Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2025, Vol. 539 Issue (5): 39-56    
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
银企数字化协同与企业信贷获取——基于银行贷款的经验证据
江轩宇, 张明媚, 林雯
中央财经大学会计学院,北京 100081
Bank-Enterprise Digital Synergy and Bank Lending: Evidence from Bank Loans
JIANG Xuanyu, ZHANG Mingmei, LIN Wen
School of Accountancy, Central University of Finance & Economics
下载:  PDF (944KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 数字技术已经成为新时期经济、金融发展的重要引擎,但现有研究大多聚焦于实体企业或者金融企业单边数字化效果,并未探讨银企之间的数字化协同是否有助于构建新型银企关系,赋能产融结合。为此,本文将企业和银行的数字化转型纳入同一分析框架,考察银企数字化协同对企业信贷获取的影响效果及机制。研究发现,企业与银行数字化协同水平的提高显著增大了企业的信贷获取规模,且促进银企信息协同和治理协同是实现这一效应的重要路径。进一步分析表明,(1)银企数字化的实质性协同更为显著地促进了企业信贷获取能力的提升;(2)当企业与银行之间合作关系较弱或银行软信息依赖度更高时,数字化协同与信贷获取之间的正向关系更为显著;(3)相比于“双慢”协同,适度数字化水平下的协同更为显著地提升了企业信贷获取能力;(4)银企数字化协同还有助于优化企业整体信贷结构。本研究对充分释放数据要素价值、畅通金融业与实体经济良性循环提供了政策启示。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
江轩宇
张明媚
林雯
关键词:  数字化协同  数字化转型  银企关系  信贷获取    
Summary:  Driven by the integration of the digital economy with the real economy, the digital transformation among enterprises has progressed rapidly in China. Prior research highlights that the digital transformation of enterprises and banks has significantly expanded the scale of corporate debt . However, it is crucial to recognise that Chinese enterprises continue to face persistent challenges in accessing credit. Furthermore, digital finance still encounters notable barriers and inefficiencies, limiting its ability to fully support the sustainable development of the real economy.
A critical reason for this phenomenon lies in the prominent issues of information fragmentation during the digital transformation process. Transformation efforts have primarily focused on internal processes within enterprises, often overlooking the digital synergy between enterprises and their external stakeholders in the broader ecosystem. This raises an important question: to what extent can digital synergy between enterprises and banks help break down information silos, enhance firms' access to credit, and strengthen the capacity of digital finance to effectively empower the real economy?
In this paper, we construct a “firm-bank-year” level dataset using bank loan data from A-share listed companies between 2014 and 2022. We find that: (1) higher levels of digital synergy between firms and banks significantly enhance firms' ability to access credit; (2) this effect is primarily driven by two channels—enhanced information coordination and governance coordination; (3) the impact is more pronounced in scenarios where digital synergy is substantive, firm-bank cooperative relationships are weaker, or banks exhibit a greater reliance on soft information; (4) in further analysis, compared to “dual low” synergy, moderate levels of digital synergy significantly enhance firms' credit access capabilities. Additionally, digital synergy between firms and banks contributes to optimizing the overall credit structure of firms.
Our paper makes several notable contributions to the literature. First, it expands the research on the economic consequences of digital transformation. Prior studies primarily focus on the impact of digital transformation of single firm on its operational performance or its spillover effects on stakeholders. This paper incorporates the digital transformation of both firms and banks into a unified analytical framework, shedding light on the economic consequences of digital synergy among stakeholders. Second, it enriches the understanding of firm-bank relationships. Prior research mainly examines the economic outcomes of firm-bank relationships from the perspectives such as cooperative characteristics, equity linkages and geographic proximity. This study reveals that digital synergy between firms and banks contributes to optimizing firm-bank relationships. Third, our paper explores the heterogeneity of firm-bank digital synergy and provides both theoretical explanations and empirical evidence on the channels through which digital synergy influences firms' access to credit. The findings of this study demonstrate that digital synergy enhances firms' credit access capabilities by improving information coordination and governance coordination between banks and firms. Furthermore, it identifies differentiated effects of substantive versus strategic digital synergy types, on the relationship between firm-bank digital collaboration and credit access.
