Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2022, Vol. 500 Issue (2): 189-206    
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
媒体记者与公司管理层沟通提高了新闻报道质量吗?——基于公司调研活动的实证研究
汝毅, 呙昊婧, 薛健
中国人民大学商学院,北京 100872;
北京工商大学商学院,北京 100048;
清华大学经济管理学院,北京 100084
Does Communication Between Media Journalists and Firm Executives Improve the Quality of News Reports? An Empirical Study Based on Company Visits
RU Yi, GUO Haojing, XUE Jian
Business School, Renmin University of China;
Business School, Beijing Technology and Business University;
School of Economics and Management, Tsinghua University
下载:  PDF (533KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 本文以2007-2019年媒体记者参与的上市公司调研活动作为研究对象,实证检验了媒体记者与公司管理层直接沟通对媒体报道质量的影响。实证结果表明,调研媒体的报道语气整体更加乐观,集中体现在公司公布坏消息的情形之下。此外,仅当公司公布好消息时调研媒体的报道信息含量更高,而当公司公布坏消息时调研媒体的报道信息含量与非调研媒体没有显著差别。以上结果表明,媒体记者同管理层沟通后信息的阐述方式视调研所获取信息的性质而有所不同。进一步研究发现,分析师、机构投资者或者记者同行的共同参与,以及良好的公司信息环境能够帮助调研媒体改善新闻报道质量。参与公司调研是媒体维持和拓展经济业务的重要途径。在使用处理效应模型纠正变量自选择偏差及一系列其他稳健性检验之后,研究结论仍然成立。本文为媒体记者和上市公司管理层直接沟通所带来的经济后果提供了经验证据。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
汝毅
呙昊婧
薛健
关键词:  公司调研  记者参与  新闻报道  乐观性偏差  信息含量    
Summary:  Many studies explore the role of media as an information intermediary and corporate monitor in the capital market. However, studies increasingly show that the media's lack of objectivity and independence can undermine their normal functions. In addition, studies mainly focus on the economic consequences and restrictive factors of news reporting and ignore its production process in which journalists write and compile news articles. The prerequisite for high-quality news articles is that journalists should obtain sufficient information from society and then analyze and interpret their findings accurately and promptly. Therefore, the types of information source channels and their effectiveness are worthy of in-depth discussion.
Direct communication with firm managers should be one of the most valuable information sources for financial journalists. However, it is not clear whether journalists can improve the quality of their reporting through this activity. On the one hand, journalists may obtain crucial information and publish more accurate news reports with higher information content, which is called the “information discovery hypothesis”. On the other hand, journalists may alter the tone of their news reports to satisfy the needs of firm managers, leading to more optimistic tone and lower information content, which is called the “reporting bias hypothesis”.
China's special institutional background provides an ideal setting for our study. The Shenzhen Stock Exchange requires listed companies to increase communication with investors, analysts, media, and other market participants through investor relations activities. Using a sample of journalists from prestigious media outlets who visited listed companies from 2007 to 2019 and implementing a difference-in-differences method, we examine whether direct communication between media journalists and firm managers affects the quality of news reporting. The site visit data are obtained from the Corporate Site Visit Database (CSVD) developed by Datago Technology Limited and the investor relations activity database of the China Stock Market and Accounting Research (CSMAR).
Our results show that the tone of visiting media is more optimistic, especially when companies release bad news. In addition, the visiting media only increase the information content of their news reports when companies release good news. There is no significant difference in information content between the visiting and nonvisiting media in the case of bad news. These results indicate that the way media journalists interpret information after communicating with management varies with the nature of the information obtained. Our analyses show that the involvement of analysts, institutional investors, or peer journalists and a richer information environment can effectively restrain the optimism bias of visiting media. Company visits are an important channel through which the media are more likely to establish or maintain business relationships. Our conclusions are still valid after using a treatment effect model to address self-selection bias, in addition to a series of other robustness tests.
Our study supplements the relevant literature on the factors reshaping the role of media in society. Studies mostly discuss the factors affecting the quality of media reports from the perspectives of journalists, readers, advertisers, and governments, but few studies explore the process and channels through which media obtain information. Corporate site visits are one of the most important ways to obtain information. However, this process and its economic consequences remain locked in a “black box”. Our study empirically assesses the effectiveness of journalists' communications to obtain information from firm managers. The results show that in terms of the nature of news about site visits, the reactions of visiting journalists after communicating with firm managers are asymmetrical and their optimism bias emerges only when firms release bad news.
