Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2021, Vol. 492 Issue (6): 21-38    
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
监测系统性金融风险——中国金融市场压力指数构建和状态识别
李敏波, 梁爽
中国人民银行金融稳定局, 北京 100800
Monitoring Systemic Financial Risks: Construction and State Identification of China's Financial Market Stress Index
LI Minbo, LIANG Shuang
Financial Stability Bureau, the People's Bank of China
下载:  PDF (3055KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 对系统性金融风险进行识别和评估,日益成为各国中央银行的核心关切。囿于数据频率,基于金融机构经营稳健性评估的金融系统性风险监测存在一定的滞后性,不利于中央银行及时进行风险应对,利用金融市场交易数据进行风险监测可极大程度克服滞后性问题。本文根据中国金融市场特点,选取债券市场、股票市场、货币市场和外汇市场17个有代表性的指标,运用经验累积分布函数法分别构造了各子市场的压力指数,以各子市场之间时变的相关关系刻画系统性金融风险的跨市场传染特征,合成金融市场压力指数,并通过建立马尔可夫区制转换模型,对金融市场压力状态进行识别。金融市场压力指数能有效反映样本域内的压力事件,并兼具稳健性、能逐日监测等优点,为监测评估系统性金融风险、选择政策实施窗口和评估政策实施效果等提供了有力工具。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
李敏波
梁爽
关键词:  系统性金融风险  金融市场压力指数  马尔可夫区制转换    
Summary:  For the central bank to maintain financial stability and carry out macro-prudential management, it is essential to have timely and efficient monitoring of financial market conditions. The stability of financial institutions depends on the conditions of the financial market, and the effects of monetary policy and macro-prudential policy are transmitted through the financial market; the policies themselves are also responses to financial market conditions. In addition, financial market data contain highly forward-looking information. Major changes in the financial and economic system, such as policy adjustments and stress events, will be reflected in the financial market data. The central bank also needs to closely monitor financial market conditions to select the policy implementation window in advance, make adjustments during policy implementation, and evaluate the policy effect. A good method of monitoring the overall risk level of the financial market is to construct a financial market stress index with selected indicators of the financial market. Overseas researchers and institutions, and more recently domestic researchers, have extensively explored the construction of financial market stress indexes. Most financial market stress indexes constructed by domestic researchers can identify financial market stress events, but the index construction and stress state identification still show deficiencies. The frequencies of financial market stress indexes in the literature are relatively low, as they are limited by data availability and construction methods. Some studies use indicators such as the non-performing loan ratio of the banking sector, but the data have some lag and can be manipulated. We believe that constructing a financial market stress index with pure financial market data can address the deficiencies of the literature. Furthermore, as interest rate liberalization continues, the representativeness and effectiveness of a financial market stress index that measures systemic financial risk using financial market data will be further improved. In this paper, the construction of the financial market stress index involves two steps. The first is the construction of each sub-market stress index, and the second involves compiling the full financial market stress index based on these sub-market stress indexes. This paper selects 17 indicators, calculated with transaction data from China's bond market, stock market, money market, and foreign exchange market, to construct sub-market stress indexes using the empirical cumulative distribution function method. It then constructs the financial market stress index with the sub-market stress indexes, using the time-varying correlation between them to depict the cross-market contagion characteristics of systemic financial risk. The purpose of constructing the financial market stress index is to monitor and evaluate the stress level of the financial market, especially high stress states. Some studies define a high stress state as occurring when the current value of the financial market stress index exceeds the mean of its historical values by a specified number of standard deviations. Other studies determine stress states by comparing the current value of the financial stress index with its values during the financial crisis. None of these methods make sufficient use of the information contained in the financial market stress index. The Markov regime switching model proposed by Hamilton is a more proper method for identifying financial market stress states. This paper assumes that there are two stress states in the financial market—high and medium-to-low, which is preliminarily supported by the analysis of the historical distribution of the financial market stress index. It then establishes the Markov regime switching model to identify stress states. Through back testing, our financial market stress index is found to accurately reflect historical stress events; for example, the large number of securities firms on the verge of bankruptcy in 2003, the global financial crisis of 2007-2008, the European sovereign debt crisis, interbank liquidity strains in June 2013, abnormal stock market fluctuations in 2015, and the COVID-19 outbreak. Our financial market stress index, which has the advantages of robustness and high frequency, is a powerful tool to monitor and evaluate systemic financial risk, select a policy implementation window, and evaluate the policy effect.
Keywords:  Systemic Financial Risk    Financial Market Stress Index    Markov Regime Switching
JEL分类号:  G10   G19   E60  
通讯作者:  李敏波,经济学博士,副研究员,中国人民银行金融稳定局,E-mail:minboli@163.com   
作者简介:  梁 爽,经济学硕士,中国人民银行金融稳定局,E-mail:liangshuang1212@163.com.
引用本文:    
李敏波, 梁爽. 监测系统性金融风险——中国金融市场压力指数构建和状态识别[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 492(6): 21-38.
