Please wait a minute...
金融研究  2021, Vol. 491 Issue (5): 78-96    
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
汇率不确定性与企业跨境并购
孟为, 姜国华, 张永冀
北京大学光华管理学院,北京 100871;
北京理工大学管理与经济学院,北京 100081
The Effect of Exchange Rate Uncertainty on Cross-border Mergers and Acquisitions
MENG Wei, JIANG Guohua, ZHANG Yongji
Guanghua School of Management, Peking University;
School of Management and Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology
下载:  PDF (862KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 本文立足外部不确定性视角,提出汇率不确定性对企业重要涉外经济行为(跨境并购)影响的实物期权与风险对冲效应。本文以2000~2019年A股上市公司宣告的跨境并购为研究对象,分析发现人民币兑美元名义汇率不确定性显著降低了企业跨境并购的可能性,实物期权效应占主导;人民币名义有效汇率不确定性与企业跨境并购决策正相关,风险对冲效应占主导。横截面检验发现,人民币兑美元名义汇率不确定性对跨境并购的抑制作用在汇率交易风险和折算风险更高以及存在融资约束的企业中更为明显;有效汇率反映一国贸易条件,行业竞争激烈与汇率经济风险更高的企业,在人民币名义有效汇率不确定性加剧时更有可能进行跨境并购。最后,汇率不确定下的企业跨境并购取得了较好的财务绩效(汇率风险约束使企业并购行为更审慎高效),降低了有效汇率风险敞口。本文区分了双边汇率与有效汇率的差异,拓展了汇率波动的经济后果与跨境并购影响因素的研究范畴,为“双循环”下我国推进高质量对外开放与汇率市场化改革、有效引导国际资本流动以及企业在不确定环境下提升并购效率,提供了理论依据。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
孟为
姜国华
张永冀
关键词:  汇率不确定性  跨境并购  实物期权  风险对冲    
Summary:  In the context of an increasingly uncertain international situation and the market-oriented reform of the RMB exchange rate, exchange rate fluctuations among countries have become the norm. The potential financial risks and the operational risks for micro firms associated with these increasingly unpredictable exchange rate fluctuations will have a profound impact on the sustainable development of China's economy. The international environment is becoming increasingly complex, characterized by growing uncertainty and instability. Firms engaged in cross-border mergers and acquisitions (M&As) face three additional uncertainties: (1) uncertainties caused by anti-globalization, trade disputes and protectionism, and geopolitical conflicts; (2) uncertainty in the relationship between the acquirer's and the target's countries; and (3) uncertainties in the economic, political, security, legal, and other spheres of the target country.Unexpected exchange rate fluctuations are related to these three uncertainties.
Based on the China's aim to achieve a high-quality opening up, we define Exchange Rate Uncertainty as the condition of being unable to accurately predict the direction, range, or distribution probability of future exchange rate fluctuations. In this condition, exchange rate fluctuations cannot be predicted based on historical trends and existing information. In general, Chinese firms join international markets through cross-border M&As. This study suggests two mechanisms through which fluctuations in exchange rates affect this process. (1) Real Option Effect. Exchange rate uncertainty constrains firms' cross-border M&A decisions by increasing transaction costs and earnings uncertainty and by aggregating external financing difficulties. (2) Risk Hedging Effect. Exchange rate uncertainty encourages firms to increase their market share and hedge exchange rate risks by engaging in cross-border M&As that enhance their market competition. Using a sample of cross-border M&As announced by A-share firms in the 2000 to 2019 period, we find that uncertainty in the nominal exchange rate of the RMB against the US dollar (NUTR) reduces the likelihood of cross-border M&As, indicating the dominance of the real option effect; while uncertainty in the nominal effective exchange rate of RMB (NEER) has a positive impact on the number of M&As, which reflects the risk hedging effect. Further cross-sectional analysis shows that the negative effect of NUTR uncertainty is more significant among firms with higher trading and translation risks and tighter financing constraints. In addition, firms in industries with intense competition and firms that face higher economic risk from exchange rate fluctuations are more likely to conduct cross-border M&As when NEER uncertainty intensifies. Tests of the mediating effects of financial friction and corporate risk further prove that both NUTR and NEER uncertainty affect firms' decisions to engage in cross-border M&As via the real option mechanism and risk hedging effect, respectively. Finally, the financial performance of cross-border M&As is better during periods when the exchange rate is uncertain. Cross-border M&As reduce the sensitivity of firm stock prices to changes in effective exchange rates (NEER); that is, they reduce the economic risks of exchange rates, but have no significant mitigation effect on the risk exposure created by bilateral exchange rates.
