Summary:
Regional coordinated development is a strategic priority in China. Cross-regional capital flows and allocation directly affect regional economic disparities and are a key factor in promoting regional coordinated development. Compared with developed regions, the degree of capital agglomeration in China’s underdeveloped regions remains relatively low. Achieving the allocation of resources across geographical regions is one of the fundamental functions of the financial system. With the deepening application of technologies such as artificial intelligence, big data, blockchain, and cloud computing, China’s financial system has undergone rapid innovation and has become an important force in enhancing the role of the market mechanism. China’s financial system relies heavily on the banking sector, which makes banking financial service innovation particularly noteworthy. Does banking financial service innovation affect cross-regional capital flows? What is the mechanism? Can it guide capital flows toward underdeveloped regions? Addressing these questions clarifies the theoretical channels of how finance promotes regional coordinated development and offers important insights for boosting capital agglomeration in underdeveloped regions and optimizing the policy system. This paper constructs a two-region theoretical model of capital flows to explore the impact of banking financial service innovation on cross-regional capital flows. On this basis, it constructs an index of banking financial service innovation using the number of news reports, measures capital flows employing the full set of business registration data of Chinese enterprises, and constructs city-pair-level data from 2011 to 2023 for empirical testing. The results show that, first, banking financial service innovation promotes cross-regional capital flows, and this conclusion remains valid after a series of robustness checks. Second, banking financial service innovation promotes capital flows by improving the spatial accessibility of financial services and reducing the frictional cost of enterprises’ cross-regional investment. The promotional effect is more significant when the capital-outflow region has strong innovation capacity and advanced digital adoption capability, and when the capital-inflow region features a high degree of marketization and a low level of financial risks. Third, banking financial service innovation encourages capital to flow to regions with high production efficiency and high returns on capital, and steers capital from developed regions to underdeveloped regions, thereby helping to narrow the interregional capital allocation gap. Fourth, within provinces and urban agglomerations, the role of banking financial service innovation in driving cross-regional capital flows is more prominent, while for the three major urban clusters, it exhibits a stronger cross-megaregion capital flow effect. This paper proposes the following policy recommendations. First, deepen banking financial service innovation and enhance the role of the market mechanism in capital allocation based on local conditions. Second, consolidate the foundations for the role of banking financial service innovation, and facilitate the two mechanisms of improving spatial accessibility and reducing frictional cost. Third, strengthen efficiency orientation and coordinated linkages, and empower regional coordinated development through banking financial service innovation. The marginal contributions of this paper are as follows. First, it establishes an analytical framework for the impact of banking financial service innovation on cross-regional capital flows, enriches the literature on capital flows from a financial perspective, and lays a theoretical foundation for promoting regional capital flows and optimizing allocation. Second, proceeding from the service functions of the banking sector, it categorizes such innovation into traditional financial service innovation and non-financial value-added service innovation, systematically analyzes the mechanism through which banking financial service innovation affects capital flows, and provides empirical evidence for promoting cross-regional capital flows through market-oriented approaches. Third, it examines the impact of banking financial service innovation on capital flow efficiency, spatial boundaries, and flow directions between regions with different levels of development, offering new evidence for resolving theoretical debates on capital flows and advancing regional coordinated development.
盛天翔, 范从来, 滕家辉. 银行业金融服务创新与资本跨区域流动[J]. 金融研究, 2026, 555(9): 95-113.
SHENG Tianxiang, FAN Conglai, TENG Jiahui. Banking Financial Service Innovation and Cross-Regional Capital Flows. Journal of Financial Research, 2026, 555(9): 95-113.
