研究——基于信息溢出的视角[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 446(8): 1 -18 .
[7] 祝树金, 赵玉龙. 资源错配与企业的出口行为——基于中国工业企业数据的经验研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 49 -64 .
[8] 胡婷, 惠凯, 彭红枫. 异常波动停牌对股价波动性和流动性的影响研究——来自我国取消异常波动停牌的自然实验[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 447(9): 146 -160 .
[9] 闫先东, 高文博. 中央银行信息披露与通货膨胀预期管理——我国央行信息披露指数的构建与实证检验[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 446(8): 35 -49 .
[10] 陈德球, 陈运森, 董志勇. 政策不确定性、市场竞争与资本配置[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 65 -80 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1