This study distinguishes the role of bilateral and effective exchange rate uncertainty and expands our understanding by considering the economic consequences of exchange rate fluctuations and uncertainty. At the same time, this study also supplements the literature on the factors that influence cross-border M&As. It provides a theoretical basis for regulators' guidelines for firms seeking active international economic cooperation. These guidelines could help firms to improve their core competitiveness and to participate in the reform of the global economic governance system. In particular, to obtain stability in an uncertain environment, firms must pay attention to exchange rate risk and improve the efficiency of cross-border M&As. This study explores the spillover effect of exchange rate uncertainty from the perspective of the stock market and provides a basis for the market-oriented reform of the RMB exchange rate system under the Dual Circulation development pattern.
Keywords:  Exchange Rate Uncertainty    Cross-border M&A    Real Option    Risk Hedging
JEL分类号:  F31   G32   G34  
基金资助: * 本文得到国家自然科学基金青年项目(71902004)、中国博士后科学基金项目(2019M660356)、国家自然科学基金面上项目(71472007)的资助。感谢匿名审稿人的宝贵意见,文责自负。
作者简介:  孟 为,管理学博士,北京大学光华管理学院,E-mail:wei.meng@pku.edu.cn.
姜国华,管理学博士,教授,北京大学光华管理学院,E-mail:gjiang@gsm.pku.edu.cn.
张永冀,管理学博士,副教授,北京理工大学管理与经济学院,E-mail:yjzhang@bit.edu.cn.
引用本文:    
孟为, 姜国华, 张永冀. 汇率不确定性与企业跨境并购[J]. 金融研究, 2021, 491(5): 78-96.
MENG Wei, JIANG Guohua, ZHANG Yongji. The Effect of Exchange Rate Uncertainty on Cross-border Mergers and Acquisitions. Journal of Financial Research, 2021, 491(5): 78-96.
链接本文:  
http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/  或          http://www.jryj.org.cn/CN/Y2021/V491/I5/78
[1] 顾露露和Reed R,2011,《中国企业海外并购失败了吗?》,《经济研究》第7期,第116~129页。
[2] 郭飞,2012,《外汇风险对冲和公司价值:基于中国跨国公司的实证研究》,《经济研究》第9期,第18~31页。
[3] 郭飞、肖浩和史永,2014,《为什么人民币汇率波动的影响不显著?——基于美的电器的案例研究》,《管理世界》第10期,第163~171页。
[4] 郭飞、游绘新和郭慧敏,2018,《为什么使用外币债务?——中国上市公司的实证证据》,《金融研究》第3期,第137~154页。
[5] 何诚颖、刘林、徐向阳和王占海,2013,《外汇市场干预、汇率变动与股票价格波动——基于投资者异质性的理论模型与实证研究》,《经济研究》第10期,第29~42页。
[6] 刘海明和曹廷求,2017,《信贷供给周期对企业投资效率的影响研究——兼论宏观经济不确定条件下的异质性》,《金融研究》第12期,第80~94页。
[7] 刘啟仁和黄建忠,2017,《人民币汇率变动与出口企业研发》,《金融研究》第8期,第19~34页。
[8] 鲁晓东、刘京军和陈芷君,2019,《出口商如何对冲汇率风险:一个价值链整合的视角》,《管理世界》第5期,第92~105页。
[9] 毛日昇和郑建明,2011,《人民币实际汇率不确定性与外商直接投资择机进入》,《金融研究》第5期,第42~57页。
[10] 吴国鼎和姜国华,2015,《人民币汇率变化与制造业投资——来自企业层面的证据》,《金融研究》第11期,第1~14页。
[11] 谢红军和蒋殿春,2017,《竞争优势、资产价格与中国海外并购》,《金融研究》第1期,第83~98页。
[12] 杨子晖、陈里璇和陈雨恬,2020,《经济政策不确定性与系统性金融风险的跨市场传染——基于非线性网络关联的研究》,《经济研究》第1期,第65~81页。
[13] 张夏、汪亚楠和施炳展,2019,《事实汇率制度选择、企业生产率与对外直接投资》,《金融研究》第10期,第1~20页。
[14] Baker, S. R., N. Bloom and S. J. Davis, 2016, “Measuring Economic Policy Uncertainty”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131(4): 1593~1636.
[15] Bernanke, B. and .M. Gertler, 1990, “Financial Fragility and Economic Performance”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 105(1): 87~114.