Our study also enriches the literature on communication between capital market participants and firm managers. Market participants can obtain valuable information from corporate site visits and make better decisions. To the best of our knowledge, few studies illuminate the benefits or costs for visiting journalists. Our results show that when firms release bad news, the quality of visiting journalists' news reporting is impaired. Today, we find that the standards for reporting quality and the responsibilities of journalists during investor relations activities are not clear or specific. The conclusions of our study should attract the attention of regulators and investors.
Keywords:  Company Visits    Journalists' Participation    News Reports    Optimism Bias    Information Content
JEL分类号:  G14   L82   M41  
基金资助: * 本文感谢国家自然科学基金面上项目(批准号71972115)、国家自然科学基金青年基金项目(批准号72102224)、中国博士后科学基金面上项目的资助。感谢匿名审稿人的宝贵意见,文责自负。
通讯作者:  呙昊婧,博士,讲师,北京工商大学商学院,E-mail:guohj@btbu.edu.cn.   
作者简介:  汝毅,博士,讲师,中国人民大学商学院,E-mail:ruyi@rmbs.ruc.edu.cn.
薛健,博士,长聘教授,清华大学经济管理学院,E-mail:xuejian@sem.tsinghua.edu.cn.
引用本文:    
汝毅, 呙昊婧, 薛健. 媒体记者与公司管理层沟通提高了新闻报道质量吗?——基于公司调研活动的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 500(2): 189-206.
RU Yi, GUO Haojing, XUE Jian. Does Communication Between Media Journalists and Firm Executives Improve the Quality of News Reports? An Empirical Study Based on Company Visits. Journal of Financial Research, 2022, 500(2): 189-206.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2022/V500/I2/189
[1]李菁,2020,《财经媒体写作指南》,中国友谊出版公司2020年6月第一版。
[2]谭劲松和林雨晨,2016,《机构投资者对信息披露的治理效应——基于机构调研行为的证据》,《南开管理评论》第5期,第115~126+138页。
[3]汪昌云和武佳薇,2015,《媒体语气、投资者情绪与IPO定价》,《金融研究》第9期,第174~189页。
[4]王木之和李丹,2016,《资本市场中的媒体公关:来自我国企业IPO的经验证据》,《管理世界》第7期,第121~136页。
[5]薛健和汝毅,2020,《信息披露业务关系与新闻报道质量》,《管理世界》第10期,第139~156页。
[6]Ahern, K.R., and D. Sosyura, 2015, “Rumor has it: Sensationalism in financial media”, Review of Financial Studies,28 (7), pp.2050~2093.
[7]Bowen, R. M., S. Dutta, S. Tang, and P. Zhu, 2018, “Inside the “Black Box” of Private in-house Meetings”, Review of Accounting Studies,23(2), pp.487~527.
[8]Bowen, R. M., S. Dutta, S. Tang, and P. Zhu, 2019, “Managing the Demand for Information from Lnstitutional Investors through Private in-house Meetings”, Working paper.
[9]Call, A. C., S. A. Emett, E. Maksymov, and N. Y. Sharp, 2021, “Meet the Press: Survey Evidence on Financial Journalists as Information Intermediaries”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, forthcoming.
[10]Cheng, Q., F. Du, X. Wang, and Y. Wang, 2016, “Seeing is Believing: Analysts' Corporate Site Visits”, Review of Accounting Studies,21(4), pp.1~42.
[11]Cheng, Q., F. Du, X. Wang, and Y. Wang, 2019, “Do Corporate Site Visits Impact Stock Prices? ” ,Contemporary Accounting Research,36(1), pp.359~388.
[12]Dyck, A., N. Volchkova, and L. Zingales, 2008, “The Corporate Governance Role of the Media: Evidence from Russia”, The Journal of Finance,63(3), pp.1093~1135.
[13]Dyck, A., A. Morse, and L. Zingales, 2010, “Who Blows the Whistle on Ccorporate Fraud?” ,The Journal of Finance,65(6), pp.2213~2253.
[14]Gentzkow, M., and J. M. Shapiro, 2006, “Media Bias and Reputation,” Journal of Political Economy,114(2), pp.280~316.
[15]Guest, N., 2021, “The Information Role of the Media in Earnings News”, Journal of Accounting Research,59(3),pp.1021~1076.