This paper also offers several policy implications. First, it emphasizes the need to actively promote digital synergy between firms and banks to create a virtuous cycle between the financial sector and the real economy.Second, it highlights the importance of increasing subsidies for digital transformation initiatives, particularly for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) .Enhanced financial support from governments would enable SMEs to participate in collaborative digital initiatives with banks, thereby laying a sustainable financial foundation for their long-term high-quality growth. Third, the study highlights the need to strengthen innovation, application, and integration of digital technologies to promote substantive digital synergy between firms and banks. To maximize the benefits of digital collaboration, firms and banks should engage in deeper cooperation, thereby reinforcing foundational data infrastructure, cultivating a resilient and interconnected digital ecosystem, and facilitating more efficient information sharing and seamless business coordination between banks and firms.
Keywords:  Digital Synergy    Digital Transformation    Bank-Enterprise Relationship    Credit Acquisition
JEL分类号:  G21   G34   D82  
基金资助: *本文感谢国家自然科学基金项目(72372171、72402247)及中央财经大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助。感谢匿名审稿人的宝贵意见,文责自负。
通讯作者:  张明媚,博士研究生,中央财经大学会计学院,E-mail: zhangmingmei@email.cufe.edu.cn.   
作者简介:  江轩宇,管理学博士,教授,中央财经大学会计学院,E-mail: jiangxuanyu@163.com.
林 雯,管理学博士,助理教授,中央财经大学会计学院,E-mail:w.lin@cufe.edu.cn.
引用本文:    
江轩宇, 张明媚, 林雯. 银企数字化协同与企业信贷获取——基于银行贷款的经验证据[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 539(5): 39-56.
JIANG Xuanyu, ZHANG Mingmei, LIN Wen. Bank-Enterprise Digital Synergy and Bank Lending: Evidence from Bank Loans. Journal of Financial Research, 2025, 539(5): 39-56.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2025/V539/I5/39
[1] 蔡庆丰、陈熠辉和林焜,2020,《信贷资源可得性与企业创新:激励还是抑制?——基于银行网点数据和金融地理结构的微观证据》,《经济研究》第10期,第124 ~ 140页。
[2] 陈德球、刘经纬和董志勇,2013,《社会破产成本、企业债务违约与信贷资金配置效率》,《金融研究》第11期,第68~81页。
[3] 陈栋和陈运森,2012,《银行股权关联、货币政策变更与上市公司现金管理》,《金融研究》第12期,第122~136页。
[4] 陈庆江、王彦萌和万茂丰,2021,《企业数字化转型的同群效应及其影响因素研究》,《管理学报》第5期,第653~663页。
[5] 陈中飞、江康奇和殷明美,2022,《数字化转型能缓解企业“融资贵”吗》,《经济学动态》第8期,第79~97页。
[6] 范合君、吴婷和何思锦,2023,《企业数字化的产业链联动效应研究》,《中国工业经济》第3期,第115~132页。
[7] 郭瑾、刘志远和彭涛,2017,《银行贷款对企业风险承担的影响:推动还是抑制?》,《会计研究》第2期,第42~48页。
[8] 郭晔、未钟琴和方颖,2022,《金融科技布局、银行信贷风险与经营绩效——来自商业银行与科技企业战略合作的证据》,《金融研究》第10期,第20~38页。
[9] 韩峰、黄敏和姜竹青,2024,《企业数字化、网络地位与污染减排》,《世界经济》第2期,第204~232页。
[10] 何青、琚望静和庄朋涛,2024,《如何缓解企业投融资期限错配?基于数字化转型视角》,《数量经济技术经济研究》第5期,第113~133页。