[16] Bhagwat, V., R. Dam and J. Harford, 2016, “The Real Effects of Uncertainty on Merger Activity”, Review of Financial Studies, 29(11): 3000~3034.
[17] Bonaime, A., H. Gulen and M. Ion, 2018, “Does Policy Uncertainty Affect Mergers and Acquisitions?”, Journal of Financial Economics, 129(3): 531~558.
[18] Cao, C., X. Li and G. Liu, 2019, “Political Uncertainty and Cross-Border Acquisitions”, Review of Finance, 23(2): 439~470.
[19] Choi, J. J. and C. Jiang, 2009, “Does Multinationality Matter? Implications of Operational Hedging for the Exchange Risk Exposure”, Journal of Banking & Finance, 33(11): 1973~1982.
[20] Delis, M. D., P. N. Politsidis and L. Sarno, 2018, “Foreign Currency Lending”, Available at SSRN 3220260.
[21] Duchin, R. and B. Schmidt, 2013, “Riding the Merger Wave: Uncertainty, Reduced Monitoring, and Bad Acquisitions”, Journal of Financial Economics, 107(1): 69~88.
[22] Ekholm, K., A. Moxnes and K. H. Ulltveit-Moe, 2012, “Manufacturing Restructuring and the Role of Real Exchange Rate Shocks”, Journal of International Economics, 86(1): 101~117.
[23] Erel, I., R. C. Liao and M. S. Weisbach, 2012, “Determinants of Cross-Border Mergers and Acquisitions”, Journal of Finance, 67(3): 1045-1082.
[24] Francis, J. R., S. X. Huang and I. K. Khurana, 2016, “The Role of Similar Accounting Standards in Cross-Border Mergers and Acquisitions”, Contemporary Accounting Research, 33(3): 1298~1330.
[25] Garfinkel, J. A. and K. W. Hankins, 2011, “The Role of Risk Management in Mergers and Merger Waves”, Journal of Financial Economics, 101(3): 515~532.
[26] Gulen, H. and M. Ion, 2016, “Policy Uncertainty and Corporate Investment”, Review of Financial Studies, 29(3): 523~564.
[27] Julio, B., and Y. Yook, 2012, “Political Uncertainty and Corporate Investment Cycles”, Journal of Finance, 67(1): 45~83.
[28] Nagar, V., J. Schoenfeld and L. Wellman, 2019, “The Effect of Economic Policy Uncertainty on Investor Information Asymmetry and Management Disclosures”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 67(1): 36~57.
[29] Nguyen, Q., T. Kim and M. Papanastassiou, 2018, “Policy Uncertainty, Derivatives Use, and Firm-Level FDI”, Journal of International Business Studies, 49(1): 96-126.
[30] Valencia, F., 2017, “Aggregate Uncertainty and the Supply of Credit”, Journal of Banking & Finance, 81: 150~165.
[1] 郭飞, 游绘新, 郭慧敏. 为什么使用外币债务?——中国上市公司的实证证据[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 453(3): 137-154.
[2] 刘红忠, 毛杰. P2P网络借贷平台爆发风险事件问题的研究——基于实物期权理论的视角[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 461(11): 119-132.
[1] 王曦, 朱立挺, 王凯立. 我国货币政策是否关注资产价格?——基于马尔科夫区制转换BEKK多元GARCH模型[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 1 -17 .
[2] 刘勇政, 李岩. 中国的高速铁路建设与城市经济增长[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 18 -33 .
[3] 况伟大, 王琪琳. 房价波动、房贷规模与银行资本充足率[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 34 -48 .
[4] 祝树金, 赵玉龙. 资源错配与企业的出口行为——基于中国工业企业数据的经验研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 49 -64 .
[5] 陈德球, 陈运森, 董志勇. 政策不确定性、市场竞争与资本配置[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 65 -80 .
[6] 牟敦果, 王沛英. 中国能源价格内生性研究及货币政策选择分析[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 81 -95 .
[7] 高铭, 江嘉骏, 陈佳, 刘玉珍. 谁说女子不如儿郎?——P2P投资行为与过度自信[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 96 -111 .
[8] 吕若思, 刘青, 黄灿, 胡海燕, 卢进勇. 外资在华并购是否改善目标企业经营绩效?——基于企业层面的实证研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 112 -127 .
[9] 姜军, 申丹琳, 江轩宇, 伊志宏. 债权人保护与企业创新[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 128 -142 .
[10] 刘莎莎, 孔高文. 信息搜寻、个人投资者交易与股价联动异象——基于股票送转的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2017, 449(11): 143 -157 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 《金融研究》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn
京ICP备11029882号-1