Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2026, Vol. 555 Issue (9): 114-132    
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
银行金融科技创新与实体经济投资“扩量提质”:信贷逻辑与服务边界
彭红枫, 张景静
Bank FinTech and the “Quantity Expansion and Quality Improvement” of Real Economy Investment: Credit Mechanisms and Service Boundaries
PENG Hongfeng, ZHANG Jingjing
School of Finance, Shandong University of Finance and Economics
下载:  PDF (582KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 本文基于银企匹配样本,采用多方法交叉验证识别银行专利测度银行金融科技创新,进而考察其如何影响客户企业投资。研究发现,投资数量层面,银行金融科技创新通过提升信贷可得性与延长信贷期限的融资优化机制,以及抑制信贷资金引致的增持现金及金融资产的监督机制,显著促进客户企业投资。投资质量层面,银行金融科技创新的融资优化机制有助于缓解投资不足企业的非效率投资,但整体没有通过强化信贷监督提升企业投资效率。原因在于,银行金融科技创新赋能下的偏向性信贷配置使低风险低生产率企业获得了更多授信,这削弱银行实施信贷监督激励的同时也限制了信贷资源流向高效率企业。本文从银企信贷关系视角揭示了银行金融科技创新服务实体经济投资的信贷逻辑与现实约束,为优化信贷配置与提升金融服务实体经济质效提供了启示。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
()
作者相关文章
彭红枫
张景静
关键词:  金融科技  银行信贷  债权人监督  客户企业投资  实体经济    
Summary:  In the context of sluggish global economic growth, the Chinese economy is facing increasing downward pressure, accompanied by weak corporate investment incentives, and slow fixed-asset investment growth. Revitalizing corporate investment requires not only sound policy arrangements that encourage firms to invest but also an effective financial system that enables them to obtain sufficient credit. In this context, improving banks' long-term lending mechanisms is essential for supporting investment in the real economy and promoting high-quality economic growth.
The rapid application of big data, cloud computing, artificial intelligence, and other digital technologies has made financial technology (FinTech) one of the most influential financial innovations. Within China's bank-dominated financial system, commercial banks have increasingly embedded FinTech into credit services, fundamentally reshaping lending decisions and risk management. Existing studies mainly examine how regional FinTech development affects corporate investment or focus on the financing function of bank FinTech. However, bank lending performs not only a financing function but also a monitoring function. Moreover, enhanced algorithmic risk assessment may unintentionally reduce credit accessto productive but risky firms. Whether bank FinTech innovation jointly affects corporate investment through credit financing, credit monitoring, and credit allocation remains largely unexplored.
Drawing upon financial intermediation theory, creditor monitoring theory, and investment substitution theory, this paper develops a unified analytical framework linking bank FinTech innovation to both the quantity and quality of corporate investment. We construct a bank-firm matched dataset based on the Bank Loan Details of Listed Companies from the Chinese Research Data Services Platform (CNRDS) from 2013 to 2023. Bank FinTech innovation is measured using a patent-based indicator identified through multiple cross-validation methods, including a FinTech dictionary, Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) topic modeling, supervised machine learning, IPC classification, and manual verification. These data are merged with firm-level information from the China Stock Market & Accounting Research (CSMAR) database to examine the effects of bank FinTech innovation on corporate investment.
The empirical results reveal three main findings. First, bank FinTech innovation significantly increases corporate investment by improving credit accessibility and extending loan maturity. Additionally, strengthened credit monitoring reduces excessive cash holdings financed by bank loans and discourages firms from diverting credit funds into financial asset investment, thereby mitigating financialization and promoting real investment. Second, although bank FinTech innovation alleviates inefficient underinvestment among underinvesting firms through improved financing, it does not significantly enhance overall investment efficiency through stronger monitoring. Third, further analyses from the perspective of credit allocation show that FinTech-enabled precision risk control reallocates credit away from high-risk but highly productive firms toward low-risk but less productive firms. This allocation pattern weakens banks' incentives to conduct effective post-lending monitoring and limits the flow of credit resources to more productive firms, thereby constraining the positive effect of bank FinTech innovation on investment efficiency. These findings suggest that, to further harness the potential of FinTech in supporting the real economy and promoting high-quality financial development, it is essential to optimize FinTech-enabled credit monitoring and precision risk management mechanisms. Such improvements would facilitate both the expansion of investment and the enhancement of investment quality in the real economy.