[11] 黄勃、李海彤、刘俊岐和雷敬华,2023,《数字技术创新与中国企业高质量发展——来自企业数字专利的证据》,《经济研究》第3期,第97~115页。
[12] 黎文靖和郑曼妮,2016,《实质性创新还是策略性创新?——宏观产业政策对微观企业创新的影响》,《经济研究》第4期,第60~73页。
[13] 凌润泽、李彬、潘爱玲和王慧,2023,《供应链金融与企业债务期限选择》,《经济研究》第10期,第93~113页。
[14] 施炳展和李建桐,2020,《互联网是否促进了分工:来自中国制造业企业的证据》,《管理世界》第4期,第130~149页。
[15] 王海、郭冠宇和尹俊雅,2024,《数字新基建政策如何影响企业避税行为?》,《财经研究》第3期,第64~77页。
[16] 吴非、胡慧芷、林慧妍和任晓怡,2021,《企业数字化转型与资本市场表现——来自股票流动性的经验证据》,《管理世界》第7期,第130~144页。
[17] 项后军和高鹏飞,2023,《银行数字化转型能缓解流动性囤积吗》,《经济学动态》第8期,第82~100页。
[18] 肖红军、沈洪涛和周艳坤,2024,《客户企业数字化、供应商企业ESG表现与供应链可持续发展》,《经济研究》第3期,第54~73页。
[19] 尹志超、钱龙和吴雨,2015,《银企关系、银行业竞争与中小企业借贷成本》,《金融研究》第1期,第134~149页。
[20] 袁淳、肖土盛、耿春晓和盛誉,2021,《数字化转型与企业分工:专业化还是纵向一体化》,《中国工业经济》第9期,第137~155页。
[21] 周冬华和万贻健,2023,《数字化转型会提升企业劳动投资效率吗》,《山西财经大学学报》第2期,第87~101页。
[22] Agarwal, S. and R. Hauswald, 2010, “Distance and Private Information in Lending”, The Review of Financial Studies, 23(7), pp.2757~2788.
[23] Behr, P., A. Entzian and A. Güttler, 2011, “How do Lending Relationships Affect Access to Credit and Loan Conditions in Microlending?”, Journal of Banking and Finance, 35(8), pp.2169~2178.
[24] Dekeyser, S., X. He , T. Xiao and L. Zuo, 2024, “Auditor Industry Range and Audit Quality”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 77(2-3), pp.101669.
[25] Drake, M. S., J. Jennings and D. T. Roulstone, 2017, “The Comovement of Investor Attention”, Management Science, 63(9), pp.2847~2867.
[26] Goldsmith, R. W., 1951, “A Perpetual Inventory of National Wealth”, NBER Studies in Income and Wealth, 14, pp.5 ~73.
[27] Gong, G., L. Y. Li and L. Zhou, 2013, “Earnings Non-Synchronicity and Voluntary Disclosure”, Contemporary Accounting Research, 30(4), pp.1560~1589.
[28] Hasan, I., K. Minnick and K. Raman, 2020, “Credit Allocation When Borrowers are Economically Linked: An Empirical Analysis of Bank Loans to Corporate Customers”, Journal of Corporate Finance, 62, pp.101605.
[29] Hollander, S. and A. Verriest, 2016, “Bridging the Gap: The Design of Bank Loan Contracts and Distance”, Journal of Financial Economics, 119(2), pp.399~419.
[30] Li, N., 2025, “Labor Market Peer Firms: Understanding Firms' Labor Market Linkages Through Employees' Internet ‘Also Viewed' Firms”, Review of Accounting Studies, 30(1), pp.384~435.
[31] Luo, S. and N. J. Nagarajan, 2015, “Information Complementarities and Supply Chain Analysts”, The Accounting Review, 90(5), pp.1995~2029.
[32] Slager, R., K. Chuah, J. P. Gond, S. Furnari and M. Homanen, 2023, “Tailor-to-Target: Configuring Collaborative Shareholder Engagements on Climate Change”, Management Science, 69(12), pp.7693~7718.