[1] 卞元超和白俊红,2024,《金融地理扩张与中国企业劳动收入份额的变迁》,《金融研究》第3期,第56~74页。 [2] 蔡庆丰、吴奇艳和吴冠琛,2024,《地方隐性债务、银行风险感知与企业信贷可得性》,《中国工业经济》第1期,第112～130页。 [3] 曹廷求和张翠燕,2021,《资本回报、产权保护与区域资金集聚》,《金融研究》第2期,第75～93页。 [4] 陈诣之和蔡庆丰,2023,《信贷资源与异地并购:基于省级层面的研究》,《统计研究》第9期,第120~134页。 [5] 储德银、纪凡和刘俸奇,2024,《税收竞争、资本流动与收入不平等》,《经济研究》第6期,第88~106页。 [6] 杜立、屈伸、钱雪松和金芳吉,2020,《地理距离、契约设计与企业内部资本市场借贷风险防控——来自中国企业集团内部借贷交易的证据》,《金融研究》第8期,第130~148页。 [7] 何欣、杨薇薇、王海军和宣权圣,2026,《银行金融科技如何驱动农业企业转型升级？》,《统计研究》第2期,第78～90页。 [8] 胡海峰、白宗航和王爱萍,2023,《银行业竞争吸引了企业异地投资吗》,《经济学动态》第10期,第33~51页。 [9] 李茂林、王子路、何光辉和王宇琨,2024,《银行业金融科技创新、结构性普惠效应与创业活力》,《管理世界》第6期,第195～224页。 [10] 李扬,2017,《“金融服务实体经济”辨》,《经济研究》第6期,第4~16页。 [11] 马光荣、程小萌和杨恩艳,2020,《交通基础设施如何促进资本流动——基于高铁开通和上市公司异地投资的研究》,《中国工业经济》第6期,第5~23页。 [12] 彭小辉和史清华,2012,《“卢卡斯之谜”与中国城乡资本流动》,《经济与管理研究》第3期,第65~72页。 [13] 彭远怀和胡军,2024,《政府数据开放与资本区际流动:企业异地投资视角》,《数量经济技术经济研究》第10期,第89~110页。 [14] 沈艳、江弘毅、胡诗云、赵家琪和黄卓,2024,《数字金融支持高质量发展:理论、机制和证据》,《金融研究》第7期,第20~39页。 [15] 盛天翔和范从来,2020,《金融科技、最优银行业市场结构与小微企业信贷供给》,《金融研究》第6期,第114～132页。 [16] 宋科、李振和杨家文,2023,《金融科技与银行行为——基于流动性创造视角》,《金融研究》第2期,第60~77页。 [17] 孙伟增、司璐和吕越,2025,《数字经济发展、资本跨区域非对称流动与异地分类投资》,《经济研究》第3期,第69~86页。 [18] 王纪全、张晓燕和刘全胜,2007,《中国金融资源的地区分布及其对区域经济增长的影响》,《金融研究》第6期,第100~108页。 [19] 王曦、杨扬、余壮雄和陈中飞,2014,《中央投资对中国区域资本流动的影响》,《中国工业经济》第4期,第5~18页。 [20] 许月丽和纪晓丹,2024,《数字普惠金融对县域城乡资本要素一体化的影响——基于新二元转型视角》,《数量经济技术经济研究》第2期,第193~212页。 [21] 杨继彬、李善民、杨国超和吴文锋,2021,《省际双边信任与资本跨区域流动——基于企业异地并购的视角》,《经济研究》第4期,第41~59页。 [22] 余典范、张家才和陈磊,2023,《企业数字化促进了资本跨地区流动吗？——来自上市公司异地设立子公司的证据》,《财经研究》第12期,第91~105页。 [23] 余明桂、马林和王空,2022,《商业银行数字化转型与劳动力需求:创造还是破坏？》,《管理世界》第10期,第212~230页。 [24] Barbarasa, E. and C. Miliaras, 2012, “Why Banksin Emerging Markets are Increasingly Providing Non-Financial Services to Small and Medium Enterprises”, Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group. [25] Dai, Y., J. Hou, and X. Li, 2021, “Industry Policy, Cross-region Investment, and Enterprise Investment Efficiency”,Research in International Business and Finance, 56: 101372. [26] Dong, X., B. Miao, and R. Chi, 2023, “Capital Flows under Integration: Evidence from China's Metropolitan Area Development Planning”,China Economic Review,82: 102066. [27] Giroud, X. and H. M. Mueller, 2015, “Capital and Labor Reallocation within Firms”,The Journal of Finance, 70(4), pp.1767~1804. [28] Huang, R., L. Quan, H. Luo, Z. Gao, X. Lai, and S. Tang, 2024, “Can FinTech Promote Enterprise Cross-region Investment?—Evidence from China”,International Review of Economics and Finance, 96: 103524. [29] Merton, R. C., 1995, “A Functional Perspective of Financial Intermediation”,Financial Management, 24(2), pp.23~41. [30] Sirakova-Yordanova, G., 2024, “Banks Go Beyond Banking: The Expansion Towards Non-Banking Services”, Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, 18(1), pp.391~404. [31] Yang, T. and X. Zhang, 2022, “FinTech Adoption and Financial Inclusion: Evidence from Household Consumption in China”,Journal of Banking and Finance, 145: 106668. [32] Zhan, M., S. Li, and Z. Wu, 2023, “Can Digital Finance Development Improve Balanced Regional Investment Allocations in Developing Countries?—The Evidence from China”,Emerging Markets Review, 56: 101035.