The academic contributions of this paper are threefold. First, unlike previous studies that rely on regional FinTech indicators or text-based measures, we develop a patent-based measure of bank FinTech innovation using multiple cross-validation methods and identify its asymmetric effects on the quantity and quality of corporate investment at the bank-firm level. Second, we integrate the financing and monitoring functions of bank credit into a unified framework, providing new evidence on the micro-level transmission mechanisms through which bank FinTech innovation affects investment in the real economy. Third, by uncovering why bank FinTech promotes investment expansion but fails to improve investment efficiency, this study offers new insights into optimizing credit allocation under FinTech-enabled banking.
Future research may extend the analysis to non-listed small and medium-sized enterprises and explore the heterogeneous effects of bank FinTech innovation across different financial regulatory regimes and market structures through cross-country comparisons.
Keywords:  FinTech    Bank Lending    Creditor Monitoring    Corporate Investment    Real Economy
JEL分类号:  G21 G31 O33  
基金资助: *本文感谢国家社科基金重大项目“高水平开放背景下全球金融周期冲击与系统性金融风险防控研究”(22&ZD119)、山东省自然科学基金资助项目“金融科技支持山东省环境信息治理与绿色转型研究”(ZR2026QC1624)的资助。感谢匿名审稿人的宝贵意见,感谢第十六届《金融研究》论坛点评专家的宝贵意见和建议,文责自负。
通讯作者:  张景静,经济学博士,预聘制副教授,山东财经大学金融学院,E-mail:jjzsdu@163.com.   
作者简介:  彭红枫,经济学博士,教授,山东财经大学金融学院,E-mail:fhpeng@whu.edu.cn.
引用本文:    
彭红枫, 张景静. 银行金融科技创新与实体经济投资“扩量提质”:信贷逻辑与服务边界[J]. 金融研究, 2026, 555(9): 114-132.
PENG Hongfeng, ZHANG Jingjing. Bank FinTech and the “Quantity Expansion and Quality Improvement” of Real Economy Investment: Credit Mechanisms and Service Boundaries. Journal of Financial Research, 2026, 555(9): 114-132.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2026/V555/I9/114
[1] 蔡庆丰、陈熠辉和林焜,2020,《信贷资源可得性与企业创新:激励还是抑制?——基于银行网点数据和金融地理结构的微观证据》,《经济研究》第10期,第124~140页。
[2] 冯晨、孙迎雪、陶云清和张欢,2025,《以税增信、融资信息摩擦与企业投资结构》,《世界经济》第2期,第138~165页。
[3] 高瑜、李响和李俊青,2024,《金融科技与技术创新路径——基于绿色转型的视角》,《中国工业经济》第2期,第80~98页。
[4] 胡奕明、林文雄、李思琦和谢诗蕾,2008,《大贷款人角色:我国银行具有监督作用吗?》,《经济研究》第10期,第52~64页。
[5] 黄益平和黄卓,2018,《中国的数字金融发展:现在与未来》,《经济学(季刊)》第4期,第1489~1502页。
[6] 简泽,2013,《银行债权治理、管理者偏好与国有企业的绩效》,《金融研究》第1期,第135~148页。
[7] 江轩宇、张明媚和林雯,2025,《银企数字化协同与企业信贷获取——基于银行贷款的经验证据》,《金融研究》第5期,第39~56页。
[8] 金钊、谢晨裕和王曦,2024,《同业市场波动、银行信贷与企业长期投资》,《管理世界》第8期,第177~199页。
[9] 李凤羽和史永东,2016,《经济政策不确定性与企业现金持有策略——基于中国经济政策不确定指数的实证研究》,《管理科学学报》第6期,第157~170页。
[10] 李惠竹、王振山和刘井建,2024,《短期信贷与银企双向寻租:存在证据与形成机制》,《经济研究》第9期,第23~41页。
[11] 李茂林、王子路、何光辉和王宇琨,2024,《银行业金融科技创新、结构性普惠效应与创业活力》,《管理世界》第6期,第195~224页。
[12] 李逸飞、李茂林和李静,2022,《银行金融科技、信贷配置与企业短债长用》,《中国工业经济》第10期,第137~154页。
[13] 李逸飞、王子路和李茂林,2024,《金融技术进步的稳就业效应:基于异质性信贷扩张视角》,《世界经济》第11期,第92~115页。
[14] 李真、李茂林和朱林染,2023,《银行金融科技与企业金融化:基于避险与逐利动机》,《世界经济》第4期,第140~169页。