[1] 王修华, 彭德荣, 赵亚雄. 农信机构数字化转型能否促进双重目标兼顾?——基于省联社“大平台”模式视角的分析[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 538(4): 75-94.
[2] 赵静, 刘姝江. 数据治理对银行风险的影响——基于《银行业金融机构数据治理指引》的经验研究[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 536(2): 58-75.
[3] 卢垚, 战明华. 银行数字化转型、信息结构与商业信用和银行信用间的替代性[J]. 金融研究, 2024, 531(9): 39-58.
[4] 沈坤荣, 闫佳敏. 高铁开通与企业数字化转型——基于信息学习效应与资源集聚效应的双重视角[J]. 金融研究, 2024, 530(8): 150-168.
[5] 王亮亮, 祁媛媛, 张海洋, 徐星美. 数字化转型与公司税负水平的动态调整[J]. 金融研究, 2024, 526(4): 188-206.
[6] 戴翔, 马皓巍, 张二震. 数字化转型一定能提升企业加成率吗?[J]. 金融研究, 2023, 515(5): 134-151.
[7] 冀云阳, 周鑫, 张谦. 数字化转型与企业创新——基于研发投入和研发效率视角的分析[J]. 金融研究, 2023, 514(4): 111-129.
[8] 方明月, 聂辉华, 阮睿, 沈昕毅. 企业数字化转型与经济政策不确定性感知[J]. 金融研究, 2023, 512(2): 21-39.
[9] 徐照宜, 巩冰, 陈彦名, 成程. 金融科技、数字化转型与企业突破性创新 ——基于全球专利引用复杂网络的分析[J]. 金融研究, 2023, 520(10): 47-65.
[10] 叶永卫, 李鑫, 刘贯春. 数字化转型与企业人力资本升级[J]. 金融研究, 2022, 510(12): 74-92.
[11] 朱恩伟, 吴璟, 刘洪玉. 基于新闻文本共现性的银企关系分析——以房地产上市公司为例[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 464(2): 117-135.
[12] 钱龙. 信息不对称与中小企业信贷风险缓释机制研究[J]. 金融研究, 2015, 424(10): 115-132.
[1] 宗计川, 吴庆帮. 流动性冲击与系统重要性银行的稳定作用[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 538(4): 21 -38 .
[2] 丁璇, 杨道广, 张新民. 中介机构固定搭配:“合作”抑或“合谋”——基于债券信用评级的经验证据[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 539(5): 171 -187 .
[3] 贾君怡, 潘慧峰, 宋敏杰. 资管产品估值规范如何影响债券市场效率?——来自资管新规的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 538(4): 39 -56 .
[4] 张龙耀, 李渊, 郜栋玺. 提低扩中:普惠金融能否实现益贫式增长?[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 539(5): 21 -38 .
[5] 张少辉, 余泳泽, 陶云清. 新型“政银担”模式与小微企业投资——基于风险共担的视角[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 539(5): 57 -75 .
[6] 王雄元, 王慧娴, 王子平. 竞争对手主持或参与标准制定与企业创新质量[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 539(5): 95 -113 .
[7] 孙传旺, 何一若. 低碳转型中差异化绿色金融政策的驱动机制与协同影响——基于引入多元绿色金融工具的DSGE模型[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 539(5): 114 -132 .
[8] 邓国营, 李欣媛, 颜镜洲, 邓启运. 媒体ESG报道情绪与公司债券风险溢价——基于信息传导视角的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 539(5): 133 -151 .
[9] 郭豫媚, 王航, 郭田勇, 郭俊杰. 中央银行通货膨胀预期管理有效性评估——基于文本通货膨胀预期指数的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 538(4): 1 -20 .
[10] 兰天琪, 陈运森, 赵瑞瑞, 贾宁. 股东诉讼溢出与策略性信息披露[J]. 金融研究, 2025, 539(5): 188 -206 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1