[16]Gurun, U. G., and A. W. Butler, 2012, “Don't Believe the Hype: Local Media Slant,Local Advertising, and Firm Value”, The Journal of Finance,67(2), pp.561~597.
[17]Lennox, C.S., J. R. Francis, and Z. Wang, 2012, “Selection Models in Accounting Research”, The Accounting Review,87(2), pp.589~616.
[18]Li, R., 2013, “Media Corruption: A Chinese Characteristic”, Journal of Business Ethics,116(2), pp.297~310.
[19]Li, C., 2014, “The Hidden Face of the Media: How Financial Journalists Produce Information”, Working paper.
[20]Miller, G. S., 2006, “The Press as a Watchdog for Accounting Fraud”, Journal of Accounting Research,44(5), pp.1001~1033.
[21]Mullainathan, S. and A. Shleifer, 2005, “The Market For News”, American Economic Review,95(4), pp.1031~1053.
[22]Patterson,E. T., 2013, “Informing the News,”, New York, NY: Vintage Books.
[23]Piotroski,J. D, T. J. Wong, and T. Zhang, 2017, “Political Bias in Corporate News: The Role of Conglomeration Reform in China”, Journal of Law and Economics,60(1), pp.173~207.
[24]Reuter, J. and E. Zitzewitz, 2006, “Do Ads Influence Editors? Advertising and Bias in the Financial Media,” Quarterly Journal of Economics,121(1), pp.197~227.
[25]Ru, Y., J. Xue, Y. Zhang, and X. Zhou, 2020, “Social Connections Between Media and Firm Executives and the Properties of Media Reporting”, Review of Accounting Studies, 25(3), pp.963~1001.
[26]Verrecchia, R. E., 1983, “Discretionary Disclosure”, Journal of Accounting and Economics,5, pp.179~194.
[27]You J., B. Zhang, and L. Zhang, 2018, “Who Captures the Power of the Pen?” ,The Review of Financial Studies,31(1), pp.42~96.
[1] 史永东, 郑世杰, 袁绍锋. 中债估值识别了债券信用风险吗?——基于跳跃视角的实证分析[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 493(7): 115-133.
[2] 倪骁然, 顾明. 资本市场国际影响力提升效应研究——来自A股纳入明晟(MSCI)新兴市场指数的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 479(5): 189-206.
[3] 郑振龙, 黄珊珊, 郭博洋. 外汇期权信息含量与在岸离岸市场效率[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 472(10): 21-39.
[4] 陈康, 刘琦. 股价信息含量与投资-股价敏感性——基于融资融券的准自然实验[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 459(9): 126-142.
[5] 徐巍, 陈冬华. 自媒体披露的信息作用——来自新浪微博的实证证据[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 429(3): 157-173.
[6] 邓柏峻, 李仲飞, 梁权熙. 境外股东持股与股票流动性[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 437(11): 142-157.
[7] 邵新建, 何明燕, 江萍, 薛熠, 廖静池. 媒体公关、投资者情绪与证券发行定价[J]. 金融研究, 2015, 423(9): 190-207.
[1] 王曦, 朱立挺, 王凯立. 我国货币政策是否关注资产价格?——基于马尔科夫区制转换BEKK多元GARCH模型[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 1 -17 .
[2] 牟敦果, 王沛英. 中国能源价格内生性研究及货币政策选择分析[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 81 -95 .
[3] 王丽艳, 马光荣. 帆随风动、人随财走?——财政转移支付对人口流动的影响[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 448(10): 18 -34 .
[4] 刘勇政, 李岩. 中国的高速铁路建设与城市经济增长[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 18 -33 .
[5] 吴超鹏, 张媛. 风险投资对上市公司股利政策影响的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 447(9): 178 -191 .
[6] 李建军, 马思超. 债券违约对涉事信用评级机构的影响:基于中国信用债市场违约事件的分析[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 441(3): 116 -129 .
[7] 彭方平, 欧阳志刚, 展凯, 刘良. 我国落入债务陷阱了吗?——理论模型与经验证据[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 440(2): 70 -83 .
[8] 龙海明, 王志鹏. 征信系统、法律权利保护与银行信贷[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 440(2): 117 -130 .
[9] 王兵, 戴敏, 武文杰. 环保基地政策提高了企业环境绩效吗?——来自东莞市企业微观面板数据的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 442(4): 143 -160 .
[10] 李政. “811汇改”提高了人民币汇率中间价的市场基准地位吗?[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 442(4): 1 -16 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1