[15] 李志辉和张旭东,2024,《银行金融科技能改善企业投资效率吗?——来自中国上市公司的证据》,《南开学报(哲学社会科学版)》第5期,第101~113页。
[16] 刘贯春、刘媛媛和张军,2019,《金融资产配置与中国上市公司的投资波动》,《经济学(季刊)》第2期,第573~596页。
[17] 申志轩、祝树金、文茜和汤超,2025,《以有为政府赋能有效市场:政府数字治理与企业投资效率》,《世界经济》第2期,第166~195页。
[18] 沈红波、张广婷和阎竣,2013,《银行贷款监督、政府干预与自由现金流约束——基于中国上市公司的经验证据》,《中国工业经济》第5期,第96~108页。
[19] 盛天翔和范从来,2020,《金融科技、最优银行业市场结构与小微企业信贷供给》,《金融研究》第6期,第114~132页。
[20] 宋科、李振和杨家文,2023,《金融科技与银行行为——基于流动性创造视角》,《金融研究》第2期,第60~77页。
[21] 宋敏、周鹏和司海涛,2021,《金融科技与企业全要素生产率——“赋能”和信贷配给的视角》,《中国工业经济》第4期,第138~155页。
[22] 王红建、张科和李青原,2023,《金融科技的经济稳定器作用:金融加速器理论的视角》,《经济研究》第12期,第4~21页。
[23] 徐昕和沈红波,2010,《银行贷款的监督效应与盈余稳健性——来自中国上市公司的经验证据》,《金融研究》第2期,第102~111页。
[24] 杨仁发和陆瑶,2025,《市场准入管制放松与企业长期投资——兼论耐心资本的形成》,《中国工业经济》第6期,第159~177页。
[25] 杨兴全、齐云飞和吴昊旻,2016,《行业成长性影响公司现金持有吗?》,《管理世界》第1期,第153~169页。
[26] 杨兴全、张丽平和吴昊旻,2014,《市场化进程、管理层权力与公司现金持有》,《南开管理评论》第2期,第34~45页。
[27] 张成思和刘贯春,2018,《中国实业部门投融资决策机制研究——基于经济政策不确定性和融资约束异质性视角》,《经济研究》第12期,第51~67页。
[28] 张亦春、李晚春和彭江,2015,《债权治理对企业投资效率的作用研究——来自中国上市公司的经验证据》,《金融研究》第7期,第190~203页。
[29] 钟凯、程小可和张伟华,2016,《货币政策适度水平与企业“短贷长投”之谜》,《管理世界》第3期,第87~98页。
[30] Berg, T., V. Burg, A. Gombovi and M. Puri, 2020. “On the Rise of FinTechs: Credit Scoring Using Digital Footprints”, Review of Financial Studies, 33(7),pp. 2845~2897.
[31] Böhm, A., C. Eufinger, I. Kadach and Y. Sakasai, 2025. “Green Banking Illusion? The Influence of ‘Eco-Conscious’ Bank Shareholders on Credit Allocation”, Journal of Corporate Finance, 92,102767.
[32] Cao, S., W. Jiang, J. Wang and B. Yang, 2024. “From Man Vs. Machine to Man + Machine: The Art and AI of Stock Analyses”, Journal of Financial Economics, 160,103910.
[33] Chu, Y. and J. Wei, 2024. “Fintech Lending and Credit Market Competition”, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 59(5),pp. 2199~2225.
[34] Diamond, D. W., 1984. “Financial Intermediation and Delegated Monitoring”, Review of Economic Studies, 51(3),pp. 393~414.
[35] Erel, I. and J. Liebersohn, 2022. “Can FinTech Reduce Disparities in Access to Finance? Evidence from the Paycheck Protection Program”, Journal of Financial Economics, 146(1),pp. 90~118.
[36] Frankel, R., B. H. Kim, T. Ma and X. Martin, 2020. “Bank Monitoring and Financial Reporting Quality: The Case of Accounts Receivable–Based Loans”, Contemporary Accounting Research, 37(4),pp. 2120~2144.
[37] Heitz, A. R., C. Martin and A. Ufier, 2026. “Bank Monitoring with on-Site Inspections”, Journal of Finance ,81(2),pp.687~732.
[38] Li, M., T. Makaew and A. Winton, 2025. “Does Bank Monitoring Reduce Corporate Misreporting? Evidence from Foreign Bank Entry in China”, Management Science, 71(5),pp.4223~4245.
[39] Li, X., J. Ng and W. Saffar, 2024. “Accounting-Driven Bank Monitoring and Firms' Debt Structure: Evidence from IFRS 9 Adoption”, Management Science, 70(1).
[40] Richardson, S., 2006. “Over-Investment of Free Cash Flow”, Review of Accounting Studies, 11(2-3),pp. 159~189.