LI Minbo, LIANG Shuang. Monitoring Systemic Financial Risks: Construction and State Identification of China's Financial Market Stress Index. Journal of Financial Research, 2021, 492(6): 21-38.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2021/V492/I6/21
[1] 陈忠阳和许悦,2016,《我国金融压力指数的构建与应用研究》,《当代经济科学》第1期,第27~35页。
[2] 李研妮,2013,《我国系统性金融风险压力指数的测量与应用分析》,《南方金融》第10期,第43~48页。
[3] 刘晓星和方磊,2012,《金融压力指数构建及其有效性检验——基于中国数据的实证分析》,《管理工程学报》第3期,第1~6 页。
[4] 孙国峰和段志明,2017,《中期政策利率传导机制研究——基于商业银行两部门决策模型的分析》,《经济学(季刊)》第1期,第349~370页。
[5] 陶玲和朱迎,2016,《系统性金融风险的监测和度量——基于中国金融体系的研究》,《金融研究》第6期,第18~36页。
[6] 许涤龙和陈双莲,2015,《基于金融压力指数的系统性金融风险测度研究》,《经济学动态》第4期,第69~78页。
[7] 徐国祥和李波,2017,《中国金融压力指数的构建及动态传导效应研究》,《统计研究》第4期,第59~71页。
[8] 郑桂环、徐红芬和刘小辉,2014,《金融压力指数的构建及应用》,《金融发展评论》第8期, 第50~62页。
[9] Balakrishnan, R., Danninger, S., Elekdag, S. and Tytell, I., 2011, "The Transmission of Financial Stress from Advanced to Emerging Economies", Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 47, pp. 40~68.
[10] Bernanke, B. S. and M. Gertler, 1995, “Inside the Black Box: The Credit Channel of Monetary Policy Transmission”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), pp. 27~48.
[11] Bernanke, B. S., M. Gertler and S. Gilchrist, 1999,“The Financial Accelerator in a Quantitative Business Cycle Framework”, Handbook of Macroeconomics, Published by Elsevier, pp. 1341~1393.
[12] Cardarelli, R., S. Elekdag and S. Lall, 2011, “Financial Stress and Economic Contractions”, Journal of Financial Stability, 7(2), pp. 78~97.
[13] European Central Bank, 2009, “Box 1: A Global Index of Financial Turbulence”, Financial Stability Review, Dec., pp. 21~23.
[14] Hakkio, C. S. and W. R. Keeton, 2009. “Financial Stress: What Is It, How Can It be Measured, and Why Does it Matter?”, Economic Review, 94(2), pp. 5~50.
[15] Hamilton, J. D., 1989, “A New Approach to the Economic Analysis of Nonstationary Time Series and the Business Cycle”, Econometrica, 57(2), pp. 357~384.
[16] Illing, M. and Y. Liu, 2006, “Measuring Financial Stress in a Developed Country: an Application to Canada”, Journal of Financial Stability, 2(3), pp. 243~265.
[17] Kliesen, K. L. and D. C. Smith, 2010, “Measuring Financial Market Stress”, Economic Synopses, 2(2010-01-15).
[18] Kraenzlin, S. and T. Nellen, 2015,“Access Policy and Money Market Segmentation”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 71, pp.1~12.
[19] Kremer, M., M. L. Duca, and D Holló, 2012, “CISS-A Composite Indicator of Systemic Stress in the Financial System”, SSRN Electronic Journal, 1(3), pp. 347~351.
[20] Lall S., R. Cardarelli and S. Elekdag, 2008, “Financial Stress and Economic Downturns”, World Economic Outlook, Oct., pp.129~158.
[21] Nelson,W.R.and R. Perli, 2007, “Selected Indicators of Financial Stability”,Irving Fisher Committee's Bulletin on Central Bank Statistics,23,pp.92~105.
[22] Wheelock, D. C. and Wohar, M. E., 2009, “Can the Term Spread Predict Output Growth and Recessions? A Survey of the Literature”, Review-Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, 91.
[23] Yiu, M. S., Y. A. Ho and L. Jin, 2010, “A Measure of Financial Stress in Hong Kong Financial Market-The Financial Stress Index”, Hong Kong Monetary Authority Research Note 02/2010.
[1] 白鹤祥, 刘社芳, 罗小伟, 刘蕾蕾, 郝威亚. 基于房地产市场的我国系统性金融风险测度与预警研究[J]. 金融研究, 2020, 482(8): 54-73.
[2] 陈湘鹏, 周皓, 金涛, 王正位. 微观层面系统性金融风险指标的比较与适用性分析——基于中国金融系统的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 467(5): 17-36.
[3] 刘哲希, 随晓芹, 陈彦斌. 储蓄率与杠杆率:一个U型关系[J]. 金融研究, 2019, 473(11): 19-37.
[4] 杨子晖, 陈雨恬, 谢锐楷. 我国金融机构系统性金融风险度量与跨部门风险溢出效应研究[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 460(10): 19-37.
[5] 陶玲, 朱迎. 系统性金融风险的监测和度量——基于中国金融体系的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2016, 432(6): 18-36.
[1] 王曦, 朱立挺, 王凯立. 我国货币政策是否关注资产价格?——基于马尔科夫区制转换BEKK多元GARCH模型[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 1 -17 .
[2] 刘勇政, 李岩. 中国的高速铁路建设与城市经济增长[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 18 -33 .
[3] 况伟大, 王琪琳. 房价波动、房贷规模与银行资本充足率[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 34 -48 .
[4] 祝树金, 赵玉龙. 资源错配与企业的出口行为——基于中国工业企业数据的经验研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 49 -64 .
[5] 陈德球, 陈运森, 董志勇. 政策不确定性、市场竞争与资本配置[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 65 -80 .
[6] 牟敦果, 王沛英. 中国能源价格内生性研究及货币政策选择分析[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 81 -95 .
[7] 高铭, 江嘉骏, 陈佳, 刘玉珍. 谁说女子不如儿郎?——P2P投资行为与过度自信[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 96 -111 .
[8] 吕若思, 刘青, 黄灿, 胡海燕, 卢进勇. 外资在华并购是否改善目标企业经营绩效?——基于企业层面的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 112 -127 .
[9] 姜军, 申丹琳, 江轩宇, 伊志宏. 债权人保护与企业创新[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 128 -142 .
[10] 刘莎莎, 孔高文. 信息搜寻、个人投资者交易与股价联动异象——基于股票送转的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 143 -157 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1