[41] Saunders, A. and K. Song, 2018. “Bank Monitoring and CEO Risk-Taking Incentives”, Journal of Banking & Finance, 88,pp. 225~240.
[42] Vives, X. and Z. Ye, 2025. “Information Technology and Lender Competition”, Journal of Financial Economics, 163,103957.
[1] 彭红枫内容精粹 Download
[2] 彭红枫附录 Download
[1] 陈雨轩, 段文奇. 金融科技投资、信贷优化与供应链效率[J]. 金融研究, 2026, 555(9): 151-169.
[2] 丁攀, 李力, 李向阳. 气候物理冲击、地方债务风险与实体经济波动[J]. 金融研究, 2026, 553(7): 114-132.
[3] 王傲, 孙伟增, 张齐林, 彭俞超. 政府数字化转型与企业脱虚返实——基于企业投资结构偏向的分析[J]. 金融研究, 2026, 553(7): 133-150.
[4] 孙莎, 巩倩, 潘奇, 范静. 媒体负面报道与银行信贷——基于信息中介和外部监督的双重视角[J]. 金融研究, 2026, 550(4): 74-92.
[5] 宋鹭, 李佳林, 方意. 数字信贷发展对区域金融风险的影响——基于非金融企业部门的视角[J]. 金融研究, 2026, 549(3): 95-113.
[6] 周泽将, 汪顺, 董丰. 气候政策不确定性应对与实体企业金融资产配置[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 538(4): 95-113.
[7] 江伟, 李钰, 雷婧祯. 生产网络中心性与银行信贷决策[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 536(2): 95-113.
[8] 王擎, 秦慧颖, 盛夏. 金融科技、货币政策传导与消费——来自大科技平台个人用户的微观证据[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 545(11): 1-18.
[9] 张博, 张晓帆, 蔡子阳. 金融科技、金融普惠与非法集资风险[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 535(1): 39-57.
[10] 钟超杰, 赵淳, 高峰, 王天宇, 王倩. 金融科技改善你的基金投资了吗?——基于基金销售渠道的分析[J]. 金融研究, 2024, 527(5): 114-131.
[11] 王雅琦, 贾思源. 汇率冲击、银行外币敞口与企业投资[J]. 金融研究, 2024, 534(12): 78-96.
[12] 宋科, 李振, 杨家文. 金融科技与银行行为——基于流动性创造视角[J]. 金融研究, 2023, 512(2): 60-77.
[13] 王修华, 刘锦华. 金融科技能否缓解农村信贷服务的“三角困境”?——基于农村金融机构与金融科技公司合作的视角[J]. 金融研究, 2023, 522(12): 150-168.
[14] 潘敏, 秦力宸. 金融结构对宏观经济韧性的影响——来自跨国比较的经验证据[J]. 金融研究, 2023, 521(11): 39-58.
[15] 徐照宜, 巩冰, 陈彦名, 成程. 金融科技、数字化转型与企业突破性创新 ——基于全球专利引用复杂网络的分析[J]. 金融研究, 2023, 520(10): 47-65.
[1] 陈德球, 陈运森, 董志勇. 政策不确定性、市场竞争与资本配置[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 65 -80 .
[2] 潘越, 肖金利, 戴亦一. 文化多样性与企业创新:基于方言视角的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 448(10): 146 -161 .
[3] 孙淑伟, 梁上坤, 阮刚铭, 付宇翔. 高管减持、信息压制与股价崩盘风险[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 175 -190 .
[4] 罗进辉, 向元高, 金思静. 中国资本市场低价股的溢价之谜[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 439(1): 191 -206 .
[5] 金宇超, 靳庆鲁, 李晓雪. 资本市场注意力总量是稀缺资源吗?[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 448(10): 162 -177 .
[6] 范庆祝, 贾若, 孙祁祥. 寿险供给侧指标对寿险消费的影响——基于寿险供给质量、动能和效率的视角[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 447(9): 115 -129 .
[7] 康书隆, 余海跃, 刘越飞. 住房公积金、购房信贷与家庭消费——基于中国家庭追踪调查数据的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 446(8): 67 -82 .
[8] 黎文靖, 李茫茫. “实体+金融”:融资约束、政策迎合还是市场竞争?——基于不同产权性质视角的经验研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 446(8): 100 -116 .
[9] 王茵田, 黄张凯, 陈梦. “不平等条约?”:我国对赌协议的风险因素分析[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 446(8): 117 -128 .
[10] 孔东民, 项君怡, 代昀昊. 中小企业过桥贷款投融资的财务效应——来自我国中小企业版上市公司的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 441(3): 145 -158 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1